4 thoughts on “Attack of the UFOs

  1. Have strange things been spotted in the skies before and been shot down without it becoming public knowledge, mainly because they were no big deal? I wouldn’t be much bothered if this were so, but it would probably be a good idea to make things presumptively public from now on — especially if it’s fairly common and usually no big deal — just so people don’t lose their s**t when it happens again.Report

    1. Aren’t there are actually rather a lot of UAPs (or UFOs if you prefer) and only a very small number of them behave in ways that cannot ultimately be explained prosaically? N.b., as I use the term here, “Chinese spy balloon” is a “prosaic” explanation for the aerial phenomenon; it does not involve non-human agent nor a human misidentification of a natural phenomenon.

      The phenomenon that lacks explanation, IMHO, is the White House communications people failing to provide a coherent explanation for what may very well be a justifiable decision to start shooting things out of the sky (or in the alternative, to explain why they decided to start telling us about doing it if this sort of thing has been going on a long time).Report

  2. There were always Weird Flying Things. The reason we didn’t “see them” before is exactly as described — the radars were tuned to not detect them, because otherwise there would be hundreds or thousands of these things reported, and the job of the people operating these radars is complicated enough as it is without adding hundreds of weather balloons into the situation.

    I mean, the thing in “99 Luftballoons” isn’t actually made up!Report

Comments are closed.