Angels & Terrorists
I promise you don’t know where this is going pic.twitter.com/I1XRWIM6Jr
— k🃏 (@skepticalspice) December 4, 2021
Be sure to watch to the end.
Features
Hot Posts
A Message From Devcat
Devcat is watching over, but if you notice any problems contact the editors and Devcat will be notified and deployed immediately.
Recent Comments
on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024Our current situation is the gov is creating massive market distortions. My suggestion is for the go…
on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024Right?.. that's the beauty of it. Protect actual losers (there will be some) allay fears of many who…
on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024I was going to make a joke about how white men struggle hardest with disappointment due to getting t…
on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024Ann Selzer has an op-ed in which she announces her retirement from polling. It's kinda defensive in…
Comics
-
November 17, 2024
-
November 16, 2024
-
November 15, 2024
-
November 14, 2024
More Comments
on The Four Stages of Post-election Cruelty
on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024
on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024
on The Four Stages of Post-election Cruelty
on Saturday Morning Gaming: Castlevania (Remembered)
on Weekend Plans Post: Garlic (Specifically Toom)
As someone in the replies put it: the human body is not meant to handle the speed with which she flipped that thing around.Report
The Crumbleys were my favorite characters in Harry Potter.Report
I just did a quick Google search for Crumbley, followed by Ethan Crumbley. The former mostly shows the mug shot of Ethan, often with those of his parents. The latter mostly shows the mug shot. The US Sun is notable exception.
I cannot speak for social media, but the news outlets don’t seem to use the more flattering picture.Report
I followed this all pretty closely on social media — out of perverse curiosity I suppose. Anyway, we knew who the shooter was long before his mugshot was available. At that time, the only confirmed images that showed the shooter’s face were those when he was a kid, so the media went with those. There were a few more recent images from social media, but those were pretty dubious, and in fact turned out to be completely bogus, not Ethan Crumbley at all.
After the mugshot came out, the media gradually began to switch to that on new articles. However, links to the existing articles were still circulating around, so people would click on those, not check the publication time, and get salty because they were showing the “nice” photo. In other words, it was all a false controversy.
Regarding the vid, that woman is a ranting loon. The argument that the media shows black people as “thugs” and white people as “angels” — all to make white people look bad — that’s literally stupid. Is anyone that stupid? Is she that stupid, or does she just think her audience is? (Probably both, tbh.)Report
I think that is the point of the OP, the fact that she was building up the idea that the media chooses the image to use based upon how they want to portray a victim or perpetrator, and she was heading to that point full steam, and then flipped it so hard your brain wants to break.Report
For Rittenhouse, there are a lot of pictures from the trial and a lot of video stills of him with the gun.
I wonder if it might be easier to get clearance for mug shots (no copyright?) vs. social media posts, where they might need permission to use the picture?
And going a little further, maybe savvy defense teams make sure there are more flattering pictures of their clients for news outlets to use.Report
These high profile cases don’t make for good examples of how the system works.
The average Joe doesn’t have a savvy defense attorney, and in almost all cases the only information media have to work with is what’s spoon fed to them by the cops and prosecutors.Report
Since the case in the video is high profile, I thought it made the most sense to compare it to other high profile cases. Low profile cases aren’t going to have as much coverage, so less opportunity for any media manipulation to be an issue.
Anyway, after reading other comments, I realize I missed the twist in the last few seconds.Report
Locally, a 15 year old student murdered an 18 year old student at a high school about four weeks ago and there is no picture of the “suspect.” There is a picture of the victim, who does not appear to have been the intended target, but intervened to stop the girl from stabbing another student. The state’s attorney has indicated his intent to charge her as an adult, so I assume that would happen before we see any pictures, though I guess media standards differ: (1) knife, not gun; (2) girl “suspect”, not boy; (3) “suspect” probably black (school is majority minority); and (4) victim was black, not white.Report
There’s a lot of layers and tough to justify inconsistencies in how these things are covered. I think the real driver is how big of an outlier the incident is. With multiple homicide incidents we’re already talking about the outliers of the outliers.Report
I agree with that. Availability of video is important too, though in this case, the girl chased someone through the school at the end of the day and I gather photos were taken by other students. Her mom might have been the instigator.
But really, I don’t want her name or face made public or that of any minor.Report
“The media is trying to maliciously subvert our entirely correct biases about angelic-looking white boys by presenting a horrible person as an angelic-looking white boy.” was _not_ on any of my bingo cards, but probably should be.
I especially like how she’s worried that people might think white men, _no matter how nice they look_, are domestic terrorists. Because…the correct way to judge whether someone is a domestic terrorist is by how nice they look?Report
Physiognomy is real.Report
Ung, the idiocy in this one is so strong it burns.Report
Is she serious, or trolling? I saw it when it was originally posted, but now the tweet is private and I can’t remember the source.Report
In twitter I am not convinced there’s even a line between the two terms.Report
Oh, it’s public again. Weird. I’ve never heard of Kim Iversen, but apparently she’s a right-populist, so probably serious.Report