Judge Issues Default Judgments Against Alex Jones In Sandy Hook Lawsuits
The judge in the Sandy Hook lawsuits again Alex Jones has had enough of not being complied with and dropped the hammer, finding him liable by default in two of the cases.
Infowars host Alex Jones has lost two of several lawsuits filed against him by relatives of Sandy Hook victims after he routinely failed to comply with requests to produce documents related to his involvement in spreading lies about the deadly shooting.
Judge Maya Guerra Gamble on Monday issued her ruling for default judgments against Jones in two different cases, which means he and the conspiracy-theory-spewing outlet Infowars have been found liable for all damages and a jury will now be convened to determine how much he will owe the plaintiffs. The new rulings became public Thursday.
In the filings, Gamble eviscerated Jones and reasoned that default judgments should be ordered because “an escalating series of judicial admonishments, monetary penalties, and non-dispositive sanctions have all been ineffective at deterring the abuse,” caused by Jones’ unwillingness to turn over documents related to the cases, the Texas judge ruled.
The ruling — which is often referred to in Texas as a “death penalty sanction” for a party unwilling to comply with court orders — is a rarity in the legal world. Jones, who is now on his seventh lawyer in these cases, had years to provide documentation requested by the court, including internal company emails.
HuffPost was the first to report the start of Jones’ Sandy Hook legal woes in 2018 when parents Leonard Pozner and Veronique De La Rosa filed a defamation lawsuit related to Jones’ continued lies that the 2012 school shooting that left 20 children and six adults dead was a “false flag” hoax filled with “crisis actors.”
Pozner and De La Rosa’s 6-year-old son, Noah, was killed in the shooting. In the years since, the parents have dealt with continued harassment from those who followed Jones’ lead and claimed the shooting was faked.
They’re not the only ones. In total, nine families who lost loved ones in the Sandy Hook shooting have leveled lawsuits against Jones and Infowars for the damage he and his outlet caused. Since then, Jones has lost multiple legal battles in his many lawsuits and was ordered to pay nearly $150,000 in legal fees in 2020 for failing to provide discovery documents for the plaintiffs.
It was Jones’ continued refusal to hand over discovery documents that led to Monday’s rulings against him in a lawsuit brought on by Pozner and a separate lawsuit by parent Scarlett Lewis, whose 6-year-old son, Jesse, was also killed in the shooting. Pozner, De La Rosa, and Lewis are being represented by Texas law firm Farrar & Ball, who told HuffPost that they are “not surprised by the Court’s decision.”
Jones’ most recent lawyer, Brad Reeves, told the Austin-American Statesman earlier this month that a default judgment against Jones would be a “hugely excessive” response to his discovery failures. Judge Gamble felt otherwise:
“Furthermore, in considering whether lesser remedies would be effective, this Court has also considered Defendants’ general bad faith approach to litigation, Mr. Jones’ public threats, and Mr. Jones’ professed belief that these proceedings are ‘show trials’,” the court rulings read.
Where’s my teeny, tiny violin…Report
I don’t think Jones is dumb. Which means he’s made the judgement that turning over the documents would be worse for him. It could be that he just drives ratings this way, or maybe there’s something really bad in the requested documents.Report
It’s very hard to see how there could be anything good from his point of view. He’s clearly making stuff up, he presumably knows it’s a lie.Report
in prior litigation – perhaps even some of this litigation, his own lawyers called him an entertainer, and made the claim that he’s not providing serious news. Despite what his audience thinks. He knows its a lie, and he knows he’s doing it for the ratings. He doesn’t care.Report
I’m not sure there is enough cosmic justice that could be given out to this guy. So a little default judgment will have to do for now. But we can hope for more.Report
Did Jones have counsel in this case or was he representing himself? Normally lawyers understand the risks of discovery non-compliance and terminating sanctions. If a lawyer can’t get his or her client to comply, there is normally a motion to be relieved as counsel. Part of me wonders whether this is a deliberate strategy because now the plaintiffs need to do the hard job of enforcing a judgement and I imagine that Jones is either judgement proof (read: he has no money) or all his assets are very carefully sheltered. Texas and Florida have lots of laws that allow for the protection of assets from judgment collection.Report
Jones is on his 7th (8th?) lawyer or something.Report
Well that answers that.Report
“Your honor, this cannot possibly be enforced. If there’s one thing that his life demonstrates, it’s that Alex Jones and judgment are antithetical.”Report