22 thoughts on “They Just Don’t Make Satanic Panics Like They Used To

    1. Gay teachers grooming children for sex is the latest one I heard.

      Husky men in dresses barging into girls restrooms was before that.

      Caravans of dark skinned barbarians coming for our wimmin is a perennial.

      Outtacontrol Crime never seems to go out of fashion.Report

    2. My belligerent answer is, everything Chip panics about.

      A more level-headed observation is that we really haven’t had many in recent days. Kind of a lull, probably due to summer heat. The Supreme Court decisions might have exhausted people.Report

    3. I think Q * A * n * o * n counts, plus the various spin-offs. They don’t seem as active these days as they were a few years ago, but the “true believers” are still around, a fair number in congress, so yeah.Report

      1. It’s an interesting example. Though I do wonder if even they don’t meet the bar. It’s worth remembering that our most recent universally agreed upon satanic panic, that being the 80s-early 90s daycare thing, resulted in actual prosecutions and people going to prison arising from allegations ranging from the far-fetched and unsubstantiated to the impossible.Report

        1. I’d say we are still very much living under the umbrella of “stranger danger” and the myriad effects it has had on parenting/childhood.Report

    4. Eh, the concept of the “Egregore” is an interesting one. Throw “gestalt” into a blender with some Jung and add some (unnecessary, if you ask me) spirituality and, viola.

      Anyway, the *REAL* answer to your question is found in “What’s Happening?” on Twitter.

      Looks like: The SS (referring to the Secret Service), Tarantino, Joe Rogan, and Jussie Smollett. Again.Report

  1. I really don’t like disagreeing with Arthur Symons, but I feel like the progress of lumières is more like the progress of the enlightened or the enlightened ones, basically.Report

        1. It’s explained in the article:

          Baudelaire referred to the Devil using the feminine pronoun “elle” and the masculine pronoun “il” in different sections of the story. Within the excerpt above Baudelaire primarily employed “elle”, but English translators have used “he” instead of “her”

          Report

            1. I don’t know French, but theologically, within a Catholic culture like France, there would be no problem referring to the Devil as he or she, but not as it. As a spirit, the Devil doesn’t possess masculinity or femininity, but does possess personhood.Report

  2. Just for clarity – I looked up “hamartiology”, and there’s nothing necessarily incompatible with the idea of personal good or evil spirits. Your theology may vary.Report

  3. Satan sure catches a lot of blame for doing the job he was assigned to at the beginning of the world. Talk about employee loyalty. Someone give his infernal majesty a couple vacation days, he’s earned them.Report

  4. Reporter: “And in other news, world peace has been achieved, hunger has been eliminated, and all humans report feelings of utter joy and contentment.”
    Twitter: “@Satan4000BCE… YOU HAD ONE JOB!”Report

Comments are closed.