39 thoughts on “Derailed: Performative Nihilism and Critical Infrastructure Attacks On The Railroads

    1. Agreed. I don’t expect a multi-comment argument to break out here, so this article might not get many comments at all, but I hope it doesn’t get overlooked.Report

  1. I would like a link to a news story describing this. Some basic google searches have turned up stories about anti-rail demonstrations in WA, but none of the links seem to match this one.

    Thing is, this is likely to have happened right where I grew up, and I’d like more details.Report

      1. Thanks! As I suspected, this is my home county. My sister still lives in Bellingham, and I visit often. There’s a photo in the other story @Dark Matter linked that shows track in a place I take walks sometimes.

        In an interesting connection to this story, trains laden with coal (not hazmat) rumble through Bellingham on their way to a coal terminal in Tsawwassen, BC, where it is loaded on ships and sailed to China.

        I would have expected that these trains would be more of a target than the hazmat trains.

        As it turns out, some entrepreneurs tried to build a coal port in Whatcom County, but the Lummi, who by treaty hold a veto power over use of coastal lands in the area, said no.

        But the coal trains still rumble on past to Tsawwassen.Report

    1. Thanks for the link. I see that she was just sentenced, and the sentencing seems proportional and just to me. Even though the name of the charge against her, and the language used by some to describe what she did seems a bit heightened.Report

      1. Disabling crossing guards/notifications seems likely to get someone killed sooner or later.

        Also seems like they did cause damage to one of the trains, “On one occasion on Oct. 11, multiple shunts were placed in three different locations in Whatcom and Skagit. The devices triggered an automatic braking system on a train that was transporting hazardous and combustible material. The emergency braking then caused a portion of the train to decouple from the engine. Though a disaster did not occur, federal prosecutors said the decoupling could have caused the tanker cars filled with flammable gas to derail in a residential area.”

        https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3911408/postsReport

        1. I find it difficult to imagine a scenario where emergency braking could cause decoupling. But that could just be my ignorance.

          There are situations which would engage emergency braking that don’t involved any vandalism, I would think. And the trains should be able to handle that without a derail, shouldn’t they? So if they don’t, who’s responsible?

          Don’t forget, I’m ok with them being found guilty and sentenced. I just am seeing some scapegoating going on here, too.Report

          1. It didn’t derail, it decoupled. And this is not my field, but emergency braking because you think you’re going to kill people seems like something that is going to be pushing the limits.

            I’m a little surprised they’re getting off with a few months and not years.Report

          2. Emergency braking is still emergency braking, i.e. not safe, controlled braking. And for a train, it’s more fraught because you have to coordinate the brakes on all the cars, with the right amount of force, etc. If one car malfunctions even a little bit and fails to apply enough force, or too much, it can cause a derailment.Report

  2. Our property shares a long border with the Norfolk Southern… I think the house is far enough away from the tracks that we’re safe (more or less) from the kinetic energy of a catastrophic derailment… but yeah, toxic chemical release and we’re gonners. Fortunately it seems that 90% of the freight is intermodal containers and dry goods; but if you don’t hear from me after an incident at the Virginia Inland Port … remember me fondly.

    Regarding Joan of Arc, I get the rhetorical use… but kinda feel like she gets side-swiped in the Anarcho-Communist-Enviro usage… not simply because of the politics, but because she was fundamentally aligned with the apparatus of the state against another state. Now, Ashli Babbitt? Closer. If Babbitt had survived, I’m confident she would have been abandoned at some point by Trump to her fate… so sure, maybe a little tenuous, but I could see that one working. Commentary brought to you by the Catholic Rhetorical Devices Society.Report

  3. When will they FINALLY eliminate thee LOUD and frequent Blast of TRAIN HORNS ?!? They serve No REAL purpose EXCEPT to awaken ,annoy , and startle people living Nearest to the tracks ! Deaf People can legally drive. Blind people cannot. Use High Powered colorful LED lighting at night to WARN motorist and people biking or strolling nearby . HORN Blast are NOT needed to be heard at 3AM and 4 AM for miles beyond the train itself ! WHY ? The only thing this does is drive property values WAY way DOWN ! I Don’t NEED to feel RAGE every HOUR ,Everyday!Report

    1. At least west of the Mississippi, the legal principle is first in place, first in right. Where I live, not only do the railroads hold the controlling right at almost all intersections, backing city traffic up for 30-40 minutes at a time, but road construction must not interfere with irrigation canal water flows. The city just spent umpteen million dollars to build an overpass to clear a railroad track because all of the case law favors the railroad.

      I can point you at a whole bunch of city and county governing bodies who pray almost daily that the rapid shift away from coal forces the BNFS into bankruptcy, so they can buy right-of-way for pennies on the dollar.Report

        1. Unless the local authorities have established a quiet zone — at considerable expense, in order to meet all of the conditions — trains are required to sound their horn (49 CFR Part 222) for all at-grade crossings. The city I used to live in converted all of the at-grade crossings to quiet zones over the course of several years — about a million dollars per crossing for all of the necessary improvements.Report

      1. My sister in law lives very close to some tracks that freight trains absolutely barrel down. Trains were required to sound their horns when approaching the crossing because there wasn’t a gate. Now there is a gate, and the need for the horn has been obviated, so no more horn.Report

  4. This was a well written piece that was totally marred by the phrase “anarcho-communists”. What on earth does that even mean, and when did it become fashionable again to label those on the left the right disagrees with as Communists? It’s like Tailgunner Joe has come back to haunt us. Utterly ridiculous.Report

    1. What on earth does that even mean

      Anarcho-communism,[1][2][3][4] also known as anarchist communism,[a] is a political philosophy and anarchist school of thought which advocates the abolition of the state, capitalism, wage labour, social hierarchies[17] and private property … in favor of common ownership of the means of production[19][20] and direct democracy as well as a horizontal network of workers’ councils with production and consumption based on the guiding principle “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”.[21][22]

      Some forms of anarcho-communism such as insurrectionary anarchism are strongly influenced by egoism and radical individualism,

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-communism

      What on earth does that even mean, and when did it become fashionable again to label those on the left the right disagrees with as Communists?

      Given that “insurrectionary anarchism” (above link has a link to that and it’s probably more relevant) is a flavor of Anarcho-communism AND that it seems like what these two were doing, I suspect he’s using the term correctly.

      These two were fighting the system by breaking it.Report

      1. How do we know it applies to them? (and thanks to Dark Matter for elucidating.) The one news story about this mentions only their connection to some tribal lands that seemingly are being encroached.

        While I don’t condone messing with the tracks, wouldn’t the effect of the device they planted cause train traffic to be halted on that line because the control system is fooled into believing a train is already there? The doomsday scenario being painted here seems unlikely, at least at my admittedly novice level of understanding.Report

        1. I did some looking on wiki and yes, the train needs to spend a few miles stopping because it can’t stop on a dime, and yes, that’s unlikely to cause it to derail (although “unlikely” is one hell of an unnecessary risk to run with a train full of toxic combustibles).

          The problem is it also turns off all signaling for the train track. So everywhere there used to be gates that drop to stop cars from crossing and getting squished, that doesn’t work any more.Report

        2. (I should have bundled but whatever)

          How do we know it applies to them? The one news story about this mentions only their connection to some tribal lands that seemingly are being encroached.

          They’re leftist “activists” engaged in highly illegal direct action, and supposedly being supported/encouraged by people who id themselves as A-Com on twitter.

          That’s not “proof” that it’s a duck, but it looks, walks, swims, and quacks like one.Report

        3. They participated in an online community that is, primarily, populated by anarchists (though of many different tendencies, not merely communist or syndicalist), and were acting in a way consistent long tradition of green anarchism in the PNW. I don’t know that we know their specific anarchist tendency (and green anarchists are often hostile to, well, pretty much everyone else, ideologically at least, but again, I don’t know if they were greens or just eco-somethingorother in addition to being anarchists of one sort or another. I’m not sure the author of the OP does either, though.Report

Comments are closed.