The Big Game Sunday

Jaybird

Jaybird is Birdmojo on Xbox Live and Jaybirdmojo on Playstation's network. He's been playing consoles since the Atari 2600 and it was Zork that taught him how to touch-type. If you've got a song for Wednesday, a commercial for Saturday, a recommendation for Tuesday, an essay for Monday, or, heck, just a handful a questions, fire off an email to AskJaybird-at-gmail.com

Related Post Roulette

56 Responses

  1. InMD
    Ignored
    says:

    I think Kyle Shanahan is hands down the best coach in the league but my gut says KC wins it. Going on the road and finding ways to beat the Bills and the Ravens makes me think they will do something similar here. We’ve seen what happens when Purdy and the 49ers offense struggle and it’s that they lose, whereas even when KC’s offense is unable to do much the defense can hold the opponent down.Report

  2. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    San Francisco defense showed up today. Huh.Report

  3. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    The guy who has 0-0 on the square board is happy.Report

  4. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    There’s a Twister sequel?

    “Because you demanded it!”, I guess.Report

  5. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    And they broke Jason Elam’s record? This is obscene.Report

  6. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    In my youth, I would have thought that getting injured because you were excited would be funny/absurd.

    Now? It’s, like, yep. That can happen.Report

  7. InMD
    Ignored
    says:

    Scoring play the 49ers just ran was incredible.Report

  8. InMD
    Ignored
    says:

    Not to politics on this but that RFK Jr commercial was some weird sh*t.Report

  9. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    OOOH!!! THERE’S LANA DEL REY!!!

    I love her.Report

    • Marchmaine in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      My wife and son thought the blond next to Taylor was Mahomes’ wife, but I thought not.

      I asked my daughter who was *not* watching the game if she knew who was in the booth with Taylor? She did: Blake Lively and Ice Spice… and Lana. So I won the bet, but am now a little concerned about my daughter.Report

  10. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    ROLLER DISCO!!!!

    I am no longer making fun of this in my head.Report

  11. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    That’s the second injury. Goodness gracious.Report

  12. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    YES! WE HAVE A STREAKER!!!!Report

  13. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    They’re going to start a new game?

    This is the second OT in history, apparently.

    If they go through three OTs, can it end in a tie?Report

  14. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    If a field goal decides the game, here’s your headline:

    “I don’t know about you, but I’m feeling 22.”Report

    • DensityDuck in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      Interesting how this is the…fourth, I think? Anyway, multiple games this postseason have been decided by a missed kick (either a missed FG or a blocked PAT).

      Someone did point out that this Super Bowl was a victory for Special Teams, and I think you can just say that about the whole postseason this year.Report

  15. InMD
    Ignored
    says:

    That was a really good game.Report

  16. Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    Okay. KC won. It was close AF. Pretty good game, I guess.

    I mean, what’s the definition of the best game? The highest scoring one? The one where you have no idea what’s going to happen next? That means that the best game of the year could happen in, like, week 4 between two teams that don’t make the playoffs.

    For a game that didn’t have the Broncos in it, this was a pretty good game. It had the bad guys take the lead early and the good guys came up from behind to win it in OT.

    And Lana Del Rey was there.Report

    • DensityDuck in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      A commentor on Twitter summed it up in a way I agree with: “three quarters of WTFootball and then two quarters of really good offense”. So a good game for people who tuned in late.Report

    • InMD in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      Unless it is your team playing, in which case the most fun game to watch is a totally one-sided butt kicking by your guys, I think the best is one that is interesting and exciting right up to the end. This SB delivered that.Report

  17. CJColucci
    Ignored
    says:

    No.Report

  18. Brandon Berg
    Ignored
    says:

    Let the record show that I was not watching the Super Bowl before it was a political thing.Report

  19. Marchmaine
    Ignored
    says:

    Handful of funny commercials last night.

    My personal favorite was Matt Damon/Ben Affleck as they evolve into pure memes of themselves for Dunkin Donuts

    https://news.yahoo.com/j-lo-tom-brady-matt-205200825.html

    Most disappointing? The E*Trade babies… they just don’t seem to get that the whole thing that made the originals funny was the improv over the raw baby footage. The CGI staging with babies as props entirely misses the point, Shankopotomus.Report

    • Slade the Leveller in reply to Marchmaine
      Ignored
      says:

      Definitely the best of the bunch. What I found so surprising was the roster of A-list celebs who were doing TV commercials. It must be pretty lucrative.Report

      • Michael Cain in reply to Slade the Leveller
        Ignored
        says:

        Myself, I put the change back when Mercedes did the commercial that included Willem Dafoe, Usher, Kate Upton, and the original Sympathy For the Devil. Suddenly, Super Bowl commercials could be art (well, the 90-second version; the 60-second one was kind of choppy). It didn’t have to be embarrassing to be in a Super Bowl commercial.

        I’ve always wondered what the Stones charged for the one-time license for that commercial :^)Report

  20. DensityDuck
    Ignored
    says:

    One thing that struck me was how there were not nearly as many sports-betting commercials as I’d expected.

    Like, I think we had more commercials for Temu than we did for betting — and the whole “Kick Of Destiny” thing seemed almost like it got cut for time, like after weeks of buildup the commercial itself was maybe ten seconds?Report

    • InMD in reply to DensityDuck
      Ignored
      says:

      I’d like to think they were developing a sense of propriety about this stuff, but I am sure that is not true. The open question is whether they’re going to be so aggressive as to push the pendulum back in the other direction on sports gambling. It’s one thing to say small time betting will no longer be criminal. Having casinos where such activity is allowed within the 4 walls for those who voluntarily enter is something I would expect to be mostly tolerated. But endlessly peppering all of civilization with the ability to blow money on idiotic bets on your smart phone like they have been? That could prompt a backlash.Report

    • Philip H in reply to DensityDuck
      Ignored
      says:

      The NFL controls the broadcast rights, and I suspect leans heavily on the network regarding commercial content. And the last thing the NFL wants to be seen to be doing is encouraging sports betting on its premier annual game.Report

    • Jaybird in reply to DensityDuck
      Ignored
      says:

      That could be based on nothing more than the price of getting such a commercial. $7M per 30 second spot, the google tells me.

      Why do that when you can spend $50K for 30 seconds during Smackdown?

      I’ll keep my eye open during RAW tonight. I betcha* that there are just as many sports betting commercials as ever.

      *Gambling Problem? Call 1-877-8-HOPENY.Report

      • Michael Cain in reply to Jaybird
        Ignored
        says:

        This was my thought. Legalized gambling is a state-by-state thing. $7M for a 30-second national spot probably isn’t nearly as many eyeballs who can actually gamble per buck as buying more and much cheaper slots in regional/local games. Also too, I think the network is much stingier about slots reserved for the local affiliates during the Super Bowl.

        Anyone have any idea if the California teams’ regional games — California doesn’t have legal sports betting — are saturated with gambling ads to the same level as the Broncos’ games?Report

      • Jaybird in reply to Jaybird
        Ignored
        says:

        No gambling ads tonight!

        I was surprised.

        Now that the The Big Game is behind us, I guess that we just don’t have anything to bet on until March Madness.

        Why buy an ad? Save a little money for a couple of weeks. Turn the machine back on in a week or two.Report

    • John Puccio in reply to DensityDuck
      Ignored
      says:

      The NFL has a one gambling spot per quarter policy. Preseason through the Super Bowl, doesn’t matter.

      It’s complete hypocrisy of course. No single sports league benefits more from gambling than the NFL, legal or otherwise. But they have a very long history of distancing themselves while embracing gambling at the same time.

      From Jimmy the Greek to Las Vegas hosting the Super Bowl, the common thread is pretending gambling isn’t one of the pillars the league was built upon.Report

      • Fish in reply to John Puccio
        Ignored
        says:

        The Premier League’s relationship with gambling is interesting to me. Notably, Brentford’s star striker Ivan Toney was suspended from the league for 9 months for gambling. Apparently he was betting on himself to score goals–which ok? It’s not like he’s betting on his own team to lose, which as a striker he could certainly influence (this carries a lifetime ban). Anyway, while the league was busy suspending Toney, Brentford was cashing the checks from their kit and ad hoardings sponsor, Hollywoodbets.

        Also HOW ABOUT THEM CHIEFS????Report

      • Michael Cain in reply to John Puccio
        Ignored
        says:

        Is that for national spots? What about regional ones? Does it include local ads?Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *