On Writing of Wrongs
“Re-examine all you have been told” wrote Walt Whitman: “Dismiss what insults your soul.”
Ok.
So why do you even bother with politics, anyway? Why bother engaging on social media, or watching the news, or trying to keep up with current events and the news of the day? The notion of “standing athwart history and yelling, STOP” is one that, for the most part, will get you summarily ignored if not washed away in a tidal wave of inevitability, trampled under by the tweeted hooves of stampeding group think. Why not just despair and tune out, cultivate your social media feed to only pleasant things, and let the world go to hell if it so chooses, as long as it doesn’t interrupt your streaming of the latest shenanigans of 90 Day Fiancé: Every Which Way?
What’s the point?
I can only speak for myself. When I first got my Twitter account in October of 2017, it was the first social media of any kind I had ever participated in. I wrote a few months later, in one of my first public pieces:
Understand, at 37 years of age, I had never had any social media account and rather despised the concept. However, my decision was not without sound reasoning. I have always been a follower of current events and politics, and most of the media now is using the medium as a companion to their official writing, reporting, or punditry. Being a historian at heart and a person who still deeply loves his country, it seemed like the appropriate outlet to dabble and engage in areas that interested me, and in a small way participate in the public discourse. The truncated format keeps things brief, and it was a controllable environment; unlike being in a public, crowded, noisy place full of potential triggers, a phone can be put down or turned off. Even as a public platform, a certain degree of anonymity remains as I am a virtual nobody, pun intended.
Mostly, though, I wanted to see if I was still sharp enough mentally to compete in the arena of ideas.
I set some ground rules for myself that have served me well. I do not carry any debate from Twitter over to actual people in my life; I discuss politics, current events, or anything else I engage on twitter with the real people in my life rarely, if at all. I don’t throw bombs or act outrageous just for the attention. I try not to put anything on a tweet I wouldn’t say in person. I don’t insult people on a personal level or based on their looks. I try to be fair; if I’m wrong or mistaken, I say so, and if I’m right, I try to know when to be comfortable enough in that to stop arguing. In other words, many of the principles for good mental well-being in real life also apply to social media. Tweet at someone the same as if you were talking to them is a pretty good rule of thumb. I do not always measure up to my own standards, but they are there, and I am getting better at it all the time.
I revisit that piece — the one that first caught some attention from folks who thought enough to share it and led to the writing opportunities I have today — because we are certainly in a time of change in politics, the news media, and in the wider online commenting community where I spend much of my time and energy. As the Trump Presidency comes to an end and his second impeachment is now on record, it feels appropriate to take some stock of the last few years.
The 2016 campaign for president was something I watched attentively, mostly because I had no choice. I spent August, September, October, and the first part of November at Duke Hospital. Voting in the 2016 election was the first time I ventured out other than coming home from the hospital. I did so at the ADA compliant station, as I couldn’t stand for very long and still had fun things like a J-tube surgically attached and hanging out of me. Social media and the writing that came from it was a natural progression of finding a way to try and have an outlet and be involved in the wider world. I’ve tried to hold to those initial principles and ground rules I lined out when I first started. Some 3 years later, on the whole, I’m proud of the work I’ve put in, and even prouder of the affiliations and relationships among our writing and social media friends we have built.
In the aftermath of recent events I usually took to writing — the election, the attempts by some to talk civil war/secession, the assault on the capitol, the impeachment — and such a constant stream of “bad news” and heavy topic honestly does weigh on you. So many folks are talking about needing a break, or stepping back from politics and current events, having reached their various breaking points and limits. I understand that, and support anyone doing anything they need to do for their own well being, mental health, and families. But recent events have struck me as a call to do even more in whatever limited realm of influence I have to affect good. We should understand that because of the technology of the day, we may well be the most recorded and documented generation in history. Those of us who write publicly should be mindful how the things we write and stances we take may well be available for the consideration of future generations for a long time to come.
As a kid watching Ken Burns’ The Civil War and the voiceovers of the diaries and writing of people of that era, I wondered what they would have thought about their voices being the ones so many would forever hear when thinking of those troubled times. Perhaps we should take that view point, of what someone 150 years in the future might think if ours is the only voice they hear about these times we find ourselves in. If so, how does that change how we write, how we converse, what news we focus and take in, and how we try to explain it to others?
I’m just a guy who started to write because I needed to do something, anything, to feel productive again at a very trying and challenging moment in my life. I do not have the resumes of some, nor the letters after my name and degrees on the wall that are often the main points on a bio. But I have been blessed with something of a platform and a voice to get my viewpoint out. To the best of my ability I use that to pass the same opportunity on to others as well. I want to not eat alone, to raise all boats, to be successful at whatever level I reach with a good group of people coming with me and enjoying therein.
But there is also the responsibility to get things right. Those that may read our writing in the future should know, or at least be able to assume, we were willing to see things as they are as they happen, to comment on the good, but be willing to write the wrongs. Our chief purpose in this age of conspiracy and distrust and anger must be to get to the truth, to explain it as best we can, and cling to it for as long as we are able. If we cling to the truth, even when it hurts us, even when it might look bad, we at least have a fighting chance against the tsunami of unworthy people who would rather advance themselves with lies, and schemes, and machinations of self interest.
We who are privileged enough to write, to comment, to participate in the arena of ideas, must never allow the dust and dirt and grit of that battle to lead us into places where we are not doing so for a purpose. Too many have too easily slipped into the untruths of the moment to expedite their own wants, needs and desires. But that isn’t the way, no matter how much our human nature might pull us towards that in moments of doubt and pain. To put my name on a lie, or lies of the day, would do something far beyond view counts or social media follows. It would injure my soul.
So I re-examine the things of the first two weeks of 2021, and the last four years of the outgoing president, and what I think the next four years of a new president will bring. I don’t know all of what is to come but I can dismiss now what I know for a fact would injure my soul, and be a disservice to anyone present or future who is kind enough to read the words I write.
Do not fall for the easy lies. Fight for truth. Write the wrongs.
To Right the Wrongs, one must Write the Wrongs.
Nice, I like it. It’s apt. Too much, we are all so wrapped up in making sure the other guy doesn’t win, that we refuse to face our own failings.
Politically, morally, we have all stared too long into the abyss.Report
I’ve been thinking about this a bit because it’s my turn this week to check in on my parents. In reality, my sister and I both check in on them each week, but she lives in South Korea and I’m in Canada, and it can be expensive, since neither parent has grasped the concept of zoom.
Also, both of them are really angry about potlicks- like constantly and obsessively angry. It’s like the poisonous gas that has expanded to fill every corner of their lives. They’re both right-wingers, but it’s pretty much the same with my left-winger friends- in America that is. They obsess constantly on the topic that makes them the most unhappy. It’s enervating. And it’s not easy to call mom and dad and listen to a tirade about how liberals are starting a race war every week.
Jaybird has the line about political struggles ending in divorce, and it feels like Americans are in the last days of marriage counseling now. They say that divorce is a process of replacing one shared story with two competing stories. Americans seemingly want to be validated in their anger- told the “other side” really is dysfunctional and corrupt and irredeemable. They want to tell their story constantly. I think what gets enervating is just what happens in a failing marriage- everyone is waiting for the other person to fix themselves and it doesn’t work that way.
Sorry to say an even darker metaphor has come to my mind, I’m afraid to say: Der Weg ins Freie- the Arthur Schnitzler novel about being a Jew in Vienna at a time in which nationalism and antisemitism were at a peak, but so were art and psychology and literature. It translates to “The Road into the Open” and what he was describing was a situation where there was no road into the open- the Jews couldn’t assimilate or remain unassimilated without being despised either way. He thought it would end in a large bonfire. This was written in 1908.
No, I’m not saying anyone in America is in the same situation as the Jews in Austria. What I’m saying is there is something irreconcilable about the political situation in America. Y’all can’t live together, but you can’t exactly expel a third of the country either. There has to be some way out that isn’t a huge fire. I feel like writers, like marriage counselors, are there to help us understand what is human in the other. Not to bring kindling.Report
There are lots of problems with “divorce or war” a la Jaybird:
1. It has happened less than we think;
2. The United States is a combination economic union (like the EU.) and military union (like NATO). There is an often cited fact that California would be a G10 country if it were an independent nation but this neglects the fact that California does not have to pay for its own defense and still gets some money from the Federal Government (especially for disaster relief). Likewise, a lot of red states are going to discovery they are in for a world of hurt if they are suddenly cut-off from easy access to coastal ports and blue-state dollar flow;
3. The United States is just as much divided by census tract as it is by red state v. blue state. Joe Biden received 11 million votes in California (63.5 percent of the total). This still means Trump’s 34.3 percent equaled just over 6 million votes. That is more than he received in Texas. What happens to these 6 million people in the case of “divorce” if California goes to the blue nation?Report
Loose talk of divorce or war also has the anesthetizing property of conjuring up Hollywood science fiction scenarios- Plucky teenager Katniss Evergreen shooting helicopters or something.
By being so otherwordly and alien, it has the effect of seeming unreal and un-possible and therefore soothing.
But a more likely scenario is just the long gray cold war struggle of other nations; Less violent than Beirut or Yugoslavia, but maybe something like Northern Ireland in the Troubles.
The show Derry Girls on Netflix does a good job of showing how normal life can be during Troubles; Where the recurring patter of shootings and occasional car bombings just fades into the background wallpaper of daily life, and going on holiday means passing through numerous checkpoints of armed military vehicles.Report
I wouldn’t even go as far as the Troubles. Another big issue is that the United States is a very big nation and this allows for the census tract division. Both of us might as well be closer to Mars than we are too conservative Bakersfield. Northern Ireland is small, very small.Report
Hey, I’m just gaming this stuff out.
The game is iterated.
Keep gaming it out. Where do you see it ending up?Report
America, circa 1920 would be a suitable example.Report
A Red Scare, Prohibition, a Wall Street Bombing, and a Harding-style Presidency?
I guess I can see that for 2021.
Keep iterating.Report
The Tulsa Massacre, the Matewan Massacre, the US Army taking control of Gary Indiana and declaring martial law, a lynching almost every week, the Klan virtually running the Indiana state government.
Point being, American history is astonishing violent from the viewpoint of us who only experienced the post WWII prosperity.
And yet the 1920s are looked back on with nostalgia. Claire Briggs certainly didn’t think he was living in a nation beset with Troubles or civil strife, but he did.
We don’t have to game this out or use our fortune telling prognostication powers. America has already experienced convulsions of polarization and violence on a large scale.
The good news is America survived and became a better place.
The bad news is the victory wasn’t inevitable and the outcome could have been much worse.Report
Does that not sound like war to you?
Well, maybe we’ll get to the other side and look back on the 2020s with incredulity that the people who made the 80s, 90s, and oughts were capable of creating a generation that ended up with a country as awesome as the 30s are likely to end up being.Report
It has never led me to divorce or war which as Chip notes as the quality of being a numbing opiate.Report
I asked where it led you. Not to where it didn’t lead you.
How do you see this playing out?Report
That’s what Domestic Terrorism Laws are for.
I certainly take your point that Divorce is very impractical… maybe impossible. Are we sure the ruling out Divorce means we’ve also ruled out War? I’m not so sure. Not that we’d start it… they would start it, of course.Report
Now that I think about … we’ve always been at war.Report
Maybe we’ve always been at War with varying degrees and terms of Truce.
Except I don’t think there’s any coherent “we” in that sentence. But I do think there’s a coherent Truce.Report
This is the point I’m making above, that America has always been in a simmering cold war between its factions, and the peaceful transfer of power has always been precarious.Report
I’m not sure I agree that transfers have been precarious. In my lifetime maybe 1968, if we squint? Then off the top of my head I could see Jackson, Lincoln and Hayes… maybe with a few lesser knowns? Otherwise a remarkable run, really.
I guess I’m suggesting sort of the opposite, that the Truce mostly holds, not that War almost always nearly wins.
What I’m noticing is that America isn’t really using the language of Truce and Plurality anymore. I don’t think we ever had Unity, if that’s what you mean… but strangely calls for Unity these days strike me as calls for war… a Unity of elimination.Report
I’m not sure what you mean by the “language of Truce and Plurality”.
When was that, and what might be some examples?Report
There is an often cited fact that California would be a G10 country if it were an independent nation but this neglects the fact that California does not have to pay for its own defense and still gets some money from the Federal Government (especially for disaster relief).
I think your accounting is wrong here. California has a state GDP now, of which roughly 19% gets sent to Washington, DC and 12% goes to Sacramento (plus locals). As an independent country with that same GDP it would no longer send money to Washington, and could spend a portion of that 19% on its military. That’s quite likely to cost less than its current contribution: the US spends ~3.5% of GDP on the military; most European countries seem to get along fine on ~2%. The details might be interesting. Currently, California’s “share” pays for something over one full carrier strike force. I don’t think an independent California would have much interest in one.Report
But Sir! We must not allow a carrier gap with Greater Portlandia!Report
As if metro Portland could afford a carrier strike group. Or would want one :^)Report
Sure, and be at the mercy of the Antifa hordes on the commanding heights of Capitol Hill to sap and impurify all of their precious bodily fluids.Report
Portland doesn’t want a carrier strike group, they want a well-disciplined Marine expeditionary unit. Who can be told, “Clean out the Antifa camp.” Or “Clean out those people at Malheur.” At least, listening to my long-time friends in the Portland suburbs, that’s what they want.Report
I’ll say it now, on the record: I don’t want to live in any state that doesn’t want its own carrier strike force.Report
Warmonger!Report
Don’t move here, then :^) A carrier strike force does nothing for the state’s actual military goals, which are to interdict the inflow of Texans.Report
If they go down the rabbit hole of having their own army then they also need walls and control over their borders… at which point their economy would rapidly shrink because they wouldn’t have unlimited free trade with the rest of the nation.
