The $3.5 Trillion Democrat Budget Blueprint: Read It For Yourself
Racing against the August recess, and needing to get the reconciliation process done before the end of the fiscal year, the Senate Democratic leadership has unveiled the $3.5 trillion Democrat budget blueprint they hope to pass on the heels of the $1.2 trillion infrastructure package.
Senate Democrats on Monday released a sweeping $3.5 trillion budget blueprint that proposes to expand Medicare, combat climate change, and boost federal child care and education programs as lawmakers prepare to take the next step toward advancing the central elements of President Biden’s economic agenda.
The scope of the spending outlined by Democrats is vast, reflecting the party’s grand ambitions to grow the size and reach of the federal government to a level not seen in decades. The measure paves the way for new funding to enroll students in universal prekindergarten, help immigrants obtain legal residency and lower prescription drug prices for seniors, along with a slew of additional efforts that coincide with promises Biden and his allies made during the 2020 election campaign.
In releasing the document, Democrats pledged Monday that their package would be financed in full through proposed tax increases on profitable companies and wealthy families. The resolution, which sets up a process to craft full legislation in the weeks ahead, is expected to gain the support of only the chamber’s 50 Democrats — forcing the party to rely later on a legislative move known as reconciliation to bypass Republican opposition and avert a likely filibuster.
The budget is the second component of Biden’s broader economic ambitions set to come before the Senate this week. Lawmakers also are expected to approve another major element: roughly $1.2 trillion in new investments targeting the nation’s roads, bridges, pipes, ports and Internet connections. Republicans are set to join Democrats overwhelmingly in advancing the infrastructure bill, which the Senate negotiated with the White House.
Despite the rare political accord, however, the GOP has adamantly opposed Democrats’ budget measure and pledged to vehemently fight it, arguing that it would worsen the deficit and wrongly unwind the tax cuts they adopted four years ago. Both proposals face a complex path in the House, where Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has pledged not to take up one without the other.
For now, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who led the committee that drafted the resolution, on Monday described the effort as historic. He touted the budget as the “most consequential piece of legislation for working people, the elderly, the children, the sick and the poor since FDR and the New Deal of the 1930s.”
“When we go forward and do that, when we protect our children and the elderly and the environment, we are going to create millions of good-paying jobs, put people to work rebuilding this country in a way that is long, long overdue,” Sanders said.
The two expected votes mark major political milestones for the Senate as well as for Biden, months after he unveiled his jobs- and families-focused plans calling for more than $4 trillion in new spending. The president long has maintained a desire to work with Republicans to pass considerable swaths of his economic agenda — even as he has made clear that Democrats will not squander their narrow majorities in Congress to accomplish their goals.
The budget and infrastructure measures technically are separate, yet they are politically intertwined. In the Senate, Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) has labored to move both proposals in tandem on a tight timeline ahead of lawmakers’ planned August recess.
“Many folks called that two-track process unrealistic; many others said it’s unachievable on such a short timeline and in such a slow-moving chamber,” he said Monday. “But we have managed to steer two trains at the same time. There have been some bumps. There have been some delays. But the Senate is on track to finish both tracks.”
Some liberal-leaning Democrats have insisted that they will not support one tranche of spending without the other, arguing that the bipartisan public-works bill on its own is insufficient. The demands have been especially potent in the House, where Pelosi cannot afford to lose many votes if she hopes to adopt either economic package.
The Democratic leadership plan is for a “vote-a-rama” marathon to get amendments and committee instructions done by September 15th to officially kick off the reconciliation process Democrats plan to use to pass the Democratic budget without any Republican support.
Read the Democrat budget blueprint for yourself here:
budget
Can we not do “Democrat” as an adjective?Report
In this instance there isn’t really a way around it when they themselves tout is as the “Democrat Budget Blueprint”.Report
I’m seeing “Senate Democrat Budget Blueprint”, which takes some of the curse off, but point acknowldged.Report
If the party pulls off even half what they’re going for with this reconciliation bill it’ll be historic. My goodness it’s bold.Report
Its uncharacteristically bold for the Democratic Party. And if they are really going to do it by reconciliation they may yank a big reelection rug out form under the Republicans.Report
They need to succeed and if they fail both Pelosi and Schumer should lose their leadership spots, even on the off chance they keep the majority.Report
Well odds are fantastic that Pelosi, at least, is going to retire after the next election.
Schumer, probably yeah. If he pulls this juggling act off, though, I think I’ll need to lean on Stillwater to take back all the bad stuff he’s said about him.Report
I share a lot of Still’s criticisms of the D congressional gerontocracy but I also believe you have to give credit when it is due. And if this works they will definitely deserve some.Report
Good thing that at least a full third of it exists solely so it can be killed as a price for Manchin, Sinema, and perhaps one or two others.
Which, fair enough. Bake that into the pie if you have to.
On the other hand, it being pretty much entirely a Democratic bill, you can get some actual, honest, good-faith horse-trading done.Report
From your lips to God(ess?)’s ear. Also, in the spirit of giving credit where credit is due: who the fish knew Crazy Uncle Bernie could be such a canny operator as the Chair of the Budget Committee?
It’s like someone kicked a stick out of the cogs on the left and the whole party’s gears have just been clunking and turning since Super Tuesday of 2020 or something.Report
Manchin and Sinema are already playing “I can’t vote for 3.5 trillion”.
Which, as a cynical man who has watched politics for awhile, strikes me very much as “So please serve up the sacrificial pound of flesh added solely to this bill so we can strike it”.
Because I cannot fathom this leaving Committee without Schumer at least (and Sanders is experienced enough he should know how the sausage is made) having already talked to Manchin and Sinema heavily, and assured them there will be something to stand against to prove their bold, independent, “I’m not your usual politician” mavericky ways.Report
So, it’s the best of bills and it’s the worst of bills. From a positive standpoint, it is much needed and the climate component in particular is absolutely essential. From a negative point of view, it is likely to be inflationary, which will just eat our lunch, especially the federal budget. It seems like a no-win situation. Dire eventualities abound.Report
I am stuck on your formulation of much-needed but a no-win. My sense is that our whole approach to infrastructure is deeply flawed and mostly a way to use ideological sentiment to funnel money to a bunch of special interests, but I admit that I am cynical. What does the winning version of an infrastructure bill look like? Or is it that you think we are so far behind, the effort to catch up will exhaust us no matter what?Report