I downloaded it through the Lara Logan Twitter. Its a legit PDF of a ppt. And its chock full of lies and misdirections about the Chinese, Venezuelans, and Dominion voting systems machines.
Slide 23 is pretty straight forward:
Recommendations
● Brief Senators and Congressmen on foreign interference
● Declare National Security Emergency
● Foreign influence and control of electronic voting systems
● Declare electronic voting in all states invalid
● LEGAL & Genuine Paper ballot counts or Constitutional remedy
delegated to Congress
Two slides later:
Next Step – Count the Paper Ballots ▪ When you first disqualify all the counterfeit ballots and then count all the remaining
legal paper ballots nationwide, you restore confidence in the Election Outcome
▪ Regardless of the cheating and stuffing of the ballot box, by eliminating the counterfeit mail-in
and absentee ballots -> Trump Almost Certainly Wins
▪ Additionally, US Senators, US House Races, State, and Local races now turn to Republican
▪ This remedies the problem quickly and easily by:
▪ Eliminating counterfeit ballots and subtracting them from current totals to see if races change, or
▪ Recounting remaining, legal ballots by hand to see who wins races.
▪ Either way, we quickly and easily find out who the elected leaders REALLY ARE and restore confidence in
the outcome!
▪ The electronic voting machines are shifting votes from Trump to Biden
▪ The election fraud perpetrated used the major brands of machines Dominion and ES&S
▪ The foreign actors had to shift votes across the country in all areas in order to achieve
their objectives (Biden Victory)
▪ They had to shift votes in traditionally Republican strongholds in order to deliver a Biden win
because they could jam no more into the major cities (fraud votes)
Then Slide 31:
Restoring Confidence in the
2020 General Election
▪ “Clear the air – count and compare"
▪ The tabulators cannot be trusted nationwide, and many counterfeit ballots have been inserted, therefore:
▪ A full check to weed out counterfeit paper ballots and then a count of the remaining legal ones across the nation must be done
for all races in all states and will accurately determine who the people of America actually elected as our leaders.
▪ All ballots must remain locked and physically protected until directed by the federal government.
▪ A task force led by a trustworthy individual (we recommend Sid Gutierrez: NASA Astronaut, retired Air Force Colonel, Center
Director at a National Laboratory) produce a standard procedure that will be required and will include full accountability so
that counterfeit ballots are excluded and legal ballots are not lost, modified, substituted, or added in.
▪ We estimate counting can be done in each state in 5 to 10 days time with support from identified national assets.
▪ It must be done in full public view (via web broadcast) where each person has the chance to do the count themselves if they so
desire. No more hiding behind barriers, distances, secrecy, and gag orders.
▪ We have the technology to do this.
▪ The paper ballots are secret ballots which means you cannot tell who voted it.
▪ Counterfeit ballots can easily and quickly be identified using technology similar to that used by Treasury to find counterfeit currency. Illegal paper stock,
ballots filled out by a machine, mail-in ballots that never went through the mail, ballots printed and marked with the same ink can all be identified and
rejected.
▪ Every legal paper ballot will have a camera pointed at it and will be captured for a few seconds.
▪ It will be recorded and be broadcast in real time on the Internet.
Next slide:
Count-the-Ballots Top Level Plan
▪ A Trusted Lead Counter will be appointed with authority from the POTUS to direct the actions of select
federalized National Guard units and support from DOJ, DHS and other US government agencies as needed
to complete a recount of the legal paper ballots for the federal elections in all 50 states.
▪ US Marshals will immediately secure all ballots and provide a protective perimeter around the locations in
all 50 states.
▪ DHS will use their emergency response logistic capabilities to support the effort. They will integrate the IT
support that will include separating out the legal from the counterfeit ballots and communications with all
supporting the effort and cameras (Possibly cell phones) imaging each and every ballot. These images will
be distributed to the Internet.
▪ The federalized National Guard in each state will be supplied detailed processes and be responsible for
counting each legitimate paper ballot. Teams made up of three (first couple counties will be five) National
Guard members will do the counting. As the counting occurs each ballot will be imaged and the images
placed on the Internet so any US citizen can view them and count the ballots themselves. The process will be
completely transparent.
and the end:
Options for 6 JAN
VP Pence seats Republican Electors over the objections of Democrats in states
where fraud occurred
VP Pence rejects the electors from States where fraud occurred causing the
election to be decided by remaining electoral votes
VP Pence delays the decision in order to allow for a vetting and subsequent
counting of the all the legal paper ballots
Now, this COULD be a massive misdirection. A gigantic "Own the Libs" play. But if Logan had this 5 January then so did others. And given that its built on demonstrable lies, the conclusion that it was something resembling a coup plan - given its admitted origins - is hard to ignore.
How Ironic that Ted Cruz's former communications director is essentially calling them all out:
Turns out, some of former President Trump’s biggest, most powerful fans/informal advisors at Fox News knew he did something terrible on January 6. And so did his family. And members of Congress. And Trump administration officials.
They knew he was enabling the riot.
How do we know this? Because they explicitly begged his former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to ask Trump to take action to stop the riot in real-time texts as the destruction unfolded that day.
Agreed. Much like Abbot and Texas have now cleared the way to end Roe, Trump was perfectly content to finish the Republican's 50 year march to authoritarianism.
They see the end goal of their 50 year march to overturn the new Deal, roll back civil rights, and instill white conservative male minority rule. Even absent Donald Trump they believe they are winning and will continue to do so.
We keep underestimating them at our own peril, even though they have been VERY clear about who they are and what they are doing. That they would do this on personal cell phones, turn it over willingly and then seek to gum up the works by not answering questions about it ANOTHER example among many of their complete lack of shame or caring.
There are now two confirmed copies in the public sphere, with their attached meta data. That's not impossible to forge mind you, but it would take a lot more work then these folks think they need to put in here. That Meadows turned it over without any hint of duress tells me he thinks its fine.
Mark Meadows sent emails as early as November 7, 2020, about a plot for Republican-controlled states to send "alternate" slates of presidential electors to Congress on January 6 and texted a member of Congress about the idea, saying, "I love it," the House select committee investigating the Capitol insurrection said.
Or this from Mitch McConnell in May:
"I think at the heart of this recommendation by the Democrats is that they would like to continue to debate things that occured in the past," McConnell said. "They would to continue to litigate the former president into the future. We think the American people going forward, and in the fall of 2022, ought to focus on what this administration is doing to the country and what the clear choice is that we have made to oppose most of these initiatives."
Or this from Forbes in May:
About half of Republican voters characterize the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol as a “legitimate protest,” according to a new survey published Thursday, a finding that comes as a handful of GOP lawmakers continue to try and cast the riot in a more positive light.
Or this:
Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., said federal law enforcement was “harassing peaceful patriots” as it searches through photographic evidence of those who might have committed crimes on that day.
Rep. Jody Hice, R-Ga., added: “It was Trump supporters who lost their lives that day, not Trump supporters who were taking the lives of others.”
And maybe most jaw-dropping of all was Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., who compared those who entered the Capitol on Jan. 6 to a “normal tourist visit.”
“There was an undisciplined mob. There were some rioters, and some who committed acts of vandalism,” Clyde said. “But let me be clear, there was no insurrection and to call it an insurrection in my opinion, is a bold-faced lie. Watching the TV footage of those who entered the Capitol, and walk through Statuary Hall showed people in an orderly fashion staying between the stanchions and ropes taking videos and pictures, you know.”
I could keep going, but I suspect you don't actually care.
They are saying the "facts" as presented by CPD and the Prosecution are not to be trusted in this case because of a long history of CPD and other police agencies not actually sharing the facts. They do have a point.
He didn't decide it was unsalvageable - he bought it with the intention of taking it apart, making a much as possible on sales of the pieces and then bolting, leaving whatever was left (including the labor) to fend for itself. He was after a wealth transfer and nothing more.
The approach makes society and the country worse off and there’s nothing wrong with noticing that.
Sure there is - if you notice things like this, then you are noticing why libertarian economic thought and social policy might not actually work in the real world. Some people will object to that curtain being pulled that far back.
Well for starters some of us object to the obscene idea the generating ever more profit in ever shorter time frames - which is what happened here - is a good thing. We don't believe long term economic stability is compatible with sell it, sell it all NOW. And frankly, we object to the near monopolies in retail this creates, since Sears and KMart closing now leave only Target and Walmart in that retail sector. You can't sustain competitive markets by forcing all the competitors out of business. Or so I'm told.
he has been where he felt they were necessary - but its not working. Take Student Laon forgiveness. Biden has issued executive orders on this, and it is resulting in some relief to some people. But you'd never know about it from the news, as the E.O. Signing got buried in other stuff that other people think is more important.
Point being that Dems have the tools. They are using the tools, but they aren't the flashy showmen Trump is and so its not getting the media coverage he got. That's not something the Party can overcome by themselves, no matter what tool they deploy.
I suspect he get's indicted for multiple things before the campaign next year. Then you have 2022-2024 for a series of trials. You don't need to kill him to destroy him - just lock him up where no one can hear him.
Wow. Epic trolling. Except of course it has no basis in the real world. No one is restricting the right to free travel within national borders in the US. and I want fewer permanent restrictions on individual autonomy. Overturning Roe increases permanent restrictions on autonomy.
But sure, call liberals authoritarians if it makes you feel better.
Those 74 million voters (As Jay corrects me below) were in large sub groups, many of which overlapped. There's also been a TON of reporting on what motivated them. And i live among them - they are not hesitant to say what they based their voting on.
You also assumed in your answer that the one box he ticked was uniform across the voters in question. I said no such thing. I did say - which is correct - that they voted for him affirmatively based on him ticking at least one box they felt was important. I stand by that assertion.
On “From The Guardian: Capitol attack panel obtains PowerPoint that set out plan for Trump to stage coup”
I downloaded it through the Lara Logan Twitter. Its a legit PDF of a ppt. And its chock full of lies and misdirections about the Chinese, Venezuelans, and Dominion voting systems machines.
Slide 23 is pretty straight forward:
Two slides later:
Then Slide 31:
Next slide:
and the end:
Now, this COULD be a massive misdirection. A gigantic "Own the Libs" play. But if Logan had this 5 January then so did others. And given that its built on demonstrable lies, the conclusion that it was something resembling a coup plan - given its admitted origins - is hard to ignore.
On “Texts Between Fox News Host and Trump White House Revealed By January 6th committee”
And by the time the vast majority of the electorate rises to the damage done, it will be too late . . . .
"
How Ironic that Ted Cruz's former communications director is essentially calling them all out:
https://www.thebulwark.com/fox-hosts-begged-trump-to-stop-the-january-6-attack-on-the-capitol/
"
Agreed. Much like Abbot and Texas have now cleared the way to end Roe, Trump was perfectly content to finish the Republican's 50 year march to authoritarianism.
"
They see the end goal of their 50 year march to overturn the new Deal, roll back civil rights, and instill white conservative male minority rule. Even absent Donald Trump they believe they are winning and will continue to do so.
We keep underestimating them at our own peril, even though they have been VERY clear about who they are and what they are doing. That they would do this on personal cell phones, turn it over willingly and then seek to gum up the works by not answering questions about it ANOTHER example among many of their complete lack of shame or caring.
On “Is the Supreme Court Afraid of Democrats?”
Given how the Texas law is playing out, you are likely 100% correct.
"
I have a BUNCH of Republican politicians who would like a word.
On “From The Guardian: Capitol attack panel obtains PowerPoint that set out plan for Trump to stage coup”
There are now two confirmed copies in the public sphere, with their attached meta data. That's not impossible to forge mind you, but it would take a lot more work then these folks think they need to put in here. That Meadows turned it over without any hint of duress tells me he thinks its fine.
"
Well lets' start here:
Or this from Mitch McConnell in May:
Or this from Forbes in May:
Or this:
I could keep going, but I suspect you don't actually care.
On “From the Wall Street Journal: California’s Gavin Newsom Favors Gun Suits Modeled on Texas Abortion Law”
SCOTUS has already had two cracks at the the Texas law and left it alone. Your call as to what that means . . .
On “The Creative Destruction of Sears”
he definitely stayed within the lines.
On “Mastermind of Racist, Homophobic Attack of Jussie Smollett found Guilty of 5 of 6 Counts by Jury”
They are saying the "facts" as presented by CPD and the Prosecution are not to be trusted in this case because of a long history of CPD and other police agencies not actually sharing the facts. They do have a point.
On “The Creative Destruction of Sears”
And yet government goes right on picking winners and losers . . . .
"
Agreed.
On “Mastermind of Racist, Homophobic Attack of Jussie Smollett found Guilty of 5 of 6 Counts by Jury”
Good. Once it became clear he did this to himself, he lost any credibility he had much less sympathy.
On “The Creative Destruction of Sears”
He didn't decide it was unsalvageable - he bought it with the intention of taking it apart, making a much as possible on sales of the pieces and then bolting, leaving whatever was left (including the labor) to fend for itself. He was after a wealth transfer and nothing more.
"
Sure there is - if you notice things like this, then you are noticing why libertarian economic thought and social policy might not actually work in the real world. Some people will object to that curtain being pulled that far back.
"
Well for starters some of us object to the obscene idea the generating ever more profit in ever shorter time frames - which is what happened here - is a good thing. We don't believe long term economic stability is compatible with sell it, sell it all NOW. And frankly, we object to the near monopolies in retail this creates, since Sears and KMart closing now leave only Target and Walmart in that retail sector. You can't sustain competitive markets by forcing all the competitors out of business. Or so I'm told.
On “CNN Takes Bold Action In Firing Chris Cuomo On A Saturday Night”
Agreed.
"
With media in private sector hands and the Fairness Doctrine gone, that noble career path is probably dead.
On “Donald Trump’s 2024 Campaign Will Be Insane. It Also Might Win.”
he has been where he felt they were necessary - but its not working. Take Student Laon forgiveness. Biden has issued executive orders on this, and it is resulting in some relief to some people. But you'd never know about it from the news, as the E.O. Signing got buried in other stuff that other people think is more important.
Point being that Dems have the tools. They are using the tools, but they aren't the flashy showmen Trump is and so its not getting the media coverage he got. That's not something the Party can overcome by themselves, no matter what tool they deploy.
"
I suspect he get's indicted for multiple things before the campaign next year. Then you have 2022-2024 for a series of trials. You don't need to kill him to destroy him - just lock him up where no one can hear him.
On “The Center Cannot Hold”
lucky you. Those must be interesting conversations.
On “Donald Trump’s 2024 Campaign Will Be Insane. It Also Might Win.”
Wow. Epic trolling. Except of course it has no basis in the real world. No one is restricting the right to free travel within national borders in the US. and I want fewer permanent restrictions on individual autonomy. Overturning Roe increases permanent restrictions on autonomy.
But sure, call liberals authoritarians if it makes you feel better.
"
Those 74 million voters (As Jay corrects me below) were in large sub groups, many of which overlapped. There's also been a TON of reporting on what motivated them. And i live among them - they are not hesitant to say what they based their voting on.
You also assumed in your answer that the one box he ticked was uniform across the voters in question. I said no such thing. I did say - which is correct - that they voted for him affirmatively based on him ticking at least one box they felt was important. I stand by that assertion.