Boomers by Proxy
Andrew wrote an excellent piece delineating the problems with the Republican Party as it comes to the youth. I had some thoughts of my own, so off we go to the races!
The biggest unaddressed problem in his article is what needs to be laid at the feet of the Boomer generation. The Boomers have all the wealth, while the Millennials they decry constantly have almost nothing. My generation is putting off home ownership, marriage, and kids because we got absolutely demolished by the 2008 financial crisis. We can’t build savings, let alone pay off our debt if we are unlucky enough to have that. The job market still really hasn’t recovered to where it needs to be. And the pandemic sure didn’t help. But but but! “The stock market is going gangbusters!” Which doesn’t really help someone just starting out who is not just lucky enough to have a decent job that keeps them out of debt, but Hell if that same person has a job with retirement benefits. It definitely helps those who’ve been paying into that system for decades. Enjoy your comfortable retirement!
It should be noted I do not see the government as the solution to the problems of my generation. Screw that. With malice. The main problem is the federal government (and, to a lesser extent, the state and local governments) are stealing from Peter to pay Paul. Peter being my generation and future generations, and Paul being the Boomers. But that is a whole other problem for another day.
Where does the title come into it? Boomers by Proxy are those conservative grifters who make all their money marketing themselves to conservative Boomers while being Millennials. Not all of these people are terrible. The gold standard for this genre is Ben Shapiro. See, he actually seems to have principles. He quit Breitbart after Bannon backed the Trump campaign over his own reporter when Corey Lewandowski manhandled Michelle Fields. Going his own way has been very profitable for him, having at any time two to seven of the top ten news stories on Facebook, a social network now dominated by parents and grandparents, as I alluded to previously. Bannon has been making Andrew Breitbart spin in his grave so viciously, the energy produced could power Las Vegas for years. Ben still mostly trolls liberals, which is a profitable land to sow, but he’s not some great intellectual doing the hard work of convincing those who disagree with him. He is preaching to the choir in a land where the liberals rarely trod. William F. Buckley, Jr. he is not. The dude had a show on PBS for decades that did the hard work of taking liberal sacred cows and goring them viciously to riotous praise across the ideological spectrum.
One ridiculous subset that isn’t explicitly a Millennial is what I call “false machismo PAB.” These are men who pretend to be super macho when they’re as weak as they come. Casual misogyny as a joke, tired humor that was old in the early 1980s, and life advice that only works if you have a lot of money already. Jesse Kelly, Mike Cernovich, Steven Crowder, etc. Milo Yiannopoulos would even fit this subset. These people are tiresome. Painfully unfunny trolls who think they’re deep, rehashing tired tropes of manhood. I fell for their charms way back when, except for Cernovich, that dude is king of the PABs. Their content is deep if you’re a naïve college student. That’s about it. If you think they’re actually deep or thoughtful, you’re being played. Jordan Peterson they are not. As much as I may disagree with the genteel Canadian, Peterson has done some real good for unmoored young men. That is to be celebrated.
No, the people I am specifically talking about are the Turning Point USA people. Which, Ben Shapiro does himself no favors by scalping those people for his media venture. Candace Owens is one of the worst, and she now works for Ben. Take any conservative who isn’t a white male and see how they act towards their own race and/or gender. If they spend all their time crapping on their race and/or gender, they’re a grifter. (The white liberals who spend all their time flagellating themselves for being born white are the reverse side of the same coin.) That’s what Candace Owens does. Yes, she is occasionally speaking hard truths, but hard truths without solutions are useless. Thomas Sowell she is not. The last great living economist actually comes up with solutions to the hard problems facing blacks in America. She just earns plaudits from white conservative Boomers by saying things that would be blatantly racist coming out of a white person’s mouth. She is comforting, like a sweet that eats away at your enamel.
The worst, as if made in a lab to appeal to conservative Boomers, is the head of the snake: Charlie Kirk. He is basically a cheap clone of Ben Shapiro, who I don’t hate (but don’t particularly love.) He just says all the things conservative Boomers who hate Millennials want to hear. I’m sure every Millennial reading this knows the tropes. “Millennials know nothing of history!” “They have no respect for their elders!” “They are lazy morons!” Heard it all before. Charlie Kirk is playing you, Boomers. He knows exactly what you easy marks like to hear coming from someone of his age demographic. He craps on his own generation. Do Millennials have issues? Yes. Way too many of us are comfortable with collectivism. That’s real bad. But we have unique problems the GOP couldn’t care less about solving. The Democrats at least pretend to care as they continue to throw taxpayer money at problems that won’t be solved with endless dependency on taxpayer cash.
In order to do better with my age demographic, GOP geniuses, try to ask us what our actual issues are where we actually live. Jimmy No Shoes down the street doesn’t count. Go to NYC, Austin, San Fran, and L.A. and ask what super liberal Millennials with really high-paying jobs, smart and hard-working professionals, see as the problems facing the world. Not the giant global problems, but the local ones. Global problems will always be the bread and butter of collectivists. Local problems are easier to solve, but harder to enact solutions to. Local elections are where the GOP can start to build an intergenerational and lasting coalition. But the GOP would actually have to show up to do that. Which they haven’t in the major metropolitan areas for some fifty odd years. You can’t win if you don’t even try. Try, for God’s sakes.
If one of the many fanboys of the above jerks got this far, thank you for the rage clicks.
Yeah it’s a fairly predictable pattern. Old conservatives are aware, uncomfortably, that the later generations don’t buy into their schticks… like at all… and these bright young “conservative” people make them feel better about the future. They’re political narcotics. They are, though, making bank.
It’ll be interesting to see, in 20-30 years or so when the Boomers shuffle off this mortal coil, what this group of people do? They’ll presumably be very wealthy by that point. I wonder if they actually have any political principles they genuinely believe in that they’ll try to advance or will they just drain every last drop of blood from that generation they can out of sheer muscle memory?
And good catch on the white CRT peddlers. Robin Diangelo does seem like a somewhat parallel left wing version- albeit she’s not catering to old people- she’s catering somewhat to the social justice crowd and majorly to the corporate set who need smokescreens and camouflage to get along in the current social justice paradigm.Report
“old conservatives are aware, uncomfortably, that the later generations don’t buy into their schticks… like at all… and these bright young “conservative” people make them feel better about the future.”
Diamond and Silk is what you get when no matter how obvious the pander is, your audience will never notice — or feel insulted.
Everything about Diamond and Silk was custom-tailored to appeal to white conservative boomers. Absolutely designed to reinforce their priors, while also allowing them to feel gloriously non-racist (after all, if you agree with Diamond and Silk and they’re black, how can you possibly be any sort of racist? They’re right there on TV, saying all the things I say!).
Even the names were a marketing stroke of genius.
“let’s put two black women on Fox to tell old white conservatives that they’re correct and it really is all the kids and minorities and hippies at fault. But let’s make sure we name them after cheap appeals to wealth, because we know how them black people are? Living off my taxes, and selling dope for expensive shoes and gauche displays of wealth, amiright?”
I don’t know what brilliant sociopath flack managed that, but it’s quite a trick to convince people they’re totally post-racial while simultaneously reaffirming some of their worse racist beliefs.Report
I have never had the “pleasure” of seeing them on Fox. I watch little TV and no Fox at all.Report
A little late, but….
Imagine you’re a 60 year old white Fox Executive, you feel your audience is 60+ white rural and suburban dwellers who are, at the very least, products of their time when it comes to race relations. They’ve had 40 years of “welfare queens” and “inner city thugs” to internalize.
So you take two young black women and you want them to sell conservative talking points WHILE simultaneously reassuring said viewers that they are not racist, and in fact all the things they’ve been told about black people that form a single, subconscious image, are in fact correct. And you are very, very good at your job.
Enter Diamond and Silk. Down to their very names, they reinforce the stereotype of blacks being obsessed with shallow displays of wealth despite being poor — welfare queens with Cadillacs, single mom’s eating lobster, right. And the whole time, while reaffirming that stereotype, they speak right wing talking points.
So said viewer gets to have their racist priors affirmed while simultaneously feeling protected against claims or racism and bias — after all, don’t Diamond and Silk believe the same things he does?
A master’s class in tokenism and stage management. My only real question is whether D&S are a Fox News creation (in which case someone needs a raise for sheer skill), or grifters in their own right — in which case, kudos for skill again. I suspect the latter.Report
You say: “Go to NYC, Austin, San Fran, and L.A. and ask what super liberal Millennials with really high-paying jobs, smart and hard-working professionals, see as the problems facing the world.”
Because these people have problems like the vast majority of hard working Americans of their generation??? Are their opinions somehow more valuable? No and no. You are such a whiner. Stop complaining about how hard you have it. Nobody handed me anything. I worked and saved. Most savvy people of any age know that works for the vast majority. Show them that Republicans have policies to support this rather than get in their way and they’ll follow with their votes.Report
Okay boomer.Report
Though seriously, I would probably pick Houston, Atlanta, Denver, Phoenix as the cities to visit in the liberal safari tour for millennials.Report
Houston’s not all that different from Austin these days.
It wasn’t Austin’s new voting measures and turnout that’s driving the GOP-controlled State Leg to crack down on voting. They wrote off Austin long ago.
They’re terrified of the numbers coming out of the much, much bigger Houston — and the trendlines in the suburbs.Report
Having lived in Houston and traveled a fair bit to Austin, I’d say the biggest difference is that Austin is still in that sorta ‘we’re trying to be like the cool places like Williamsburg’ phase and attracts a lot of highly educated white liberals.
Houston’s growing liberalism is just a reflection of suburbanites plus the increasing weight of average millennials moving or remaining left.Report
Well, and it’s a port town with a LOT of varied ethnic groups.
“A taco truck on every corner” does not, in fact, upset Houstonians. That sounds delicious.
I mean just offhand and fairly close by, there’s a handful of Ramen places, at least two authentic German places (one with live music, or at least pre-COVID it was), several Vietnamese places including one rather fantastic fusion place with a ridiculously long craft beer menu (and that has lines out the door on Saturdays for their pho) — that’s in addition to the usual Italian, French places, Mexican, and Tex-Mex places.
Now if I could get a Dim Sum place that wasn’t quite so far (there’s a number of great ones in Houston, but they’re all a hefty drive from my side of town)….
In short, Houston is incredibly multi-cultural for the reasons most port cities end up that way.
Which is why our Congressional districts have started getting weird, even by gerrymandered standards.Report
After one of the Obama administration mid-terms where the Republican one big, I think it might have been in 2014, I had to go to Houston, Texas for work. The hotel where I was staying was predictably playing Fox. What I noticed is that they had a show where young millennials were giving Republican talking points including a young African-American man. There was an element of trying to get boomers calm.Report
The Boomers have all the wealth, while the Millennials they decry constantly have almost nothing.
Report
It occurs to me that I’m now a member of two groups that have all the money, but Boomers don’t also have space lasers.Report
I see a kinda obvious flaw there: In places the GOP _does_ win local elections, they don’t solve problems either!
It seems extremely unlikely they’d come up with any solutions in larger cities.
This is on top of the fact that denser places need to operate in a more ‘collectivist’ manner anyway. It’s not some random chance that people in cities want more government…people in cities need more government than people in rural areas.
And the GOP is nowhere near enough flexible to operate in a universe like that, where they might required to decide ‘Actually, we _do_ need to deal with a specific problem here in a city, despite the fact in rural areas it’s fine to leave it alone.’Report
I wonder, what kinds of easy-to-solve local problems for GOP politicians to tackle are we talking about here? Let’s run through some typical problems facing a large number of urban areas and imagine what, if any, GOP-friendly solution might be offered to these sorts of problems:
• Crime.
• Inadequate public transit. Related: traffic.
• The rent’s too damn high. Related: homelessness. Also related: too expensive for most first-time buyers to enter the housing market.
• Damn near no one can afford health insurance.
• Businesses are leaving downtown.
• Food deserts / not enough markets for people to easily purchase necessities.
• Not enough people are wearing masks and COVID is running rampant.
• Poor race relations, particularly between African-Americans and the police.
• How can we get more people to register to vote, and then actually vote?
• Underfunded schools, parks, and libraries. Related: inadequately educated workforce.
• Not enough snowplows and pothole repair crews.
• Public utilities like electricity, water, and sewer have fewer resources to distribute, which are significantly more expensive to obtain or generate than they were in the past, and only a crumbling infrastructure suffering from decades of deferred maintenance to do it with.
• Public employees are demanding pay raises. Related: unfunded mandates for public employee pensions.
About the only sort of answers I hear from Republicans to these kinds of issues are a) “privatize it!,” b) “lower your expectation of what the government’s going to do, because we’re cutting taxes rather than solve this problem,” or c) “do nothing at all and hope the problem goes away, if it’s even a problem at all which we’re not sure that it is.”
Granted, my list above is based on the sorts of things that I perceive as problems a local government is likely to address. When I last lived in a Republican-run city, the local city council identified and tackled problems like:
• Insufficient respect being paid by attendees of City Council meetings to the U.S. Flag and to God.
• Insufficient respect being paid by municipal residents to veterans, and also the U.S. Flag.
• Insufficient public contracts and land development permits to be given to friends and campaign donors of the mayor. (YMMV re: local corruption, graft, fraud, and patronage; this is not a one-party problem.)
• Homelessness, but only in the downtown commercial district, purportedly caused by the administration of a larger nearby city giving one-way regional transit tickets to homeless people. (The proposed solution, by the way, was to shut down the regional transit service to this city completely.)
• Sale and consumption of drugs.
• Avoidance of expense of compliance with state-mandated environmental protection measures.
• Overabundance of “Maoism” manifesting in the form of “political correctness” in various local school districts.
So maybe I’m not really seeing the kinds of problems Republican rising stars will. I guess that’s why there are two parties in this great nation of ours!Report
Here in Texas, after a freeze that killed people and saw large swathes of the state without power — a situation that came within mere moments of lasting MONTHS not days….
The Republican controlled Texas State Leg has decided to tackle the following problems:
1. It’s too easy to vote in Houston, let’s outlaw a lot of stuff they started doing.
2. Asking people to get a permit to carry a gun is too onerous.
That is it. The sum total of their focus.Report
TestReport