Echoes of History
October 7 is a day that will be long remembered in Israeli and Jewish history. Holocaust analogies are extremely overused, but the reports coming out of Israel indicate that they are apt here. The testimony and reports of Israeli emergency workers bring to mind nothing so much as the Nazi terror raids on Jewish neighborhoods that left many dead and the balance removed to concentration camps. The analogy here between savage murders and kidnappings from three weeks ago and 80 years ago bears more than a passing resemblance.
That’s from a gentile perspective. A Jewish perspective would probably be to shrug and point out that Jews were the victims of pogroms long before Hitler. If anything has changed, it is in the will and the ability of Jews to fight back.
It is this ability to fight back effectively that seems to make much of the world hesitant to support Israel. I guess it’s easy to put a flag on your social media profile to signify support for the victims of genocidal atrocities, but it’s more difficult to watch while the victims systematically dismantle a terrorist regime that hides behind innocent women and children. Collateral damage is a tragedy of any war, but it is an integral part of Hamas’s strategy.
Marco Rubio was on target with a retweet (re-x?) of a video showing Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense intercepting flurries of Hamas rockets.
“In Gaza civilians have no electricity and are running out of food, water, medicine and fuel,” Rubio observed, “Yet somehow Hamas still has plenty of rockets.”
As Israel gets accused of implementing fascist policies, it’s ironic to remember that the actual Nazis (as opposed to figurative ones) were instrumental in fomenting the current strife between Jews and Arabs. The Nazis had a warm relationship with Middle Eastern Arabs and Muslims even as they considered them racially inferior and consigned some in Europe to concentration camps. Politics and war make strange bedfellows and Arab antipathy to Britain, which governed Palestine at the time, probably contributed to the alliance. Hitler supported a 1941 Arab revolt against British rule and the 13th division of the Waffen SS was comprised of Bosnian Muslims, ironically the same group targeted by Serbs in the 1990s.
The Germans also had a cozy relationship with Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Muslim grand mufti of Jerusalem. After the end of World War II and Israel’s establishment as an independent state (and its sister Palestinian state’s absorption into the surrounding Arab kingdoms), Husseini became a pioneer of Palestinian rights and Arab anti-Semitism.
What we saw on October 7 wasn’t a new phenomenon as much as a return to the past. In the early days of Israel, cross-border raids by fedayeen, Arab commandos, were not uncommon.
What was different about October 7 was the scale. Between 1949 and 1956, about 200 Israelis were killed. About 1,400 people in Israel were reportedly killed by Hamas in the opening of the current war.
October 7 was a pogrom on steroids. We have to go back to WWII and the Holocaust to find a larger mass murder of Jews. Even the infamous Kristallnacht had only an estimated death toll of 91, not counting the tens of thousands who were arrested and would later die in the camps. But the Nazis marching Jews off to the camps has another direct parallel in the contemporary Hamas kidnappings.
The kidnapping and hostage-taking also hearken back to another Middle Eastern crisis. I was about eight years old when Iranian militants stormed the US embassy in Tehran. It was more than a year before the 52 hostages were released.
Part of that story includes the first major operation by the Army’s Delta Force, a mission that ended in disaster. The carnage at Desert One became a cautionary tale for overly complex, long-range missions that may have impacted world leaders in their decisions not to overtly attack Iran’s nuclear reactors and weapons program infrastructure. Yet.
Another recurring theme is that of anti-Semitism. In the weeks since Hamas’s attack, both sides of the domestic political spectrum have pointed the finger of anti-Semitism at the other. Republicans point to Democratic Palestinian sympathizers like Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, who is the American-born daughter of Palestinian immigrants. The statements made by some Democrats, including many leftist students at colleges and universities around the country, are very problematic and some even cross the line into racism.
It’s true that much of the anti-Israel agitation has come from pto-Palestinian segments of the left, but it’s also true that political affiliations are often assumed. For example, we really don’t know anything about the people who attacked a Jewish Tulane student at a pro-Palestine rally. Pro-Palestine does not automatically equal Democrat.
