Jeopardy! And What Are Things That Are Different Are Not The Same
For the two hundred-odd years our family has inhabited our beloved Up Yonder in West Virginia, some traditions have endured while others only have a season. The main get together times of Fourth of July and Christmas are pretty much set in stone, other than natural disaster, rapture, or modification for Covid-19. Others, like massive tarps and tailgating on top of the mountain gave way to the permanent facilities of the built, then expanded picnic shelter and camping facilities. Some, like repelling across the pond, only happened once, initially because of Aunt Nora’s loss of a brand-new red shoe of which we still haven’t heard the end, and then because the expanding four lane below meant it had to be drained and removed.
Then there were other traditions borne of habit. No matter what else was going on, no matter the conversation going, or meal being eaten, or who was there to enjoy it with, right around 7:15pm Aunt June was going to stand up, pull out a cigarette, and start walking and/or in later years riding her Kawasaki MULE to her house which was right beside ours. You could be mid-sentence in the greatest story ever told; nope, 7:15pm Aunt June has to go. Hottest political debate of the day reaching a crescendo? Tough wallo jellybeans, it was a Virginia Slim and a bee line the few hundred yards to her house. Long lost relative from out of town in to reconnect? They better wait a while, because there was serious business over on WSAZ Channel 3 to be seen too first.
Because Up Yonder and across the nation for millions of folks, at 7:30pm Eastern Standard Time for the better part of 30 years the world stopped for Jeopardy! At least it did for Aunt June and millions of others. The timeslot was not just treated with the reverence of church, but was a competition. Whoever was in the living room during was competing to see who got what questions correct, and would hear about it relentlessly until the next episode the following evening. You definitely did not want to “lose” on a Friday and hear about it until Monday night. Watching her beloved game show with Alex Trebek was not a spectator sport, and your own cache of self-worth was as much at risk as the contestant’s winnings.
Those memories are precious, especially some five years since Aunt June ceased to watch Jeopardy! nightly after shuffling off her mortal coil following a “What is cancer” diagnosis in 2016. I missed her funeral, as I was inpatient in the hospital myself at the time, and most evenings, when I was lucid enough to watch, Jeopardy! was a welcome respite from the monotonous routine of intensive medical care.
Long story semi-short: I’ve loved and appreciated Jeopardy! for as long as I can remember. Which is the context, and surprising to folks, background in which I did this:
Just cancel Jeopardy. Seriously, just let it go.
— Andrew Donaldson (@four4thefire) August 24, 2021
Just…hear me out.
This is more than a bit of a troll, of course. Jeopardy! isn’t going anywhere. In addition to its popularity and pop culture status, Jeopardy! is one of the most profitable properties in television history. Merv Griffin bragged in his biography that he made $70 million just from the writing credits from the “Think!” jingle now universally known as the Jeopardy! theme. A tune he wrote, interestingly enough, as a lullaby for his child.
Depending on which version you believe, what we now know as Jeopardy! made its way from Merv Griffin’s mind to legendary status via his wife. Julann Griffin’s off-handed comment on a plane ride in 1963 that there hadn’t been any “question and answer” type game shows since the quiz show scandals of the late 1950s. The idea of giving answers to get the questions had been done before in the 40s but seemed like just the change up the television game show quiz format needed. There was some starts and stops along the way, but once the magic connection of game and the recently passed Alex Trebek married in 1984, till death did they part, a juggernaut romped the TV prime time lineup.
When my eminent friend and Ordinary Times legend Burt Likko took exception to my tweet1 and wrote his thoughts on Jeopardy! this paragraph was relatable to me:
The difficulty and seeming obscurity of the questions became a part of pop culture as well. It became a mark of prestige to be the person in a family or a group of friends who could get Jeopardy! questions right when playing along at home. Quietly, half an hour daily on most weekdays, from 1984 to his death in 2020, Alex Trebek and Jeopardy! helped make being smart cool, to make trivia quizzes a national craze, and most of all to celebrate knowing things.
Hand up. That was me. I wanted to know things. Growing up pre-to-early internet knowing things meant talking to adults, raiding my father’s books, and trying to out-Jeopardy! the ridiculously good at it June Foster Gower and other members of my family.
So, why did I tweet it was time to shut down the institution, especially knowing no such thing was going to happen?
Because, and admittedly selfishly, it isn’t Jeopardy! as we have — or at least my age group has only — known it anymore, nor never will be again.
Oh, it’s really, really close. Maybe, 80-85% of what it was. More than enough to be better than most other things, and certainly good enough to continue on for a time being.
But not the same.
Folks like Burt rightly point out that Twitter is not real life. That the ratings for the guests hosts during the yearlong replacement sweepstakes were good. That the guest hosts by and large did well. That interest in that search has kept the show at the fore of the culture dialogue. But Twitter is real, and it is both the headwaters and sloosh boxes of our media. We cannot return to unknown unknowns after knowing things. I cannot unknow how social media documented the way Ken Jennings conducts himself when not smiling to camera either during his 75-win run, various guest appearances, or his own audition for the role of Trebek replacement. I cannot unknow my lingering questions as to why Jeopardy! didn’t have more of a problem with that behavior, until the Mike Richards debacle made it suspicious that the latter, having his own similar issues with not respecting folks, wasn’t about to reel in the former. That might not be fair, but there it is, honest as I can tell you. In the latest media kerfuffle that prompted my tweet, the other announced host of Jeopardy!, Mayim Bialik, was dealing with her own social media past and statements being combed through for questionable content.
To be fair, in the current environment, I’m sure whoever Jeopardy! puts up now will get the wrong deeds carwash treatment. To Burt and probably the majority of Jeopardy fans, it doesn’t matter who the host is. Burt eloquently writes in detail why it doesn’t matter, that the whole of the show is much greater than the part of the host. That this unique universal space of great knowledge being shared by whosoever will tune in is a virtuous thing worth preserving.
In principle I agree. I want it to be true in practice as well. But I can’t. It isn’t.
That space of knowledge that was universally accessible will henceforth and forever be missing the certain something extra that made a clever spin on a quiz show into something truly special. It wasn’t the format that let the geniuses, the nerds, the trivia hounds, and the average people just wanting to poke their nose under the knowledge tent to see if they could hang all feel like they could commiserate for a bit in peace and harmony and friendly competition. It was Alex Trebek keeping the trivia circus at just the right temperature to incubate that universal feeling of comfort. His easy wit, gentle rebukes, firmness to process, and ability to be in charge without beating people over the head with it took a great show and made it special. The accessibility to knowledge that has been intimidating throughout human history had the perfect guide in Alex Trebek on Jeopardy! You could know nothing for 30 minutes and never feel stupid, just that you needed to keep at it. You could get more answers right than anyone in the room, or bar, or waiting room you were in and still feel like there was more to accomplish. For lack of a better term, Jeopardy! was as close to a high knowledge safe space as most folks will ever experience.
It just isn’t going to be the same now. Mike Richard’s bigfooting the supposed open competition and authoring his own downfall doing it is a piece of it, especially since he is still running Jeopardy! behind the scenes. Ken Jennings and his baggage, who will probably now get another shot since — as Burt points out — he had the best ratings of the guest hosts and is the logical choice for multiple reasons, is another part of it. Alex Trebek being gone is a huge part of it. The decision making to make the search for the next host into a quasi-gameshow that was really a foregone conclusion, until it wasn’t, is also a part of it. The media and social media coverage of the same is yet another part of it.
No, Twitter is not real. But increasingly, neither is the well-manicured illusion the slick production values of Jeopardy! has maintained for so long. A presentation that let folks see something that was that good and wholesome thing that was there for them in tough times having rough days of its own. We knew that to be the case logically, this is television entertainment after all, but the questions raised by the last year or so of the guest host search and related hubbub asks questions that the Jeopardy! powers that be do not seem to have answers for.
The fact remains that this next phase of Jeopardy! is not Jeopardy! as we have known it. Time is undefeated. Everything changes. Traditions come and go. Jeopardy! will go on mostly like it was. Nothing wrong with that. Lots of folks will enjoy it. Maybe the next Alex Trebek is waiting in the wings at Sony Pictures Studios’ Stage 10. Maybe in a few months, or a year, or a few years I’ll be writing another post about how wrong I was about the next version of Jeopardy! I hope so.
But that is not this day. For now, Jeopardy! has become just another point of noise in the cultural caterwauling with more than a little reality show feel to it. I hate it, but try as I might I can’t pretend it is otherwise. If they get a non-Richards, non-Jennings permanent host I’ll give them as fair a chance as I can. Honestly, I will. But for now, I’m content to let Jeopardy! go. At least the Jeopardy! and what it meant to me is gone, and if they called it a day and let the legacy speak for itself with the legendary run the show had, it would be fine with me.
But as to “What is Jeopardy!” the question is still going to be for me “Not the same as it was, despite how much I wish it was so.”
