Can Joe Biden Protect Himself from Inflation?

Eric Medlin

History instructor. Writer. Rising star in the world of affordable housing.

Related Post Roulette

36 Responses

  1. Kazzy says:

    How many of the factors contributing to inflation are due to the pandemic? Early on, resistance to lock downs was often countered with cries of “You want to trade lives for the economy!” I also read recently that China shut down one of the largest shipping ports due to a single Covid case there. The potential for inflation was not something I ever heard discussed when various responses to the pandemic were unfolding in the early going.

    I guess what I’m asking is, in hindsight, should we have anticipated the potential for inflation (and other related issues, like shortages and supply chain problems) to result from our response to the pandemic? And, if so, should we have proceeded differently?Report

    • Jaybird in reply to Kazzy says:

      I want to say that there was a warning about inflation, insofar as we had a bunch of people who had a bunch of pent-up demand and they all left the house within a few months of each other and went shopping for the same stuff.

      “But this is expected”, we were told.

      If it doesn’t go away after the pent-up demand disperses, then Biden has a problem that won’t be easily countered with articles in the NYT explaining that if you own a home and if you have a retirement fund that you haven’t tapped into yet, inflation is good, actually.Report

    • Philip H in reply to Kazzy says:

      Yes this was predictable and predicted and yes we should have proceeded differently. We have had a good many discussions here about we should have proceeded differently. Our nations politicians and business managers chose to drag us to the place we are. We can’t undo any of that and bluntly Biden only has a few tools to address it as he finds it. He did, however, make headway getting the port of LA and all its constituents to run 24/7 and major shippers to clear sooner.

      Now he just needs to get the railroad and trucking companies to hire more so they are not the domestic bottle neck.Report

  2. Chip Daniels says:

    I’m increasingly doubtful about the predictive value of conventional political variables such as inflation or unemployment to swing elections. Not saying they have zero value, just not as much as pundits like to imagine.Report

    • Jaybird in reply to Chip Daniels says:

      “Right Track/Wrong Track” is the only one you need to look at.Report

      • Chip Daniels in reply to Jaybird says:

        Maybe. Maybe not.

        Empirical evidence is nearly nonexistent, and any theory that begins with “all you need to know” sounds like ideology not reason.Report

        • Chip Daniels in reply to Chip Daniels says:

          Tucker, it’s mid-afternoon. Don’t you have a show to prepare for?Report

        • Chip Daniels in reply to Chip Daniels says:

          Here’s an example of what I mean. Greg Sargent, writing in WaPo:

          Going too far down the Trumpian rabbit hole might complicate peeling off the educated and suburban voters a Republican needs to win in Virginia, voters Youngkin is appealing to with his businessman-turned-politican routine as well. But feeding Trumpian pathologies to whatever degree he can get away with is essential to keeping Trump base voters engaged.

          That latter notion helps explain a key aspect of the continuing GOP enthrallment to Trump’s 2020 pathologies — the refusal of some GOP leaders to state unequivocally that he lost; the sham “audits” in numerous states; the trend in GOP candidates running on an openly declared vow to subvert future losses; and the relentless whitewashing of Jan. 6.
          Indeed, Republicans themselves have basically copped to this motive. Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) has suggested Republicans should mute criticism of Trump’s attacks on democracy because the GOP “can’t grow” without him, meaning siding with those attacks at a minimum is essential to keeping Trump voters in the GOP coalition.
          In Virginia, to be sure, Republicans are keeping the base energized in other ways. They’re demagoguing about critical race theory, which stokes White grievance and plays on parental anxieties about kids returning to school amid covid-19. Youngkin has been feeding anti-vaccine, anti-mask derangement as well.

          But the idea that Democratic and liberal election victories are inherently illegitimate — that when Trump and GOP voters find themselves in the minority coalition, it constitutes a profound injustice that must be subject to nullification — is clearly seen as playing an increasing role in keeping them politically engaged.

          His thesis is that the GOP strategy is all about engagement and keeping the base attuned and enraged.

          See what’s missing here? In a fiercely contested gubernatorial election, there is no talk about inflation, unemployment, or infrastructure or any pocketbook issues.

          Even traditional issues like schools and crime are just pretexts for culture warring.

          Culture war doesn’t allow for compromise. There isn’t any “middle ground” for CRT or vaccine mandates or stolen election claims.

          There doesn’t exist any large pool of undecideds or independents who can be persuaded.
          There’s really only that tiniest of slivers of detached apolitical types who can break either way, and then there is the much larger variable of turnout and engagement.Report

          • Philip H in reply to Chip Daniels says:

            But the idea that Democratic and liberal election victories are inherently illegitimate — that when Trump and GOP voters find themselves in the minority coalition, it constitutes a profound injustice that must be subject to nullification — is clearly seen as playing an increasing role in keeping them politically engaged.

