Open Mic for the week of 11/27/2023

Jaybird

Jaybird is Birdmojo on Xbox Live and Jaybirdmojo on Playstation's network. He's been playing consoles since the Atari 2600 and it was Zork that taught him how to touch-type. If you've got a song for Wednesday, a commercial for Saturday, a recommendation for Tuesday, an essay for Monday, or, heck, just a handful a questions, fire off an email to AskJaybird-at-gmail.com

Related Post Roulette

65 Responses

  1. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    Walt Disney released an SEC report.

    Page 18 contains this interesting section:

    We face risks relating to misalignment with public and consumer tastes and preferences for entertainment, travel and consumer products, which impact demand for our entertainment offerings and products and the profitability of any of our businesses.
    Our businesses create entertainment, travel and consumer products whose success depends substantially on consumer tastes and preferences that change in often unpredictable ways. The success of our businesses depends on our ability to consistently create compelling content, which may be distributed, among other ways, through broadcast, cable, theaters, internet or mobile technology, and used in theme park attractions, hotels and other resort facilities and travel experiences and consumer products. Such distribution must meet the changing preferences of the broad consumer market and respond to competition from an expanding array of choices facilitated by technological developments in the delivery of content. The success of our theme parks, resorts, cruise ships and experiences, as well as our theatrical releases, depends on demand for public or out-of-home entertainment experiences. Demand for certain out-of-home entertainment experiences, such as theater-going to watch movies, has not returned to pre-pandemic levels. In addition, many of our businesses increasingly depend on acceptance of our offerings and products by consumers outside the U.S. The success of our businesses therefore depends on our ability to successfully predict and adapt to changing consumer tastes and preferences outside as well as inside the U.S. Moreover, we must often invest substantial amounts in content production and acquisition, acquisition of sports rights, launch of new sports-related studio programming, theme park attractions, cruise ships or hotels and other facilities or customer facing platforms before we know the extent to which these products will earn consumer acceptance, and these products may be introduced into a significantly different market or economic or social climate from the one we anticipated at the time of the investment decisions. Generally, our revenues and profitability are adversely impacted when our entertainment offerings and products, as well as our methods to make our offerings and products available to consumers, do not achieve sufficient consumer acceptance. Further, consumers’ perceptions of our position on matters of public interest, including our efforts to achieve certain of our environmental and social goals, often differ widely and present risks to our reputation and brands. Consumer tastes and preferences impact, among other items, revenue from advertising sales (which are based in part on ratings for the programs in which advertisements air), affiliate fees, subscription fees, theatrical film receipts, the license of rights to other distributors, theme park admissions, hotel room charges and merchandise, food and beverage sales, sales of licensed consumer products or sales of our other consumer products and services.

    “Further, consumers’ perceptions of our position on matters of public interest, including our efforts to achieve certain of our environmental and social goals, often differ widely and present risks to our reputation and brands.”

    In the past, when we’ve had discussions of people no longer consuming products, it’s devolved into accusations against the people no longer consuming the products.

    I’m guessing that we are nowhere near unique in this.

    This little nugget in the SEC report seems to hint that, maybe, they’re considering going a different direction than blaming the people who used to consume the product but now no longer consume the product or consume the product less.Report

    • Damon in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      I saw this a while ago. While I don’t go see movies much in the theatre, I have seen a lot of the Marvel movies on TV, and it’s generally on point. Scroll to the 3 minute mark for a breakdown on why Disney may be having some problems-at least with The Marvels. So, here’s an idea….make good movies that don’t insult your intelligence.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnFqai4EGhE&ab_channel=TheCriticalDrinkerReport

    • Pinky in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      Disney has spend around $1 billion this year on Quantumania, The Little Mermaid, Indy 5, and The Marvels, and that’s not counting advertising (which is often nearly 1:1). Those four didn’t make a $1 billion so far. I don’t think they have a single healthy franchise other than Avatar, which is currently a money-maker but not a game-changer. Maybe Pixar could squeeze out another sequel – its biggest hits in the past 5 years were Toy Story 4 and The Incredibles 2.Report

      • Michael Cain in reply to Pinky
        Ignored
        says:

        Disney’s global box office for 2023 (from IMDb): Guardians of the Galaxy v3, $845M; Little Mermaid, $570M; Quantumania, $476M; Dial of Destiny, $383M; Elemental, $495M; The Marvels, $189M. Call it $3B. I have no idea what Disney’s share of the global box office is.Report

        • Jaybird in reply to Michael Cain
          Ignored
          says:

          I think that part of the issue is 2019.

          Cut to the end of 2019, and Disney has hit a stunning, historic milestone, earning 33% of all domestic box office grosses for the year. According to Comscore, it’s the first time since at least 1999 that a single studio has commanded this much box office revenue in the US and Canada.

          And, a little bit later in the story:

          All told, Disney has to date earned $3.76 billion domestically (an all-time record) and $7.35 billion internationally (an all-time record), for a global take of $11.12 billion — yes, an all-time record. Those totals, by the way, do not reflect the grosses from this year’s releases from 20th Century Fox. But factoring in Fox inches Disney’s worldwide grosses up to $13.15 billion — practically a rounding error, and a stark reminder of how far Disney’s latest acquisition has to go to equal its new corporate cousins.

          They were on top of the world.

          Regression to the mean isn’t particularly surprising. We can talk all day about how Avengers: Endgame was a magnificent capstone for a story that started 11 years before and that’s amazing. You’d have to be crazy to think that 2020 could have been better even without a global pandemic.

          But here we are. Looking at 2023. It wouldn’t be surprising that the executive types are looking at 2023 through the lens of 2019.Report

        • Pinky in reply to Michael Cain
          Ignored
          says:

          Good catch. I was looking at domestic. Those 6 movies cost about $1.5 billion. Figure advertising was about that much, and then the studio has to share revenue with the theaters, so most people figure a movie has to make 2.5x its original cost to be profitable (and studio financials are both obscure and padded). So those 6 may have netted a $1 billion loss, at least for release. Adding in intellectual property rights, along with the toys and soundtracks, and they may ultimately break even. But it’s hard to see an Indy 6, Guardians 4, or Incredibles 3.Report

    • Jaybird in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      In that vein, CNBC Reporter Alex Sherman reports:

      Report

  2. Damon
    Ignored
    says:

    Secretive White House Surveillance Program Gives Cops Access to Trillions of US Phone Records

    https://www.wired.com/story/hemisphere-das-white-house-surveillance-trillions-us-call-records/

    “According to the letter, a surveillance program now known as Data Analytical Services (DAS) has for more than a decade allowed federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies to mine the details of Americans’ calls, analyzing the phone records of countless people who are not suspected of any crime, including victims. Using a technique known as chain analysis, the program targets not only those in direct phone contact with a criminal suspect but anyone with whom those individuals have been in contact as well.”

    Well, I’m surprised…..not.Report

    • Philip H in reply to Damon
      Ignored
      says:

      Its just a down stream revelation of the warrantless wire tapping authorized under the original Patriot Act back in GWB days . . . .Report

      • Damon in reply to Philip H
        Ignored
        says:

        Things that make you say “hmmm”.Report

        • Philip H in reply to Damon
          Ignored
          says:

          This story doesn’t make me say hum at all. Some of my earliest blog-o-sphere work (very pre OT) was on this vary topic and I railed (as did a good many liberals) about the Pandora’s box this was opening. We were told that the GWOT REQUIRED this sort of response, and it would only be used against the “bad” people. I didn’t believe it then, nor do I believe it now. Problem is we are dialing in on 20 years of this program and its predecessors being in existence. Which tells me its as close to permanent as anything in the federal sphere is.Report

          • Damon in reply to Philip H
            Ignored
            says:

            Agreed, and I opposed it then and do so now, but I think it’s important to remind folks of what was done in the past if only to rebut “oh but they’d never do something like that.”.Report

  3. LeeEsq
    Ignored
    says:

    Home school diplomas for sale in Louisiana. No need to attend classes. Time for the Federal government to smash down good and hard with the full force of the state against this practice.

    https://projects.apnews.com/features/2023/missing-students-unapproved-schools/index.htmlReport

    • Philip H in reply to LeeEsq
      Ignored
      says:

      My home state . . . and House Speaker Mike Johnson’s as well . . .

      the feds have no real dog in this fight unfortunately. As education policy is a state by state decision, and as Louisiana has been slowly squeezing public schools because they have the audacity to use white people’s tax money to educate black people, this is a very predictable outcome. The best enforcement mechanism to correct this would be college refusing admissions on the basis of fraudulent documents, and employers refusing to hire for the same reason. I’m doubtful that will occur however.Report

    • Pinky in reply to LeeEsq
      Ignored
      says:

      State tests for state-approved diplomas, no tests for unapproved diplomas. Calling an unapproved diploma “approved” is considered fraud. That sounds right to me. This doesn’t even sound like “homeschooling”, particularly.

      A am pretty top-down on education reform, however. I think we need a national GED. An employer can’t afford to gamble on whether a school – approved or not – or homeschool has done its job. And since lower-qualification positions are so important for potentially disadvantaged people, we need a way to convey trustworthiness in a certification.Report

    • Marchmaine in reply to LeeEsq
      Ignored
      says:

      State regulations differ by state… so I can’t exactly say what’s going on in LA… but as a general rule, there isn’t really a concept of a ‘Homeschool Diploma’ that you could sell. None of my kids have a (HS) diploma.

      Here’s what the article is specifically talking about:

      “Unlike public schools, formal homeschooling programs or traditional private schools, nearly 9,000 private schools in Louisiana don’t need state approval to grant degrees. Nearly every one of those unapproved schools was created to serve a single homeschooling family, but some have buildings, classrooms, teachers and dozens of students.”

      It seems, rather, that some folks are creating Private Schools in order to grant a degree. It’s a Private School loophole to deal with the fact that there isn’t really a degree that is conferred for homeschooling.

      For example, this is the VA Dept of Ed policy on granting diplomas:
      “Typically, school boards do not award diplomas to students who are not enrolled in public schools under their supervision. Therefore, students taught at home may not receive diplomas unless those students are enrolled in a correspondence program or other program that awards a diploma or other exiting credential.

      Neither VDOE nor public school divisions maintain any academic records, such as transcripts or diploma status, for students who have been home schooled. Thus VDOE cannot verify a home schooled student’s high school graduation status for military recruiters, colleges, universities, technical schools, employers, or any other entity.”

      Which is why we ‘close the loop’ by having our kids attend Community College and basically get a 5-yr High-School Associate’s Degree… or just apply to College as a Home schooled student — and the Colleges verify what information they want to accept or not.

      There are better ways to open-up educational pathways … I have lots of ideas that would re-invigorate public and communal education, if not the current broken institutions we have — but I prefer incremental improvements with rational actors rather than radical ‘smash them all and let the DOE sort them out’ approaches.Report

      • Philip H in reply to Marchmaine
        Ignored
        says:

        I suspect if you trace this back in Louisiana far enough in time, you will see this relating quite strongly to the white flight after desegregation in the 980’s, and further still back tot he segregation academies that sprang up in the 1960’s to fight back against the civil rights movement.Report

        • Michael Cain in reply to Philip H
          Ignored
          says:

          Earlier than that. First half of the 1970s saw a whole lot of restrictions on annexation in the Midwest and Near West states. The basic model was that big cities couldn’t annex across county lines without permission of the annexed area. In Michigan it was specifically to keep Detroit from annexing into Oakland County, where white-collar parts of the auto industry moved*. In Nebraska, it was specifically to keep Omaha from annexing into the rapidly growing suburbs to the south. In Colorado, the Poundstone amendment said that any “city and county” — at that time only Denver — was restricted to keep them out of the big western suburbs.

          Overall, the geography is interesting. Eg, St. Louis collapsed and has never recovered. Kansas City never fell as far and has come back.

          * Still one of the largest global concentrations of high end automotive engineering talent.Report

        • Marchmaine in reply to Philip H
          Ignored
          says:

          I’m pretty sure you’d be conflating unrelated issues with regard this particular situation regarding homeschoolers using a private school diploma loophole.

          It’s not solving for racism, it’s solving for credentialism.Report

          • Philip H in reply to Marchmaine
            Ignored
            says:

            I would greatly appreciate it if you would not tell me about my lived experiences in the state in question, and what conclusions I may or may not draw from those experiences. Unless you care to tell me what parish you grew up in and which school system you graduated from. Whether you like or agree with my conclusions or not, as a native of Louisiana and a graduate of its public schools in the decade after court ordered desegregation I may actually know more then you do about why thigs there are the way they are.Report

      • Pinky in reply to Marchmaine
        Ignored
        says:

        “It seems, rather, that some folks are creating Private Schools in order to grant a degree. It’s a Private School loophole to deal with the fact that there isn’t really a degree that is conferred for homeschooling.”

        The article says that there is an option for official diplomas for homeschooled students in Louisiana:

        “Parents who want their child to receive a state-recognized high school diploma can apply for the official home study program. They must submit documentation such as test scores or copies of the student’s work to show their child has received 180 days of schooling at the same quality as a public school’s. The state-recognized diploma is more widely accepted by colleges and allows students to qualify for a popular in-state scholarship program.”

        If there’s a loophole, I think it’s to trick parents / students / institutions into thinking that a real diploma has been granted when it hasn’t. I mean, if you want to send me $25 I’ll send you a Pinky’s Certification of Flawless Genius, but I’m going to make sure it says clearly “Not An Official Diploma” so I won’t get arrested.Report

        • Marchmaine in reply to Pinky
          Ignored
          says:

          Sure, as I mentioned, each state has all sorts of variations… Virginia (for a while anyway) had a program where you could plop a kid in front of a screen for the requisite number of hours each week/month/year and as long as all the hours were accounted for and were equal to the number of hours required for being in a public school… you could get a Virginia ‘homeschool’ program that would keep you sort of in the Public System.

          But I don’t know anyone who ever did that — for obvious reasons.

          What seems to be happening is that there was an easier way to grant a diploma to your kid that was easy enough for 9,000 +/- families to go that route.

          The reason I call it a loophole is that usually there’s a pretty simple requirement to document the activity in the ‘school’ related to the child… which the article implies isn’t happening. I mean, I have to keep records of my own children’s education… so it’s odd if I was granted the ability to confer a diploma without proof of any sort of educational activities.

          But yeah, every state has different requirements… some better, some worse for homeschooling… but this issue doesn’t strike me as a key problem — more of an accident of not paying attention to shifting assumptions regarding HS diplomas.Report

    • Jaybird in reply to LeeEsq
      Ignored
      says:

      If we’re going to be graduating functionally illiterate people, the *STATE* should be getting that money!Report

  4. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    Re: Socialized Medicine.

    It wasn’t *THAT* long ago that this would have been a strawman:

    Report

    • Chip Daniels in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      I mentioned the other day that the end of the Cold War settled several disputed issues and placed them beyond debate.

      One was to confirm that the optimum outcome for society is to have regulated markets with a robust safety net.

      Contained within that is the fact that a robust safety net includes a highly socialized system of Healthcare.

      Even accepting this story, systems like Canada’s provide a superior outcome for its citizens than the American one does.Report

    • Saul Degraw in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      American parent takes kid to an emergency room after the kid has an accident at soccer practice because the kid was hit by a ball to make sure the kid does not have a fractured arm or leg, the independent emergency room doctors’ group is not in network, parent gets it with a 35K bill.Report

  5. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    Venezuela apparently wants to invade Guyana.

    Guyana, you see, has oil.Report

  6. Pinky
    Ignored
    says:

    Education Secretary Cardona: “I think it was President Reagan who said, ‘We’re from the government. We’re here to help.'”

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2023/11/29/reagan-misquote-education-secretary-biden-administration-overreach/71727121007/Report

  7. Burt Likko
    Ignored
    says:

    Random observation: I kind of like the overall GOP debate structure: have many debates (getting the candidates and the party brand on TV and out to the public), eliminating candidates one by one, based on polling and fundraising, until there’s only a small number left. Before the primaries. This is a good strategy for making primaries less bruising and disunifying and producing a candidate who will be most likely to appeal to the mainstream. It’s too bad that Trump isn’t playing ball with it, but Trump disrupts everything.

    The Democrats don’t have a Trump problem (or rather, they don’t have the same kind of Trump problem mainstream Republicans do). I think I’d like to see the Democrats adopt a similar sort of pre-primary debate regimen in 2028.Report

  8. LeeEsq
    Ignored
    says:

    This article from Vox on the regressive dating advice you can find on TikTok basically speaks a lot about the difference between how college educated liberals see the world and how nearly everybody else sees the world. I agree with Vox’s overall criticism but there are lots of people who believe this regressive dating advice is absolutely correct and hold to it very dearly. Possibly way more people than the ones who hold progressive relationship beliefs even if only dealing with the West.

    https://www.vox.com/culture/23978325/dating-advice-shera-seven-tiktok-sprinkle-sprinkleReport

    • Pinky in reply to LeeEsq
      Ignored
      says:

      It’s an interesting article. I really liked the observation that dating apps have “gamified” dating. I think a lot of online behaviour is gamified. I was thinking about something similar on the Celebrity Death thread, but without that great word.

      As for the latest wave of dating advice, I don’t think it’s regressive exactly. It’s more like the cheat codes for playing the game under feminist rules, maybe with some “how to find the right person to marry” mixed in. But the core feminist idea is that the male and female don’t complete each other. Regressive would be compatibility and morality. The Tate stuff is a natural result of an iterative game, although there’s a contrary force within most of us that aspires to a happy life married.

      One other thing the article nailed was at the end. Why do people really listen to this stuff? Mostly bored.Report

      • Chip Daniels in reply to Pinky
        Ignored
        says:

        In addition to “gamification” I think “cheat code” is a great term also.

        That’s what struck me, is the way all the advice is in the vein of “Try this One Weird Trick” to get a happy life.

        I remember reading an essay about the magical thinking of some young women regarding their wedding- that they grew fanatical about making the One Special Day perfect, convinced that if that day were perfect, the marriage itself would be perfect as well, and conversely, if the cake fell over or the doves didn’t fly out as planned, the marriage was ruined.Report

    • Damon in reply to LeeEsq
      Ignored
      says:

      Regressive? Not sure about that. I’ve gotten some good advice from some content, which I used very effectively, specifically about establishing boundaries about what a woman has input on in my life. It was very effective.Report

  9. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    Headline of the Day: FBI agent carjacked in DC, police say

    Around 3:45 p.m., MPD officers responded to 12 St NE for an armed carjacking of a federal agent. The agent told police that two suspects took their vehicle.

    The vehicle was recovered at 4:10 p.m. in the 1000 block of 15th St SE, less than a mile from where the car was taken.

    Unfortunately, the vehicle was also carrying some to-be-declassified documents about the Kennedy assassination. These documents were not recovered.Report

  10. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    It happens in threes.
    Rosalynn Carter.
    Henry Kissinger.
    Shane McGowan.Report

    • pillsy in reply to CJColucci
      Ignored
      says:

      This is a particularly wild contrast:

      Trump attorney Christopher Kise called it “a tragic day for the rule of law.” Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, complained that the order was “nothing but attempted election interference, which is failing terribly.”

      Engoron imposed the gag order Oct. 3 after Trump posted a derogatory comment about the judge’s law clerk to social media. The post, which included a baseless allegation about the clerk’s personal life, came the second day of the trial in New York Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit.

      It actually still surprises me how little political price Trump pays for the way the care and feeding of his own ego is his top priority, both when campaigning and (even worse) when in office.Report

    • DensityDuck in reply to Kazzy
      Ignored
      says:

      right, just like Bush knew about 9/11 and let it happen, and Johnson knew about Oswald and let it happen, and Roosevelt knew about Pearl Harbor and let it happen…Report

      • Kazzy in reply to DensityDuck
        Ignored
        says:

        Did you read the article? If so, why do you dismiss the evidence pointing towards Israel’s knowledge of the plan?Report

        • DensityDuck in reply to Kazzy
          Ignored
          says:

          Yeah, and I wrote what I wrote.Report

          • DensityDuck in reply to DensityDuck
            Ignored
            says:

            like, there’s a difference between “there was credible intelligence that Hamas was moving men and material into place to conduct an attack” and “they knew that These Exact Activities were going to occur on This Actual Day And Time, and intentionally chose to not react”Report

            • KenB in reply to DensityDuck
              Ignored
              says:

              Yes this looks basically like hindsight bias. It’s like when you watch a murder mystery and they reveal whodunnit, you react with “I knew it!!” because of all the clues pointing to that person – but there were also clues pointing to other people, so you didnt know which information was salient and which wasn’t until after the fact.

              Still, it doesn’t mean there won’t be fallout – the criticism may in fact be unfair but the voters may not see it that way.Report

            • Kazzy in reply to DensityDuck
              Ignored
              says:

              Those goal posts feel light to you?Report

        • Philip H in reply to Kazzy
          Ignored
          says:

          He dismisses it because he believes that so many other equally or more powerful players in so many other nations have done this that it doesn’t matter. And because there was no fallout for those others their should be no fall out in Israel. But he wants to appear sophisticated and trollish so he writes obtusely.Report

      • Philip H in reply to DensityDuck
        Ignored
        says:

        So you think Israeli politics plays by the same rules American politics does? Fascinating.Report

    • Michael Cain in reply to Kazzy
      Ignored
      says:

      Since this is the newest top-level comment on the Middle East, I’ll put this here. For other reasons I was looking at the very beginning of the site’s post/comment database. Here’s the first paragraph from the oldest comment still in there:

      Although I richly deserve a reputation as something of a polemicist, I’d like to think that I am not so shrill a partisan that I don’t admit that times have changed. In the beginning of the assault on Gaza, I joined Glenn Greenwald and others is saying that the American media consistently tells only one side of the story in the Israeli/Palestinian divide, and that side is Israel’s side. While I continue to believe that our national conversation is far from an equitable or fair one, I have to admit that things have changed; there is more criticism and questioning of Israel and its actions than I would have felt possible before the conflict began.

      Report

  11. Chip Daniels
    Ignored
    says:

    Yet another stochastic terror attack:

    Ex-Marine pleads guilty to firebombing Planned Parenthood in Costa Mesa
    A former US Marine pleaded guilty in federal court on Thursday, Nov. 30 to firebombing a Planned Parenthood clinic in Costa Mesa in 2022.

    Chance Brannon, 24, of San Juan Capistrano, who was an active-duty Marine stationed at Camp Pendleton at the time of the crime, also said he made plans for additional attacks on a second Planned Parenthood clinic, a Southern California Edison substation, and an LGBTQ pride night celebration at Dodger Stadium, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said in a statement.

    https://www.ocregister.com/2023/11/30/ex-marine-pleads-guilty-to-firebombing-planned-parenthood-in-costa-mesa/Report

  12. LeeEsq
    Ignored
    says:

    Not surprisingly Hamas engaged in a systematic campaign to rape Israeli women it held and is holding in captivity. This is not going to make arguments that Israel should wage war against Hamas less hard. That a lot of the loudest critics of Israel in the war against Hamas are going to be silent about this and seem to conveniently forget what Hamas did is not going to help the Palestinians either. They can’t even engage in some ritual denunciation.

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-11-30/ty-article-magazine/.highlight/hamas-campaign-of-rape-against-israeli-women-is-revealed-testimony-after-testimony/0000018c-2144-da36-a1de-6767dac90000Report

  13. Michael Cain
    Ignored
    says:

    Tom’s Hardware reviewed the available information about China’s new exaflop super computer. An exaflop is a billion billion double-precision floating-point operations per second. This is one of the technologies that the US restrictions on exports is supposed to keep China from achieving. China designed and fabricated the integrated circuits for the machine in-country. Granted that the tech is not bleeding edge (14nm), and consumes more energy both for processing and cooling than supercomputers based on TSMC and Intel parts, but it works.Report

  14. Damon
    Ignored
    says:

    If Electric Cars Were Honest

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRUg2NXmLd0&ab_channel=HonestAds

    I can’t disagree.Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *