SCOTUS Lifts Eviction Moratorium, Again: Read It For Yourself

Andrew Donaldson

Born and raised in West Virginia, Andrew has been the Managing Editor of Ordinary Times since 2018, is a widely published opinion writer, and appears in media, radio, and occasionally as a talking head on TV. He can usually be found misspelling/misusing words on Twitter@four4thefire. Andrew is the host of Heard Tell podcast. Subscribe to Andrew'sHeard Tell Substack for free here:

Related Post Roulette

18 Responses

  1. Jaybird says:

    The two takes of this that I have seen:

    1. The CDC had already been established as not (yet) having the authority to make this call once or twice before. The only people who can give the CDC this authority is the legislative branch, the executive branch does not have it (yet). If you want the CDC to have the authority to do this, it needs to be granted this power by the legislative branch.

    2. But it’d help people out in the short term! Therefore the CDC has this authority *NOW*.Report

    • Marchmaine in reply to Jaybird says:

      3. It would be dumb to give this authority to the CDC, ever. Ever, ever.

      4. SCOTUS would/should strike down the delegation should it even happen.

      5. If congress sees this as an important matter, they can legislate a relief act.

      I’m not sure Congress could simply forbid evictions (that would indeed be an indirect form of taking) but they could (and did) craft legislation to aid people in paying these bills… it could go to renters by need, it could go to landlords by proof of deficit, it could go to citizens as stimulus… the remedy to the problem is so open to solutions that the only way we *shouldn’t* do it, is by some sort of departmental fiat. Ever.

      The fact that the relief acts they have done are pretty bad is a lesson in crafting good relief acts, not a reason for the Executive/CDC to usurp powers it can’t possibly have.Report

      • Jaybird in reply to Marchmaine says:

        But it’d help people out in the short term!Report

        • Marchmaine in reply to Jaybird says:

          Heh… like this is April 2020. Congress has the power to address the shitty aid-plan they passed… and if they need more time, they can extend a moratorium while they price that in to a hopefully less shitty aid plan.Report

          • I am tired and grumpy this morning, so leaning towards the position that the SCOTUS has decided the Constitution is indeed a suicide pact if Congress decides (by action, or inaction) that it is.

            I blame the tired and grumpy on donating blood (we are in an apparently open-ended shortage situation). A combination of giving them 10% of my oxygen transport capacity and dealing with the perky young woman: “Hi! I’m Yoshi, and I’ll be stabbing you this morning!”Report

            • Marchmaine in reply to Michael Cain says:

              Polity is a suicide pact; a constitution is the thing that prevents the suicide from happening.Report

            • Oscar Gordon in reply to Michael Cain says:

              Letting the moratorium persist without a clear exit plan is also a suicide pact.

              It would be better if the states hadn’t been dragging their heels so badly on getting the rental assistance to anyone, but they haven’t, and the clock is running out.Report

            • PD Shaw in reply to Michael Cain says:

              The Constitution is not a suicide pact is usually attributed to Lincoln and his address to Congress in reference to Taney’s decision in Ex Parte Merryman. Burt Likko has said it was Taney’s finest hour.

              I think there is a significant qualitative difference in that Baltimore officials had burned bridges and denied passage to federal troops through Maryland. The legislators could not return to Washington to vote on suspension of the writ without using the military to secure a route through Maryland. There is nothing preventing Congress from passing laws here.Report

  2. Oscar Gordon says:

    I’m more intrigued at the logical contortions the dissenters have to undertake to justify the CDC actions.Report

  3. InMD says:

    I don’t get how there’s a split on this. It isn’t even clear that Congress has the power to suspend state and local action of this nature. Even then, by the dissenters’ logic what couldn’t the CDC do? And by extension what couldn’t any admin agency do?Report

    • Oscar Gordon in reply to InMD says:

      This. A given state or county may be able to suspend evictions (since local LE enforces them), but the feds don’t have that kind of power, never have (TTBOMK), and certainly not an entity like the CDC. At best, they should have been able to strongly recommend a moratorium.Report

      • North in reply to Oscar Gordon says:

        Yeah the evictions suck but I also don’t see how anyone honestly thought this’d hold up in court. Frankly, to be blunt, I think the Admin didn’t think it’d hold up either and just did it to give the states a few extra weeks to try and sort out their rental assistance crap show.Report

  4. Jaybird says:

    Good news! The CDC is now talking about gun violence.

    Critics are pouncing on this, calling it a transparent ploy to distract from recent debacles.

    This demonstrates their lack of good faith.Report

  5. Rufus F. says:

    Sigh. I agree the CDC didn’t have the authority, so I’m not surprised.

    I do think if and when a few million more people get evicted from their housing, it will be a bad thing. But, like the botched exit strategy in Afghanistan, it’s one of those bad things that will be treated as yesterday’s news today.Report

  6. Jaybird says:

    Related:

    Report

    • Oscar Gordon in reply to Jaybird says:

      Makes sense. If you have a number of units and you can’t evict people and you aren’t getting income from the units, then you need to get the income from somewhere. So new tenants are the potential source.

      Taxes and mortgages and upkeep still has to be paid for.

      What the CDC should have done is put a halt on foreclosures of residential property, and accrual of interest and collection of property taxes.Report