At the same time, the virus of anti-Semitism is present on the right as well, it just takes a slightly different form. For example, Marjorie Taylor Greene isn’t as much as Holocaust denier as a Holocaust generalizer. For she of “Jewish space laser” fame, everything she opposes can be likened to the Holocaust, which is a less direct way of cheapening the price paid by Europe’s Jews.
Then, aside from the neo-Nazi factions of the right, there are people like Nick Fuentes, Candace Owens and Kanye West. Fuentes is an overt Holocaust denier and anti-Semite. Kanye, embraced by the right, has gone on anti-Jewish rants. Owens has been a longtime defender of Kanye and has gone silent on the current war except to call for Israeli restraint.
For many on the right, there’s a curious cognitive disconnect between being pro-Israel and not liking Jews, who tend to be liberal, very much. For the segment of the right that is Christian Nationalist and/or that dabbles in replacement theology(there’s a lot of overlap between the two), it can be difficult to rationalize support for a modern Israeli state. As I mentioned not long ago, I’ve even heard some on the right who deny that modern Israelis are Jewish.
I’ve also seen some online accounts accuse Jewish writers of anti-Semitism for such microaggressions as questioning whether the babies in Israel were beheaded before or after death. This becomes a “gotcha” argument against the media even though there was never any question that Hamas murdered the babies.
In truth, both sides are right that the other side is anti-Semitic, at least in part. We shouldn’t then devolve into a debate over which side is more or less hating of the Jews. Rather, both sides should police their own. Free speech is a requirement at public universities, but private political organizations don’t have to tolerate anti-semitism in their midst.
The fact that both sides have anti-Semites goes way back. The Ku Klux Klan was anti-Jewish as were the Nazis and the communists. So was Henry Ford and a great many blacks as well as whites. Anti-Semitism is a veritable melting pot of races, colors, and creeds.
In 1930s America, some chose to sympathize with Nazi and Fascist groups who were hostile to the Jews. Others, isolationists and conservatives and leftists, refused to allow more Jews to immigrate. At one point, a ship carrying almost a thousand Jewish refugees was refused permission to land in the US, Canada, and Cuba. The ship ultimately returned to Europe where most were murdered.
Jesus might ask, “Which of these do you think was a neighbor to the Jews?”
“Amen or oh me?” as one of my former pastors used to ponder.
The war against Hamas is recent, but it isn’t new. It’s simply another act in the ongoing play that has been going on since 1947 when Israel was founded. Or maybe it goes all the way back to Haman or even to Cain. Either way, it’s a new version of the old scene.
The Gaza War (2023 edition) is already horrible, but it’s going to get worse. What it isn’t, however, is new. The only thing that is new this year is that the bloodshed can be live-streamed into our homes in real-time.
While these scenes are heartrending and tragic, the current war is 100 percent the fault of Hamas. The Palestinian fighters on October 7 were doing what thousands of anti-Semitic militants have been for decades and centuries: killing and kidnapping Jews. The difference is that Jews now fight back.
“ The analogy here between savage murders and kidnappings from three weeks ago and 80 years ago bears more than a passing resemblance.”
Please… make this analogy. 6M dead at the hands of a powerful government waging war on its neighbors is analogous to a terrorist organization breaking through fences with bulldozers and killing fewer people than the government of the people it attacked killed in recent years how exactly?Report
We don’t know how many people have been killed in Gaza. The figures you hear in the news all come from government organizations in Gaza, that is, Hamas. The same people that accused Israel of killing 500 people blowing up a hospital whose parking lot was hit by a Palestinian-fired rocket but wasn’t blown up and where not nearly that many people died.Report
Even still…
As abhorrent as Hamas’ actions were, comparing them to the Nazi government and war machine that conquered much of Europe and likely would have exterminated European Jews (and other groups) absent a massive war fought by super powers on multiple fronts… it just doesn’t work.
Their goals and target may be the same but 10/7 was not the Holocaust. Calling it such is a disservice to the millions and millions who died during the Holocaust and in trying to stop it.Report
Comment in mod.Report
This is not true. Strife between Jews and Arabs in Mandatory Palestine started after the Balfour Declaration in 1917 (Erm, once Mandatory Palestine existed in 1920. Whatever.), where Britain pledged to create an explicitly Jewish state in an area where Jews were very much a minority, which would have either required some sort of minority-run government or ethnic cleansing to work. (Spoiler, it ended up being the second.) And the Arab population knew that, the entire area was in a war almost from that point onward.
The Na.zis had basically nothing to do with it, except with their eventual behavior against the Jews being the justification for the world acceding (somewhat) to their requests. The actual conflict in that area started way before that.
And it’s exceptionally weird how you mention Haj Amin al-Husseini and his ‘enemy of my enemy is my friend’ approach to the Na.zis (His exact words), but failed to have noticed he had literally been arrested in _1920_ by the British by inciting violent rioting in Jerusalem against Jews and Jewish property, in protest of the Balfour Declaration! I’m rather sure that didn’t have anything to do with Na.zis, as the Na.zi party would literally not even be founded until a few months later.
Just so there’s no confusion about what I’m saying, I want to make clear that Haj Amin al-Husseini was not a good person. He was rather antisemitic. And violent. I am not here to praise him in any manner. My objection here is the timeline, as all this was well before the Na.zis.
In fact, you can find a lot of examples of antisemitic stuff from that time…as I think I have mentioned here before, this time period, between WWI and WWII, is exactly the point when, due to the Arab-Jew conflict starting, antisemitism became extremely prevalent among Muslim Arab in that area, imported from Europe and local Christians.
Before, especially in that area (The Ottoman Empire), there had been…very little antisemitism, and what amount had existed had mostly come from local Christians. It’s not until WWI that (Due to Jews, some Arab but mostly not, openly trying to seize governance of part of Palestine) that any sort of general anti-Jewish sentiment arose among the Muslim Arab population, and, luckily for everyone (wait, no, not lucky), the Christians had _centuries_ of things to say about Jews that the Muslim Arab world imported full force, and were fully up to speed in a decade or so.
But having said all that, I will point out that while a lot of the stuff said and done was very bad…there actually is a reason for it, the aforementioned plan of ‘We are going to carve out a piece of where you live and hand it to the Jews.’, which managed to get Arab Muslims pissed off at the Jews…and also very much the British too! It wasn’t Na.zis coming in. And there was quite a lot violence in the other direction, along with a lot of slander there, also.Report
I happened to come across Schlender’s list on tv a few days ago. What I found curious was the compliance of the jews to being rounded up and many being shot. I think it was a scene where they were moving jews to the ghettos. I remember one scene where 5 people were put into a line, one behind each other. A german soldier shot into the line killing 3 of the 5. The other two stood were they were as another soldier pulled out a pistol and, took aim, and shot each in the head. The last guy stood and watched they guy in front of him killed and just stood there waiting.
W
T
F?
People knew what was happening and they still stood by…
No running, no mobbing the germans, nothing.Report
The Hollywood-ification of the Holocaust has become a bit misleading in that regard. For one thing there was resistance in some places. But for the most part the Holocaust looked like being unexpectedly dragged out of your home at 2AM after the lines changed on the eastern front without necessarily knowing what was going on, being marched at gunpoint into the woods with (and sometimes by) your neighbors, and abruptly machine gunned. There were no survivors from those kinds of episodes nor were people necessarily on notice about what was going to happen in the way hindsight now makes obvious. However there were some survivors from the camps, and the ghettos, and for that somewhat arbitrary reason the Elie Wiesel type experience is the one that gets remembered, along with the experience of the Jews in Germany and occupied western Europe, where there simply weren’t that many to begin with prior the war. You also have the complicating factor of the sites of the most serious and representative atrocities ending up on the other side of the iron curtain, where Westerners couldn’t learn about them and where the politics of what happened were very different, due to being in Soviet or Soviet allied communist states.
Which isn’t to say that experience shouldn’t be remembered too, just that Steven Spielberg is only going to show you a very specific, and small piece of things. There was a book that came out around 15 years ago by Timothy Snyder called Bloodlands that somewhat controversially dug into this, and used a lot of information from the Russian sources that only became available in the late 90s. It’s very worth reading.Report
The death camps get a lot of attention because they were where the Jews of Western Europe* tended to get sent to die and because they allow for big ideological pontification against things ranging from government to industrialization or whatever else. Most Jews killed during the Holocaust were killed with mobile death squads or in massacres more like the Rwanda genocide.
*This is important because the Jews of Western Europe were more much more acculturated than the Jews of Eastern Europe. Ann Frank is a teenage girl just like you while Dvora Frumkin kept glatt kosher and never saw a movie or listened to the radio. The much more religious and traditional Jewish communities in Eastern Europe come across as much less identifiable for Western audiences. It is also why a lot of attention is paid to the plight of German Jews under the Nazis while the Jews or Romania, Poland, and elsewhere in Eastern Europe are something of an afterthought despite them wanting to escape before 1939 as well.Report
adding to the comments above, there are WW2 movies that depict Jews who ran (Pianist), hid (The Invisibles) & fought back…to the extent they could (Defiance). I’m just naming a few off the top of my head. Schindler’s List is just one POV.Report
Stanley Kubrick remarked on seeing Schindler’s List was that “the Holocaust is about the six million Jews that died not the few thousand that lived.” The problem with Kubrick’s approach is that nearly no audience has the emotional strength to go through two to two and half ours of sheer depression. Some sort of emotional payoff is needed.Report
What makes these sorts of films difficult also is the scarcity of heroes.
For every Schindler there are millions of others all across Europe and the Americas who turned their eyes and pretended not to see, both at the individual and institutional level.
Which is particularly difficult for us Americans in the post-war generations to grasp. The Allied victory seems predestined and inevitable, so when presented with new evils its easy for us to just sort of assume that someone somewhere will do something.Report
Many people even doubt Schindler’s heroism and argue he was just a war profiteer that managed to do good by sheer accident of his greed for cheap labor. And yeah, the Allied victory was basically predestined even though it could have been a much longer and bloodier war. There was no way the Axis powers could have taken on the demographic and industrial might of the four most populous political entities in the world. These being the USA, the USSR, the Republic of China, and the British Empire.Report
I think some sort of WWI style armistice with terms allowing the Reich to retain control of much of Europe was a very real possibility, had just a few cards played out differently.
The bigger point is that as we’ve seen in Rwanda, Indonesia, and China, large scale atrocities can and do happen while the world dithers passively. Sometimes the bad guys do win.Report
Sometimes the bad guy wins because the good guys sweeping in makes things worse. Like trying to invade the PRC to prevent Mao’s mad sociological experiments would not have worked. Same with stopping the current PRC genocide against the Uyghurs.Report
“Most Jews killed during the Holocaust were killed with mobile death squads or in massacres more like the Rwanda genocide.”
Yeah, about that Rwandan genocide….”Hotel Rwanda” was excellent, if only for the reason that you see one of the main bad guys talking about people as “cockroaches”. Every time I read or hear someone basically devaluing another persons life by referring to them as something similar I’m reminded about how close to the edge we as a race are to another event like that. It always starts with dehumanization….Report
I’ve heard Andrew Klavan go off on how disappointing it is that the definitive Hollywood film about the Holocaust is about the kind-hearted German who looks out for Jews.
A bit off-subject, but I love the movie Swing Kids.Report
I don’t want to totally denigrate any particular movie. I’m more just saying that the larger documented history doesn’t lend itself to these kinds of films, even if there are stories in the horror worth telling. To Lee’s point the bulk of the killing was done by SS units using firearms. Gas was introduced in part due to the inefficiency but also because the murderous work was so awful it was having a well documented deleterious impact on the morale of the units carrying it out. There is no nice way to put that in a movie.
Mina mentioned Defiance, which I think is a pretty good movie and takes a slightly different tone than the usual depictions but IIRC it was controversial in Poland because the Soviet aligned militia that on the one hand protected some Jews is also alleged to have been involved in massacres against ethnic Poles.Report
I don’t know which/whose comment I’m replying to, but whatever.
The concentration camp is usually going to be the strongest choice for such a visual medium as film. They were immense – which also helps to prevent people from discounting the magnitude of the Holocaust. They were “efficient” in a 20th-Century sort of way, and state-approved. They used people as slaves, which is imagery that’s always going to resonate with Americans. Additionally, we’re not far removed from the generation that experienced the shock of the discovery of what the Nazis had been doing, and it was pictures of concentration camps that caused that shock.Report