            Yep – the GOP has only the goal of keeping power, and they will not engage on what that means downstream.Report

            • JS in reply to Philip H says:

              “Yep – the GOP has only the goal of keeping power, and they will not engage on what that means downstream.”

              I think it’s a bit simpler. They’ve caught the tiger by the tail. The lunatics have taken over the asylum.

              Bluntly, they’re trying to work with the hand they dealt themselves. And it’s full of QAnon, white supremacists, and nutcases because they’ve spent decades feeding them red meat to get them to the polls — and instead of staying good little rubes, they started running for office themselves.

              They can’t get off Mister Toad’s Wild Ride. Even if they decamped (as the Never Trump movement has), the ride remains with plenty of riders. All they’d do is split the ‘conservative’ wing into old-fashioned conservatives and radical reactionaries, meaning they’d get nothing.

              No, no, those that didn’t have the courage to walk away will stay frantically holding onto the tiger, unable to get off, justifying each and every awful thing, trying desperately to maintain control.

              But hey, Trump won the nomination. They lost control. They consoled themselves and thought they could ‘steer him’. They couldn’t.Report

              • Philip H in reply to JS says:

                Bluntly, they’re trying to work with the hand they dealt themselves.

                True – but remember they dealt themselves this hand BECAUSE they knew their policy prescriptions wouldn’t keep them in power. Once they consolidate that power and ensure they never have to face Democrats – much less leftists – again, they will kill the tiger. Every authoritarian government in the last two centuries has done this.Report

              • Kenneth Almquist in reply to JS says:

                I’ve been wondering about the long term viability of the GOP for the past twenty years. But under Trump, Republicans got another round of tax cuts targeted primarily at the wealthy and a slate of judges chosen by the Federalist Society. So it seems to me that the tiger is still carrying the GOP in the direction the GOP leadership wants.

                The current Republican Party is a bit like the former Soviet Union. It’s internal contractions could cause it to collapse rather suddenly, but at the moment it’s still standing, and while a collapse may be coming, it’s hard to predict in advance.Report

              • Dark Matter in reply to Kenneth Almquist says:

                The collapse will come. It will spend a few years burning. It will emerge renewed.

                “Renewed” might mean “different set of weird ideas” but whatever. There are huge structural reasons why we have two big teams.Report

              • North in reply to Dark Matter says:

                I agree. America seems pretty hard coded for a party duopoly. At some point demographics and internal contradictions should cause the GOP to spectacularly implode but it’s not a forgone conclusion that they will (an utterly brilliant politician hijack the party and reshape it- think Trump but with ideas and principles) and unless its collapse precipitates a split in the Dems then in very short order a party, GOP or otherwise, will arise to oppose them.Report

              • InMD in reply to North says:

                Not to be a downer but I don’t buy this anymore. I’ve been hearing about the favorable demographics just around the corner for 20 years and I think it’s based on a number of beliefs that have proven false. The biggest one is that everyone with any ancestry from anywhere south of the Rio Grande (including the Caribbean) comes with political solidarity on par with native born black Americans. It isn’t the case and it’s going to be even less the case as they assimilate and inter-marry, which they are already doing even more rapidly than passed waves of ‘white ethnics,’ which is how their experience is best understood.

                I also don’t think the internal contradictions of thr Democrats are any less stark. The only big differences are an older leadership with a decent understanding of how to hold a diverse coalition together and a foundation of still strong local party machines, as opposed to reliance on a media and entertainment complex like the GOP. Combined with the inefficient geographic allocation of core Democratic voters I could see the stalemate, including with the GOP in its current iteration (or very close to it) hanging on for decades to come. In some ways its focus on cultural grievance may even be the big unforced error holding it back.Report

              • North in reply to InMD says:

                I don’t think that’s being a downer, I think it’s being realistic. The only demographics I was thinking about when I used the word is the unaltering fact that the baby boomers are eventually going to start dying in large numbers and they are the numeric core of the GOP’s base and the somewhat more spongey fact that all the generations after X have incredibly bad opinions of the right and the GOP in particular and no memories of even half way competent or sane GOP administrations in the past.

                The Democrats have their own contradictions but, as you note, they have an intact party apparatus and they have actual policy visions (arguably too many of them!) that they want to advance in the realm of policy. Absent a GOP implosion I don’t see it likely that the Dems will collapse or fracture. A worst case scenario is they gallomp too far to the left in substance free identarianist woo and get walloped electorally but that isn’t an existential threat- just an electoral one. The party remains a functional breathing organization.

                Which is a lot of words to offer just to end up saying that your final prediction, a decade of stalemate based on the GOP’s current mode and distribution of its voters, seems entirely plausible to me.

                Either which way, though, there’ll be two parties.Report

              • Dark Matter in reply to North says:

                The young are always going to stay loyal to the Dems forever.

                Thing is as they get older they start disliking the idea of wild new ideas.Report

              • North in reply to Dark Matter says:

                That suggests their kids may give the GOP a second look. Depending on the state of the GOP at that time.Report

              • Dark Matter in reply to North says:

                The Dems have won on gay marriage, they might win on other things.

