Sunday Morning! “Severance”
While reminiscing about some of the older regulars at the dive bar I used to frequent (and about myself, to be fair), an image went through my head: a lab rat in a cage pushing pedals for food and drinks. It occurred to me that the rat isn’t in the cage because it drinks more water or eats too many food pellets. On the other hand, though, it’s not getting out of the cage if it practices self-discipline. For the most part, its behavior doesn’t matter.
I realize that’s a pretty trite image (we’re all rats in cages, maaaaan!) yet it comes to my mind when thinking of self-destructive behaviors and individual choices, probably because of the famous “rat park” experiment that seemed to show lab rats would keep pushing the button for heroin as long as they were kept bored and unfulfilled. We simply don’t understand the capacities of most animals, nor of our fellow human beings, and the implications of gaining that understanding might be too troubling to consider. Often times, who you are is simply a matter of where you are.
A friend once told me, in regards to why he drank so much every night after work: “The truth is I’m really bored.”
This week, I watched the streaming series “Severance,” a surreal depiction of four very likeable human rats in a very unstimulating corporate cage pushing buttons; whatever it is they’re doing is unclear and absurdly abstract. What the company, dubbed Lumon Industries, does is a guarded secret. In fact, due to a sci-fi brain implant, the four have no memories of life outside of work. Their work persona is a totally separate existence that gets paused each day when they leave the office. Ostensibly, this is because they work with top secret information. But nothing they’re doing seems to have any more meaning than pushing pedals for food pellets, so it’s unclear what exactly they might reveal to others. Their life outside of the office has its problems and affinities. However, their corporate overlords seem to be manipulating that realm as well.
In other hands, this might be a bleak scenario — and it is that as well- but the show’s creators (Dan Erickson, and directors Ben Stiller and Aoife McArdle) seem to be inspired by a sort of Charlie Kaufman sensibility, in which things are a bit skewed and absurdity often bubbles up to the drab surface. Zach Cherry plays the overachiever Dylan, whose high level of productivity has won him uninspiring incentives such as sets of Chinese finger traps and “waffle parties.” John Turturro’s Irving seems the most stuck on rules, until he becomes enamored with the artist Burt (played by the always singular Christopher Walken) who creates company propaganda. The newest worker, Helly (Britt Lower), is the most clearly clued in on how terrifying all of this is, while the focus of the series is on the newest manager, Mark (Adam Scott), who is trying to keep order in his department, while his outside self is harboring a former co-worker who seems to have escaped the implanted programming and gone rogue.
In keeping with the Kaufman sensibility, the offices of Lumon are more than a bit anachronistic. The set design and computers seem to be frozen in the 70s, while the corporate ethos recalls Henry Ford or Dr. John Harvey Kellogg. The fictional company was founded, presumably in the early 20th century, by a family called the Eagans, and we seem to have reached the point in which the original figures of a cult have been followed by the founders of a religion: less in the sense of going from Christ to Paul than Hubbard to Miscavige. What Lumon Industries actually produces is totally unclear, but by the end we’re pretty sure the workers themselves are the main product.
So, why in the world would anybody agree to work in such a place? In the case of Mark, the answer is grief: his wife was killed in a car accident and burying himself in this kind of work is a sort of sanctuary from his pain. He can’t deal with the reality of his life without her and, well, some guys would rather get “severed” than go to therapy. I have mixed feelings on how these streaming series tend to rely on grief as a trope that imbues characters with instant “depth”; life isn’t confusing and painful enough without someone dying? And I’m not sure a sensible person still wouldn’t run screaming from an alternate existence in which they can’t ever leave the office, no matter how much pain they’re in.
And, maybe, I should digress for a minute to talk about my real problem with these streaming series, which seem to have become the central storytelling form of this era. Whenever I watch a series like “Severance,” I can’t help but ask: Why couldn’t this be a movie? Aside from economic reasons, of course, why is this an 8-hour series, instead of telling its story in 1-2 hours? Most movies hew to a three-act structure, and these series quite often take that structure and simply extend the second act to excruciating lengths. The first episode or two dumps information on us, and the last episode is action-packed; but everything else is a slog. In the case of “Severance,” it sort of works because these are people whose lives are a slog of endless repetition. But I found some of the middle episodes as hard to get through as, well, a working day. It could have been a movie and still convey that corporate work sucks.
Nevertheless, I will say the final episode really messed me up- I spent the next day in bed, in fact. You see, the Mark character was once an academic teaching history, until he lost his wife and buried himself in stultifying work to flee the pain. Which, on one hand, is a little ridiculous. On the other hand… a decade ago, I was an academic teaching history, until I lost my marriage, and I buried myself in stultifying work to escape the pain. People will say “Work won’t love you back,” but sometimes you don’t want it to; sometimes, you want it to make you hurt in a different way than you’re already hurting. So, maybe, it’s not that absurd.
But if these series are going to over-rely on the grief trope, maybe they could finally bury the idiotic cliché where every middle-aged person who is no longer married lost their spouse in a tragic accident, since it’s more “sympathetic” than divorce? Sometimes, they’re still alive and just cease to love you, and it feels like they died. Or, like some part of you died.
And, sometimes, pushing buttons gives you a reassuringly false feeling of control while you’re coming up with a Plan B. Who the hell are we to judge lab rats anyway?
And so, what are YOU watching, reading, playing, pondering, or working for this weekend?
I recently finished the Japanese novel Lady Joker, Volume 1 (Volume 2 comes out in October) by Kaoru Takamura. It is one of those novels that straddle the line between literary and genre fiction. It is ostensibly about the kidnapping of the CEO of Japanese beer corporation by five men but each five men represent people on the margins of Japanese society in one way or another. You have the maternal grandfather of a promising young man who killed himself because he was denied a job because of burakumin on his father’s side, a Zainichi Korean, a truck driver with a disabled daughter, etc. The novel is also written in a very panoramic style, reviews explicitly say it reads like a 19th century realist novel, where Ms. Takamura describes the relevant scenes like corporate meetings in vivid detail. It is pretty great.Report
I should really make a master list of all the cool-sounding books people have mentioned here, so I stop forgetting to look them up. I think the only thing I’ve remembered long enough to check it out was the film Monsieur Klein, which Saul recommended and was excellent.Report
I will borrow this.Report
One thing that I haven’t read but noticed as a small but definite genre of fiction are a bunch of novels dealing with young women in Ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities who seek to gain liberation into the wider secular world rather than the narrow and I guess patriarchal world of Ultra-Orthodox Judaism. This genre is interesting to me as a Jew because it seems to conflict with the sort of Hijab fetishism that exists among the Intersectional set of liberals. On the Alameda County Building in Oakland they have photos of the different communities to celebrate the diversity of Alameda County. One of the photos are two Muslim woman in burkas and hijabs with a young boy.
That traditionalist Muslim communities are celebrated as part of diversity while traditionalist Jewish communities are seen as regressive things to be destroyed is rather disturbing to me even though I’m far from the most observant Jew. My only guess as to why hijab fetishism is a thing but the Halachic modesty codes are derided is that Jews read as white and many Non-Jewish women see Jewish women in Ultra-Orthodox communities as more oppressed than women in traditional Muslim communities because of this. A novel about a young woman in a traditional and strict Muslim community seeking liberation, especially if written by a non-Muslim, would be targeted as Islamophobic.
You can’t have it both ways. If the Jewish modesty laws are bad than so are the Muslims modesty laws because they have the same reasons behind them. If traditional Muslim communities are to be celebrated as part of diversity than so should Ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities.Report
Well, my girlfriend’s Jewish, but I’m more Jewesque, being often taken for Jewish. So, I’ve no particular opinions on this. At least, no informed opinions.
I will say the “hijab fetishism” might have been a response to the weird stridently-anti-Muslim-but-nominally-“secularist”-vibe that went around some corners of the left for about a decade or so. We used to get people here, oh, about ten years ago, who’d rant and rave about how we weren’t sufficiently critical of the “so-called ‘religion of peace’!” They all seem to have moved on to other concerns or otherwise evaporated, however. I sort of wondered if the horrific attack on Salman Rushdie would provoke a revival, but that doesn’t seem to have happened, even on Twitter. So, people might have been celebrating the hijab to wind those people up, in the same way it’s tempting to list your pronouns and watch them go nuts.Report
I agree about the source of hijab fetishism. My main point is that I’ve been thinking about how a lot of the Intersectional Left relates to Jews, Jewishness, and Judaism. I’m not entirely pleased with this to say it mildly. The best thing I can say is that Jews really confuse their basic cosmology, so they choose not to deal with us as much as possible.Report
I think it is also because a lot of reporters, including female reporters, come from the less Orthodox/traditional sections of Judaism, and said people feel more free to criticize the traditionalists in the tribe than outside it.Report
I disagree with this. Non-Jews have no problems voicing their opinions on the traditionalist Jewish communities because they perceive them as white and therefore open to criticism while Muslim critics of traditional Muslim communities are denounced as collaborators with the Islamophobes.Report
They’re all bad. This is the 21st century.Report
I can’t help but ask: Why couldn’t this be a movie? Aside from economic reasons, of course, why is this an 8-hour series, instead of telling its story in 1-2 hours?
I think that a lot of this has to do with the whole “parasocial” thing. While it’s true that the plot could probably be hammered out in 2 hours, the reason you’re here with these people is that you like them.
The point isn’t the story (though the story is also there). The point is that you’re spending time with these people that you like. Watching them achieve tiny victories, agonizing with them as they experience tiny failures, and thinking about how well you’d fit in.
It’s almost nice. Paranice.Report
It’s this weird thing now where people have a lot of spare time to kill (which is nice!) while also complaining frequently that they have no spare time to kill.Report
A few years back, I did this thing where I said “I’m just going to start to go to bed at 10. I don’t care if my brain says ‘but I haven’t had fun yet!’ Fine. You don’t get to have fun. We aren’t going to crowbar ‘fun’ in at the expense of going to bed at 10.”
And I started going to bed at 10.
AND HOLY COW IT WAS AMAZING.
I think that it’s easy to forget that stuff like recreation and relaxation and whatnot are by-products rather than purchasable in and of themselves.
Maybe the joys of creating envy can be found in the purchasables.Report
I did not like Severance. The series would have been much better as a mini-series where the creators were told “You have 12-16 episodes. That is it. We expect the series to have a start, a middle, and a finish.” This is not the American way of doing television though. The Brits are masters of doing TV in the mini/limited series way though. I guess American TV has so much money out there that people want it to be a perpetual motion machine for everyone as much as possible.
From a design/aesthetic standpoint, I found it confusing that the “outer” world is some variant of today with cell phones/etc/ but the “inner work” world was set back in time in a very mid-century modern corporate environment with computers that look like they came from 1985 or so. The office itself looked like it was from the 1960s when such a place would have looked sleek and modern.
Thematically, I thought the series wanted to be too much and just had mysteries but it did not know how to reveal explanations. Possibly because of the angling for a second season (see first point). Also the series suffers from the same issues of alienation of labor/BS jobs that Dan Graeber suffered from. It takes a gem of a good idea but then ruins it by running the gem through the author/creators own prejudice and snobbery. Graeber’s anarcho-bohemian-leftism leaves him blind to the idea that people could honestly find that their white collar tech/finance/business jobs produce positive change in the world. He also does not seem capable of understanding that there are finance nerds just like there are theatre kids.
Likewise, the creators have the same issue with office/white-collar work, they just have things that they would rather be doing otherwise that it is inconceivable to them that someone could find social utility in office work.Report
The British do short series because most of their scripts are produced by one person rather than a committee of writers. When you have one person doing the writing, you get limitations on how many episodes are possible. Multiple script writers, even if it is only one to three people per actual episode script, makes longer series possible.
Streaming also effects things. Streaming series favors cliff hangers to get people to watch the next episode and you always need an next opposed. Anime commentator Bennet the Sage made the good argument that the live action Cowboy Bebop didn’t work because of the need for cliff hangers in work that had a very definite ending. British streaming series might have the same issue with the need for cliff hangers.Report
These are all fair criticisms. I would definitely say they didn’t need to tell this story aiming for a season two. It felt like much more could have been wrapped up because, at some point, you stop caring about the mysteries they’re trying to drag out.
One related thing I’ve thought of recently (as I’m now up to three jobs and trying out for another tomorrow) is that there’s a really deep level of satisfaction in simply mastering something, even if it’s a menial task, that has absolutely nothing to do with living in a “late capitalist society” or whatnot. Yes, jobs can absolutely suck, based on who you’re working with and how much or little you can develop your skills, but almost any work has the potential to be deeply fulfilling.Report
Speaking of the East Village: I’m reading about all the ins and outs of the allegedly transgressive scene at “Dimes Square” including its dissenters who might just want to be let in: https://mcrumps.substack.com/p/my-own-dimes-square-fascist-humiliation
For those who don’t know, Dimes Square is a newly created microhood between Canal Street and the Lower East Side. It is named after a health food restaurant in the area. It may or may not be the place for arts/ideas that matter these days. The culture writer Taylor Lorenz is a big dissenter on the idea that it is even a thing and she thinks the scene consists of 2000 people that 99.8 percent of humanity has never heard of. The scene seems to be a bunch of 20-30 somethings in New York who have been trying to make it in art or media for a bit. Some of whom have peripheral success. Many of whom have day jobs of banal variants like tutor. Others might just not need to work. Some of gone into that weird realm of becoming Catholic trad rads to shock their older siblings in bougie-boho Brooklyn.
