Why Don’t Americans Trust Republicans with Entitlements?
The Republican Party is currently in the middle of a long-standing disaster regarding entitlement spending. President Joe Biden has been hammering the party for months on their professed support for cutting Medicare and Social Security. Biden received accolades during his State of the Union address for attacking his opponents on these programs. The argument that House Speaker Kevin McCarthy wants to raise the retirement age and turn Medicare into a voucher program will continue to be part of Biden’s stump speeches, likely for the rest of his presidency.
Republicans know that the issue of entitlement cuts is a non-starter. These programs are incredibly popular. Threats to change them helped lead to Mitt Romney’s presidential defeat in 2012 and George W. Bush’s cratering popularity in 2005. Donald Trump has crafted a strong attack against his main presidential rival, Ron DeSantis, on protecting entitlements. The idea is one of the most toxic that many Republicans hold. At the same time, they cannot help themselves from unleashing such attacks.
The problem that the Republican Party faces is the problem faced by any party trying to change their stance on an unpopular issue. Both Democrats and Republicans have experienced policy shifts in recent years. The differences between both experiences highlights the uphill climb Republicans will continue to have in the court of public opinion.
In order to make a true change in a party’s stance on an issue, the party must be committed to such a change at every level. There must be a concerted effort from think tanks to politicians on the local, state, and national levels. Leadership must speak with one voice and wayward actors must be marginalized or even punished. A large-scale effort has the chance of convincing the public that the shift is genuine and not done for short-term partisan gain.
The most obvious example of this shift is the move away from “defund the police” rhetoric among Democrats beginning in 2020. For years, Democrats had been clear about their desire for police reform. But beginning in 2020, the party embraced the idea of shifting police resources to other local government departments. This rhetoric became politically perilous following the rise in crime that year.
As a result, the party began to move away from rhetoric about defunding. The president and major party leaders embraced reform without defunding or abolishing the police. Critically, popular leftist Democrats in Congress like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez fell in line. Joe Biden and other party leaders hammered home the move away from defunding on an almost daily basis. In February 2022, NBC News reported, “President Joe Biden and the Democratic Party are toughening their talk on crime, and refunding the police only two years after some progressive activists took up the call to defund them.” By the 2022 midterms, it was difficult for many pundits to even remember that Democrats had ever supported defunding the police. The move helped neutralize crime as a political cudgel and contributed to overperformance for Democrats in the midterm elections.
The recent move by Republicans on entitlements has been much less organized. Republicans have been critical of entitlement programs since they were first enacted in the 1930s. The party rallied behind several budgets throughout the 2010s that slashed Medicare and raised the retirement age for Social Security. Trump professed to support entitlements before and during his presidency, but the moment he left office the drumbeat against government programs began anew.
Many Republicans have tried to present a message of unified support for Medicare and Social Security. But they have been constantly undermined by other Republicans, most notably Rick Scott and Nikki Haley. A number of Republicans have stressed the importance of reducing entitlements or criticized those entitlements on a philosophical level. The Republican plan to protect or strengthen these programs does not exist. Even the rhetoric of spending supporters makes no logical sense. If a politician is on the record claiming that all government spending promotes laziness and ought to be replaced with charity and private programs, why are Medicare and Social Security exempt?
Republicans have not made the hard choices required to communicate to the public that they will not cut Social Security and Medicare. They have not reined in recalcitrant members or enforced message discipline. The party has not crafted a coherent narrative where entitlements fit into their vision of America’s future. As a result, they will not be able to stop both President Biden and former president Trump from being able to score political points on the issue.
That’s because Republicans have waged war against earned benefits, and the taxes that go with them, for nearly a century. Just as they don’t believe in regulation as a check on the excess, hubris and greed of business, they don’t accept a societal responsibility to take care of the less fortunate with government action. Its like the ACA – A democratic president (who happened to be black) got a democratic congress to pass Heritage Foundation ideas into law. Instead of taking the victory lap, they have spent over a decade saying they will repeal and replace their own ideas because it takes government to implement them. To create and sustain a position protective of earned benefits, Republicans would have to create and sustain a position that government can do good things.Report
On top of that, there’s the whole issue of how, after a couple of glasses of wine, the whole “you know, balancing the budget *IS* important… and entitlements *ARE* the biggest part of the budget… I’m just saying” speeches start coming out.
It’s not merely that they’ve stopped coming out and saying “we need to do X!”
It’s that the whole issue of “I’m just saying X would *WORK*!” keeps bubbling up when it’s really inconvenient.
I mean, if you asked me “do you think that Republicans would cut social security if they got a super-duper majority?”, I’d say “probably”. I’m not sure how many people wouldn’t say that.
To compare to “Defund”, you *KNOW* that Democratic Leaders would start pouring money on police departments the *SECOND* that Police Protests left the CHAZ and wandered toward the mayor’s house. The FREAKING SECOND.
Even now, even San Francisco is pouring money back into cops. And it’s only the politicians who live at the top of various hills that are still talking about defund.Report
The fundamental flaw of the post Cold War Republican Party really has been its failure to make peace philosophically with the fact that a modern state runs these kinds of programs. They’re just part and parcel with an advanced and prosperous society, and for that reason all the gimmicks and half baked ideas they (at least used to) propose are obvious subterfuge.Report
Is this a real or a rhetorical question?Report
Republicans have not made the hard choices required to communicate to the public that they will not cut Social Security and Medicare. They have not reined in recalcitrant members or enforced message discipline. The party has not crafted a coherent narrative where entitlements fit into their vision of America’s future.
C’mon, give them time. Its only been a hundred years, they’ll come up with something, any day now.Report
Heheh, good article. Why don’t Americans trust the foxes to guard the henhouse?Report