But I disagree with your conclusion.
Try this then.
Until someone(anyone) can give a valid secular reason that either homosexual orientation or behavior is damaging to society, then your ability to swing your religious fist leaves off exactly where my citizen nose begins.
2009-01-28 19:35:47
But should a religious school be able to discriminate against non-religionists?
Yes, because religious affiliation is a choice.
A student could convert.
Race and gender and sexual orientation are not choices.
2009-01-28 18:19:23
Transplanted Lawyer, two words.
Segregation Academies.
2009-01-28 18:14:22
"I find the idea of forcing traditionalist pastors to marry gay couples pretty disturbing."
Also, stop with the sillie calumny that churches would EVAH be forced to marry gays. You know that simply isn't true.
I am not sure you are Mathic at all at this point.
2009-01-28 18:09:29
Wiil......the legal analogy would be segregation academies.
Unworthy of you, I truly expect more of teh Mathic.
2009-01-28 18:04:11
u go boi.
bring teh sass.
The commenter archive features may be temporarily disabled at times.
But I disagree with your conclusion.
Try this then.
Until someone(anyone) can give a valid secular reason that either homosexual orientation or behavior is damaging to society, then your ability to swing your religious fist leaves off exactly where my citizen nose begins.
But should a religious school be able to discriminate against non-religionists?
Yes, because religious affiliation is a choice.
A student could convert.
Race and gender and sexual orientation are not choices.
Transplanted Lawyer, two words.
Segregation Academies.
"I find the idea of forcing traditionalist pastors to marry gay couples pretty disturbing."
Also, stop with the sillie calumny that churches would EVAH be forced to marry gays. You know that simply isn't true.
I am not sure you are Mathic at all at this point.
Wiil......the legal analogy would be segregation academies.
Unworthy of you, I truly expect more of teh Mathic.
u go boi.
bring teh sass.