All of this stuff makes me realize I was just a real outsider when trying to direct theatre. I wasn’t even an outsider to the bitter outsiders like Mile Cumplar.Report
Hot Take: The society necessary for a proper Bohemia doesn’t really exist these days. You need basically a rather conservative mass that is easily shocked to have a proper Bohemia. People might be on the whole commercial and limited in their entertainment choices but they aren’t easily shocked. They simply don’t care. They would be Bohemians can do as they please and the response from everybody else would be a shrug. You need the outrage of the masses to have a true Bohemia.Report
It Czech’s out and holds water. What is interesting to me is how about everyone is both the establishment and not these days. Are bougie liberals who dislike J.K. Rowling’s transphobia the establishment or is it Moms for Freedom or some other right-wing group the establishment or not.Report
The classic establishment would not recognize either of them as the establishment. Bougie liberals would come across as dangerous radicals because of their lack of racism and pro-LGBT stances. Moms for Freedom would be seen as a bunch of wild improper women rather than the angel in the home but the Birchers might see some kindred spirit in them. An establishment needs a sort of agreement on how to act and what is not to be done. No Emily Post, no establishment.Report
If a Bohemian falls in the woods and nobody hears it…?
In my experience, what you need is basically just cheap rent to get the elements of Bohemia. I was just reading about a very run down area quite a bit outside of Detroit (which ain’t great shakes either) where the “artsy kids” realized you could rent a house together with very part time jobs and make art all the rest of the time, throw rent parties, etc. So, very predictably, that’s what they’re doing and it’s safe so long as the outside world doesn’t care. It’s not the outrage that puts an end to stuff like that, so much as the hype.
Honestly, I think you probably still get the weirdo artsy kids in every affordable town or city- what made NYC seem “special” for so long was just that so much media is centered there that the local news could go out and write a puff piece about Klaus Nomi or some other “kooky” artist and finish by lunchtime. Now? Well, NYC is unaffordable for most people, or you’ve lucked into a rent stabilized apartment that someone willed you. I know a woman in an enormous pad that’s about $700 a month and she, naturally, has a lot of free time to make art.Report
The need for cheap housing is probably a big part of Bohemia. You got this in many cities before the mid-20th century because the governing authorities were more tolerant of sub-part housing. Mid-20th century cities had this through a combination of public housing, noble but misguided policies, and urban decline in favor of suburbia. These days none of this applies.Report
Crumplar clearly is jealous about the amount of attention this guy got/gets: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/31/style/matthew-gasda-dimes-square.html
Compared to Crumplar, I might as well have been on Pluto during my time in art.Report
Here is a fascinating hour and half talk about the differences between literature and fan fiction in trying to determine whether fan fiction is art.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvP_BLMgYBgReport
I just started this and can tell it’s going to be interesting. Thanks!Report
Oh oh oh! But that’s the thing, what if Lumon….
[camera aspect ratio and focal depth changes]
[blinks] [pauses]
..sorry, what were we talking about?Report
No acronym here- I did legitimately laugh out loud at this,Report
More seriously, I do get what you’re saying — ‘why wasn’t this a movie, because it’s basically an 8 hour movie”. I think, however, in this case, they made good use of their time. If anything, got a bit in the spirit of, and made effective use of, the old ‘movie serial’ trope, with a cliffhanger on the end of most (every?) episode.
edit –
I also disagree with Saul above and perhaps Rufus in the OP, in that the anachronistic mashing of different time periods in the set and costume design , I found brilliant. Mostly because it wasn’t so much ‘mashed’ as ‘blended’
(and one aspect even had an element of serving the plot in the end)Report
I think the real advantage you have with a show like this is the cast. You could probably film 120 hours of Walken/Turturro banter without too many complaints.Report
If there’s one nitpicking plothole I can’t quite let go of (e.g. a la mst3K, “repeat to yourself, ‘it’s just a show, I should really just relax'”)
wbua ghegheeb orvat noyr gb qevir n pne ng gur raq. Boivbhfyl gur vaavrf unir fbzr zntvpny novyvgl gb ergnva shyy ynathntr shapgvba qrfcvgr univat ab xabjyrqtr bs yvgrengher be rira uhzna pbairefngvbaf orsber njnxravat, ohg ubj znal cenpgvpny fxvyyf pna gur vaavrf npghnyyl npprff, rira vs vs snveyl ebhgvar sbe gurve bhgvrf?Report
I can’t figure out how to translate this, so I’ll just say: “Yes, I totally agree with you!”Report