Sap to Syrup: A February Tradition in the Cold North

Bryan O'Nolan

Bryan O'Nolan is the the most highly paid investigative reporter at Ordinary Times. He lives in New Hampshire. He is available for effusive praise on Twitter. He can be contacted with thoughtfully couched criticism via email. His short story collection Mike Pence & Me is currently available from Amazon.

Related Post Roulette

4 Responses

  1. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    This means that five gallons of sap will yield two cups of finished syrup.

    This is nuts.Report

  2. DensityDuck
    Ignored
    says:

    One of the interesting things I read in a book about the Maine syrup industry was that it used to be typical to inject formaldehyde into the tree to keep the hole from plugging up during sap collection. (usually through the use of an airgun that spat wax pellets impregnated with the solution.)

    Apparently what happens with trees is that they’re all hosts to aerobic bacteria. When a hole is opened in the tree, this aerobic bacteria multiplies hugely, to the point that the bacterial colonies plug it up; an example of endosymbiosis. (The tree develops a scab that permanently blocks the hole after a season or two of growth.)

    So when you bash a hole in a tree to drain sap, the bacteria and the tree react just as if you were a particularly well-endowed woodpecker. The older tradition with formaldehyde just killed all the bacteria and kept the sap hole from closing; and producers did often complain that their sap trees would die after a few seasons, with large areas of dead wood spreading upward from the sap points.

    What changed this was the advent of cheap plastic tubing. Once that was available it was possible to construct a completely closed system; instead of an open tap draining into a bucket, a closed tube pulled sap into a pail or pan or tank, with the end of the tube submerged so there was no possibility of air getting back to the tap.

    The tubes had their own problems (they had to be cleaned thoroughly after each use, and eventually wore out) but the trees were a lot healthier and lasted longer instead of dying quickly from the loss of their bacterial assistants.

    So that’s an interesting example of how improved technology leads to greater agricultural yields with lower environmental impact, and it didn’t even really take much; just some plastic tubing.

    Older more-conservative producers stuck with the pellet-and-bucket method, considering it annoying to have to construct the tubing runs and clean them out every year (also the tubing-collection method required a more centralised layout for the producing area, instead of just having the right to collect from random trees around the state) but most regions eventually banned the use of formaldehyde in maple-syrup collection.Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *