ChatGPT Isn’t Taking Your Job
When it all started, the “OMG You Should Try Out This ChatGPT Thing!” craze, I thought I’d give it a whirl.
(I Have A Question…)
…ChatGPT, of course, had an answer. Here it is:
It is difficult to predict with certainty which specific cryptocurrencies will survive or fail in the future. The success or failure of a cryptocurrency can depend on a wide range of factors, including its technology, adoption, market conditions, and competition.
Bitcoin and Ethereum are two of the largest and most well-established cryptocurrencies, and they have both achieved a significant level of adoption and have strong networks of users and developers. This can make them more resilient to changes in the market and give them a competitive advantage over smaller or less established cryptocurrencies.
However, it is important to note that the cryptocurrency market is highly volatile and unpredictable, and it is possible for any cryptocurrency, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, to experience fluctuations in value or to fail. It is also possible for new cryptocurrencies to emerge and gain significant adoption, potentially competing with or even surpassing existing ones.
Ultimately, it is impossible to accurately predict the future of the cryptocurrency market, and it is important for investors to carefully consider the risks and potential outcomes before making any investment decisions.
That Wasn’t Too Bad…
Nuance — in the form of online discussions at least, and maybe with respect to political discourse as well — died recently. It ain’t coming back online, and it certainly won’t come back if it’s reliant on machine-learning, algorithms, and AI-led back-and-forths about topics that used to be parlor discussions. (Yes, Bitcoin and Ethereum were parlor discussions back in the olden days.)
It’s time to figure out why ChatGPT isn’t taking your job. It’s…complicated. But simple.
There might only be two approaches to content these days, anyway: either you have a 30-second TikTok piece that goes viral, or you spend 3 hours talking to Joe Rogan and it gets 5 million views. Quick hits, or nuanced explanations. Which brings us to our second experiment.
(Here’s ChatGPT’s Response, Round Two…)
Cryptocurrency is a complex and fascinating topic, one that requires a deep understanding of both human psychology and the mechanics of finance. As with so many things in life, it is a subject that is both rooted in tradition and destined to shape the future.
From a psychological perspective, cryptocurrency can be understood as a manifestation of our innate desire for freedom and independence. It represents a rejection of centralized systems of power and control, and instead offers a decentralized alternative that is based on trust, transparency, and accountability.
At its core, cryptocurrency is a form of digital currency that is built on blockchain technology. This technology allows for secure and transparent transactions, as well as the creation of new units of currency through the process of “mining”. Unlike traditional currency, which is controlled by governments and financial institutions, cryptocurrency operates independently and without interference.
However, it is important to recognize that the use of cryptocurrency is still in its infancy and that it is not without its risks. Just as the traditional financial system is prone to instability and corruption, the world of cryptocurrency is also vulnerable to fraud and manipulation.
Ultimately, the rise of cryptocurrency represents a profound shift in the way we think about money and financial systems. It is a subject that requires careful consideration and a deep understanding of both its potential benefits and its potential drawbacks.
In the words of Jordan Peterson, “The only way to truly understand the world is to understand the underlying patterns that give rise to it.” The same is true for cryptocurrency. To truly grasp its significance, one must delve into its history, its technical workings, and its psychological underpinnings. Only then can we begin to understand the full scope of its impact on our lives and our world.
And This Is Related to Crypto…How?
In our quest to automate everything — do you really need a “smart fridge?” — we’re quick to both automate and delegate the ability to think. That part of your brain that can remember the call-in number for the radio station hotline where you tried to win money back in the day — 234-7533, in case you’re curious; 674-8851 if you’re outside of St. Joe County — can now focus on other things thanks to your “smart phone.” (Which you *do* need.) So your brain is free to explore. Your keyboard is still yours.
Some thoughts, then…
Don’t Be Afraid of Thinking This Through
I haven’t arrived at any of the hundreds of blog posts on this site by heading over to some blog post generation engine and asking what I should write about. And, dare I say it out loud, there are some folks I’ve outsourced some content creation to haven’t been able to provide enough of a nuanced discussion to touch a nerve with readers. (Others? Yeah, some of the work from my pal Anthony were darn good.)
You live and learn, and you continue to think your way through how all of this might play out.
Or might not.
The Power of Narrative
In an article for Ordinary Times, I gave a sneak peek at the book I’ve been working on (for too long, it seems) called “Own The Narrative.” The concept: most really good narratives do tend to follow a few rules — and we’re not talking about conflict, rising action, resolution stuff — and if you can see around blind corners and figure out what those rules are and how they apply to your situation, you can use those rules to your advantage.
One of those 8 rules (50 percent fewer than Jordan Peterson’s 12) is to “Identify a Boogeyman.” Automation can be your friend but, in this case, automating the content marketing necessary to tell the story about the nuances of crypto…that’s an enemy. A villain. The Boogeyman.
If It Smells Like A Scam
One wonders if ChatGPT had been employed at all to sniff out FTX. I mean, it looked like a scam, it sounded like a scam. But, if all you’re looking for is some cheap content to ratchet up your brand’s profile, you’re likely to go after keywords and throw in a few affiliate links for good measure. (This blog: guilty as charged on using affiliate links, but not guilty of pumping FTX.)
Of all the questionable purchases, though, putting the FTX logo on Major League Baseball umpires' uniforms is the most questionable.
I mean, the average American only knows of one umpire: Enrico Palazzo. pic.twitter.com/gTpG4nKVzN
— Dave Van de Walle (@Area224) May 24, 2022
So Why Won’t ChatGPT Take My Job?
Simple. You think, you read, you explore. You’re willing to seek out more information about whatever subject you’re interested in. You enjoy nuance. You’re not afraid of doing your own research.
And you continue to sharpen your own thinking, and your own writing. Right?
Your voice is…YOUR voice. Not anyone else’s. Don’t outsource your voice to a computer.
This post originally appeared on the Metacoin blog
I haven’t yet considered asking ChatGPT to write a post. Huh. Maybe I’ll explore that.
So far, the big thing I did was this:
Well, it spat out something that doesn’t always work. (It didn’t confirm that whatever was plugged in was a USB drive. It just checked whether *SOMETHING* got plugged in.)
So I changed my prompt to:
It spat out something that actually worked that time.
In the very, very short term, I could see how ChatGPT could be an excellent helper for low-level admins.
In the longer term, I could see this replacing low-level admins.
Which is bad because the way you get a medium-level admin is to have a guy who wandered through the whole low-level admin thing first.
ChatGPT will give us enough breathing space to eat some of the seed corn. That will give us a very nice feast in the short term.Report
Oh, wait, I *DID* ask it to “Write a New York Times opinion piece. The author is a leading professor of critical theory. The author explains why we need to keep property values high to fight racism.”
Here’s what it gave me:
Professional Take people probably should worry.Report
Oh yeah???
I asked it to write a side hustle idea post in the style of a LinkedIn marketer.
As a marketer, you already have the skills and experience to connect with audiences, build relationships, and create compelling content. But what if you could put those skills to work in a side hustle and earn some extra cash?
Here are five side hustle ideas for online marketers:
Content creation: If you’re a wordsmith or videographer, you can offer your services as a freelancer. Sites like Upwork and Fiverr are great places to get started, and you can set your own rates and work as much or as little as you want.
Social media management: Many businesses struggle to keep up with their social media presence, but you can help by offering to manage their accounts for them. This can include tasks like scheduling posts, responding to comments, and running social media advertising campaigns.
E-commerce store: With platforms like Shopify, it’s easier than ever to launch your own e-commerce store. You can sell physical or digital products, and use your marketing skills to drive traffic and sales.
Affiliate marketing: If you have a large following on social media or a popular blog, you can earn money by promoting products as an affiliate. Simply share a unique link to the product, and if someone clicks through and makes a purchase, you earn a commission.
Online course creation: If you have expertise in a particular area, you can create an online course and sell it through platforms like Udemy or Teachable. This can be a great way to share your knowledge and earn passive income.
Now that you have some ideas, it’s time to get started! Remember, your side hustle is a great opportunity to expand your skillset and bring in extra income, so have fun with it and don’t be afraid to take risks.
The key to success with any side hustle is to approach it with a marketing mindset. Focus on creating value for your customers, building relationships, and finding unique ways to stand out in a crowded market. And don’t be afraid to get creative! The beauty of being an online marketer is that there are countless ways to put your skills to work and earn money.
So what are you waiting for? Start exploring these side hustle ideas today and take control of your financial future. Whether you want to earn a little extra money or build a full-fledged business, the opportunities are endless. And with your marketing skills and expertise, the sky’s the limit!Report
I don’t know what will happen with Substack.
The people who write takes that are indistinguishable from the ones that the AI is allowed to generate are out of a job.
Leaving only the humans capable of writing stuff that is outside of the bounds of the ones that the AI is allowed to generate.Report
I think that’s the key. Why do you read the people you do? For facts, insightful analysis/advocacy, or confirmation bias. Any computer system can get you the first category, and it’s hard to believe that AI will be able to tackle the second. People who are just looking for agreement, well, they deserve AI articles.Report
The insightful analysis and advocacy I get is generally from AIs (they are pretty good at numbers and math, even if sometimes excessively optimistic about humanity).
It’s fun when they write about how to prevent the incipient AI-takeover.
AI-generated stories have brought me to tears, and I don’t generally cry. I could hand you a book, and say “There’s an AI-generated story in here” and you couldn’t tell me where it is in the novel, assuming you bothered to finish the doorstopper.Report
I’ve seen it said that ChatGPT is the digital version of mansplaining, where it concocts a plausible sounding but completely erroneous argument presented with total self assurance.Report
Clever definition…I like it.Report
where is this other article about narrative theory?Report
Hi Burt…
Sorry that the link didn’t come through, but here it is: https://ordinary-times.com/2022/04/28/student-loan-forgiveness-watch-what-unfolds-from-here/Report
From what I have read, ChatGPT writes like a college freshman which means it can be very confident sounding but also very wrong.Report
The two digital currency responses from it made me think of a high school student who didn’t read the course material. “The Spanish Civil War was an important event in the history of Europe whose effects are far reaching and consequential. Even now we see how this momentous conflict changed the world in significant ways. It would be hard to imagine a world in which the Spanish Civil War didn’t…”Report
Now that I’ve played with it (see below), and having had the experience of grading hundreds of essays written by actual college freshmen, I can say with confidence that ChatGPT has better technical skills than most college freshmen. One of the worries I’ve seen is that actual college freshmen will use it rather than writing their own essays. One place to look to tell if this has happened might be citations.
As an AI language model, ChatGPT has a good understanding of APA (American Psychological Association) citation style, which is a widely-used citation format in the social sciences. ChatGPT can provide information on the general guidelines and format for citing various types of sources, including books, journal articles, websites, and more. However, it is important to note that the specifics of APA citation style may change over time, so it is always a good idea to consult the latest edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for the most up-to-date information.Report
I asked it “write a legal opinion on X” and it gave me some claptrap:
So I asked it: “Write a short essay from the perspective of a human rights lawyer as to why the recent X decision was decided incorrectly”.
And it gave me a short essay. But it wasn’t, you know, particularly good.Report
Just before logging out, I asked for 750 words on the influence of Zen Buddhism on the voyages of Christopher Columbus. Then I told the bot that no, it got the emphasis wrong, and it had to be from an anti-colonialist perspective.
It went from:
to
And you can see why I am not particularly troubled by this bot.Report
And you can see why I am not particularly troubled by this bot.
This bot was science-fiction a decade ago.
Five years ago, it was only going to be a glorified Markov chainer.
What will it be in 2028?Report
At one of the other online places I hang out, one of the commenters teaches writing classes. He is currently thinking about incorporating ChatGPT into his classes by explicitly acknowledging it as a tool. Some student assignments would be to get ChatGPT to write an essay on a subject, then the students would be graded on their editing/correction of that essay.
