Tim Walz Tapped to be VP Kamala Harris Running Mate
Vice President Kamala Harris will be looking to win the 2024 presidential election with Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate.
Vice President Harris has chosen Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz to be her running mate, opting for a former high school teacher and Midwestern Democrat to complete a newly assembled presidential ticket following, according to three people familiar with the pick, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a decision that is not yet public.
The choice of Walz, 60, brings a degree of balance to the ticket that many Democrats have felt would be politically beneficial. Harris, 59, who is Black and Indian American and spent much of her career in deep-blue California, chose from a list of finalists populated by White men, including Walz, who have represented more competitive swaths of the country.
The selection culminates an increasingly intensive process in recent days, as the Harris team narrowed down the prospects and various factions of the Democratic Party lobbied for their favorites. On the weekend, Harris interviewed three finalists: Walz, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly.
Compared with some of the other prospects who Harris considered as potential running mates, Walz is less well-known and has faced less scrutiny on the national stage.
A second-term governor and chair of the Democratic Governors Association, Walz does not hail from a traditional battleground state — Minnesota has supported a Republican presidential candidate only once since 1960. But Walz’s credentials as a military veteran and gun owner who previously represented a Republican-leaning, rural part of Minnesota in Congress could help Harris appeal to working-class White voters who have turned away from Democrats and helped fuel Donald Trump’s political rise.
Walz, who is not well-known across the country, catapulted onto the national radar as it became clear that Harris was considering him for the ticket after Biden ended his reelection bid on July 21. He repeatedly criticized Trump and other Republicans as “weird” in cable news appearances, an unusual formulation that attracted attention. Other Democrats followed with the same line of attack, which appeared to strike a nerve in some Republicans, who have felt compelled to push back.
Walz now faces the urgent task of introducing himself to the country with about three months left before an election that has already been rocked by historic turmoil. The political tests ahead include a potential debate against Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), whom Trump tapped as his running mate in July.
Harris will hold her first rally with Walz on Tuesday in Philadelphia, the first stop in a four-day tour of battleground states that includes visits to Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada and elsewhere.
Harris’s choice for a running mate was among the most closely watched decisions of her fledgling campaign, as she sought to bolster the ticket’s prospects for victory in November and rapidly find someone who could be a governing partner. In picking Walz, she has selected a seasoned politician with executive governing experience and signaled the importance of Midwestern battleground states such as Wisconsin and Michigan.
The comparisons with Hillary Clinton picking Tim Kaine for the 2016 campaign will be immediate, but do not fit other than just on surface appearance. Walz, while not nationally known yet, is much more verbose and engaging in media that Kaine was and can talk to folks in an engaging way that sticks out. While VP Harris came up through the Democratic machine that is California, Walz represented a rural, contested area before rising to executive leadership of the state. He is the current chair of the Democratic Governors Association, so he plays well with others in the party.
The amount of help a VP pick brings is arguable, but historically proven to be negligible. The first rule of a VP pick therefore is, “first, do not harm.” Tim Walz is that, perfectly safe, and he will be good on tv and a contrast when set against MAGA Tech Bro Senator JD Vance in the vice president’s debate. Being able to attack the GOP ticket in a vocal cadence that is more Prairie Home Companion than the brash Trumpism everyone is accustomed to in year nine of Trump dominating GOP will have an appeal. But the race will still be decided on Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump, and the VPs are a small side show to that main event.
In a 2024 race that spent most of its lifestyle being boring and predictable before turning into historically chaotic over the last month or so, Tim Walz represents a very traditional “balance the ticket” type of safe pick. Now we go to the Democratic National Convention, with all the players now on the board. As soon as that is done, the real 2024 race can begin.
I want to hear North’s thoughts on this. He lives there, if I recall correctly, and has insight to how Walz did over the last few years.Report
Walz is, in some ways, a mini-Biden. He got a narrow trifecta in MN and then enacted a truck load of policy changes using it. He’s overseen legalizing pot which is a significant win not just on policy but also on politics- MN has had two sock puppet Pot legalization parties propped up by the right to split the left vote on pot grounds which have long been a drag and now, with pot legalized, are basically defunct.
Walz has vulnerabilities- his policies are kryptonite for libertarians and some brands of Trumpist populists and he was Governor during the 2020 summer of Floyd.
Personally I’m a fan. Picking Walz was the safer bet compared to Shapiro who is less vetted, less tested and carries more risk (both upside and downside risk). Walz is a party man, a folksy mid westerner and also seems to have some good political instincts. He’s a formidable pick but not an inspired one.Report
Okay. That’s insightful.
Future attacks that I see sticking to Walz involve his response to the 2020 mostly peaceful protests. I don’t see attacks like “he was governor when Floyd was murdered!” getting off the ground, but I do see attacks like “his cities burned and he supported the burners” moving the needle.
Do you see any truth to that observation?Report
The summer of Floyd happened. Two things can be true at once:
-The massive daytime protests were overwhelmingly peaceful.
-Then when it got dark bad actors, both among the protestors; among the cops supporters and especially the opportunistic dirtbags who sensed that the Law was on hiatus; caused no small amount of damage and trouble.
Walz was in charge when the initial troubles cropped up and the right will, no doubt, try to rag on him for it to varying effect. It will be complicated slightly by the fact that the police unions and worst police actors are/were unabashed right wing Trumpists.
Walz also was in charge when everyone got sick of it and the National guard and police got sent back in to put paid to the disorder. The left could rag on him for that but, thankfully, in the intervening times the idiocy of the “property violence is the righteous cry of the oppressed” minority got thoroughly shellacked so I suspect there won’t be much heart behind it. Note that Walz and Mayor Frey ultimately squashed the misbehavior in the cities very firmly and both got easily re-elected.
But absolutely I’d expect that the right will go after Walz for 2020. I’m not sure it’s a good idea for them because Kamala is a Kop and the sting on the left has mostly been excised from that so they’d be basically lobbing a slow pitch over the plate for her to repeat Bidens position on the whole matter.Report
Eh, they’ll have plenty of the mostly peaceful summer stuff to throw at Kamala too.
We’ll see.
But that’s where I see the stuff sticking.Report
I don’t think Kamala was actually in charge of any jurisdictions when the summer of Floyd happened. She said plenty of dumb stuff while running for the 2020 nod but, in theory, if she says different-opposing things now that should mostly ameliorate it. It helps that I get the distinct vibe that the further left is quietly chastened by the worst excesses of 2020’s events- not enough to actually vocally renounce it, mind, but enough to not want to talk about it and, thus, not get exercised if Kamala defects in a centrist direction on most of those subjects.Report
Eh, the whole “bail fund” thing will manage to ding her consistently, I imagine. Repudiation of the stuff she said in 2020 is fine and the more of it there is, the better it is.
Hell, I think it may even be the case that it’s better for *HER* if she does a good enough job repudiating it.
But the attacks that I think will require the most repudiation is the mostly peaceful summer attacks.Report
You need to stop basing your predictions on what you see in the Mirror of Erised.Report
Unless someone can dig up a video of Harris leading a night time mob into a target with a burning torch or something I think the 2020’s less peaceful minority events will have limited salience- so long as she, de minimis, sticks to Bidens lines on this.Report
But just to be clear, I love love LOVE the idea of Trump and Vance talking nonstop about George Floyd from now until Election Day.Report
I go back and forth. What Trump and Vance will say is entirely predictable. What team Harris says in return is the big question mark.Report
Maybe I’m wrong about this but the longer I follow politics the more I think there never is a satisfactory reckoning. Things just happen and eventually people move on. A not exactly apples to apples might be the GWOT that dominated politics for about 8 years. It was all anyone talked about and debated. Yet as far as I can tell there has never been a ‘lessons learned’ commission or official repudiation of all kinds of crazy things that were said and done. The subject was just changed, and new issues arose to be at each other’s throats over. None of which is to say there won’t be attacks on both Harris and Walz on their records. I’m just not sure it’s a knock out blow, or at least not one that’s available to Trump.Report
Yeah there’s not often a formal repudiation, just a kind of awkward reluctance to talk about it, a refusal to step up to defend what used to be passionate and now are defunct positions and a general eagerness to change the subject.Report
I get the sense that we are in a strange in between moment. All of the big blows related to the issues that animated roughly 2015 to 2022 have been exchanged. I assume the election will influence what materializes next.Report
I think so as well with at least some (mostly internet twitter) subjects.Report
The switch that flipped for me in 2015-2016 was, during the debate, when Trump spoke out against Iraq.
I’m trying to find the comment thread but, jeez, I can’t. But it was back then and I remember commenting something like “holy crap, Trump condemned the Iraq War”.
He Sista Soulja’ed it.
Kamala has a shot at a Sista Soulja moment.
But she has to take the shot at it.Report
Yea, Trump having no stake, role, or authorship of the most unpopular and embarrassing aspects of GOP policy prior to his nomination made the pivot easy. There will always be that interesting question of whether he saw something the Republican establishment was too bought off or blinkered to get or if he just stumbled into it by willingness to say anything and embrace what stuck.
Harris has a bit if a tougher road in that regard due to some of the things she said. However voters seem almost comically forgiving of flip flopping. What she said in the past I think is less important than what she is willing to say now. But to your point she needs to get out there and actually say some stuff on these topics, and have answers when inevitably questioned about it.Report
I think that nothing Harris or Walz did in 2020 will matter unless it’s found that they directly donated to the bail fund for a wife-beater whose first act on release was to knife her and the kids.Report
This is the story I think they’re going to tell with Walz. “Give us power, and we’ll make sure your kids are fed at school so they can learn, we’ll make you safer on the road when you drive, we’ll help you go to college,” and so on. The best Walz quote I’ve seen so far is that you don’t win elections to accumulate political capital, you win elections to use it. Dems will call Minnesota a Democratic policy success story and take whatever hits come along with that for things that haven’t worked out as well as Walz and his slim governing majority there had hoped.Report
we’ll make you safer on the road when you drive
By keeping deaf people off of it?Report
Is that a policy they’re pushing? Deaf people can’t be allowed to drive?Report
It’s the excuse Walz gave when he failed his roadside sobriety test. He couldn’t follow the instructions because he was deaf. Also, it was a kind of deafness that caused him to have balance problems.
There’s an article about this linked below!Report
As opined elsewhere in the thread if that’s the worst they can dig up on the guy, I think the Dems can live with it.Report
I don’t think that it is the worst that they can dig up on the guy.
It might be the funniest thing they could dig up on the guy.
“What?”
“I SAID IT MIGHT BE THE FUNNIEST THING THEY COULD DIG UP ON THE GUY!”Report
You’ve said more than once that you’re not a fan of stand-up comedy. We believe you; you don’t have to prove it.Report
It’s the argument from the Congress in 2010 all over again and I think it cuts in favor of the left. Yes the ACA was passed. Yes they lost their majority. The ACA endures and is even popular now and the majority has been regained and lost a couple times since.Report
He’s a formidable pick but not an inspired one.
Opportunities for inspired picks are rather few and far between. Name, say, three political picks that turned out to be inspired.Report
Lyndon Johnson is one. Unfortunately we got to learn how inspired it was when he acceeded to the Presidency.
Al Gore was… not inspired, maybe, but a bolder choice than it seems now (a second southern Democrat?), because now we think of him as the very personification of “dull and boring.”
Before that… McKinley picking Teddy Roosevelt, maybe? Jefferson picking Madison?Report
Madison wasn’t Jefferson’s VP. They were both Virginia’s, so the 12th Amendment got in the way. He was, rather, Secretary of State, which, in those days, was also a stepping stone to the Presidency.Report
Dick Cheney.
The charisma of a slug and brought zero electoral votes with him.
Picked because W was weak on how Washington worked and he figured he’d need help governing.Report
Probably we need to look for other VPs who did good in the main job so that’s Johnson and Ford.Report
HW. Had to wait his turn but was did a decent job once he got it.
Ford is a super-weird special case.Report
Sometimes formidable is better than inspired and he is good at the digs.Report
Indeed, don’t mistake my analysis for disapproval. I am not confident enough to say that Walz is a mistake. I think he’s more like an assured 12 on a d20 roll whereas Shapiro is an unmodified raw roll. Shapiro could be the better choice but he could EASILY be the worse one. Walz is solid.Report
Yeah the thing that gave me pause about Shapiro is that he has a couple potential scandals brewing.
Could be and probably are nothingburgers, but the downside risk is he’s Andrew Cuomo 2.0.Report
I am curious to hear what comes of that. I thought Shapiro was the right move but would certainly re evaluate if evidence of something serious comes to light.Report
We may never know now. Without Shapiro being Veep there’s not a lot of incentive for the GOP or anyone else to put those whispered rumors on full court roar. Instead, the DUI deafness thing from twenty some years ago and the Summer of Floyd troubles may be what we will hear about endlessly.
I’ve also heard that Shapiro, himself, was unenthused about taking the gig after such a short stint in PA (though of course he’d say that now). Politics is obfuscating as well as revealing.Report
You’re probably right. And if the guy has liabilities that would have bitten the campaign in the ass or if he just wasn’t enthused for whatever reason so be it. It’s entirely possible they did the right thing. However it still stings. There’s probably no realistic path to victory without PA. I would want every edge no matter how tiny.Report
You and I both, and if Harris goes down to defeat after losing PA then you can be sure we both will chew this decision over with great rue.
But it bears noting that things have broken our way the last few weeks in a manner that can scarcely be believed. If I had phoned back to my self of July 4th 2024 fame and told him everything that had happened he’d think I was flying high on the devil’s lettuce (and he’d want some!).Report
The Ellen Greenberg murder was the thing to look at if Shapiro was the VP choice. Wait, not murder, it was officially deemed a “suicide”.
She suffered 20 stab wounds including one that seemed to have taken place after she expired.Report
My thought on that is that Shapiro’s baggage was sufficiently known that you’d start off playing defense the next week to get through them.
Walz bought you a week when Team Blue was entirely on offense, with him not just not vulnerable to any early attacks, but leading the charge on the other guys.Report
Did she announce it in 3/4 time?Report
She stepped back with her right, and he led with his left.Report
Okay. Apparently some of the dirt on Walz will be that he was pretending to be deaf when he got his DUI in 1995. This is not true. He *WAS* deaf, his hearing has since been surgically corrected.
The argument, as I understand it, is that Walz was *NOT* drunk, it’s just that since he was deaf he didn’t understand what the state trooper was saying and his deafness contributed to his balance issues that caused him to fail a field sobriety test.
So he wasn’t drinking and driving, he was just deaf and driving 96 in a 55.
I’m not sure how much fun it’ll be defending Walz against this… but, of course, there remains the question: What about Trump?Report
And here’s a story that claims that the court transcript says that Walz’s BAC was .128:
Court transcript sheds new light on Walz’s DUI arrest
From the article:
Assuming that this article isn’t lying, I suppose we can be pleased that drunk driving isn’t a big deal anymore.Report
George W Bush openly talks about how he was a fall down drunk during a period of his life before he turned to faith and got his act cleaned up. Barack Obama openly talked about experimenting with drugs. Voters outside the Very Online Political Bubble don’t care about this stuff being in the back bio of long ago, especially for a VP pickReport
He wasn’t drunk.
He was deaf.Report
A DUI in 1995
*J_A counts with his fingers* 1, 2,….., 9, 10
*J_A gets continues with his toes * 11, 12, …., 20
*J_A commandeers some of J_A’s spouse’s fingers* 21,…, 28, 29.
So that happened 29 years ago.
Is this the worst we have? Is this Like Douglas Emhoff (who apparently must be an antisemite Jew according to the GOP) cheating on his first wife before he met Kamala Harris?
If that’s all, I will feel quite safe if Walz ever gets his hand in the nuclear footballReport
They are really scrapping the bottom of the barrel.Report
How well do you think the argument will do out in the wild?
“It was years ago! It doesn’t matter!”
(I will say that I would *MUCH* rather defend a 30 year old DUI than Shapiro’s murder cover-up.)Report
You’re right, this was a while ago and we shouldn’t care. It’s not like he cut another guy’s or something, right?Report
Did you commandeer your spouse’s toes when evaluating Blasey Ford’s accusation against Kavanaugh?Report
I think it’s disgusting that we live in a country where it’s still legal for a man to commandeer his wife’s toes for mathematical calculations.Report
Unless he’s transitioned without my knowledge , my spouse is a 6’3″Ulster dude.
However, being a fan of the ERA, I do believe commandeering your spouse’s toes should be illegal. Now, his fingers, that’s different, because reasonsReport
LOL! Fair enough!Report
Is Jaybird actually trying to concern troll with a nearly 30 year old DUI?Report
No point asking. Just let it sit there and speak for itself.Report
I actually find it revealing as a tell. The dude who spent years and years arguing that the Democratic Party should just adopt legalize weed as a mono-issue is now concern trolling over a DUI from 1995.Report
I’m not arguing that they should make it legal to drive stoned, Saul.
And the “concern trolling” isn’t about the DUI.
It was about driving while deaf.
Yell at me for being ableist.Report
If anything, I think voters affirmatively like the “I cleaned up my act and now look at me” story, which is great until and unless you stumble. So… don’t stumble, I guess.Report
Who among us.Report
First I’ve heard of it. The Right certainly has the capacity to try and make hay out of anything but this doesn’t sound like it’ll get legs outside the already decided bubble.Report
If you think both sides don’t do it, I’ve got a couch I’d like to sell you.Report
I don’t recall saying both sides don’t do it.Report
That’s the way I read the specificity of “the Right certainly has the capacity to try and…”.Report
Yeah I probably should have worded it as the right has the unique capacity to make hay out of nothing. The DUI event, at least, actually happened so that’d be a comparatively easy subject for them to work with.Report
It’s the kind of attack that both sides do, both sides should do (norms against drunk driving are Good, Actually!), and are not gonna move a single vote when aimed at the bottom half of the ticket.Report
Let us provide some more context. The DUI happened in the vicinity of Alliance, NE. Ever been to Alliance? I have. Nobody drives the speed limit. DUIs are routinely waived unless someone is hurt. Hell, DUIs are often nearly waived even if someone is killed. Box Butte County’s population density is 10.1 people per square mile, just a bit below the overall average for the half-million square miles of the rural Great Plains. The most notable thing about Alliance is that the long coal trains headed east out of the Powder River basin in Wyoming (on the order of 40% of all coal used to generate electricity in the country) have to get up the hill. Extra locomotive engines push trains up the hill, then coast back down to push the next train. From Alliance east, it’s basically downhill for the next 400 miles.Report
I’m sure you’ve seen this footage from an 80’s news report from when they made drinking a couple of beers before getting behind the wheel illegal:
The past is another country.Report
Heard an interesting observation. Don’t remember from who. Not my idea. But I kind of like it.
Campaign moves are often about opening up “permission gates,” so voters can come to you. For instance, Trump seems to have thought that by going to speak at the National Association of Black Journalists, he was opening up a “permission gate” to allow black voters to consider voting for him. (Not sure that worked if that truly was the goal and I’m not sure it was.) The J.D. Vance pick was a bad one because it didn’t open up any new permission gates for different people to join the Trump coalition.
Picking a normie-looking, normie-talking, white guy from a middle America state who isn’t a lawyer, served in the Army, doesn’t have a fancy college degree, has guns, is from a rural area, etc. opens up a “permission gate” for voters who identify with some of those traits to say they would consider voting for Kamala. On the one hand, it’s safe because we’re talking about majority sorts of traits, but maybe that’s a necessary serving of white bread under the barbeque, after so much effort has gone in to portraying Kamala Harris as “other” in one way or another.
Again, I’m not sure that I buy this idea, but I certainly see it and get what … whoever it was … on whatever channel it was on … was trying to get at, particularly with the idea of a “permission gate.”
If this idea of “permission gates” is right, then it seems like it might be possible to close them, too, either your own by a misstep or your opponent’s by a clever maneuver. And although I’ve cited bad gate moves by Trump here, that doesn’t mean he’s always had bad moves; the man did get elected in 2016 and came close again in 2020. These are just the recent ones that come to mind as signals to voters of this nature.Report
Maybe. I generally think of veep picks as being usually on the neutral to bad scale for electoral decisions. But you can squint and see how Pence could certainly have been a permission gate in 2016. Vance is more of a disaster as a pick it seems and has mainly resulted in Democrats having mocking fun which only upsets the right, the self-appointed underwear twisted contingent, and self-important pundits like the moustache of understandingReport
I think Walz is a pretty good pick in that he seems unlikely to particularly hurt the ticket with anybody, and Dem partisans are pretty excited about him. Grassroots enthusiasm does not directly translate to votes, but it does get you more money and more volunteers for GOTV efforts.
Given the way the election is probably going to play out (decided by a handful of battleground states with vote margins in the 4 or low 5 digits), that last seems pretty valuable.Report
From what I’ve heard talking to people over the weekend, nobody who was a likely Harris voter felt they needed “permission” to do it, and anybody who was a likely not-Harris voter wasn’t going to have their minds changed by a VP pick.Report
As Walz said, these people are extremely weird. Also every accusation is a confession.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c3aeb8ca12fa592b6ebbf1d0097feea42f90b3360a3cd012a893f6c2bf6c73fa.jpgReport
Democrats want us to know that they’re very concerned that children aren’t getting enough exposure to drag queens, and also that their opponents are weird.Report
Anita Bryant called from 1976: You’re stealing her act.Report