Started off completely disagreeing with your premise, and by the end you completely convinced me.Report
That is quite the compliment thank youReport
I checked the Internet bylaws, and I can’t find a rule specifically prohibiting this, but it’s clearly contrary to the spirit of the whole enterprise.Report
I was never really a Jeopardy guy. I had friends who were Jeopardy people… I’d watch the show with them every now and again and they had a “play at home” version of the game:
1 point for each question they got right (buzzer == yelling it out first)
-1 point for each question they got wrong
Final Jeopardy allowed you to bet all or some of your points. (You needed pen and paper for this one.)
Most points wins.
They talked about this game like I talk about D&D. (“Two months ago, I was doing awful, I had only 13 points and he had 25, but final jeopardy was on “Big Countries” and I knew that the acronym “BRIC” referred to Brazil, Russia, India, China and he said “Britain, Russia, India, China” and I bet all of my points and he didn’t bet any and I won!”)
So, with that in mind, I’d just say that there are people out there who would be happy with a “Good Enough Jeopardy”.
Would we rather have a perfect, optimized Jeopardy? Golly, I sure would! Maybe we could get rid of those dumb video questions where they have Gavin Newsome ask a question about California Vineyards and just have the announcer, whomever it is, read the card the way God intended!
But if that’s not on the table, there’s enough love out there for Jeopardy to fizzle away leaving the Game Show Network 2 to increase its market share between old episodes of The Price is Right and Joker’s Wild.Report
“Good Enough Jeopardy”
Ow, My BallsReport
“This isn’t as good as when Alex Trebek was on it.”
“Well, he’s dead.”Report
(video clues are paid promotions that keep the show on the air.)Report
As opposed to merely providing additional monetization?
doubt.jpgReport
Ken Jennings has baggage?
Wait, who’s Ken Jennings?Report
Maybe folks know more about Jennings’ off-screen conduct than I do. What I know is he tried some pretty indefensible jokes on Twitter. Jokes that punched down and tried to use cruelty as the humor device. They weren’t funny and I feel no impulse to defend them, or Jennings for making them.
I do think there needs to be room for grace in our culture, room for people to make apologies and also room for others to accept them. And I think Jennings has done his part in that, recognizing the nature of his mistakes and the hurt they caused and offering sincere contrition. To my knowledge he hasn’t repeated those mistakes.
But even that isn’t the point here. Jennings is good at hosting but certainly wouldn’t be the only good choice. Burton could easily grow into the role despite a slow start. Bialik has baggage too but again, there is room for grace or at least ought to be. There ought also be room for people to try out ideas for size and discard them when they find they don’t fit. That could be Bialik and her anti-vaxxing comments.
What else is out there that’s awful? That’s unforgivable? And just like in politics, if no one is available who is free of sin and fault, AND there is no room for grace, growth, and forgiveness, then we paralyze ourselves as a culture. None of us are free from sin (so the Christians say and I think they’re right on that) so in a graceless world, no one is morally eligible to do anything important.
Not even host a gameshow.Report
“I do think there needs to be room for grace in our culture, room for people to make apologies and also room for others to accept them. ”
oh look
here’s a white man, explaining how sometimes punching down is okayReport
Well, if it’s unclear if it could ever be the old show, they could just change the punctuation, so it’s now “Jeopardy?”
Seriously, though, I don’t know why they didn’t ask Canada- we could’ve sent down another host.Report
Ryan Reynolds is busy.Report
Forget Jeopardy. The shoe wasn’t found when the pond was drained?Report
^ Your honor, redirect.Report
I need to write that story sometime, we had a crowd show up for the pond draining for that very reason (not even sure the passage of time there, maybe 8-10 years) and alas no shoeReport
I watched a lot of game shows as a kid, and for me the Art Fleming Jeopardy (as of the last few years of its run) was the real Jeopardy. I was pretty skeptical when Trebek was brought in — I knew him from less “sophisticated” game shows like High Rollers, and he didn’t seem to have the intellectual gravitas that I felt was needed for Jeopardy. And honestly that feeling never went away for me in all the times I watched it since — the illusion I had with Fleming just wasn’t ever there with Trebek, though the show was still enjoyable enough.Report
“For the two hundred-odd years our family has inhabited our beloved Up Yonder in West Virginia, some traditions have endured while others only have a season.”
OT but stuff like this boggles my mind. I suppose it was generally true enough for my ancestors or could have been (when we weren’t getting expelled from places for being Jews) but those records and info are lost to the sands of time.Report
It boggles my mind in other places of the world there are families that can track back for unbelievable amounts of time. And saddens me that something like what the Jewish people have had to deal with for most of their existences to be robbed of that.Report
Bitter herbs in sweet wine, this comment is.Report
It’s always just struck me as strange. If we designate Solomon Cain, born 1821 in eastern Kentucky as generation #1, my son is generation #8. Six of the eight generations are in the ground, progressing west — Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska — and none within a hundred miles of the previous graves. At 35 miles, my son and I live closer together than any two previous generations.Report
I would have thought that for our current African-American population, the First Free Ancestor would be a family icon. But I have asked several about it and a surprising — to me — number can’t identify him or her.Report
As a The Price is Right fan as well as a Jeopardy! fan, I’ve been through this sort of thing before, when Bob Barker retired. There were no public auditions for that, they just announced that the new host was Drew Carey. And he was not well received, and he was not very good when he first started. But he kept at it until he figured out what Drew Carey’s version of Price is Right would be. Now he’s quite a good host. I’d even say that I prefer him to Barker (though I only ever saw Barker’s late seasons, not those back in his heyday.) But the host change changed the show into something else. The same will be true of Jeopardy!.
I think the reason people are so protective of Jeopardy! and so resistant to letting this particular game show go has less to do with fond memories of Trebek and more to do with the fact that Jeopardy! is almost the only decent quiz show out there. It has the well-written questions Burt Likko pointed out, but it also has a fast pace: 61 questions in a half-hour air time. The Chase is the only other show I can think of that goes for such a sheer volume of questions. Other quiz shows (Who Wants To Be a Millionaire, The Wall) really focus more on drawing each question out for every agonized second they can to increase drama. Jeopardy!, now more than ever, is vulnerable to a competing show that delivers Quiz Bowl-style fast-paced, literate trivia, but no such competition exists, especially not in a nightly format.Report
thing is, Drew Carey got the job at a time when “Your Fave Is Problematic” was a Tumblr joke. These days, people will comb through your Internet history looking for a time when you took slightly longer than you should have to say “yes” when asked whether Black Lives Mattered, and if they find it, they’ll gleefully use you as a shame-bearer for their angry masturbation. After all, Carey is well-documented as being a homophobic misogynist.Report
I don’t watch Jeopardy! much, and I couldn’t find an answer to this question on the Internet: What happens there’s a particularly sharp slate of contestants who clear the board significantly before time runs out? Do they use that time for free discussion, or just squeeze in an extra commercial?Report
There are 61 questions in a game of Jeopardy, which airs over the course of 30 minutes. Let’s say there’s 10 minutes of commercials, leaving 20 minutes of actual Jeopardy! for those questions to be answered during. Final Jeopardy is drawn out to around five minutes, leaving about 15 minutes to answer the other 60 questions, or an average of 15 seconds per question. Daily Doubles eat up some time, so the other questions get less time. There’s also a minute or two of contestant interviews, and the opening theme and announcements taking some time. So, for most questions, there’s an average of less than 10 seconds available for the host to read the question in full, then to take answers from the contestants. If there are lots of incorrect answers given in the game before the correct answer is given, or if they have a lot of questions that the timer runs out on without an answer, then you’ll see some questions getting left on the board at the end of the round. If contestants are sharp and answer every question as soon as it’s out of the host’s mouth, then the boards will be cleared. There’s not a huge tolerance of time between a slow game and a fast game, in this respect. There’s no free discussion; the host has some ability to take longer to conduct the interviews if lots of questions were answered by the first commercial break, or to take longer to conduct Final Jeopardy if there’s a lot of time left at the end. They might squeeze in an extra 30-second commercial from time to time, but I think episodes can all reach the same length through editing pretty reliably.Report
I looked it up, and apparently a round is only 6:30. I guess that really doesn’t leave a lot of time to spare. Thanks!
Ten minutes is a lot of commercial time; usually half-hour shows run around 24 minutes. But all the episodes I found on YouTube are 20 minutes, so I guess that’s right.Report
Lots of little ways to limit the pace as well. Buttons are locked out until lights visible to the players (but not viewers) come on at the end of the answer. Those lights are under offstage control. Players can’t give their choice for next question until called on. Sometimes the host says “Correct” and moves on. Sometimes they say “Correct, he was also known as the mad king of foobar” before proceeding.
The play-along-at-home aspect does, I think, make it in the producers’ interest to keep a very consistent pace every show.Report
Report