Missouri Conducts Controversial Execution of Marcellus Williams
After a flurry of last-ditch efforts and press, Marcellus Williams was executed by the State of Missouri for a 1998 murder conviction that has been called into question.
Williams, 55, was pronounced dead at the Potosi Correctional Center in Mineral Point.
After two last-minute execution reprieves starting almost a decade ago, momentum to reexamine Williams’s decades-old conviction gathered from unlikely sources, including the local prosecutor from the office that convicted him. Williams received an outpouring of support from legal groups such as the Midwest Innocence Project and a member of Congress. The family of the victim in the 1998 St. Louis stabbing came to oppose Williams’s execution.
Late Tuesday afternoon, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to stay Williams’s execution. The court’s three liberal members — Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson — disagreed and said they would have granted the request to halt the execution.
In a statement after the high court’s decision, an attorney for Williams listed people who had opposed his execution and fought for his removal from death row, including the St. Louis County prosecutors who “now admitted they were wrong and zealously fought to undo the conviction and save Mr. Williams’ life.”
“That is not justice,” Tricia Rojo Bushnell said in a statement. “And we must all question any system that would allow this to occur. The execution of an innocent person is the most extreme manifestation of Missouri’s obsession with ‘finality’ over truth, justice, and humanity, at any cost.”
But for Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey and Gov. Mike Parson, Republicans who opposed efforts to vacate Williams’s conviction, the state long ago met its burden in finding Williams guilty.
The NAACP, which had supported Williams’s attempt to leave death row, called the execution a lynching.
“Tonight, Missouri lynched another innocent Black man,” NAACP President Derrick Johnson said in a statement. “When DNA evidence proves innocence, capital punishment is not justice — it is murder.”
They executed a man who is likely innocent. This is why I’ve moved against the death penalty. Not only does it risk an irreversible punishment on an innocent man, it creates a blood lust in the system that makes killing the innocent more likely.Report
I think the bottom line is that no matter how much you tinker with the process for capital punishment there is no way to pursue it without occasionally executing an innocent person. I’m not ok with that, nor do I see it as a price worth paying.Report
Certainly not when you justify seeing the execution through so that faith in the system as a whole may be preserved via the mechanism of pretending to ignore the evidence of innocence. What that does is make a mockery of the standard of “reasonable doubt,” and inevitably thereafter diminish rather than buttress respect for the law.Report
Everybody relevant was screaming not kill this man but the current governor decided to restart the clock towards death.Report