So, the example of essentially theocratic arguments doesn’t refute what I said at all - it is instead a good example of choosing the intellectually lazy approach to ideology over the healthy, but intellectually challenging approach.
Right on the money. Is this, in a sense, a question of simply taking the high road in all debates, arguments etc.? When faced with pure partisanship, or thoughtless ideology, one must simply take the Zen approach? Find the way to maneuver the conflict by doing the least harm, and making the most strides forward?
So much to consider...
The commenter archive features may be temporarily disabled at times.
Well said, Mark.
Right on the money. Is this, in a sense, a question of simply taking the high road in all debates, arguments etc.? When faced with pure partisanship, or thoughtless ideology, one must simply take the Zen approach? Find the way to maneuver the conflict by doing the least harm, and making the most strides forward?
So much to consider...