11 thoughts on “Thursday Throughput: Collapsing Bridge Edition

          1. Oh, jeez. I completely missed that.

            So now we’re on this one. I keep seeing arguments that the ship had electrical problems and known electrical problems and other places talked about the ship having electrical problems in the past and documenting it.

            I guess we wait for the investigation.Report

  1. I guess we wait for the investigation.

    As Felix Frankfurter once said: “Wisdom so often never comes, and so one ought not to reject it merely because it comes late.”Report

  2. What will it take to re-open the port? Do they “merely” need to pull the fallen bridge pieces out of the way enough to re-open the travel lanes? I hear this will send ripples through supply chains and whatnot… how bad and for how long?Report

  3. [ThTh1] This was back in the early 80s. A floating oil-drilling rig that had been built in Vallejo to be towed down to Southern California got loose and was being taken by the tide towards the Richmond-San Rafael bridge. There was plenty of time to close the bridge (my co-workers and I were stuck on theRichmond side) , but no way to stop or divert the rig. If it had hit the bridge, the collision would have damaged it severely, leading to who knows how long a closure (and turning out commute into a nightmare.) Fortunately the rig was stopped by a small island in the bay (a sort of natural dolphin), and no harm was done.Report

  4. A dolphin is not going to help you from this sort of collision. It’s great for relatively small vessels, but big container ships pretty much stop when they hit things like land masses, not human-built structures.Report

      1. Basically if you want to stop a container ship your choices are “wait for it to hit land and plow through a decent amount of it” or “throw Manhattan at it” or… nope that’s about it.Report

Comments are closed.