A reversal of policy like this has to have come from either Holder or Obama. And it hasto be motivated by the fact that November 6, 2012, is less than 400 days away. It’s bad policy (leaning on the landlords is particularly not endearing to me) and a waste of resources (aren’t there any terrorists to detect?), but I can only presume it’s good politics in the places the President wants to keep in his column next year.
Burt Likko
Pseudonymous Portlander. Pursuer of happiness. Bon vivant. Homebrewer. Atheist. Recovering Republican. Recovering Catholic. Recovering divorcé. Editor-in-Chief Emeritus of Ordinary Times. Relapsed Lawyer, admitted to practice law (under his real name) in California and Oregon. There's a Twitter account at @burtlikko, but not used for posting on the general feed anymore. House Likko's Words: Scite Verum. Colite Iusticia. Vivere Con Gaudium.
Devcat is watching over, but if you notice any problems contact the editors and Devcat will be notified and deployed immediately.
on The Shepherds have a Credibility ProblemYou are perfectly free to start a newspaper and run it on those principles. But your principles are…
on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What?That's in conflict with what the polls show. Now it's still early and it's possible in a few weeks t… on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What?Just because you voted for a person or a party doesn't mean you can't see their flaws, or that you c…
on The Shepherds have a Credibility ProblemHere is John Kelly, swearing _under oath_, that Trump discussed having the IRS go after John F. Kell… on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What?You would be. Hey, question: Did you vote for Harris? If so, why do you think you are the person the… on The Shepherds have a Credibility ProblemIt is evidently the case that lying about trump being a Hitleresque mass murderer got donations and… on The Shepherds have a Credibility Problem“If half the country has decided that Trump is qualified to be president, that means they’re not rea…
on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What?Why would they have to ask the government?
on TrumpedIf only Jeff Bezos had allowed the Washington Post's editorial board to run that endorsement. on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What?You’re sitting here claiming it’s impossible to pick off voters when Trump/the GOP just picked off a…
November 7, 2024
The End of the Political Parade
November 6, 2024
No Matter which Candidates You Bet on, You’ll Get a Shock or Two
November 5, 2024
November 4, 2024
on Trumped
on Puppy Love in the IG Era: Ten Favorite Dog Breeds on The *OTHER* stuff on the ballot on Weekend Plans Post: Batchin’ It (Again) and It’s Snowing
on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What? on Trumped on Trumped on Trumped on Trumped on Open Mic for the week of 11/4/2024 on Trumped on Trumped on Trumped
on Trumped on Trumped
Is it really good politics? That’s almost as distressing as this action is.Report
It is. And it is.Report
I don’t know that he’s buying votes with this. I mean, I don’t see anyone switching on account of this action.
I *DO*, however, think he’s increasing donations from a handful of folks.
Otherwise it makes no sense on pretty much any level.Report
Pharmaceutical companies? “Private” prison corporations? Cartel bosses (wink)?Report
I was sort of leaning in this direction, but the more I think about it, the more I see political value in it. Not that everybody is excited about it, but that it removes an issue (“crime”) where his party is sometimes vulnerable. It gives him something easy to point to if he’s accused of being weak on drugs. With comparatively little political downside.Report
I don’t buy it.
The evidence that I would need is for someone to show me where Obama has been attacked by anybody for being weak on Medicinal Marijuana.
I makes a lot more sense that he’s being paid by the prison guard unions… and I think it’d be easier to find evidence of that.Report
This issue goes way deeper than prison unions. Think private prison complex/state-corporate nexus/soft on crime politics/inner city social control/extensions of federal power/support for local executive power/and finally, maybe Obama hates freedom.
Take your pick.Report
The whole “Obama is playing 11-dimensional chess” thing seems less and less likely with every passing day.
What’s the simplest explanation?
Is it money?Report
You misunderstand me. I’m with you on the eleven dimensional chess thing. i just think that the answer is overdetermined. It could be any one of a wide range of potential choices that make him act this way, *none* of which are liberal or democratic.Report
… do you honestly think that none of those Wall Street firms blackmailed Obama with death threats against his kids?Report
This is disgusting. Yet I’ll vote for Obama again since the next choice seems like the wrong direction for the country.
It doesn’t seem enough to shrug your shoulders and say that democracy is the least worst form of government. This policy amounts to simply picking on the weak to placate the biggest, loudest, dumbest voters — who will vote for the other guy anyways.
Brilliant.
DUReport
Complaining about people who will vote for the other guy anyway after opening with how you’re going to vote for Obama anyway is a brilliant metacommentary on shrugging.Report
This is the essential trouble with democracy. You get a narrow range of options and each of them has been carefully crafted to appeal to the median voter, or close to it.
If you don’t like the options you are presented with then your vote really isn’t good for much.Report
“This policy amounts to simply picking on the weak to placate the biggest, loudest, dumbest voters — who will vote for the other guy anyways.”
The idea that the voters are dumb is the refuge of electoral loser. It’s also not true most of the time. The problem with American policy isn’t that the voters are dumb, it’s that the libs are bad.
For example, think about monetary policy. According to one train of thought we’re supposed to have a loose policy now in order to generate growth and (beneficial) inflation. There’s something to be said for that, but the reason why it’s not happening is because the citizens don’t trust the policymakers to devalue the dollar into oblivion a la Weimar or Zimbabwe. And if we continue the fiscal path that we’re on, that’s exactly what’s going to happen. Therefore we need to cut spending for the sake of the medium and long-term viability of the economy. But what’s preventing that? Libs, of course.
Therefore, the problem isn’t the voters. It’s the libs.Report
No, for a given value of “dumb”, voters are indeed pretty dumb.Report
Bloke on the internet, meet nobel prizewinner.
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/project_syndicate/2011/10/how_to_end_the_global_recession_more_public_spending_and_financi.htmlReport
Just a distraction from “Fast and Furious”. Nothing to see here folks, move along, move along.Report
I agree but is not only that but also a distraction from Solyndra which looks more crooked every day. What did folks expect from a Chicago politician, hope and change?Report
I’m beginning to think that if Barry had been loved as a child none of this would be happening now.Report
excuse me. you ain’t been near enough to Chicago’s politics to smell Mr. Speakers’ ass.
Talk again when you can tell me who I’m talking about, and why it matters.Report
Remember when, how for years and years after Wag The Dog came out, that every military skirmish everywhere was declared WTD? Yeah, I don’t miss that.Report
The other option is that it’s *not* Holder or Obama deciding this, and they’ve lost control of their bureaucracy, (modulo don’t care enough to rein them in)
When you read some accounts* of the Afghan war decisions, this scenario doesn’t seem all that far fetched to me.
*accounts to be sure, told by people with an axe to grind.Report
How could he lose control of the bureaucracy? This isn’t like Yes Minister where Hacker couldn’t fire Sir Humphrey, no matter how annoying he was, Obama appoints the agency heads. In nay event if he’s lost control of the bureaucracy then he’s failed as President.Report
A big deal was made in the last administration on politicizing the Justice Department; the pendulum could have very well swung the other way. But like I said, apathy may be as big, if not bigger of a part. And FWIW, the current head of the DEA is a holdover from the previous administration. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michele_LeonhartReport
Obama appoints the agency heads. That doesn’t mean he actually has the power to tell them what to do and make it stick.
The head of the CPSC, for example, has specifically stated that it doesn’t matter what Obama says about anything at all, she’s going to do what she thinks is right, even if that means obliterating the domestic small-business manufacturing industry through overregulation.Report
Oh, No! It’s Kennedy all over again…
*eyeroll*Report