How Tan Was My MRAP
The difference between a lie and something that is presented as a justification/reason/excuse/exaggeration is mostly in the ability of the recipient to discern the difference.
Anytime anyone in a governmental position utters the phrase “at no cost” it is time to get to discerning.
When a government official is proclaiming their brand new, half-a-million dollar, 32K pound, desert painted, military surplus Force Protection Cougar H vehicle, you are about to be taken for a ride.
Timing is everything. The small city of Moundsville, on the edge of West Virginia, found itself thrust into the national conversation on policing thanks to what would normally be an innocuous local news story:
The Moundsville Police Department has added a vehicle to the fleet! I’ll tell you everything this MRAP offers- and explain how the department get it for free- tonight on @WTOV9 pic.twitter.com/qveCV7X1i9
— Jaime Baker (@JBaker_WTOV) June 18, 2020
Moundsville, West Virginia, population eight thousand odd and falling, is tucked up against the Ohio River south of the Wheeling area of West Virginia. Its police force of around 20 protect a city formerly famous for its preserved and namesake Native American burial mounds and as the location of the West Virginia State Penitentiary. Now known for its burial mounds and the tourist attraction of the decommissioned West Virginia State Penitentiary. Like most of the area, Moundsville is struggling with economic hard times and a declining population. What is increasing, though, is the police fleet of vehicles.
Here comes that phrase we were talking about, watch for it:
The Moundsville Police Department unveiled a “tactical resource vehicle” they obtained from the military at no cost as part of a federal government program on Thursday.
The vehicle is a 2019 Cougar mine resistance ambush protection vehicle, or MRAP, and was obtained under a federal program that makes surplus equipment available to states and cities, according, to Moundsville Police Chief Tom Mitchell. This particular piece of equipment was initially purchased by the federal government for the U.S. Marine Corps and is manufactured by Force Protection Inc., a division of General Dynamics.
“We could use it for various things,” Mitchell said. He said the department can use it as a “tactical resource vehicle” for various scenarios…Mitchell said the protection vehicle was obtained by the police department at no cost and he advised city council about his department taking possession of it during Tuesday evening’s council meeting.
I could use a shotgun for crutch. You could use a colander for a helmet. We could ride Alpacas around for transportation. But that isn’t what those things are designed for.
MRAPs are not designed for, needed, useful, or appropriate for local law enforcement.
Of course you can point to exceptions. Large cities with tactical reasons probably should have a few. Yes during disasters like flooding and storms they can be somewhat useful. But not every city, town, and sheriff’s department is the NYPD, and those situations of natural disasters usually wind up involving the national guard that already has such equipment. The exceptions prove the rule that cities like Moundsville, WV, do not need MRAPs/MRUVs for a multitude of reasons that far outweigh any rationalizations offered for acquiring them.
First and foremost, they are not free.
Sure, the DOD’s 1033 and similar programs “give” them to law enforcement as part of a surplus disposal program. But it isn’t out of charity. The well-documented glutinous spending during the Global War on Terror resulted in things like the MRAP/MRUVs being purchased in massive quantities with no long term plan to maintain the notoriously needy vehicles. After the sequestration budget cuts, thousands upon thousands of the vehicles that were built for service in Iraq and Afghanistan but have little other uses had to go. The absurdity of vehicles too expensive for the military to maintain, each costing between $500K to over a million dollars a piece depending, being “given” away is yet another example of the excessive bloat in the DOD.
But give them to local law enforcement, who are so eager to have military hardware that there is a waiting list, and problem solved.
Problem solved for the DOD, but the problems are just starting for the departments that now have a very big line item budget amendment. While major cities can handle such things, the same operating and maintenance cost that the federal government found unsustainable doesn’t go away through the magical gifting of surplus to municipalities.
As McHenry County, Illinois found out with their MRAPs and other surplus acquired in 2015:
The Humvee’s desert tan paint job, like that of the SWAT team’s new MRAP, needs to be painted over. Emergency management put in a supplemental funding request to county staff because the department has no budget line item for such work.
The sheriff’s office does, because it has a garage and maintains a fleet of vehicles. But while acquiring MRAPs only cost the sheriff’s office and the Spring Grove Police Department a respective $1,975 and $4,000, there will be costs to their respective governments to convert them from battlefield to domestic law enforcement use, such as new paint, graphics, and installing lights.
And of course, there’s the cost of insurance and maintenance.
This presents a quandary for county government — while the sheriff’s office has a vehicle budget, vehicle and liability insurance is handled by one fund for all departments, Associate County Administrator for Finance Ralph Sarbaugh said. Besides the MRAPs and the Humvees, the sheriff’s office has obtained for itself three ATVs, a Kawasaki Mule, and four motorcycles, records show. It acquired a semitrailer for the Division of Transportation, three motorcycles for the Conservation District, and two vans for building operations.
“It adds cost to the overall budget. There are now more fuel and maintenance costs, they all have to be on the automobile or equipment insurance, and some of that gets to be quite expensive,” Sarbaugh said.
The county’s proposed budget policy, updated every year, now contains a recommendation by Sarbaugh that any acquisition of government surplus require County Board approval if it will result in additional costs for maintenance, fuel, insurance, storage, tracking and training. The County Board has not yet taken up the budget policy for a vote.
“The County Board is responsible for all facilities and equipment of the county, and even though it’s free, it’s not free,” Sarbaugh said.
Eisenberg, the Spring Grove village president, said that Chief Sanders’ goal in acquiring surplus has been to help the village obtain needed goods at discount, not to militarize his police force of 14 full- and part-time officers.
“If they’re willing to give it away, he’s willing to find a use for it,” Eisenberg said.
“Find a way to use it” is not good governance. In the current environment of policing being under the microscope with long-overdue questions of over-militarization, police tactics, and law enforcement accountability, the easy and flippant lip service of “at no cost” and “find a way to use it” are grossly irresponsible. You can call it rationalization, or reasoning, or excuses, or whatever else but telling the public “at no cost” is just a lie by other nomenclature.
Such unaccountability costs more than just money. At the core of much of our current angst is a lack of trust in institutions of government in general, and policing in particular. Police departments that happily accept all sorts of military largess that cannot be straight with the tax payers as to why they need it — not to mention having the integrity to admit just because something is free doesn’t mean you need it — plants seeds that if left unchecked become choking undergrowth to effective civic administration and trust in government. If you increase your budget to have it, you will feel compelled to use it, whether needed or not. If you use it, then you have to fund it. Taxpayers will be thrilled to death to have their taxes and fees raised just so their police can joyride in their new war toys to justify it all.
Stopping such nonsense requires some advanced and involved citizenship, though. Citizens willing to show up at council meetings and voting booths to hold their elected officials responsible for how their government across the street functions. But it’s vital. If we’ve learned anything the last few weeks as a nation it should hopefully be that police accountability and civic responsibility to care for our communities works best as preventative actions. Prevention that is far better than streets full of aggrieved folks and on-edge cops, where all sorts of bad things might happen.
Just acquiring stuff that looks cool, for the purposes of “do something”, and the rationalization that we want it so lets find a reason to get it, is fake leadership at its worst. Taking the waste from the military and putting it on the balance sheets of local government is not good management, stewardship, or leadership. Putting weapon systems designed for combat in foreign lands — even though “demilitarized” — on the streets at home against fellow citizens should be last resort, not first call. The law enforcement of our country should be protect and serve, not acquire and conquer. Our government, both local and federal, should be accountable for how things happened, why they happened, and why the bad things that are preventable were not nipped in the bud, both fiscally and otherwise.
Of course there is some reason somewhere for nearly anything, especially in the name of the public good. But all things need to be discussed and debated as to what they will actually do, and used for, and the need and expense of it all. “We’ll find a way to use it” is not good enough anymore. It never was.
Just think of the cost.
The incentives are *SOOOO* screwed up.
I mean, if someone asked me “Jaybird, do you want an MRAP? For free?”, I’d think about it and ask if I could sell it as soon as I had it delivered. (Look at those tires! You could get a couple hundred bucks for each one of those! Easy!)
If I ran a company and someone asked me “CEO Jaybird, do you want an MRAP? For Free?”, the answer would again be “yes” and, depending on my company, I could see using it or selling it (maybe not personally, but assigning someone to do that (look at those tires!)).
And if I ran a law enforcement agency and someone asked me if I wanted one? Of course I do. Because you never know what’s going to happen. Maybe there will be a bad thing. Like, a really bad thing. A terrorist attack or something. I’d rather have an MRAP and not need it than need it and not have it. I have a responsibility to the people in my jurisdiction. If I needed this tool on the day that phone rang and but I said “nah” when it was offered to me? I would have been derelict in my duties. If I couldn’t go into an awful situation because I felt scared and an MRAP would have allowed me to overcome my fear? I’m just another Scot Peterson.
I *NEED* the MRAP.
Oh, wait. I have to pay for it out of the budget? Nah. We can do without.Report
And let’s not forget how badass Santa will look throwing candy to the kids from that turret in the annual Christmas parade!Report
I had yet another person yesterday tell me that they are not qualified to judge police actions/decisions.
This is a lie that police love to encourage, so that their citizens just nod along and pay their taxes.
We need a PSA campaign of questioning the decisions of the police as a civic duty.Report
We actually left a huge number of early gen MRAPs in Afghanistan rather than pay to transport them home and store, track, maintain them. We literally cut them to pieces.Report
This is the reason I don’t buy a Mercedes or BMW. I could probably swing a used one, but the upkeep is way more than I want to spend.
As Mr. Donaldson so ably points out, free isn’t always free.
(Eds., I think we need gluttonous instead of glutinous herein.)Report
I lease.Report
How noble of you.Report
Bougie! 🙂Report
pfft.
I ride in the back seat of a $300,000 vehicle, but you don’t hear me brag.
https://www.metro.net/#Report
When the revolution comes…!Report
The FV603 Saracen was the armoured personnel carrier of Alvis’s FV600 series. Besides the driver and commander, a squad of eight soldiers plus a troop commander could be carried. Most models carried a small turret on the roof, carrying a Browning .30 machine gun. A .303 Bren gun could be mounted on an anti-aircraft ring-mount accessed through a roof hatch and there were ports on the sides through which troops could fire. Although removed from active service,[when?] it saw extensive use into the 1980s in Northern Ireland and was a familiar sight, nicknamed ‘sixers’, during “The Troubles”. At times, they appeared on the streets of Hull, a less-hostile atmosphere for driver training in a city of similar appearance to Belfast, and only a few miles from the Army School of Mechanical Transport
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvis_Saracen
I remember seeing these roll down the streets of Belfast back in the eighties. I don’t want to live in a world of LARPing the Troubles.Report
My county’s (pop ~600,000) sheriff’s department has an M113. They borrowed it from DoD back in 2005. So far, DoD has not asked for it back. If they did take it back, they’d have to repaint it:
https://kdvr.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2014/04/apc-e1397153696294.jpg?w=957&h=499&crop=1
When used, the APC is taken near the site by truck — because tracks play pure hell on typical asphalt paving — and used for the final approach. The only situations it has been used in were barricaded active shooters, either to allow EMTs to treat/recover injured persons or to bring a negotiator close enough to communicate. I admit that there’s a certain irony to a negotiator arriving in front of the house in a black-and-white APC and saying, over the sound system, “Come, let’s talk like reasonable people here.” TTBOMK, they have a good record of talking the shooter out.
In discussions one topic that comes up is, “But what if the next sheriff uses it more aggressively?” My answer is that sheriff is an elected position, subject to recall, so can be removed. Also, if a majority of the voters think aggressive use of the APC is a fine thing, perhaps I’m living in the wrong county.Report
I think the best way for us citizens to push back against this is to refuse to be afraid.
Because fear is the fuel that drives militarized policing. All those urban legends, all the rumors and scare stories told so matter-of-factly about armed marauding gangs menacing people like you and me that a friend of a friend heard on Twitter.
And this is the perfect time to have such a pushback, where people are questioning the basic concept of what police are for and why they should exist.Report
First: A plus for the title of the post.
More substantively: I don’t understand the need for this but the departments continue to procure these things and the reporter reports on it to cheerily. I think it shows how tough reform is. Even in this day when there is heightened scrutiny. The police of a small town decided to get an expensive toy that it does not need and found a courtier willing to do free PR for them.Report
Thank you Saul I was rather proud of that one and hoped folks would get it. Report
The free PR is how the journalist maintains access to their sources in the PD.Report
Like many of you, I think this is a problem. I think the Moundsville PD is not going to need this, and they will soon find it to be an expensive white elephant, never mind an incitement to overreaction.
At the same time, I’d like to describe what living in a small town is like, and what kind of impact this sort of event has. It represents acquisition of a major resource for the nominal benefit of the town and its citizens. I grew up in a place like this.
There are folks everywhere stockpiling items that might have some future undefined use. That’s because they have little money, but lots of space, which is the opposite of how it works in the city, where folks may have some money, but not much space to keep things, so they are likely to winnow furiously. That’s the style I have learned, but it’s not what I grew up with. My father and my uncles had sheds full of odd equipment that hadn’t been used in 10-20 years.
So, the Chief brings in some new equipment that would normally be super expensive and everyone, and I do mean everyone in the town is buzzing. To be sure, there will be some who think it’s dumb and a waste of time. But everyone is talking about it, thinks its interesting, and wants to get a look at it.Report
I thought about it for a second and, you’re absolutely right. This thing is going to be in every parade between Saint Patrick’s Day and Thanksgiving. The Elks Lodge, The Shriners, This Thing, The Women’s Auxiliary, The Firetruck, then, finally, The Mayor.
Welp, that’s the parade.Report
I think the MRAP could be handy for working with Eastern European special forces teams who train in inusrgency warfare in West Virginia, learning how to plant IEDs, blow bridges, and ambush armored Russian patrols. They’re also handy when police have to drive up narrow hollows to break up a feud. My home town could probably have used a few.Report
Is someone who flees by backing away in one of these a chicken PARM?Report
That joke tanked.Report
That can happen when you’re Jason a punchline.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkHTsc9PU2AReport
Wasn’t “How Tan Was My MRAP” the B-side to the Bee Gees’ single “How Deep Is Your Love”?Report
No, it was the Bside to “Too Much Heaven”Report