                They will move on and have other crazy new ideas that seem insane to the old people. Getting rid of meat perhaps, or outlawing economic growth.

                It’s hard to remember, but when the Clintons were in charge in the 90’s, Team Blue was the party of moats. When that issue switched sides, so did the bullet voters attached to it.

                Similarly in the 50’s, Team Blue was the party of racism and they also had most of the black vote because of economics.

                Both big teams are grand coalitions, and while it takes a lot for one side to steal the other’s issue(s), it does happen.

                For example if the Hispanics and/or the Asians become “White” then the political world will change and we’ll look back and we won’t be able to imagine it differently.Report

          • Everything I have read suggests that the same thing is happening in Arizona. Voter registration there is split about equally between Republicans, Democrats, and non-affiliated. The ongoing audit noise appears to be pissing off more and more of the Maricopa County suburban voters. The Republican AG, who wants to run for Mark Kelly’s US Senate seat in 2022 is trying desperately to balance losing the primary if he declines to prosecute people without evidence, and losing the general if he does.

            Still accepting bets for a craft brew that AZ in 2022 goes from Republican state trifecta to Democrat.Report

            • Philip H in reply to Michael Cain says:

              with Trump now saying that the judge in AZ who told the state Senate to hand over its Cyber Ninja documents is committing fraud he’s probably gonna tank republican participation in the primaries, and possibly the general.

              The campaign ads almost write themselves.Report

          • Dark Matter in reply to Chip Daniels says:

            There doesn’t exist any large pool of undecideds or independents who can be persuaded.

            For all the talk about how the anti-vax people will never vaccinate, we are vaccinating more and more people.

            That suggests people don’t have binary opinions and while it takes a lot of effort, it’s possible to move people.

            Now the bulk of our political-circus is now aimed at keeping the base spun up, that’s clearly a thing. However it’s like advertising, half the money spent is wasted but you don’t know which half; Most of the circus is pretty worthless, it’s probably more like 80/20.Report

        • Jaybird in reply to Chip Daniels says:

          What’s crazy is that I didn’t say “all you need to know”.Report

  3. North says:

    Good article, I agree with your analysis. It still hinges on Covid and I can’t help but agree that mandates are pretty much the only feasible and practical response.

    Biden held off on them for about half a year for obvious reasons but he’s pulled the trigger for equally obvious reasons.Report

    • Philip H in reply to North says:

      Which means that Texas Gov. Abbot is out to sink his own economy in service of maintaining power. Someone ought out point that out to Texans.Report

      • JS in reply to Philip H says:

        We are keenly aware.

        Worse thing is? If he loses his primary, Allen West is worse.Report

        • Philip H in reply to JS says:

          Allen West turns Texas Purple and possibly puts a democrat in the governors mansion precisely because the middling conservatives who put up with Abbot won’t support him.Report

          • JS in reply to Philip H says:

            >Allen West turns Texas Purple and possibly puts a democrat in the governors mansion precisely because the middling conservatives who put up with Abbot won’t support him.Re

            Nope. Allen West becomes governor, if by a narrow margin.

            If this was 2030, sure. It’s not.Report

      • North in reply to Philip H says:

        As JS very aptly noted above, they’re riding the tiger and they can’t get off.

        Alas, the tiger is pretty fierce and potent- we have no assurance that tiger riding won’t deliver them victories in the near term.Report

    • CJColucci in reply to North says:

      Unless there’s a lot more butt-f*****g of co-workers at the workplace going on than I know about, I don’t see the hazard.Report

  4. Dark Matter says:

    Biden can lean on the FDA to move faster for approving children’s vaccinations. He can lean on the FDA to NOT consider international “equality” of vaccinations when it comes to deciding if we need boosters.

    Immigration reform (to fill labor pools) would be useful.

    Unwinding Trump’s trade war would be useful.Report

    • Slade the Leveller in reply to Dark Matter says:

      I know there’s a lot of activism around getting shots into kids’ arms, but I would really prefer if our politicians wouldn’t be messing around with FDA drug approvals.Report

    • Douglas Hayden in reply to Dark Matter says:

      “Immigration reform (to fill labor pools) would be useful.”

      Yay, someone mentioned it!

      Unemployment’s under 5% and there’s still help wanted signs all over. The pandemic wiped out a lot of the work force, not just from deaths but the folks who decided now was a good time for an early retirement or to become a stay-at-home parent. They ain’t comin’ back. Now you have a tight labor market, prices going up with pay rates, and SBOs starting to nope out because there’s not enough workers to keep the lights on. Labor participation is at 61%, how do you get it back up to the high 60s again?

      In a sane society, you’d turn to immigrants to start filling in. But ten plus years of Trumpian Tea Party ‘they took our jobs’ nonsense has the Rs in thrall to nativists and the Ds running scared of them. It ain’t lookin’ good.Report