The DNC Republicans

David Thornton

David Thornton is a freelance writer and professional pilot who has also lived in Georgia, Florida, Kentucky, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. He is a graduate of the University of Georgia and Emmanuel College. He is Christian conservative/libertarian who was fortunate enough to have seen Ronald Reagan in person during his formative years. A former contributor to The Resurgent, David now writes for the Racket News with fellow Resurgent alum, Steve Berman, and his personal blog, CaptainKudzu. He currently lives with his wife and daughter near Columbus, Georgia. His son is serving in the US Air Force. You can find him on Twitter @CaptainKudzu and Facebook.

Related Post Roulette

29 Responses

  1. Chip Daniels
    Ignored
    says:

    Every political ideology has two types of adherence I suppose.
    One believes, “This ideology, if enacted, will bring peace and prosperity and human flourishing to all!”

    Another believes, “This ideology, if enacted, will bring suffering and humiliation to those I hate!”

    At various times one or the other faction is dominant in a party.

    In 1984, the first faction was Dominant in the Republican party. It was Morning In America, and conservatism was delivering good jobs and a secure peace to all.

    Today, the second faction has totally eclipsed the first. America is falling, crime is rampant, women are neglecting their duties as wives and mothers and sexual deviance is pervasive.

    The overwhelming theme of the DNC was of the first type, hope and joy and inclusive. I can see why a 1984 vintage Republican would be more attracted to the DNC than the RNC.
    IfReport

  2. Philip H
    Ignored
    says:

    I think it’s also telling that the Democratic Party has managed to get far enough right that these folks see it as an exit strategy.Report

    • Jaybird in reply to Philip H
      Ignored
      says:

      Speaking of which: Democrats Scrub Death Penalty Opposition From Campaign Platform.

      It’s a smart play. The Death Penalty is pretty popular and arguing against it led to a *LOT* of silly hypotheticals that had to go up against not only actual perpetrators but a core group of death penalty opponents who couldn’t help themselves but post stuff like “Good!” when stories of people like Nasser or Chauvin get shivved in prison.

      Part of me is surprised that this happened so closely to “DEFUND THE POLICE!” but another part of me isn’t. Less policing (whether or not less funding was the cause) didn’t work in practice the way that the abolitionists promised.

      The quick and fulsome backlash is a demonstration of how dumb the idea was.Report

      • Philip H in reply to Jaybird
        Ignored
        says:

        When we get to less policing that doesn’t involve vindictive, toddler tantrum like “Blue Flu” let me know.

        That aside, the popularity of the death penalty has been going down since its peak in the 1990’s (84%). Gallup has it currently around 53%, which is interesting since something like 59% believe its applied unfairly.Report

      • North in reply to Jaybird
        Ignored
        says:

        It shocks you mainly because you forget that, while Defund the Police was deeply popular on the internet left, it was not a formal policy of the Democratic Party. So it’s a very big change from what you imagine their policy position was but a considerably smaller move from what their actual policy position was.Report

    • Saul Degraw in reply to Philip H
      Ignored
      says:

      Assumes facts not in evidence. The Democratic Party is farther to the left than it has ever been in the lifetimes of anyone here.

      The Democratic Stance on immigration and LBTGQ rights is much further to left than anything you would see in Europe. The UK is in many ways vehemently anti-trans. The Democratic Party is also going for consumer protection and against price gouging.

      I find it astonishing that there are people who insist that the Democratic Party would be a center-right party in Europe and think that this is true because they have some imaginary version of Copenhagen in their heads that is a UBI paradise.Report

      • InMD in reply to Saul Degraw
        Ignored
        says:

        Europe in the minds of Americans is more myth than reality. Everything is free, there’s no crime, and humanity flourishes in a beneficent Goldilocks zone of social democracy and great cafes. Or so the fairy tales have it.

        One thing I will say is that the unwillingness to tax the ever living sh*t out of the middle class puts the Democrats to the right of many center left European parties. However I increasingly believe that has more to do with historical contingencies than anything else.

        Otherwise I think you’re right.Report

        • LeeEsq in reply to InMD
          Ignored
          says:

          Canada is also seen as this mystical and magical liberal land. I had to correct a friend of mine, half white/half Latina, about this several months ago in a post-COVID trip to Europe and pointed out she did not hang out with the local derp.

          Many American liberals and progressives don’t understand that the European welfare state is fueled by higher taxes not just on the wealthy but what would be upper middle class or middle class people in the United States as well.Report

        • Pinky in reply to InMD
          Ignored
          says:

          Additionally, while tax rates are important, if you spend without regard to revenue, they’re just not limiting.Report

      • Philip H in reply to Saul Degraw
        Ignored
        says:

        Having lived in Spain in the 1980’s, and traveling there regularly, I try to maintain a neutral approach to European existence. I am not one to claim the Democrats match European anything, just that they are not as liberal as anyone – including the party – wants to believe in the context of US political history.

        Where they are hardest right seems to be their economic stance. Its great that Biden went down on the picket lines last year and that the IRA and BIL are putting big money into the economy for long overdue investments. If you look closely however, a lot of that funding is hitting large corporations. And in terms of actual legislation passed, or at least not repealed, Democrats have a shoddy record of protecting small business and labor. And current Democratic foreign policy is Republican foreign policy of 30 or 40 years ago.

        Perhaps that will change, but based on history to date, Democrats are not a left party. In some areas they may finally be approaching center left -as defined in the US – but they aren’t there yet.Report

  3. Pinky
    Ignored
    says:

    For better (not true) or worse (probably true), there’s no Republican speaking at the DNC who carries anywhere near the weight of RFK Jr.Report

  4. Saul Degraw
    Ignored
    says:

    There is allegedly an old tale of Hasidic Jews about why one should see good deeds performed by atheists as being more exemplary than good deeds performed by the religious. The lesson of this story is that the atheist does not think he will be rewarded in the afterlife or avoid punishment in the afterlife for his good deeds. The atheist merely performs good deeds because he or she thinks it is the correct thing to do. Or the atheist is doing this not because he or she is commanded to do so:

    Master teaches his students that God created everything in the world to be appreciated, since everything is here to teach us a lesson.

    One clever student asks “What lesson can we learn from atheists? Why did God create them?”

    The Master responds “God created atheists to teach us the most important lesson of them all — the lesson of true compassion. You see, when an atheist performs an act of charity, visits someone who is sick, helps someone in need, and cares for the world, he is not doing so because of some religious teaching. He does not believe that God commanded him to perform this act. In fact, he does not believe in God at all, so his acts are based on an inner sense of morality. And look at the kindness he can bestow upon others simply because he feels it to be right.”

    “This means,” the Master continued “that when someone reaches out to you for help, you should never say ‘I pray that God will help you.’ Instead for the moment, you should become an atheist, imagine that there is no God who can help, and say ‘I will help you.’”

    You can probably find this in Martin Buber’s Tales of the Hasidim which has been out of print for 77 years unfortunately but this surfaces on the internet from time to time.

    Perhaps all the Republicans speaking at the DNC or writing that they are voting for Harris/Walz to save conservatism , think they are doing it because it is the correct thing to do, regardless of whether they get rewarded or not.Report

  5. Saul Degraw
    Ignored
    says:

    Harris knocked it out of the parkReport

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *