I'll swallow this mess of pottage if you can tell me how teh "terribly flawed" Roe v Wade is substantially different in mechanism or form from Brown v Board or Loving v Virginia.
To me, they are all three isomorphic.
Judgements rendered to protect the rights of individual citizens against the tyranny of the mob.
From a pragmatic viewpoint, it is inconcievable that the state could subsume the autonomy of a citizens body.
Restated, citizens simply cannot be forced to be wombs for the State against their will.
Step away from teh crackpipe boiz.
Roe v Wade is here to stay.
The commenter archive features may be temporarily disabled at times.
/yawn
I'll swallow this mess of pottage if you can tell me how teh "terribly flawed" Roe v Wade is substantially different in mechanism or form from Brown v Board or Loving v Virginia.
To me, they are all three isomorphic.
Judgements rendered to protect the rights of individual citizens against the tyranny of the mob.
From a pragmatic viewpoint, it is inconcievable that the state could subsume the autonomy of a citizens body.
Restated, citizens simply cannot be forced to be wombs for the State against their will.
Step away from teh crackpipe boiz.
Roe v Wade is here to stay.