31 thoughts on “About Last Night: Warnock Wins Georgia Runoff, Again

    1. Why? She’s only 68. Kagan is 62. Thomas and Alito are both in their 70’s. If she retires we don’t don’t gain anything but another liberal (and probably a woman) to replace … checks notes … a liberal woman.Report

      1. Some people worry that’s an age when complications from her type 1 diabetes are likely to start showing up. In broad statistics, age 70 is about when survival probabilities for women with type 1 diabetes start falling fairly dramatically compared to the population as a whole.Report

      1. Heh she’s pretty far down the list of the ones I’d impeach. The top of mine would be the one who can’t keep his wife from undermining the legitimacy of the place with her undignified activist antics. I even bet that deep down he’s the one keeping a big jug of pepto bismol in the CJ’s desk, not the wise Latina or whatever she goes by.Report

            1. Eh, it’s probably not a resignable offense, no matter which justice did it. The thing was already written, and the only thing denied was the suspense, such as it was given the make up of the court.Report

  1. In the end, Warnock. Walker received 48.6 percent of the vote (just over 1.7 million people) despite being a massively flawed candidate on numerous levels at the least. There is also a lot of examples of him, like Trump, being a massively flawed human being. Yet over 1.7 million people still voted for him again. This raises the question of how flawed can a candidate be before it matters. The answer could be that at least on the R side, no flaw is too great for many but sometimes it is just enough.

    There are plenty of Democratic politicians with scandals and less than savory actions but in my adult life many of them were forced out of office when the scandal came to light. I can’t imagine a Walker-esque candidate surviving a Democratic primary with his baggage.Report

    1. My cousin, an Evangelical Christian born and raised in Georgia (from Macon, lives in Atlanta) put it thusly on Facebook: “I am much more worried about Warnock’s future than Walker’s past.” Folks like him are gonna vote for Republicans no matter what, and they’ll always make clear why. And frankly, I don’t think they’re being irrational, given the way parties and politics works in this country.Report

  2. The thing about Trump that I thought folks could use against him (effectively) was based broadly around ‘Trust’. If you’re on Team Red, you just can’t Trust Trump.

    Trump never did the work of building a movement; and even after he took over the brand, he kept all the proceeds and still never invested in anyone other than Trump.

    Variously being reported:
    “One other note: There has been $0 in TV spending from former President Donald Trump’s MAGA Inc. for the runoff, according to AdImpact. It spent $3.6 million in Georgia in the final weeks leading up to the general election.

    By comparison, the Sen. Mitch McConnell-aligned Senate Leadership Fund and One Nation spent a combined $82 million between the general election and the runoff.”

    There are effective messages to Team Red die-hards along these angles … by whomever is building People, Networks, Policies and Donors. If that’s DeSantis, then that’s what will carry the day. But if DeSantis and/or other Team Red folks think Winner/Loser Memes will do it? It’s gonna be a slog.Report

      1. No time to find examples at the moment, but in the run-up to the election, a number of non-Trumpy republicans were posting about fundraising emails from the Trump machine that talked about how critical it was to support a given MAGA congressional candidate but that then defaulted the distribution of the dollars to be 99% to Trump and 1% to the candidate’s fund.

        It seems so obvious though already, one wonders how many Trump supporters would be swayed by it being pointed out. But i guess the normies don’t pay as much attention as we do.Report

        1. I don’t think it’s a ‘journalists will expose this to Republicans’ kind of thing… it will be a tool that a Republican could deploy against Trump after they’ve done the homework of building a competing network.

          The odd thing about McConnell is that he’s such an uncharismatic insider who doesn’t really care about Republicans outside of how it impacts McConnell. Which is to say, his project is nothing like, say, Gingrich ’94 or even Reagan post ’64.

          So pointing out his investments isn’t to say that McConnell will lead the way – because he’s a weird insider – just that there’s a ‘way’ that someone else could use effectively. But that someone else will be a Republican, not a pundit.Report

          1. I think you’re exactly right. The non-expressly conservative press already believes Trump is corrupt and has been saying so since the beginning and Trump’s base does not believe or care about anything the non-expressly conservative press says anyway. So nothing new there.

            But if I am a GOP donor I am looking at this and thinking I pay these people to get things done, not to siphon off every cent they can for themselves.Report

            1. But if I am a GOP donor I am looking at this and thinking I pay these people to get things done, not to siphon off every cent they can for themselves.

              I suspect this is the root of Murdoch’s break with Trump at Fox.Report

  3. The glass half full is that Warnock won, the glass half empty is that it was so close.

    Looking at the rightwing behavior overall generates my pessimistic view.

    How are they reacting to being on the losing side of public opinion? By doubling down and growing ever more radical.
    How are they reacting to being on the losing side of electoral battles? By refusing to accept the results and claiming fraud.

    Not every time, not always, but enough to demonstrate that they so far show no signs of moderating, or compromising, or accepting the legitimacy of their opposition.

    Which leads naturally to the question, “What is their end game? How do they see this working out in the long run?”

    The logical conclusion to their efforts is to envision some sort of Balkanized, American version of Northern Ireland, where localized pockets of minority rule impose their cultural values on the majority.Report

  4. Finger licking good! Biden did pretty good work with judges through the power sharing arrangement so it stands to reason he’ll go gangbusters on judges with an outright majority in the committees.

    On the negative side, though, it seems America isn’t healing.Report

Comments are closed.