Open Mic for the week of 4/29/2024

Jaybird

Jaybird is Birdmojo on Xbox Live and Jaybirdmojo on Playstation's network. He's been playing consoles since the Atari 2600 and it was Zork that taught him how to touch-type. If you've got a song for Wednesday, a commercial for Saturday, a recommendation for Tuesday, an essay for Monday, or, heck, just a handful a questions, fire off an email to AskJaybird-at-gmail.com

Related Post Roulette

99 Responses

  1. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    Linda Mamoun reports “There was a protestor in the liberated zone at @UCLA with a potentially fatal banana allergy. Counterprotestors invaded the encampment and saw all the no bananas warnings. The next day they came back waving bananas like settlers waving machine guns & smeared bananas everywhere.”

    She doesn’t have video evidence of the counterprotestors smearing bananas, sadly. Just video evidence of them waving bananas around like settlers waving machine guns. Also: eating them.

    Which reminds me of the “no bananas under socialism” conversation that happened a few months back. Malcom Harris tweeted out that it doesn’t make any other-than-capitalist sense to create a world-spanning daily banana infrastructure for people in Columbus, Ohio. That turned into an argument over whether he was crazy and then *THAT* got hijacked by one of the people arguing on Harris’s side that she wasn’t an ascetic who thinks that pleasure makes you a bad person and that’s why she opposed bananas in Columbus. She pointed out that she likes to have fun. Cocaine, for example.

    And *THAT* turned into a discussion about the ethical supply chain problems that cocaine is rumored to have and everything went even crazier from there.

    Anyway, that’s what I thought of when I saw the counterprotestor brandishing a banana like a settler brandishing a machine gun. “Under socialism, she’d have to brandish something else”, I thought.Report

    • LeeEsq in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      Liberated zone? Are Pro-Palestinian protestors capable of not being complete putzes? Like the Palestinians themselves, they just can’t really understand why people disagree with them or believe that Jews have a right to self-determination and national liberation. Instead they engage in these overly dramatic fantasies and demand nothing more or less than complete surrender and that all their goals are achieved. It never occurs to them to negotiate or bend or crack or yield on even them ost minor symbolic issue but just to raise their fist in bloody thirsty defiance forever and demand everything in exchange or nothing. When people explain in great and patient detail to the Palestinian or their activist supporters why they disagree with them, they just look on in a state of blank incomprehension. Meanwhile, the Palestinians or their supporters can go on in long length and epic detail on why Jewish self-determination and national liberation are evil while never understanding why Jews don’t want to be second class citizens of a Muslim polity.Report

    • LeeEsq in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      The I/P conflict as it plays out in the West is based on pure intellectualism that benefits nobody in the real world.Report

    • DensityDuck in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      “Under socialism, she’d have to brandish something else”, I thought.

      one of these, perhapsReport

    • DavidTC in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      You can laugh at the banana allergy thing, but a) counter-protestors were specifically told not to bring bananas, so b) they did, in an obvious attempt to endanger’s someone life is…telling.

      It is important? Not really? Is it a little silly? Sure.

      Does it speak to how the counter-protestors behave? Yeah, it does. Granted, the other instances of violence towards the protestors sorta speaks for themselves.

      A reminder that the Columbia crackdown happened because a _counter-protestor_ shouted ‘Kill the Jews’ at the pro-Palestine protest, and the university decided that this meant the _protest_ was unsafe and decide to make a statement about antisemitism and implying it was coming from the protest. (I remind people, pretending like the media bothered to inform anyone of this.)

      Or this: https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/counter-protesters-attack-ucla-pro-palestinian-camp/ar-AA1nZue1

      We’ve had actual repeated violence and threats at these protests, and it’s almost entirely _against the protestors_.Report

      • Jaybird in reply to DavidTC
        Ignored
        says:

        I’m not sure that anyone’s life was threatened by the counter-protestor eating a banana.

        If I had to venture a guess, I’d say that no one’s life was threatened by the banana incident.

