From NY Times: Popular Populations Potpourri
If less is more, just imagine how much more more could be, proffers the NY Times Editorial Board on what to do about immigration, population, and the debate over who and how many Americans there should be.
The federal government’s ability to regulate immigration, a basic function of any nation, is broken. Over the past four years, some eight million people settled in the United States, and most of them did so unlawfully. Instead of an immigration policy calibrated to the needs of the country, both Americans and immigrants are being let down by a set of outdated laws inconsistently enforced by underfunded agencies. Chaos has been a predictable result.
Donald Trump won a second term as president on the promise that he would turn back the clock, restoring order by returning immigrants whence they came. The president-elect has vowed to deport all immigrants who do not have legal permission to be in the United States, and some who do. He also has described plans to curtail both illegal and legal immigration.
The United States undoubtedly needs to establish control over immigration, and we describe below the necessary changes. But mass deportations, or reductions in future immigration, are not in the national interest.
Immigrants are America’s rocket fuel, powering our nation’s unsurpassed economic and cultural achievements. The famous poem inscribed on the Statue of Liberty mischaracterizes those who leave their home countries behind. They are not the tired and the poor; they are people possessed of the determination, skill and resources to seek a better life. Nobel Prizes have been awarded to 142 immigrants to the United States. Nearly half of the companies in the Fortune 500 were founded by immigrants or their children. Blue jeans, Tesla, basketball, “God Bless America” — all the work of immigrants.
There’s a more basic imperative, too. America needs more people. Americans no longer make enough babies to maintain the country’s population. To sustain economic growth, the United States needs an infusion of a few million immigrants every year.
Without immigrants, the population would start to decline immediately, leaving employers short-handed, curtailing the economy’s potential and causing the kinds of strains on public services and society that have plagued Rust Belt cities for decades.
In Japan, where the population has been in decline since 2009, there are no longer enough postal workers to deliver mail on Saturdays. Nine million homes have been abandoned, and a recent report estimated that more than 40 percent of Japanese municipalities may disappear. The challenges prompted then- Prime Minister Fumio Kishida to declare in January 2023 that “Japan is standing on the verge of whether we can continue to function as a society.”
Speaker: Now if there was only a party who had this immigration plan? Oh wait, there is one! What is it called? I think they start with a D…Oh yeah!!! The Democratic Party.
Interloper: I heard the Democratic Party is major cringe.
Speaker: Oh, that’s too bad. I guess we have to close the borders and set up the camps with squalid conditions.
Now to its credit the Times did endorse Harris strongly and called her the only patriotic choice for President but I find these editorial exercises in “the discourse” (TM). Trump is a hardcore xenophobe and his staff is filled with hardcore xenophobes. There will be mass deportations or at least attempts at them. They are also talking about trying to end birthright citizenship via executive action. Yesterday, the Times had an article about how Trump and Co. are looking very hard for some kind of disease that allows them to declare a health emergency, invoke Title 42, and close the border with Mexico.
So why the hell do people release these op-eds like they matter and actually have influence?Report
There are editorials claiming that Donald is a Dove even though he is announcing is plans to take back the Panama Canal, redo the War of 1812, and add Greenland while he is at it.Report
Mr. Degraq, if that is your real name, let me ask you: Which outlets would be appropriate for us to comment on?
As far as I can tell, the only outlet that doesn’t get pushback is AOL.
Are we going to have to limit ourselves to centrist publications like Slate, Salon, and The Nation?Report
Can you bullet and/or summarize the proposals? It is paywalled.Report
1. Clamp down on illegal immigration, 2. Create more pathways to legal immigration, 3. Give the Dreamers Citizenship, 4. We need more immigrants and don’t want to become Japan which can’t maintain a workforceReport