Deadnames and Santa’s Naughty List

Maura Alwyen

HVAC/R Master Craftsman, Chef, Woodworker, Journeyman Metalworker, somewhat of a Blacksmith, & Author I do my own stunts & cinematography. Typos, poor word choices, wrong but similar sounding word choices are par for the course. All mistakes are artisanally crafted from the finest oopsies. Otherwise I'm just a regular girl with opinions and a point from which to shout into the void.

Related Post Roulette

13 Responses

  1. Burt Likko says:

    There’s a certain contingent that, if things are consistent, will go through the roof when they read this post. They have enough trouble with honoring someone else’s preferred pronouns, and here you’re asking people to respect someone else’s preferred proper nouns.Report

    • Pinky in reply to Burt Likko says:

      You’re just trying to gaslight us after this perfectly reasonable article about relocated witnesses coming home for Christmas.Report

    • Why? My wife was allowed to change her name on her Social Security account and drivers license when she got married (just like tens of millions of Americans) despite no court ever taking note of the fact. To the best of my knowledge, she wasn’t restricted to just changing her middle and last names — she could have changed her first name and it would have been fine. When she went back to college, no one questioned the transcripts with a name that didn’t match the application except for “Mary” (nor did they demand copies of any other legal documents). Nor were there any problems when some of her ancestors left bequeaths to her pre-marriage name.

      I had a nickname bestowed upon me when I was a sophomore in high school. When I went off to college, I had to relearn to respond when someone said “Mike” or “Michael”.Report

      • JS in reply to Michael Cain says:

        “My wife was allowed to change her name on her Social Security account and drivers license when she got married (just like tens of millions of Americans) despite no court ever taking note of the fact.”

        Fun story there. I’m from Texas, and back in…2001? 2002?…a pair of my friends got married. They swapped last names.

        So they pop on down to the local DPS with their marriage license in hand the first morning after the honeymoon and….she walks out having changed her last name. He walks out…not.

        He was told that it’d require a court order.

        So he goes home, asks some friends (including a lawyer) who pulls up relevant Texas law (it is Texas in 2002ish, so who knows?) — which uses the word “spouse” not the word “wife”, and said lawyer assures them that it’s very much gender neutral. In fact it had been amended several years before SPECIFICALLY to make it “spouse” and not “wife”.

        Despite having a copy of the law, it took three visits that day, the intervention of a State Rep, and then the State Rep personally harassing the head of the Texas DPS to call that office and force them to remain open past 5:00 on a Friday, to get it done for him.

        Despite there being an absolutely clear law, a specific process for marriages, and the fact that his wife had just waltzed in and out that morning 20 minutes.Report

        • Burt Likko in reply to JS says:

          There’s a lot of words that are written in the law books. This is called a “prediction.” Maybe, if you’re generous, it’s “guidance.” What the people who administer governmental power will actually DO, however — THAT’S the law.

          This, by the way, is how the concept of “legal realism” was first defined to me.Report

          • JS in reply to Burt Likko says:

            The law was explicitly changed to allow it, and DPS had sent out guidance when it was changed.

            Everyone just assumed this particular office hadn’t processed a male name change (or rather, no one there that day had) and nobody wanted to bother.

            If the process wasn’t at least a cool grand to do through the Courts, that might have worked. But people will make an AWFUL lot of phone calls to avoid showing up to court and shelling out that kind of money.Report

            • Burt Likko in reply to JS says:

              “The life of the law has not been logic: it has been experience.”Report

            • Michael Cain in reply to JS says:

              When I worked for the Colorado legislature I got stuck, on more than one occasion, with having to do the presentation to this committee or that of, “Yes, you appropriated money for a unified software system to save counties large amounts of money because every intake location could handle Medicaid, and food stamps, and state child care, and TANF income assistance, and a variety of tuition assistance programs. But there are counties hiring 25% more staff than they need, in order to put separate application offices for each of those individual programs miles apart, in order to make it more difficult and degrading for poor people to receive the assistance the law says they are eligible for.”Report

        • Dark Matter in reply to JS says:

          My first born legally has a very different name in Poland.

          The Registrar, refused to believe that anyone would use a “last name” as a middle name. This is in spite of presented with the birth certificate with the official translation and a new baby.

          They argued about it for quite a while and my wife didn’t win.

          I don’t understand what the problem was, something about social conventions.Report

    • Brandon Berg in reply to Burt Likko says:

      Don’t be coy. Name names. I literally have no idea to whom you might be alluding.Report