Thursday Throughput: Binary Planet Edition

Michael Siegel

Michael Siegel is an astronomer living in Pennsylvania. He blogs at his own site, and has written a novel.

Related Post Roulette

8 Responses

  1. Oscar Gordon says:

    Binary systems – We can’t possibly know if the observed planet formed around the binaries, or was captured and just hasn’t been ejected yet, can we?

    Vaccine video is awesome!Report

  2. Jaybird says:

    ThTh12: A decade, maybe a decade and a half, I wandered through one of those antique stores that had Rare Artifacts in addition to stuff that was made in the 1800’s. Like, if you wanted a bracelet that had a single stone that came from an asteroid? You could get your asteroid bracelet there. A Russian icon of the Archangel Michael from the 1700s? Yep.

    In the little special case, for a mere $200, they had a blue vase about the size of your finger. The base of the vase was bubbled out, like an upside down capital-T. It would hold a shortish dandelion, maybe. It dated back to the 1st century, the little card said.

    I stared at it. Only $200. For a vase that held a flower picked by a hand of someone who said “Caligula” contemporarily. I didn’t get it. Where would I put it?

    Anyway, that’s insane. I can’t help but think that it’s an affront of some kind.Report

    • Brandon Berg in reply to Jaybird says:

      What else are you going to do with them? There are too many Roman artifacts for museums to put them all on display. Better they be in the hands of people who appreciate them than in some crate in a warehouse.Report

  3. J_A says:

    Asimov once described, from the POV of someone born in a different start system parsecs away, the Earth-Moon system as a “double planet”, and something he had never witnessed before.

    Asimov apparently subscribed to the theory that the rare circumstances of the Earth-Moon system was a likely explanation of the rareness and richness of Earth’s biomaReport

    • Oscar Gordon in reply to J_A says:

      As a factor of relative sizing, he has a point (IIRC). Sure, Jupiter & Saturn have a cubic sh*t-ton of moons, as do Neptune and Uranus (although not as many as the big boys), but all their moons are tiny compared to the planets they orbit, and, of course, all four planets are gas or ice giants. So if you run the gravity equation for those systems, the planets dominate so utterly that no one would imagine it as anything but a single gravity well.

      Of the rocky inner planets, only Earth has a moon that is not effectively a captured asteroid. Luna has enough mass to significantly pull on the Earth, the gravity equation is a different beast locally. I wonder if we’ll someday find that complex life likes stuff like tidal forces.Report

      • Dark Matter in reply to Oscar Gordon says:

        The moon used to be a lot closer to the Earth and the tidal impact was a lot greater. Like 10x larger waves greater.

        If complex life needs a constant stirring stick at one point in it’s development than that would make it a lot rarer.Report

        • Oscar Gordon in reply to Dark Matter says:

          Might not “need” a tidal stirring stick, but we stir chemical reactants* for a reason.

          *Obviously, not all chemical reactants, given that there are some that react violently to being stirred.Report

  4. Michael Cain says:

    ThTh7: News about the other sort of nuclear power…

    The Georgia Public Service Commission heard testimony last week about the Vogtle 3 and 4 nukes: another billion dollars in cost overruns and a several month slip for starting fueling. That brings the cost for the pair to just over $29B. The owners may be headed to court because the smaller ones assert trigger conditions have been met that require Georgia Power to pay the entirety of this latest overrun. As I understand previous PSC decisions, GP will not be allowed to ever include any of this latest overrun in their rate base.

    The UAMPS small modular reactor project slated for the Idaho National Laboratory increased the guaranteed maximum power price for its owners to compensate for decreased thermal efficiency. The design was changed to use air cooling of the power-generating steam loop because the “obtain cooling water by the federal government confiscating Snake River water rights” aspect of the design was making them a lot of enemies. Enough UAMPS members have bailed that the project has been reduced from 12 planned modules to six.

    Bill Gates and Warren Buffett say they will build a liquid sodium fast neutron reactor in western Wyoming. $4B price tag for 365 MWe is somewhat higher than the typical $8B per GW prices being quoted globally for pressurized water reactors (France, Finland). The announcement made a point of mentioning that the steam loop would be air cooled. This is not a good time to look for thousands (or tens of thousands) of acre-feet of water for evaporative cooling in the American West.

    The Department of Energy has restarted its search for consent-based interim storage sites for spent nuclear fuel. Responses to the RFI are due by early March, 2022.Report