Mini-Throughput: The Irrelevance of the Doomsday Clock
Today in things that have long outstayed their welcome:
The Doomsday Clock has been ticking for 76 years. But it’s no ordinary clock.
It attempts to gauge how close humanity is to destroying the world.
On Tuesday, the clock was set at 90 seconds until midnight — the closest to the hour it has ever been, according to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which created the clock in 1947. Midnight represents the moment at which we will have made Earth uninhabitable for humanity. From 2020 to 2022, the clock was set at 100 seconds to midnight.
The clock isn’t designed to definitively measure existential threats, but rather to spark conversations about difficult scientific topics such as climate change, according to the Bulletin.
The decision to move the clock 10 seconds forward this year is largely due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the increased risk of nuclear escalation, the Bulletin said in a news release. The continuing threats posed by the climate crisis, as well as the breakdown of norms and institutions needed to reduce risks associated with biological threats like Covid-19, also played a role.
OMG! We’re closer to the end of humanity than ever before! Climate change! Nukes! COVID-19! Dogs and cats living together. Mass hysteria!
Ok, no. Having the clock set 90 seconds to midnight and pretending this means something is, frankly, ridiculous.
In my previous writings on this subject, I made a comparison of our present circumstances to the year 1962. In October of that Year, we had the Cuban Missile Crisis, the closest we have ever gotten to a full-on nuclear exchange. The belligerents in this crisis were a mass-murdering drunk on the Soviet side and a novice drug addict on the American side. The only reason it was defused was because JFK had the wisdom and temporary clarity to respond to Khrushchev’s drunken remorseful message instead of his drunken belligerent message.
In addition to this, there were active civil wars going on in Laos, Sudan, the Congo, Yemen, Guatemala, Burma, Malaysia and Nicaragua as well as Communist insurgencies in other countries. The United States was starting to ramp up its involvement in Vietnam. And yet, the Doomsday Clock was at seven minutes to midnight.
OK, maybe that’s one year. Let’s leap ahead to 1972. Vietnam was at its height. Civil wars were going in Ethiopia, Guatemala, Rhodesia, South Africa, Bangladesh, Uganda, Malaysia, Cambodia and Sudan. Coups were attempted in Morocco, Qatar, Dahomey, Cyprus and the Republic of Congo. The Yom Kippur War would be launched the next year. Brezhnev was advancing the Soviet Union’s interests on all fronts. And yet the Doomsday Clock was at 12 minutes.
Huh. Well, what about 1982? Same deal. And a year later, the Able-Archer 83 exercise would bring the US and Soviet Union the brink of nuclear exchange. We were four minutes to midnight.
In 1992, the Doomsday Clock was at its lowest setting: 17 minutes to midnight. Yet the world was being roiled in the post-Cold War Era. Russia couldn’t keep track of its nukes. Wars were raging in Bosnia, Guatemala (yes, still), Peru, Mozambique, Georgia, Afghanistan, Djibouti, Croatia, Israel, Iraq, Sierra Leone, Tajikistan and Somalia. There were many people who thought that the collapse of the Soviet Union had made the world less stable. They were wrong: when the Soviet Union collapsed, two-thirds of the world’s civil wars ended. But there was a lot of chaos as the world settled down from the Cold War that had defined it for two generations.
The simple fact is that we are currently living in history’s most peaceful time. There are fewer wars going on now than there have been in a long time, even with some recent flare-ups. Even the Doomsday Clock’s own dashboard shows that we have fewer nuclear weapons than any time since the 1950’s.
Now the BAS would respond that their clock is no longer just measuring the likelihood of nuclear annihilation. They have advanced it because of concerns about the environment. But is the environment worse now than it was half a century ago? When half the planet was starving, cars were belching lead into the air, you couldn’t breathe the air in LA and rivers were catching fire? Yes, the situation with global warming has gotten worse. But the most recent analyses show that the doomsday scenarios are less likely than we thought. Global warming is bad, but it’s looking more like something that’s an expensive damaging pain than the end of civilization. Alternative energy is soaring. Carbon emissions in much of the world have flattened and carbon intensity — the greenhouse gas produced per dollar of GDP — has plunged. Every day is bringing new advanced in battery tech, nuclear power and energy storage.
And aside from greenhouse gases, most environmental indicators are healthy. Smog is down, sulphur dioxide is down, species are rebounding to the point of being taken off the endangered list, the ozone layer is healing. These are all triumphs. But to hear the BAS talk, you’d think it was Soylent Green out there.
Now I will agree that the Ukraine conflict has moved us closer to a hypothetical doomsday. Putin has rattled the nuclear saber, although mostly to try to terrify the West into abandoning support for Ukraine.1 The problem is that the Doomsday Clock people have advanced it so far, there’s no room left. In the last ten years, they’ve advanced it from 23:57 to 23:58:30 based almost entirely on climate change at precisely a time when the climate change situation has been getting less gloomy. This would be like, when the Doomsday Clock actually measured something useful, advancing it because the arms reductions treaties weren’t good enough.
Six years ago, I said that the Doomsday Clock was making itself irrelevant. It has made itself even more so since then. It’s clear that this has nothing to do with the human race annihilating itself and everything to do with a bunch of sour-pussed self-appointed ninnies trying to virtue signal on climate and foreign relations.
The Doomsday Clock was never really that important. But we can now consign it to complete irrelevancy. They can stand next to the people with sandwich boards, ringing bells and claiming the end is nigh.
- It is very telling that the primary response to the Doomsday Clock news was for Russia — currently befouling the planet and fighting an illegal war of aggression — to blame the US and NATO.
“The decision to move the clock 10 seconds forward this year is largely due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the increased risk of nuclear escalation, the Bulletin said in a news release.”
They just moved the clock for that NOW?! How much more will they move it for this:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11674127/Russia-blasts-blatant-provocation-Putins-puppets-call-Bundestag-NUKED-tank-deal.html
TLDR? Germany and the US are sending top line tanks (Leopard and Abrams) to Ukraine. So those 31 Abrams cost 310M dollars* @ 10M per tank, escalating from using the estimated 2016 amount of 9M dollars. I assume the Leopard costs something similar.Report
I wonder if Russia even has functional nukes any more.
Cheap and easy to just make threats and lie about how great your stuff is. Especially with nukes.
You have an expensive weapon you know will never be used or even tested. Why not sell important parts of it and just lie about how ready it is. Are we supposed to think that was just a thing for the rest of Russia’s military?
Have those things really been maintenance?Report
When I read the stories about Russian trucks blowing their tires and having to leave some really good stuff by the side of the road due to tire dry-rot, I immediately felt better about the nukes.
Not, like, 100% better… but I also know that triggering a really good nuclear explosion requires some well-maintained warheads and some well-maintained rockets to get them to where they need to go.
Given that the tires were not well-mantained, I thought that Russia was probably not half the threat that I thought they were prior to the Ukrainian invasion.
But 16% of a world-ender is still 16%. I feel a lot better. But I still don’t feel good.Report
Russia’s last real nuke test was 24 October 1990.
From the point of view of the Russian military, not doing maintenance on the nukes and just lying about it is low hanging fruit. Heck, actively selling important parts of the nuke is still low hanging fruit.
All of the factors which made the tanks a problem are present in big steroids for the nukes. With tanks it’s reasonable to think that someone will at some point drive them around. You do nothing similar with nukes. There are no checks. Russia hasn’t even been building new ones and the old ones eventually go bad just because of radioactive decay.
Russia doesn’t have the ability to have a working aircraft carrier when that ship is always in the public. Nukes are in holes in the ground and just sit there.
Way to bet is the money to maintain the nukes was stolen. Various parts of the systems are also missing. The people doing the servicing exist only on paper.
Because nothing bad can happen from having very old unstable nukes around. We presumably still have problems, just not the ones we’ve been worrying about.Report
Even if only a fraction of their declared stockpiles are functioning that would still be enough to do a lot of damage.
When it comes to NATO I would think the MAD principle still applies and I doubt they want to die too. The question to me is if, and it’s still a big if, Ukraine inflicts a few more major conventional defeats on the Russians. Maybe they decide if they can’t have Ukraine no one will, or at least not for a few generations.Report
In a nuclear exchange Putin’s bunker is target #1. It might even be the only target.Report
I don’t believe there would (or should) be an exchange if all targets are within Ukraine.Report
After the genii is out of the bottle you don’t know where he’s going to go.
The non-nuclear responses I’ve seen put out there by serious people look a lot like war. Russia claims it’s already at war with the West.Report
While one can certainly never rule it out it seems like actually delivering strategic nuclear weapons from ICBM or submarine to targets in the West would be several degrees of escalation, and of course would also result in the destruction of Russia. Keep in mind though that they also (theoretically) have tactical nuclear weapons that can be delivered by bomber, cruise missile, or even truck mounted MLRS. You could inflict some severe destruction still very much within Ukraine that renders it unviable as a state without the kind of doomsday full nuclear war at issue. I don’t think even the most hawkish voices on Ukraine would trade their own countries and lives to punish Russia for that.Report
It doesn’t take many functional nuclear weapons to end the world. Nuclear Winter is not a pipedream, it is a reality-based killswitch backed by science. Russia is not the only one who directs nuclear weapons towards Doomsday.Report
Great. Scientists continue to allow science to be politicized for public consumption. This will restore people’s faith in its objectivity.Report
You’re not gonna get an article in CNN for changing it from 2:33PM to 2:37PM.Report
If I were going to pick a reason, I’d pick proliferation. New estimates from the IAEA are that Iran has enough enriched uranium to build several bombs. The President of South Korea is making noises about his country becoming a nuclear power (they have also test flown a solid-fuel rocket capable of reaching orbit). If Korea goes nuclear, it’s almost a certainty that Japan will follow them.Report
The thing that gives the game away is your tidbit about 1992: The lowest it has ever been, like, *EVER* is 11:43.
Which means that it’s got a scale of 0-17.
They’ve upped it to 15.5? Huh.Report
“We are currently living in history’s most peaceful time.”
With death cults on the border, starvation in the streets, pandemics blooming in China and an occupied Europe…
Just In Time was a grand idea for Peace In Our Time.
Twenty years is a good run, for a worldwide economic engine.
Foreign policy and Domestic is currently being run with the agenda of decreasing human population.Report
Yeah, the most peaceful time. You should read up about what the world usually looks like.Report