Sunday Morning! Parable of the Sower by Octavia Butler
“Does the future have a future?” J.G. Ballard once asked. He was referring to the sleek and shiny automated “future” once promised in space age science fiction, which had seemed to have fallen into abeyance. Hopeful images of the future were increasingly hard to come by when Nixon was still in office, and seem downright quaint today. Oscar Wilde’s line about not wanting a map that doesn’t include Utopia because that is the land to which Humanity is always sailing, makes most of us snicker “good luck finding that!” The future can become outdated. Even if we hadn’t been misled into thinking our noblest impulse- the impulse to imagine better worlds- is somehow suspect, it still just seems so naive! We know better now.
Conversely, dystopias are having a real heyday right now, a trend thatshould continue into whatever’s left of our future. Our political campaigns now seem like dueling dystopias and the film versions of dystopia just seem like gritty realism. There’s no shortage of books and movies and other works of art depicting the grim times ahead; no doubt, we’ll soon be experiencing Dystopia Fatigue, even if we’re not quite living in one. It’s as if we’re steeling ourselves up for whatever’s ahead, planning for a trip.
Along with all the Twin Peaks watching, I’ve recently taken Veronica D’s recommendation and read Octavia Butler’s 1993 novel Parable of the Sower, which is set in 2024, and has to be one of the most frightening dystopian novels I’ve read, for reasons I will explain in a bit. It is a very bleak picture of the… erm, very near future, that does have a deep core of hope- buried deep, but you can see it clearly, in the same way you can see a candle burn brightest in a pitch-black cave.
Growing up in Pasedena, California, Octavia Butler was always making up stories, often of a sci-fi bent. Her father died when she was just seven and she was raised by her grandmother and her mother, who worked long hours as a maid. As she explained in an interview:
I never told myself ordinary stories. I was never interested in fantasizing about the world I was stuck in. In fact, I fantasized to get away from that drab, limited world. I was a little ‘colored’ girl in that era of conformity and segregation, the 1950s, and no matter how much I dreamed about becoming a writer, I couldn’t help seeing that my real future looked bleak.
And yet, Butler was also someone possessed of a tremendous amout of will, intelligence, and imagination, which clearly helped. By the 70s, she was writing for a living; she is remembered today as one of the key SF writers of the second half of the 20th century and an influence on what has been called Afrofuturism. Hilton Als has also argued, it must be noted, that Butler’s fiction was a key influence on Beyoncé’s Lemonade.
Similarly, the heroine of this novel, Lauren Olamina, is a young Black girl stuck in a very, very bleak world, who will nevertheless found a new religion that will, we assume, eventually populate other planets. This planet, you see, is in a very bad way. Ecological catastrophe is an accepted fact, large corporations are privatizing everything and even bringing back the company towns of the early 20th century, unemployment is the norm, especially in the cities, and roving gangs of drug-addicted maniacs are looting and raping, enslaving and killing in any neighborhood that isn’t sufficiently protected. Lauren, whose journals make up the bulk of the text, realizes that the gates protecting her neighborhood won’t hold forever; while everyone else seems to be hunkering down, she’s preparing for the inevitable fight for survival.
What I found frightening about this was it’s a dystopia that doesn’t exactly announce itself as such, nor seem that far removed from the current reality. It’s a dystopia located right next door in other words. Usually, there’s a conceit with these “post-apocalyptic” stories: a war that went nuclear, a military coup, an ecological catastrophe. Here, it’s the most likely outcome of humanity not facing the problems that it’s… well, not facing. The sci-fi conceits- a drug that inspires pyromania, another that develops a sort of hyper-empathy in which people really think they can feel others’ physical pain- are only slightly unreal, and peripheral to the story. Mostly, the novel seems to ask “how do we keep hope in times when things are really messed up and broken?” and then taps us on the shoulder and adds, “incidentally, things are really messed up and broken at present.”
And this isn’t even getting to the 1998 sequel, Parable of the Talents, in which a demogogue rises to power in the faltering America on a wave of vengeance and vague promises to “make America great again.”
Naturally, things do fall apart in this novel, as they tend to, and our heroine loses her family and has to fight to stay alive. It’s a grim and foreboding picture of the future; Butler’s straightforward prose renders everything as stark as a crime scene photo. There are little islands of hope though; Olamina falls in love with an older man, Bankole, and they lead a small group of survivors northward, to a family plot of land in Northern California, in hopes of founding a new community for the religion she’s been developing, Earthseed.
The religion is rooted in change:
“All that you touch/ You change.
All that you change/ Changes you.
The only lasting truth/ Is Change.
God/ Is Change.”
Olamina acknowledges the similarities to Buddhism; however, the point here is to act creatively with change, not passively accept it. Nor is the aim to “manifest” desired change, as in more syrupy New Age movements that assert we “create our reality.” Rebecca Solnit has noted the “solipsism” of this view: “a crass way of overlooking culture, politics, and economics- that is, realities are made, but by groups, movements, ideologies, religions, societies, economics, and more, as well as natural forces, over long stretches of time, not by individuals alone.”
Solnit was talking about Pragmatism, and there’s something very American about the Earthseed religion- a sense that we can’t control much in a world that is constantly changing, but with what we have, we can take part in that change and hope to influence it a little for the better. Maybe it’s too late to forestall dystopia, but hope is perennial in the human heart. And so, maybe we can’t make the future great again, but with work, it might not be quite so completely dystopian…
So, what are you reading, watching, pondering, playing, or creating this weekend?
I read the Parables books in reverse order, which kind of spoiled the surprise, but the prescience of the 2nd novel as far as right wing demagoguery taking power in the United States was more than a bit startling. I guess when you’re on the butt end of the law you tend to see things a bit more clearly.
I’m currently reading Kim Stanley Robinson’s Ministry for the Future. Robinson is a sci-fi writer who’s very concerned with climate change. He sets most of his novels in the relatively near future, and sea level rise plays a prominent role in them. His best, IMHO, is New York, 2140.
Watching: I just started the last season of Aziz Ansari’s Master of None, and if the first episode is any indication, it’s going to be very interesting.Report
It’s funny- I sort of did too. I read about half of Parable of the Talents before realizing it seemed like the middle of a story because there was an earlier one. And then I found that book and read it, so I guess I’ll read the other this week.
That Ministry for the Future sounds like a good one. It seems like Ballard’s The Drowned World had a similar theme, although that was written back in the 60s, so might’ve had a different logic. I’ll check at the bookstore when I make my weekly rounds.
Speaking of Aziz Ansari, I recently started with Parks and Recreation, which I’d never seen. It’s enjoyable, but I think will probably succcumb to my usual short attention span with programs.Report
If you get past season 1 with Parks & Rec, the quality goes WAY up.Report
Yay! I’m glad you read it.
Parable of the Sower was super important for me. I read it shortly after release, based on a radio interview I heard with Ms. Butler. Anyway, I got my hands on it and read it. It really shook me (as they say).
I was Laura.
Not really, of course. Not at all, actually. This was pre-transition me, a writhing bundle of dysphoria. Plus I’m white. I didn’t live in a apocalyptic hellscape (yet). In my own life I had nothing like Earthseed to shape my behavior. Honestly, as a person, I was pretty adrift.
(I related a lot to the characters in Slackers. This made me popular at coffee shops and punk shows, but still, I don’t recommend it long term.)
And yet — give a closeted trans person an introspective, 1st-person novel with an engaging character of their internal gender and bam! Shaken!
I loved Earthseed. The thing is, so much modern religion is based on doxy not praxis. (I’m stretching the meanings of those terms a bit.) What I mean is, so much modern religion is about “proper belief” instead of “what you do in the world.” Earthseed didn’t care much what you believed, except in the sense that if you believe stupid things you’ll likely end up dead — but not in the sense God will punish you, instead because eating poison berries is a mistake, but if you don’t eat you’ll starve, so recognizing which berries are edible is kind of important. I could get behind that. Plus I rather like “The Destiny of Earthseed / Is to take root among the stars.”
I don’t know if it’s true, but it gets us looking up, and that’s no small thing.
Thanks for the article.Report
Yeah, it shook me too!
I love that you could relate to the characters on that level. I come from an even-differenter (more different?) background, but was extremely bookish and introverted at that age, and probably got in my own way by thinking too much, and I really liked that the heroine of the book is much the same. A lot of her conflict with the other characters seemed like her saying “Hey, we really should be ready in case things go south by learning as much as possible now” and that was nice too. Maybe this is why it hasn’t been made into a movie yet- there’s no really super butch character flipping baddies over their head into an electric fence or whatever.
Earthseed seemed more plausible as the book grew. I also liked that the other characters expressed the same qualms I was having and then were answered. In a lot of ways, it seemed more plausible than many other religions.
Thanks for the comment. If life or my short-attention span don’t intervene, I will probably read the second book for next Sunday.Report