BBB Needs A Deadline
Recent news headlines have been dominated by inflation, the ever-dangerous coronavirus pandemic, and Russia’s continued invasion of Ukraine. These issues have presented Joe Biden with a conflicting set of opportunities. His success at showing leadership and bringing the nation together on Ukraine has been tempered by criticism over his handling of COVID-19 and inflation. On these issues, it is unclear that he will be able to control the narrative or deliver a signature victory. But on one less visible issue, the continued negotiations over his Build Back Better plan, it is certainly possible for Biden to deliver both his party and his country a decisive victory.
The entire Biden administration’s domestic agenda, outside of inflation, is bogged down with the fate of the BBB plan. It has been a stalled part of his agenda for the past year. Liberals still do not know exactly what is in it and which of their priorities has been saved or shelved. The nation could still benefit from some of its policies, especially those regarding child-care or climate change. Furthermore, it is seen as a missed opportunity for a signature legislative win. The American Rescue Plan is in the rearview mirror for many Americans who have spent their stimulus checks and gone back to work. The passage of BBB in an election year would make sure that Biden could show Democratic governance means something to its base, which he absolutely needs to turn out in November. Election returns from Virginia suggest that base turnout may be more important than convincing swing voters this election cycle.
While passing his program is enormously important, Biden also knows that such passage is far from automatic. Earlier COVID-19-related bills had the urgency of massive unemployment and case numbers driving them into law. On the other hand, BBB came about in an era of vaccines, declining case numbers, and a growing reluctance to even consider the impact of the virus on society or the economy. As a result, BBB became a typical congressional bill: carved up by competing factions, obsessed over by lobbyists, studded with poison pills and pet projects that were enormously unpopular and did nothing to aid the progression of the bill.
Most notably, Democrats could not agree to hardly any of recalcitrant senator Joe Manchin’s demands about the bill. Democrats ignored his request to focus on permanent versions of smaller policies and keep inflation and the deficit in mind. He partially blew up negotiations in December because of the overall rejection of his position by the Democratic bill. Chuck Schumer responded with a symbolic push for voting rights and then subsequently allowed the negotiations to wither.
In order to solve the slowdown, there needs to be a manufactured deadline for the bill to pass. Deadlines help Congress push through months of backlogged work in a matter of hours. Congress seems to only function when it is at the eleventh hour and they will face a maximum amount of political pain if they do not get something done. The hours before debt defaults, government shutdowns, and visible funding losses are all sources of remarkable productivity over the past twenty years. Stories abound of representatives huddled in Washington for days and sleeping in their offices in the runup before a key deadline. Democrats need to use this power and attach BBB to the beginning of the summer recess on August 8, a favorite deadline outside of appropriations or the debt ceiling. They need to coordinate an announcement for this plan with Joe Manchin, preferably framing it as the last push to enact the president’s signature legislation.
Prior to that deadline, Democrats need to put together a package that reflects the reality of the nation’s current political landscape. It should appeal to Joe Manchin and be crafted in order to secure his vote. The bill should reflect each of the points Manchin has outlined in the past year as important to his priorities. At the same time, it needs to spend as much money and cover as many areas as Manchin is comfortable with. As noted by Vox earlier this month, “In early March, Manchin effectively put a new offer on the table, saying he’d be willing to consider legislation that focuses on prescription drug prices, tax reforms, and climate investments as long as half the revenue it raises is targeted to paying down the deficit.” Democrats have already begun to move in this direction by framing the bill as a deficit reduction measure as much as any other.
Finally, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer need to prioritize the importance of the bill to the party’s prospects and whip the rest of its members in line. The House is not known for having recalcitrant members of the majority. Pelosi needs to be able to bring in her entire caucus and silence the centrists who murmured about rejecting the bill during the last round of negotiations.
BBB will not secure a Democratic victory in 2022 on its own. The most realistic positive outcome is for Democratic losses to be small and easily recouped in the presidential year election of 2024. But getting BBB done now will provide a victory that Democrats can take home to their constituents. It will also allow Biden to move on to executive orders that he believes will bolster Democrats while also accomplishing as many of his campaign promises as possible. With a newly imposed deadline that all sides believe in, turning this bill into a law may actually become a reality.
Yup. Take whatever Manchin is willing to support and pass it into law.Report
We got what he was willing to support in the Infrastructure bill. There little left in BBB that would be substantive that he’ll get behind.
Frankly given his “defeat” on voting rights – where the Republicans he allegedly negotiated with then refused to back the bill he claimed they helped him write – you’d think he’d pivot a bit more.Report
Follow JB’s link below and read the climate part. Short version, Manchin gets a veto and blue states who want to follow — or are already following — the obvious strategy of “Electrify everything and get carbon out of the grid” get no federal assistance.Report
Ok, but they’re getting no federal assistance now anyhow.Report
One story that I saw that was weird as hell was the story of the Schumer/Manchin signed agreement.
Like, Schumer and Manchin sat down and hammered out what Manchin would pay for. Manchin said “here is myline in the sand” and both of them signed it (and Schumer wrote a note saying “I’ll try to talk Joe out of some of these” under his signature) and…
Well, the deal wasn’t what Manchin said he’d support (and signed his name to) and, wouldn’t you know it, Manchin didn’t support it.
I’m mostly confused.Report
Manchin is a centerist neoliberal democrat in a red state. He wants to retain his perceived power as a US Senator, as he’s trying to be Robert Byrd 2.0 in a state that wouldn’t elect Byrd today. Like Mitch McConnell he cares about keeping job first, making republican voters in West Virginia happy second (so he can keep his job), and making the national Democratic Party happy . . . about 56th. He knows that he has Schumer over multiple barrels due tot he slim/non existent majority in the Senate.
Its not actually that hard.Report
I understand where Manchin is coming from.
What confuses me is that Schumer and Manchin had something akin to an agreement and, like, they both signed it and then Schumer offered a deal that was waaaaaaaaaaaay outside of his signed agreement and then Manchin didn’t support the deal that wasn’t like what he agreed to.
Like… why would you even have the deal in the first place? What the heck?
It’s not Manchin’s actions that confuse me.Report
Most likely it was communicating with the left flank of the party. I’m assuming it was something like “Ok we put what you wanted in it and you watched Manchin shoot it down in flames so now the choice is what Manchin will sign on to or nothing.” Presumably the fear was that if they tried to give Manchin what he would sign to out the gate then the left wing of the party would rebel over leadership not bargaining hard enough.
This way it’s relatively simple. It’s whatever Manchin will agree to or nothing. He’s already demonstrated he’ll be quite comfortable with nothing.Report
The way Joe Manchin’s become effective ruler of the country is pretty damn annoying.
It’s better than almost any easily accessible alternative, which just serves to make it more damn annoying.
He’s not extraordinarily evil or even particularly dumb. Ideology and partisanship aside he’s an unambiguously better person than maybe 2 or 3 of his Republican colleagues.
But he’s still very annoying.Report
Chaps me too, no lies, but considering his district he is, as you noted, better than the alternative. Throw darts of a picture of that damn fool Cal Cunningham to feel better maybe?Report
Ehhhh my belief remains that he isn’t the outlier he appears to be. My bet is and has always been that he is running interference for at least half a dozen, maybe a few more, other Senators and possibly even some House members that want to both be able to say they voted for BBB but are afraid of the attacks they’d have had to parry if it was signed in the form it went to the Senate.
Of course this is consistent with my priors that say the core Democratic voting base is very moderate and the big leadership challenge is squaring that reality with the party’s ever stranger branding pushed by a small chunk of it.Report
I think the Dem voting base is moderate but it is moderate in a way different from now Sinema and Manchin (and a couple other moderate standard bearers) are moderate.
In particular, IME normie Dems are, for better or worse, not particularly energized by social issues that animate a lot of activists, but are at least as ferociously anti-Republican as those activists.
This makes the leadership challenges even harder to solve.Report
Also no normie Dem has ever worried, or will ever worry, about a tax on billionaires being too divisive, as Manchin notoriously has.
They are often deficit hawks, but the ones who are tend to have fiscal preferences like, “Don’t cut social spending but tax the balls off of rich people.”Report
I agree. I think one of the additional complicating factors is the belief that ‘moderate’ means a social issue agnostic chamber of commerce type. To me that’s where there are some far meatier criticisms of Manchin. I still have no idea what to make of Sinema.Report
“he’d be willing to consider legislation that focuses on prescription drug prices, tax reforms, and climate investments as long as half the revenue it raises is targeted to paying down the deficit.” Deficits rarely get paid down. Even if they do, it’s offset by massive increases in spending in out years.Report
Or huge tax cuts without offsetting spending cuts the moment the GOP gets in power.Report
Agreed. but again this is a bipartisan problem. BSDIReport