For example they currently “import” 25% of their power.
The link below showcases to what degree we tend to rely on a few states to produce the bulk of specific products. So Arkansas produces more rice than every other state combined and sells it to them. The other examples here are hogs, eggs, and cattle.
California-a-nation either needs free trade with the US to a crazy level by international standards or they lose a huge amount of their GDP.
http://jaysonlusk.com/blog/2017/11/1/how-much-does-your-state-rely-on-other-states-for-food#:~:text=The%20average%20Bostonian%20imports%20110,hogs%2C%20eggs%2C%20and%20cattle.Report
Exactly, which only points up the silliness of any secession talk.
Any independent state or even group of states could only survive by developing a greater degree of cooperation and reciprocity with its neighbors, not less.
Seceding because you can’t stand Those People is absurd when suddenly Those People now have the power to shut down your economy.
Divorce is a game you win by not playing.Report
The good ol’ US Free Trade Zone!
Seriously though, it’s a political dispute, not an economic one. People don’t want to stop trading with CA, they just want CA to stop telling them their car needs an expensive catalytic converter, or that they can’t have guns, or whatever else they think those crazy liberals in CA want.
Likewise, CA would not want to be forced to enact whatever laws a deep red state finds acceptable that those crazy liberals would find offensive.
If we are going to keep on with the marriage analogy, lots of folks have healthy marriages by having personal spaces (Man-Caves, She-Sheds, whatever…) where the other does not have much sway.
It’s not no-sway (I can’t be letting the garage be such a mess it attracts vermin, or the like), but it’s a limited amount.
So really it boils down to how much federalism folks are willing to tolerate. I think, for the far-left/right, tolerance for federalism is crashing. And I think it’s a natural result of the information age. The world seems far too small.Report
Federalism is limited by Constitutional rights, and the modern marketplace demand for uniform markets.
The Constitutional guarantee of rights doesn’t come in fifty flavors and Ford doesn’t want to sell fifty types of pickups.
Various states can tinker around the edges of the Second Amendment or Roe, and add this or that doohickey to the emissions system of cars, but only in very limited ways.Report
Generally speaking, the issues that are in dispute are…
1) Constitutional Right #1 vs Constitutional Right #2
2) Who pays for a Right
Something we tend to see is people insisting that the Right they favor is absolute while other Rights are not.Report
And yet, those edges are a raging source of dispute…Report
Or we can have states split into two groups of approximately equal size, one which holds that voting is a privilege and people expected to jump through hoops, and one which holds voting is a right and should be as easy as possible.Report
But mail in ballots are so susceptible to fraud! Even though no one seems able to explain exactly how said fraud is committed without the entirety of the states election apparatus in a conspiracy to do so…Report
We are but imagine this: a very bad day happens and Ordinary-Times goes down.
The main documentation of my life and thought processes and how I thought about this versus that within hours of it happening will be, poof, gone.
Every time Twitter does one of those things to improve your user experience by making it impossible to scroll back more than a (whatever duration) into your own timeline? Your documentation is gone.
We live at the precipice of an Eternal Now.Report
I just checked. My twitter stops at October 28th, 2020.Report
well. Twitter Advanced Search lets you put in your @ and a date range, and you can get all the tweets from that range. You’re right that it’s not “click Profile and scroll down” but they are there.
Of course, there’s people out there who have this thing where they routinely delete all their tweets older than five minutes, so half my tweets are either quote-tweets of nothing or responses without context.Report
There’s a way to request your entire twitter history as well. Get it emailed to you a few hours or days after you put in the request.
But it’s a pain to do.
Easier to live in the now.
(Though you can do a search from:@name “keyword or phrase” and find out if the journalist who wrote a story about a guy saying something bad a decade ago said something bad 5 years ago.)Report
Your comment led me to look at what I wrote here in January, 2020. Then I cringed at some of the writing and rewrote some of it and hit “update”- in spite of the fact that almost no one will ever notice.Report
I write my thoughts and experiences down in what we used to call a “journal”, with a good old fashioned fountain pen that has lasted me ten years while wearing my bowler hat and an onion tied to my belt.
No hornswoggling consarned tech company will ever delete my journals dadblastit and by cracky if I wanna go back and look at them.[ed note: the rest of the authentic frontier gibberish was truncated]Report