This is similar to the point I reach on those (now rare) occasions that I teach Calc I. When do you teach the students about Mathematica? The software is far better at integrals than either I or the students will ever be. The students still need to be conceptually competent at writing integrals to do “summing up” applications. OTOH, if I were managing them in an actual job, I want to see the concept, then see that (with rare exceptions) they dumped it into Mathematica rather than solve it by hand.Report
Another useful thing would be to lean into the “ChatGPT does only themes, not examples”. Like, “Assignment 1: use ChatGPT to write a basic essay on a random topic and then identify examples from at least three different texts that support the essay, whether you agree with it or not. You will be graded on how well you can explain why those examples support the essay. Assignment 2: use ChatGPT to write a basic essay disagreeing with the first and then identify examples from at least three different texts to support that essay…”Report
Explain the future of multi-author blogging in light of recent developments in social media, in the style of Nate Silver.
This is absolutely a college freshman level essay. It takes hundreds of words to say next to nothing, but it does have quite good syntax. I absolutely do not see the “…in the style of Nate Silver” as there is no reference to any sort of quantified data. (So maybe ChatGPT got it right, har-de-har-har.) Going to try again, on a more local note with a humorous columnist….Report
Identify the six likeliest places to build new low-income housing in the City of Portland, Oregon in the style of Wm. Steven Humphrey.
BUZZER!Absolutely failed on copying the style of the Portland Mercury‘s snarky and smart editor-in-chief. Also there are no such things as “East Portland” and “West Portland,” and there basically are no unused areas of the city, excepting Forest Park. Which, you’ll notice, wasn’t mentioned at all. It wouldn’t be all that hard to mine the Internets for more detailed and non-generic descriptions of the portions of the city that do exist, but that doesn’t seem to have been done. So ChatGPT is not a particularly wonderful research tool.Report
Why is it that “conservative comedians” always wind up being all conservative and no actual comedy?
Hmm. Spot on. There may be something to this after all…Report
But seriously, this thing is capable of writing similar-sounding, equivocal essays. They’d probably be considered high quality essays in high school and factually sparse in college. They are technically competent and utterly anodyne.
I’m not going to worry about ChatGPT just yet. Maybe the next generation after this one.Report
What I worry about is not the top end, but the middle-range academic-eligibility classes. The stuff I’ve seen (and have been seeing for years) is “solid B-minus” work, certainly good enough to keep you on the football team or maintain your student visa. You’re not going to get a doctorate degree out of it, but if you were capable of that then you wouldn’t need to hire the job done.Report
“comedians who identify as conservative”
I mean, the jokes tell themselves.Report
“Why is it that “conservative comedians” always wind up being all conservative and no actual comedy?”
I dunno, George Carlin was conservative as all hell and he was pretty funny.Report
George Carlin was not a conservative. He was deeply critical of conservatives, conservatism, and in particular, religious conservatives.
https://youtu.be/K98TQJ5ldW0
https://youtu.be/K98TQJ5ldW0
https://youtu.be/2tp0UNcjzl8
Sure, he was critical of liberals too. He hated hypocrites of all sorts and thought Democrats were stooges for the monied elite. But that does not make him conservative.
Conservatives like to claim him and cite all manner of quotes to justify it. But most of those quotes are lies. His is one of the most widely-hoaxed names on the internet. He said himself “Here’s a rule of thumb, folks: nothing you see on the Internet is mine unless it comes from one of my albums, books, HBO specials, or appeared on my website. […] It bothers me that some people might believe that I would be capable of writing some of this stuff.”Report
Very slowly and then all at once.
Report
The concern isn’t that AI will be good enough to do the job that you have right now. The concern is that customers will decide that they’re OK with a job done half as well but at one-fourth the cost.Report
Speaking of Science Fiction:
A sci-fi magazine has closed submissions because there are too many AI stories being sent in.
AI may not take your job, but it can get submissions for your job shut down.Report