9 thoughts on “Judge Issues Default Judgments Against Alex Jones In Sandy Hook Lawsuits

  1. I don’t think Jones is dumb. Which means he’s made the judgement that turning over the documents would be worse for him. It could be that he just drives ratings this way, or maybe there’s something really bad in the requested documents.Report

      1. in prior litigation – perhaps even some of this litigation, his own lawyers called him an entertainer, and made the claim that he’s not providing serious news. Despite what his audience thinks. He knows its a lie, and he knows he’s doing it for the ratings. He doesn’t care.Report

  2. I’m not sure there is enough cosmic justice that could be given out to this guy. So a little default judgment will have to do for now. But we can hope for more.Report

  3. Did Jones have counsel in this case or was he representing himself? Normally lawyers understand the risks of discovery non-compliance and terminating sanctions. If a lawyer can’t get his or her client to comply, there is normally a motion to be relieved as counsel. Part of me wonders whether this is a deliberate strategy because now the plaintiffs need to do the hard job of enforcing a judgement and I imagine that Jones is either judgement proof (read: he has no money) or all his assets are very carefully sheltered. Texas and Florida have lots of laws that allow for the protection of assets from judgment collection.Report

Comments are closed.