Tomorrow Finally Comes For James Webb

Michael Siegel

Michael Siegel is an astronomer living in Pennsylvania. He blogs at his own site, and has written a novel.

Related Post Roulette

6 Responses

  1. Michael Cain says:

    As someone commented elsewhere, it seems like it’s been forever since we watched a launch that didn’t include “Falcon” in it. SpaceX did 31 Falcon launches this year. They have 36 Falcon-9 and Falcon Heavy launches booked for 2022, plus whatever launches for Starlink they slip in. A few non-Falcon flights of note scheduled for 2022: the first SLS launch with an unmanned moon orbit and return; the next attempt to fly Boeing’s capsule; the first Vulcan flight; and the first New Glenn flight from Bezos.Report

  2. I still don’t understand why the Whitewater guy keeps getting telescopes named after him.Report

  3. Oscar Gordon says:

    Heading to L2, FSM help us if it needs fixing like Hubble has.Report

    • The planners and designers were told to assume no repair missions. My reading says it would be a 50-day round trip, plus time doing the repairs. Assuming you could get close enough to the right parts without damaging things worse — unlike Hubble, the mirror is just hanging out there in the open.

      So, an expanded Orion or Starship. Orion is SLS-only, all of which are booked for the next many years. Depending on the replacement parts, don’t know if Orion has the necessary volume anyway. I assume Elon has already thought about it. My offer, in his place, would be “Build a cheaper new one, we’ll drop it off and wait while it unfolds, then gather up the old one and lug it home. Cost-plus. And yes, you’ll be paying for a bunch of development we need for a Mars mission.”

      NASA is doing some risky things over the next several months.

      I don’t remember if Mike has done a piece comparing the Extremely Large Telescope to the Webb, and whether the Webb is worth ten times the price tag.Report

    • JS in reply to Oscar Gordon says:

      No real choice for what they wanted to do. NASA is looking into robotics missions for refueling and possible repair, but they won’t deploy those until the very last moment (you don’t want to risk breaking it and taking time off it’s life to refuel it, so you’d only refuel it when otherwise you’d lose it). Same for any repairs they can do without.

      But they sort of needed it out in the cold, well away from everything.

      Seeing into the deep infrared means you’ve got to be very, very, VERY cold yourself if you don’t want to taint the images.Report