The Rhoden Murders: The Point-Blank Execution Of A Family, By A Family
It looked like a cartel hit, some people said of the Rhoden murders. Eight people executed in the dead of night, most in their beds, and nobody saw or heard a thing.
Nah, said others. It’s not cartel. A cartel would not have spared the children.
It was April of 2016 in Piketon, Ohio, a little town about an hour-and-a-half south of Columbus and just as far west of Cincinnati. Bobbie Jo Manley found the first bodies when she went to feed her former brother-in-law’s dogs, as she did every morning. At the home of Chris Rhoden Sr., 40, she found his body, beaten and shot in the head. The body of Chris’s cousin, Gary Rhoden, 38, was also in the home. These discoveries were just the beginning.
Next door to Chris Sr. lived his son, Frankie, 20, Frankie’s fiancĂ©e, Hannah Hazel Gilley, 20, and their two little boys, ages 3 and 6 months. The 3 year old answered Bobbie’s frantic knock at the door, and Bobbie found Frankie and Hannah dead in their bed, the baby alive between them.
At yet another home on the property, Bobbie Jo’s sister Dana, 37, who was Frankie’s mom and Chris Sr.’s ex-wife, was also dead, as was her son Chris Jr., just 16. Dana’s daughter Hanna Mae, 19, was found next, shot to death next to her unharmed, 5 day old baby.
Finally, a few miles away a Rhoden cousin, Kenneth, 44, was also found dead of a gunshot wound in his own camper.
That’s 8 dead family members, all of them shot in the head, all but Kenneth shot more than once. The community was shocked and terrified. Law enforcement encouraged them to arm themselves and lock their doors; surviving extended family members of the murdered Rhodens were given police protection. Then the rumors began:
It had to be someone known to the family; Chris Sr’s vicious dogs would have attacked strangers.
Someone scattered $3,000 cash over one or more of the bodies.
This was revenge over a previous altercation involving Chris Jr.
Police found a huge marijuana grow operation; this was clearly drug related.
It was a custody battle over one of the kids.
It was the result of a demolition derby circuit feud.
It was the Manleys.
A local businessman offered a $25,000 reward for information leading to the killer or killers, but as the rumors grew about things the family may have been involved in, the man rescinded the offer. Apparently, if they were living outside the boundaries of the law, their lives weren’t worth it. The funerals took place, the bodies were buried. Most of the community moved on.
Meanwhile, law enforcement flailed about for a suspect. They dragged Bobbie Jo Manley out of bed in the middle of the night to interrogate her. “How much did someone pay you to kill your family?” they asked her. They attached a GPS monitor to the truck belonging to Dana and Bobbie Jo’s brother, James Manley. They charged him with destruction of property when he found the device and destroyed it, charges which were later dropped.
For two years, there was nothing but speculation and theories, especially online in true crime discussion communities on Reddit or WebSleuths. Slowly, authorities were developing a suspect – four of them, actually: The Wagner family, who had quietly left town and moved to Alaska in the interim.
The Wagner Family consisted of George “Billy” Wagner III, his wife Angela Wagner, and their two sons, George the IV and Edward “Jake” Wagner. Jake, now 27, was the father of Hannah Mae Rhoden’s 3 year old daughter, Sophia. Sophia wasn’t at the Rhoden property during the massacre; she had stayed with the Wagners that night. Their arrests were announced in November of 2018.
Unbelievably, the massacre of 8 people is believed to have been a custody battle. The Wagners, determined to leave no one alive who might compete for custody of Sophia, hatched a plot to annihilate the entire extended family. Authorities say they snuck onto the Rhoden property under cover of night, disabled security cameras, and ambushed the family, silencers on the weapon or weapons used. In the media, their lawyers asserted their steadfast claims of innocence. Their supporters cited the ridiculousness of the alleged motive.
__________________________________
Hanna Mae Rhoden was just 15 when she gave birth to Jake’s child. Jake was 20. It’s unclear at what point the two parted ways, but there was speculation that Jake was the father of the new baby, as well.1 What is known is that by late 2015, the Wagners were pressuring Hanna to sign papers granting custody of her daughter to Jake. In a private message to a friend on Facebook, Hanna wrote “they’d have to kill me” to get their way. Jake hacked into Hanna’s Facebook account and saw the message, and spent the next 4 months planning.
The Wagners were not a wealthy family, per se, but they had resources. The matriarch of the clan was Fredericka Wagner, owner of a large farm valued at over $4 million, as well as several businesses. Law enforcement searched her property three times. In 2018 after the murder charges against the Wagners was announced, she was indicted on charges of obstruction. It was alleged she lied to a grand jury about purchasing bullet-proof vests online; she said she bought them on Amazon when in fact it was Ebay. In any event, it was determined the vests were purchased two weeks after the Rhoden Murders, and charges were ultimately dismissed.
On the other side of the family, Angela Wagner’s mother was also indicted. Rita Newcomb faced charges of obstruction, perjury, and three counts of forgery. It was alleged that Newcomb, a notary public, helped to create fake custody documents which made it appear Hanna Rhoden had signed her custody rights over to Jake. The documents were notarized, and dated for a year prior to the Rhoden Murders. The family created a similar set of paperwork for the child of George Wagner the younger, which was also included in Newcomb’s indictment.
Newcomb testified at the grand jury that it was her signature notarizing the papers. In December 2019, she pleaded guilty to one count of obstruction. She agreed to testify truthfully at any subsequent trials of the Wagner family, and admitted that Angela Wagner had signed Rita’s name to the forged documents. Angela asked her mother to lie and say she’d signed. Newcomb said she finally told the truth, because lying was not a Christian thing to do.
Months rolled by quietly, except for the occasional pre-trial motions and long-shot bond hearings. Covid and other assorted issues delayed the trials, while members of the Piketon community and the online crime buff communities argued amongst themselves over the guilt or innocence of the Wagner family. Others speculated which of the family members might be the first to roll on the other. The smart money was on George IV; he seemed to have the least investment in the situation. Sophia was not his child or grandchild. Others thought it might be Angela, banking on her feminine frailties or perhaps sensibilities; in sharp contrast, some insisted Angela was probably the mastermind.
On April 22, 2021, five years to the day after the bloody massacre on Union Hill Road, most of the speculation came to a shocking, screeching halt when Jake Wagner walked into court and pleaded guilty to all 23 charges against him. 2 He admitted to personally pulling the trigger on five of the victims, though it was not specified which five or who killed the other three. He agreed to testify on behalf of the prosecution in his family’s trials. In exchange for his plea, the state agreed to recommend life in prison without the possibility of parole and remove the threat of the death penalty — for Jake himself, and for his family members, in the event of their potential convictions.
It really was as simple as a custody dispute, that prompted the point-blank execution of 8 people, the orphaning of three children and effective orphaning of a fourth. An entire family, acting in concert, stalked the Rhodens for months to learn their habits and patterns before killing them all. We know the why, and we know what Jake did. In the coming months, we will likely learn more about the role played by his mother, father, and brother. But I’m not sure we’ll ever understand the minds of people who felt mass murder was the solution to a custody battle.
I never know how to end these articles. There is nothing meaningful to glean from the meaningless Rhoden murders, no nice way to summarize the slaughter of an entire family by another. This is not the Hatfields and McCoys, no matter how many media outlets want to make the comparison. This was a greater evil altogether. We can be glad, I suppose, that Jake Wagner admitted what he and his family did to the Rhodens, and why, and take solace that, at the very least, justice may be done.
- This has since been proven not to be the case; the baby was fathered by Hanna’s new boyfriend.
- In addition to the 8 counts of first degree murder, other charges included one count of conspiracy, four counts of aggravated burglary, one count of unlawful possession of a dangerous ordnance, three counts of evidence tampering, one count each of forgery, unauthorized use of property for his hacking of Hanna’s Facebook, one count each of intercepting a communication, obstruction, engaging in corrupt activity, and finally, one count of unlawful sexual conduct with a minor for having impregnated Hanna in the first place.
Was the murder site out in the country? Because even a suppressed weapon gives off a noticeable sound–likely loud enough to wake a neighbor. Over a dozen shots surely would. Neighbor being “suburban track house” distance.Report
Yes, very rural.Report
All of the pictures look country. Dirt roads. At most one building with lots of trees in the background. The description of the dogs suggests the neighbours are far away.
And that over a dozen shots was spread out over 4 different crime scenes.Report
At the risk of sounding utterly crass, how many lives could have been saved if one girls had been on birth control, or, alternatively, if one boy had been prosecuted for statutory rape?Report
Or alternately, if this family didn’t decide murder was the way to handle the situation.Report
Spot On. How many lives would be saved across the country if out of wedlock birth rates could be halved or quartered? They are directly related to the violence across the country and in particular in the cities, along with a host of other disfunction.Report
“They are directly related to the violence across the country and in particular in the cities…”
Citation needed.Report
Out of wedlock is strongly related to single parent families.
Poverty (and various other negative social ills) is strongly related to single parent families. If memory serves this is the single most predictive factor.
[i]Children raised in single-parent homes are statistically more likely to abuse drugs and alcohol, exhibit poor social behaviors, and commit violent crimes. They’re also more likely to drop out of school. [/i]
https://www.heritage.org/marriage-and-family/heritage-explains/why-the-declining-marriage-rate-affects-everyoneReport
Strongly != directly in much the same way that correlation != causationReport
True. But using a time machine to airbrush me out of my kids’ lives would be a massive loss of resources and parental involvement.
That’s everything from money to having a driver to robots and/or to charter school and/or sports.
It’s hard to see how that wouldn’t be creating a massive negative effect on their lives and it’s easy to see how it’d be linked to all sorts of other problems.
Now IDK how we’d confirm “correlation or causation”. Maybe look at families with an arrested parent and how they do after that or something (we’d have to adjust for all sorts of stuff so it’d be harder than it sounds).
But intuitively having a second parent seems like a really big deal and the data we have strongly supports that.Report
Sure, but there is a big difference between “High cholesterol is a significant risk factor for heart disease” & “high cholesterol leads directly to heart disease”.
So when it comes to single mothers, that might be a risk factor, but it is one that can be mitigated by a positive support network, educated parent, etc.Report
I’m not sure how my kids replace the impact of having me in their lives short of my wife getting remarried.
One parent means we have a single source of failure with no backups. All of the weaknesses of that parent will be magnified and they will have a lot less time.
Now it’s also true that this, like other social ills, will tend to be an indicator of problems as well as a creator.
For example my sister-in-law is crazy enough that no one will marry her. If she had a kid, then there’s no way she’d allow a “positive support network” to exist without a court of law making her.Report
The nuclear family as we know it is a very recent phenomenon.
In “traditional” i.e. pre-industrial societies, the loss of one parent was very common, which is why extended families were the norm. The loss of a father would be mitigated by an uncle or older brother filling the role of breadwinner/ caretaker.
I’m not sayin this is an achievable goal today, since people seem to prefer smaller families to begin with.
But it points toward finding a modern industrial solution to a problem which was caused by modern industrial structures.Report
Let’s see what happens in Sweden.
In Sweden, Emma Fransson et al. have shown that children living with one single parent have worse well-being in terms of physical health behavior, mental health, peer friendships, bullying, cultural activities, sports, and family relationships, compared to children from intact families.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_parent#Impact_on_children
I think the key word (used by you and Oscar) is “mitigated”.
Modern Society does “mitigate” for the loss of a parent by making sure no one starves, and everyone learns how to read. This is pretty huge by primitive society standards.
The problem comes when we expect a kid in this situation to be just as successful as one raised by good parents. That seems unrealistic even in theory. If it worked, then good parenting wouldn’t be having positive impacts.Report
Which is another way of saying that there are proven ways to mitigate and lessen the harm of single parenthood because Swedish single families fare better than their US counterparts.
What neither society has, is a method to eliminate single parent families. Maybe it can’t be done in a liberal society, we just don’t know.Report
I think you’re deep into comparing apples to oranges.
Sweden, with all of these support systems, and with a monocultural society, still observes that having only one parent is a serious handicap when compared to two.
When society creates [good things for children] we should expect good parents to take more advantage of them than absent parents.
We can “mitigate” but we can not “replace”, and we need to have realistic expectations for what “mitigate” means.Report
At least in the pre-industrial West, fast remarriage was pretty common because living alone was nearly impossible able for everybody. There is also a lot ink spilled on how recent the nuclear family is. A lot of historians believe that the Western nuclear family is kind of old and can be traced back to the Middle Ages.
A recent book, the WEIRDest People in the World, believes that the Catholic Church’s strong ban on cousin marriages did a lot to break up the extended kinship system in the West because everybody had to go further to find a spouse. It’s also why the West had orphanages to take care of children without parents. In more kinship based societies, there would be a kin to take them in.Report
I’m sure if I dig around, I can find something that says that kids do better when they have active, loving grandparents in their lives.
Both my parents are dead, my father in law is dead, and my mother in law is evil.
The role of grandparents is filled by his great aunt and her partner.
Should I make sure my son has a relationship with my evil MIL, or can we just say that having someone who is willing to fill that role in a positive manner is sufficient?
This is the point Chip is making, that the role is more important than the label (father, uncle, family friend). Positive male role model who takes an active part in the child’s life.Report
Chip isn’t wrong, but the definition of “mitigate” is “make less severe, serious, or painful”. A bad situation will suck less. If we’re interested in true equality, i.e. the kid’s odds of success and fully realizing their potential are unchanged, well that’s not going to happen. I supply…
1) Active/Positive Role Model
Everything from letting the girls observe what I do, to driving them places, to talking with them and/or stepping in to correct bad behavior.
This can be seriously time consuming. It’s possible for an uncle or family friend to replace me on this but highly likely they won’t be able to devote the same time. It’s highly likely we’re in diminishing returns here, i.e. cutting my time in half doesn’t cut the impact in half, but diminishing returns is not no returns.
2) Income Stream
I assume I’m in the realm of diminishing returns again here. But diminishing returns is not “no returns” and my Income Stream is not half the family income.
3) Legal Authority equal to their mother.
Having a second authority figure to evaluate things is why we have the courts separate from the police. Ideally the mother will never have a really bad idea or melt down or at least will be willing to listen to their partner. (And not die, go insane, have substance abuse issues, etc).
The modern reality is two parents is hugely predictive of how successful the kids will be.
On a side note, my expectation is with gay marriage existing, we’ll find out in a few decades that “two” matters a lot (to prevent a single point of failure and so on) and “male role model” not so much.Report
We are drifting away from the original point, that a single parent (specifically a single mother) is a risk factor versus a direct cause of violence.
Also, what if the single parent is male?Report
I was thinking more broadly than just “violence” and I’m not sure we’re disagreeing.
It depends on whether you say “smoking is a serious risk factor for cancer” or whether you’re comfortable saying “smoking causes cancer”.
Yes, technically this is all “risk factor” stuff; And yes, one hopes mitigation is possible (like smoking less); And yes, I know a 100+ year old smoker (and Obama came from a single parent home and did well);
But the numbers are seriously grim. So grim that just saying “smoking causes cancer” is fine in a loose conversation.Report
I think we are quibbling about the details here.
One thing to point out, from your Wiki link, is that the outcome is not about whether or not the parents are married, but the amount of time the parental figures spend with the child (and, likely, how co-operative those parents are).
So a child living with a single mom who has a biological father who is active and spends time with the child, and who co-operates with the mother regarding rearing is going to do fine. Likewise, a step parent who is active will nullify the negative.
Thus we can surmise that the negatives come from putting the bulk of the burden on a single parent, or having parents at constantly loggerheads regarding rearing decisions and activities. The more parental figures in play, and the more co-operative those figures are, the better the outcome.Report
I think we are on the same page, excellent breakdown how a different use of language can mean two thinks. Look, we all know that guy that smoked and drank a fifth until they were 100, we all know kids raised by single parents that did well… (and 2 parent homes that did not) but we know a LOT more people that smoked and developed cancer or emphysema, and heavy drinkers that developed cirrhosis, as well as children from single parent homes that did not benefit from the experience. Statistics show single parent homes are much more likely to present a range of dysfunction.
I get your point specifically, without a doubt, if this girl had simply not had (2) children out of wedlock, 8 people would be alive.Report
Note: I grew up in a low cost day care center. Mom took in all kinds of kids from low income families, and many of them were single moms, or married but with fathers who were effectively useless as a parent or resource provider. We also had kids from families that had poor resources, but were committed to the kids (thus we had grandparents and aunts/uncles doing pickup and drop-off, etc.).
From my anecdotal observations, the parent who was effectively going it alone had kids that were in much worse shape. Hell, just having mom working with the mother to provide a degree of consistency between home and day care did wonders for the kids. It’s that consistent, cooperative approach that is key. It may not take a village, but the more adults involved in rearing the child, who are in-sync, the better the outcomes.Report
This is horrifying/fascinating.Report
Em:
It’s not clear to me whether solving this murder just took a while because it was hard or because the cops did a bad job investigating. Any insight? They could, of course, both be true.Report
I think it was both.
I think the Wagners were on the list from the beginning, but there were a lot of angles to chase down. The drug rumors were true, as were the demolition derby rivalry and the prior altercation rumors. The family covered their tracks well and it took a while to gather enough evidence. Among the evidence: a receipt for shoes at Walmart matching prints at the scene and a photo of Angela buying them, silencer fragments in a well on a Wagner property, and finally, the clincher: shell casings on their property matching those at the scene. I’d really like to know how they determined they were all involved but it’s been very hush hush.
There were some issues, too.. the trailer homes were towed away to a warehouse, which was found unlocked and unguarded. And then, the sheriff ended up indicted for unrelated corruption, which probably slowed things down.Report
For me, the minimum for justice, in addition to guilty verdicts and long sentences, is for the estates of all the Wagners involved to be sold off and divided equally, in trust, between the surviving Rhoden children. Special provision may have to be made for any Wagner children who were innocent, perhaps.Report
Many of the older adults in this deadly saga were born about the same time I was give or take a couple of years. They were eighties and nineties kids just like me. Seeing how somebody born at around the same time and in the same country could have a totally different life experience based on circumstances of birth is just strange. I’m 40 with no spouse or kids and the slain 40 year old had an adult son. The vagaries of life are amazing sometimes.Report