From The Wall Street Journal: How the White House Functioned With a Diminished Biden in Charge
From The Wall Street Journal:
To adapt the White House around the needs of a diminished leader, they told visitors to keep meetings focused. Interactions with senior Democratic lawmakers and some cabinet members—including powerful secretaries such as Defense’s Lloyd Austin and Treasury’s Janet Yellen—were infrequent or grew less frequent. Some legislative leaders had a hard time getting the president’s ear at key moments, including ahead of the U.S.’s disastrous pullout from Afghanistan.
Senior advisers were often put into roles that some administration officials and lawmakers thought Biden should occupy, with people such as National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, senior counselor Steve Ricchetti and National Economic Council head Lael Brainard and her predecessor frequently in the position of being go-betweens for the president.
Press aides who compiled packages of news clips for Biden were told by senior staff to exclude negative stories about the president. The president wasn’t talking to his own pollsters as surveys showed him trailing in the 2024 race.
How long ago was the information in this story a conspiracy theory?Report
2015-16Report
What a cluster.Report
Yup. Worst part is it looks like the various architects of this scheme are so old they’re all retiring from service anyhow.Report
If this is all true, it sounds like he never should have run in 2020, because he was likely already in pretty serious decline.Report
The good news: The people who defended him were right.
Afghanistan withdrawal debacle? That wasn’t Biden’s fault!
Gas prices? That’s not Biden’s fault!
Inflation? That’s not Biden’s fault!
Losing the election? That wasn’t Biden’s fault either.Report
It’s amazing that we live in a country with two shite parties, one reduced to a proto-fascist cult of personality that’s currently being led from behind the scenes by the son of a South African emerald dealer, and the other a gerontocracy clinging to power so tightly, and at the expense of any other aim, that they ran a septuagenarian in serious cognitive decline for president, twice.Report
To be perfectly honest, I kinda see Trump as a peasants’ revolt against what you’re describing.
(As for “behind the scenes”, he seems to be doing it very publicly on Twitter.)Report
I find it hard to see a guy whose entire brand is Ultrarich leads a peasant revolt, but meh.Report
Not in a conspiratorial way, but in the back of my mind I always kinda wondered if Obama knew Joe was past peak as VP and why he would never get behind him before he was president.Report
I mean, he had to, right? They seemed pretty tight, so Obama would definitely have noticed the difference.Report