        It was pretty insensitive, though. I will give you that.Report

      • DensityDuck in reply to DavidTC
        Ignored
        says:

        “the Columbia crackdown happened because a _counter-protestor_ shouted ‘Kill the Jews’ at the pro-Palestine protest, and the university decided that this meant the _protest_ was unsafe…”

        A counter-protestor in Charlottesville ran a bunch of people over with a car and killed one, so maybe the university has a point.Report

  2. Philip H
    Ignored
    says:

    What do you do if you are faced with a popular program that has opened up internet to rural, military and elderly voters via a small government subsidy? Kill it apparently:

    The ACP has quickly gained adoption since Congress created the program in the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law. It is overwhelmingly popular with both political parties, surveys show.

    Military families account for almost half of the ACP’s subscriber base, according to the White House and an outside survey backed by Comcast.

    More than a quarter of ACP users live in rural areas, the Comcast-backed survey said, with roughly 4 in 10 enrolled households located in the southern United States alone. As many as 65% of respondents said they feared losing their job without the ACP; 3 out of 4 said they worry about losing online health care services, and more than 80% said they believe their kids would fall behind in school.

    https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/29/tech/broadband-affordability-acp-rural-older-americans/index.htmlReport

  3. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    A Columbia facilities worker claims to have been held hostage by protestors when they occupied Hamilton Hall at Columbia last night.

    But the story is only being covered by Fox. And, besides, he’s free now, isn’t he? I don’t know what he’s complaining about. If it even happened, of course.

    And pictures show that he’s getting violent with the protestors! Is he even here legally?Report

  4. Chip Daniels
    Ignored
    says:

    FBI data shows America is seeing a ‘considerable’ drop in crime. Trump says the opposite.
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/04/30/trump-crime-fbi-data-murder-statistics/73443631007/

    Fear, grievance, and resentment are the tools of those who want to strip people of liberty.Report

    • Brandon Berg in reply to Chip Daniels
      Ignored
      says:

      “When COVID hit we saw this spike, so from 2020 to 2022 it was bad but….”

      This is false. Homicide didn’t spike when COVID hit. It spiked at the beginning of the BLM insurrection.

      Fear, grievance, and resentment are the tools of those who want to strip people of liberty.

      This is true, which is why they’re used extensively by both parties. Democrats are particularly fond of stoking class and racial resentment.Report

  5. Philip H
    Ignored
    says:

    At least he’s getting some small comeuppance for being a general a$$:

    https://www.npr.org/2024/04/30/1244294199/trump-gag-order-hush-money-trialReport

  6. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    NYPD union sues Adams administration over new ‘zero tolerance’ policy on steroid use among cops

    New York City’s largest cop union is suing Police Commissioner Edward Caban and Mayor Adams for implementing a new “zero tolerance” policy on NYPD officers using steroids or other performance-enhancing drugs, the Daily News has learned.

    In a lawsuit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court on Friday, lawyers for the Police Benevolent Association alleged the previously undisclosed policy flies in the face of a legal agreement the union entered into with the city in 2011.

    The 2011 contract prohibited officers from ingesting or possessing any anabolic steroid or other forms of human growth hormones without a medical prescription. However, the old standard didn’t require officers to run any such prescription by their NYPD district surgeon before starting to use it.

    The problem, of course, is that this choice was made unilaterally rather than through the union’s bargaining process.Report

  7. Chip Daniels
    Ignored
    says:

    They’re ten days late with this announcement, but anyhoo:
    Biden administration plans to reclassify marijuana, easing restrictions nationwide
    Cannabis is currently classified along with drugs like heroin and LSD. The administration is expected to reschedule it into a category that includes Tylenol and steroids.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/biden-administration-plans-reclassify-marijuana-easing-restrictions-na-rcna149424Report

    • Philip H in reply to Chip Daniels
      Ignored
      says:

      And yet I am fairly sure Jay will find a reason not to vote for Biden . . . .Report

      • Jaybird in reply to Philip H
        Ignored
        says:

        Eh, I keep hearing this.

        It keeps not happening.’

        Remember the news article about the legislation to make the time change finally be ending and you asking me if that was enough?

        And then it didn’t go through, did it?

        But let him run on it. Like, not have the news talk about it. Have him talk about it.

        Maybe the press secretary. Depending on the phrasing she uses.Report

        • Philip H in reply to Jaybird
          Ignored
          says:

          You don’t get here:

          The Drug Enforcement Administration is expected to approve an opinion by the Department of Health and Human Services that marijuana should be reclassified from the most strict Schedule I to the less stringent Schedule III, marking the first time that the U.S. government would acknowledge its potential medical benefits and begin studying them in earnest.

          Attorney General Merrick Garland will submit the rescheduling proposal to the White House Office of Management and Budget as early as Tuesday afternoon, a source familiar with the timeline told NBC News.

          The Justice Department “continues to work on this rule,” a Biden administration official said. “We have no further comment at this time.”

          Unless the WH has already bought off on it. That’s just how the federal interagency works. So the recommendation is definitely coming. Then there will be statutorily mandated notice and public comment – where you Jaybird will be able to submit written comments to the DEA on this. I suspect you will need to shorten your novella however. There are usually word limits.Report

          • Jaybird in reply to Philip H
            Ignored
            says:

            “This is expected to happen”.

            I can be expected to be delighted.Report

            • Michael Cain in reply to Jaybird
              Ignored
              says:

              I’m a pessimist this morning, and believe that things will get worse in short order, when the FDA moves to impose purity, strength, and production quality control.Report

              • Jaybird in reply to Michael Cain
                Ignored
                says:

                “Yay! Now it’s schedule III!”
                “Yes. That means that all of the dispensaries need to close.”
                “Wait. What?”
                “Yes. Schedule III substances can only be distributed by a pharmacist.”
                “AND SCHEDULE I SUBSTANCES CAN BE DISTRIBUTED BY AMATEURS?!?”
                “Always have been.”Report

              • InMD in reply to Jaybird
                Ignored
                says:

                I understand the cynicism but I think we should all learn to to take the wins as they come. The war on weed didn’t start overnight and it takes time to de-escalate. The change in the last 5 or 10 years has been quite significant, to say nothing of the difference from when I was in high school and we had regular random sweeps by police with drug dogs.Report

              • Jaybird in reply to InMD
                Ignored
                says:

                I am still in the land of “it hasn’t happened yet, maybe we shouldn’t spike the football” cynicism.

                I look forward to moving to “but we didn’t solve the worst of the old problems and now we have new ones too!” cynicism.Report

              • InMD in reply to Jaybird
                Ignored
                says:

                I hear you. Nevertheless we already live in a world where when my kids one day hear the story of a little adventure I had back when I was younger it will sound as quaint as getting caught gin in hand at a speakeasy would to us.

                ‘You mean they used to arrest people just for having the stuff they sell in that funny store with all the weird lights at the shopping center?’

                So I applaud lowering the schedule, and I’ll applaud again the day it falls off altogether.Report

              • DensityDuck in reply to Jaybird
                Ignored
                says:

                Very likely what’ll happen is we’ll see about two weeks of happy articles about how you’ll be able to buy small-batch independently-grown grass in a gas station, and then people will learn that with official approval comes official supervision and the only entity with the knowledge and experience needed to comply with FDA regulations for selling intoxicant agricultural products to the public is RJ Reynolds.Report

              • DensityDuck in reply to DensityDuck
                Ignored
                says:

                old and busted: it’s illegal to sell weed
                new hotness: it’s illegal to sell weed unless you’re Philip MorrisReport

              • Jaybird in reply to DensityDuck
                Ignored
                says:

                I will say that if it gets descheduled by November, I’ll vote Biden instead of 3rd Party.

                But if it gets descheduled and immediately gets more difficult to purchase, that will be really, really funny.Report

              • Philip H in reply to Jaybird
                Ignored
                says:

                If they do move it to the part of the schedule that hosts Tylenol and all it’s generics I think Starbuds will be fine.Report

              • Jaybird in reply to Philip H
                Ignored
                says:

                Oh, is that what Schedule III is?

                Are you thinking of Tylenol 3? Was the author of the article deliberately obfuscating by comparing to Tylenol instead of Tylenol 3?Report

              • Philip H in reply to Jaybird
                Ignored
                says:

                More likely the author was under an enormous deadline and had little time for fact checking on what is under each schedule assuming the overworked editors would do it as well.

                I still maintain the state level franchises have nothing to worry about.Report

              • Jaybird in reply to Philip H
                Ignored
                says:

                Well, for what it’s worth, it’s true that they’re moving it to the part of the schedule that hosts Tylenol.

                It’s just Tylenol 3.

                I understand that you can get it over-the-counter in Canada.Report

              • CJColucci in reply to Jaybird
                Ignored
                says:

                Even if he doesn’t do anything about Daylight Savings Time?Report

              • Jaybird in reply to CJColucci
                Ignored
                says:

                That was always a Hail Mary.

                Maybe the promise to change it will be the new perpetual “We will move the embassy to Jerusalem!”Report

              • InMD in reply to DensityDuck
                Ignored
                says:

                That would be inconsistent with what has so far been a retreat by the federal government. It’s legal on a recreational basis in half the country now, with no real federal law enforcement or administrative action to rein it in. What we have left at the national level is more like post mortem muscle reflexes.Report

              • Michael Cain in reply to DensityDuck
                Ignored
                says:

                Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Dope, and Firearms.Report

        • Jaybird in reply to Jaybird
          Ignored
          says:

          Read the story. Saw this:

          Attorney General Merrick Garland will submit the rescheduling proposal to the White House Office of Management and Budget as early as Tuesday afternoon, a source familiar with the timeline told NBC News.

          Looking forward to Tuesday afternoon!Report

  8. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    Having had the opportunity to televise the revolution, we have decided that it is in the revolution’s best interest that the revolution not be televised.

    Report

  9. LeeEsq
    Ignored
    says:

    At UCLA, Pro-Palestinian and Pro-Israel protestors have gotten into a fight.Report

  10. Philip H
    Ignored
    says:

    Proving once again that the GOP is happy to oppose restrictions only on some rights, the Texas and Kansas AGs are suing the Biden Administration for trying to close the gun show loophole:

    Paxton and Kobach want to block a new rule that will require all gun sellers to be federally licensed and conduct federal background checks on purchasers, including weapons sold at gun shows or in private transactions. The U.S. Department of Justice announced last month that this change applies to all firearm sellers — not just gun store owners.

    Mauricio Garcia, the Allen gunman, reportedly purchased most of the guns he used to kill his victims legally through private sales that didn’t require a background check. Under the new rule – which was not in force at the time he made the purchases — he would have had to have undergone a background check.

    Mind you, the GOP is quite happy to impose significant and unnecessary restrictions on voting rights and a Woman’s right to control her own body.

    https://www.keranews.org/news/2024-05-01/texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton-seeks-to-block-gun-show-loophole-closure-days-before-allen-mass-shooting-anniversaryReport

    • Pinky in reply to Philip H
      Ignored
      says:

      Yay Constitution!Report

      • Philip H in reply to Pinky
        Ignored
        says:

        AH yes – restricting sale is unconstitutional. Except of course it’s not what with all the FFL holders doing business all across the country.Report

      • InMD in reply to Pinky
        Ignored
        says:

        I dunno. I’m probably as much of a firearm enthusiast as anyone on OT and I’ve never understood the defense of the private sale thing. People with felonies or who have been institutionalized shouldn’t be able to get a gun from anyone.Report

        • Pinky in reply to InMD
          Ignored
          says:

          On paper, I’d agree, but I don’t see a way it can mean anything practical without gun registration.Report

          • InMD in reply to Pinky
            Ignored
            says:

            I don’t see why that would be the case. You’d just have to do transfers through an FFL. I’ve done many of these and there’s always a small fee but I have never felt infringed upon by some dude calling NICS and giving me a number for the state check.Report

          • Philip H in reply to Pinky
            Ignored
            says:

            Does the current FFL system require a gun registry? No? How is this any different?

            And frankly – there was a gun registry in the US early on after this was ratified. It was set up to keep tabs on the Royalists with muskets because of a belief they would rebel. It didn’t result in mass arrests or infringement of newly described rights – which makes me wonder why you think closing the gun show loophole would.Report

            • InMD in reply to Philip H
              Ignored
              says:

              I am not in favor of a registry regardless.

              However I also don’t see any legitimate reason to have exceptions on background checks. Maybe there was a time where that could be allowed in certain circumstances but not anymore.Report

  11. LeeEsq
    Ignored
    says:

    Hillel educational director and his co-chair at NE quits the school’s anti-Semitism committee because they weren’t acting in good faith. Even before the Israel-Hamas War, Jews have pointed out that the the Intersectional Left is really bad at dealing with anti-Semitism and doesn’t get it in the same way they get other hatreds. This observation has only grown more prominent after the Israel-Hamas War. An Israeli commentator, and somebody who is very critical of Israeli policy towards the Palestinians and Israeli Arabs, points out that a lot of the current rhetoric sounds like wanting to do a CTRL+Z on Israel and Jews just can’t ignore it and let it be.

    https://twitter.com/GSDeutch/status/1785773312087396831?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1785773312087396831%7Ctwgr%5Ecac696669e02248655301f0fd50c41b46cbe8c21%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fdisqus.com%2Fembed%2Fcomments%2F%3Fbase%3Ddefaultf%3Dlawyersgunsmoneyblog-comt_i%3D14123620https3A2F2Fwww.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com2F3Fp3D141236t_u%3Dhttps3A2F2Fwww.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com2F20242F052Fcontagiont_e%3DContagiont_d%3DContagion20-20Lawyers2C20Guns202620Moneyt_t%3DContagions_o%3Ddescversion%3D006bbc905574fc5153c7814eb2dc65a8Report

  12. LeeEsq
    Ignored
    says:

    YouTuber Phil Edwards had a very interesting video on what really happened when Mr. Rodgers testified at the Senate. It turns out that the “mean” Senator he confronted was really a big Liberal Democratic supporter of PBS named John Pastore who adopted the hostile stance to make Mr. Rodgers look really good. It was a dance rather than a conflict:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODlErshr_Ic&t=894sReport

  13. Damon
    Ignored
    says:

    Homicide Rap For Tesla Driver On Autopilot

    https://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/tesla-homicide-charge-729630

    About time.
    Autopilot has been clearly demonstrated as not ready for prime time. Using it and not paying attention, which pretty much removes it’s utility, is hazardous to the driver and every car/bike/person around him.Report

  14. Philip H
    Ignored
    says:

    If the IDF doesn’t know where its precision guided munitions are landing, that’s one problem. If they do – and killing children is not a problem for them, that’s another problem.

    https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/02/middleeast/israeli-precision-guided-munition-maghazi-deaths-intl/index.htmlReport

  15. Chip Daniels
    Ignored
    says:

    Republicans in Texas: “We refuse to comply with Title IX!! We defy the corrupt and unjust authority of the government!”

    Also Republicans in Texas: “How dare Austin refuse to respect mah authoriteh!”Report

  16. Damon
    Ignored
    says:

    Turkey Confirms All Trade Halt With Israel Over War in Gaza
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-05-02/turkey-halts-all-trade-with-israel-officials

    Move expands earlier restriction on exports to Israel
    Trade between the two countries was worth $6.8 billion in 2023Report

  17. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    This was a *VERY* interesting speech. Now, where I’m coming from is somewhere around “I don’t agree with the whole antizionism project (but I see where they’re coming from)”. Like, in the whole “Israel vs. Palestine” thing, I am pro-Israel but I don’t see the pro-Palestine folks (or most of them, anyway) having *WRONG* values. They’re mostly putting emphasis on different ones.

    So I watched this clip:

    And the first thing I thought of? Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals:

    That’s the way Christianity was destroyed as dogma by its own morality; that’s the way Christendom as morality must now also be destroyed. We stand on the threshold of this event. After Christian truthfulness has come to a series of conclusions, it will draw its strongest conclusion, its conclusion against itself.

    But the guy couldn’t see where others were coming from.

    “We instilled so much morality in these children! Why are they turning against us?”

    The fact that it seems it never even occurred to him to ask “maybe we’re the problem?” is weird. Like, I’m not saying that he should have agreed with them!

    But he hasn’t even wrestled with the question.

    And that’s going to destroy his corner of what he loves so much. It’s going to cause it to crumble to the ground.Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *