It’s Time For Biden To Be A Statesman
In 1796, George Washington cemented his status as a revolutionary and an American icon. On that day, the father of our country left office voluntarily. Washington could have had a third term as president since there was no constitutional limitation at that point, but he valued the peaceful transition of power more than “four more years.”
This was actually the second time that Washington had peacefully and voluntarily relinquished power. In 1783, after winning the Revolution, Washington resigned as commander-in-chief of the army. Not many successful revolutionary leaders in the two centuries since have stepped aside to allow the democratic process to take hold.
If we are to be honest, neither Donald Trump nor Joe Biden is fit to fill Washington’s shoes. Donald Trump stands in stark contrast to Washington, not only in being the only president in American history to try to violently cling to power but also in his apparent inability to tell the truth and respect the law.
In Biden’s case, the current president should take a lesson from Washington and step aside for the good of the country. After Biden’s debate performance, I gave the president the benefit of the doubt and said that if the debate was an aberration, Biden should be front and center interacting with crowds, reporters, and people on the street to prove to the voters that it was a one-off. He hasn’t done that, and I don’t expect him to despite an upcoming interview with George Stephanopoulos.
Biden has given some strong speeches delivered with a teleprompter, but doubts have continued to rise about his abilities. Donors and Democrats are getting nervous. Voters are past nervous. Where Biden was rising in the polls before the debate, he has shown a marked decline since, a decline that I have serious doubts is recoverable. Even The New Republic is pointing out that formerly safe blue states are starting to become battlegrounds. The confused and contradictory messaging from the White House is not helping matters.
It isn’t just Biden’s current mental state that is in question. So is his ability to do the job of president for four more years. At this point, his continued ability to lead the country is a legitimate question.
To the MAGA Republicans tittering away, I say that Trump has many of the same problems. And worse. And you guys aren’t even considering replacing Trump. I at least give Democrats credit for having the discussion about replacing Biden.
But back to Democrats.
The Biden situation is not going to get better. The questions about his fitness are going to dog him until November and distract Democrats from pressing the case about Trump’s fitness to lead.
Democrats need to replace Biden, but they can’t do so unless Biden steps aside. So today, I’m calling on President Biden to follow the examples of George Washington and Lyndon Johnson in going back to civilian life for the good of the country.
It’s often difficult for people to admit that they are no longer as sharp as they used to be. I saw this with several senior pilots that I used to fly with. In private aviation, there is no age-65 rule so retired airline pilots, especially those with AIDS (aviation-induced divorce syndrome), often move to corporate and charter aviation after retiring from the airlines. Some of these guys were still good pilots, but some were losing their edge. At some point, it’s time to hang it up.
If he stays in the race, Biden will be a distraction and on the defensive. He could very well drag down other Democratic candidates. If Trump does become president again, it will be vital to have strong opposition in Congress. At this point, Biden threatens that second line of defense as well.
If Biden leaves the race, Democrats can shift the argument and make the campaign about Donald Trump. If the race is about Trump, Trump loses. If the race is about Biden’s fitness, Trump wins. It’s that simple.
And the race should be about Trump, the most dangerous and incompetent man to ever hold the presidency. Don’t forget that Nikki Haley made an issue of Trump’s fitness in the Republican primary after a series of foibles that included confusing her with Nancy Pelosi. Since then, among other things, we have seen other bizarre behavior that includes a lot of talk about sharks on multiple occasions as well as questioning whether electric airplanes can fly at night or in clouds. (Spoiler alert: They can. They have batteries and are not necessarily solar-powered.) There is also the fact that some 40 former high-level members of his administration have warned against re-electing him.
And that doesn’t even begin to touch on Trump’s destructive policy ideas. For a candidate who is vigorous and articulate, Trump’s plans for a 10 percent tariff on all imports, mass deportations, and remaking the federal government in his own image with Project 2025 make juicy rhetorical targets. And now there is also Trump’s “peace” plan for Ukraine which involves giving Vladimir Putin almost everything he wants. As a platform-formerly-known-as-Twitter user noted, “No Kings” makes a powerful campaign slogan in the aftermath of the Trump immunity decision.
Biden is not effectively doing any of this. There are powerful arguments against returning Trump to power, but we can’t talk about those if we are talking about Joe Biden’s brain.
Having said all that, I will vote for Joe Biden if he is the nominee because the prospect of a second Trump presidency is more terrifying than the prospect of a president in mental decline. In fact, we’ll have a president in mental decline with either Trump or Biden, and Trump adds a strong degree of corruption and lack of respect for laws and norms to the mix. But if Biden is the nominee, Democrats will most likely lose, even with my vote because Trump’s problems aren’t as obvious.
As Steve Berman wrote recently, Trump’s incompetence saved us once before. He has not gotten more competent or sane in the intervening four years, but I’m not prepared to bet the country that Trump’s incompetence will continue to exceed his corruption. For one thing, his hold on the Republican Party is even stronger, and principled conservative resisters have mostly been purged, retired, or coopted. It’s difficult to underestimate the depths of Trump’s depravity, but underestimating his political ability has ended many careers and gotten us to where we are.
If the most important thing is keeping Trump out of power, Biden needs to step up and step aside. As I said recently, Biden once saved the country from Trumpism by stepping up. Now he needs to help save it by stepping aside.
What happens if Biden does step down is uncertain. Vice President Kamala Harris might well become the nominee as the heir apparent. There do seem to be other options such as a brokered convention. Nate Silver suggested in the New York Times:
The party could hold an open audition for the nomination process. Candidates who raised their hands would hold two or three debates against one another. They could give speeches and hold rallies. And Democrats could vote in straw polls sponsored by donors in a combination of virtual locations and physical ones that reflected the demographic breadth of the Democratic Party — say, in Atlanta, Phoenix, Pittsburgh and one or two more rural locations. Voters would also express their opinions in regular opinion polls.
Delegates could take this information into account at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago and make a more informed decision. This plan would require Mr. Biden to declare his intention to exit the race sooner rather than later.
The bottom line here is that to continue on the present course puts Donald Trump back in the White House. If Joe Biden and Democrats truly believe that this would be a threat to democracy, then the only acceptable answer is to change course.
Would this be awkward? Yes. Would it be embarrassing for Joe Biden to go down in history as a president who backed out at the last minute? Yes, but probably less so than to go down in history as the president who selfishly stayed in the race and allowed an authoritarian to be elected. And the Biden White House’s decision to conceal the president’s condition played a significant role in putting him in this awkward position.
Many Democrats are arguing that Republicans failed to replace Trump when he was similarly plagued by problems late in the campaign in 2016 and ultimately won. My reply to that is to ask whether Democrats really want to look to Trump and the Republicans as role models. This is a chance to show how they are different.
Unlike a politician, a statesman puts his country ahead of himself. We don’t see many of those these days, especially in the Republican Party. But President Biden has an opportunity to head off an electoral disaster by refusing the nomination and helping to unify Democrats behind a younger, more capable candidate.
So today, I ask President Biden, “Are you a politician or a statesman.”
I think he will make the right choice.
This is getting tedious. Biden has said he is not dropping out and that should put an end to the story. There are basically four possible outcomes:
1. Biden stays in the race and wins, great!!!
2. Biden drops out and his replacement (presumably Harris) wins, great!!!!
3. Biden stays in the race and loses, major recriminations.
4. Biden drops out and his replacement (presumably Harris) loses, major recriminations. Biden becomes a replacement for Quisling possibly.
All of these are probably roughly equally likely.
Biden held a campaign really in Wisconsin yesterday. I thought it was very good and at the end he discussed the character needed to be President and the very clear fact that Trump has none.
Everyone who is opposed to Trump needs to snap out of it and do something productive like write GOTV postcards to swing state voters: https://www.postcardsforamerica.com/gotv-postcards.htmlReport
FWIW, Bloomberg is reporting Biden is narrowing the gap in swing states: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2024-07-06/biden-narrows-trump-s-election-lead-in-key-states-after-debate-poll?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0Dt0WF-zdygpI8mUlE0yRGPd9VD9z_DMr6NKnAIfUG_8IFKvLpyu7l4as_aem_Se1QVNgR25OPwsuL1mJpLAReport
The Pundit class is campaigning hard for a Republican victory: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jul/06/biden-trump-race-rebecca-solnit
“Although the Biden administration seems to have run extremely well for three and a half years, with a strong cabinet, few scandals and little turnover, a thriving economy and some major legislative accomplishments, the narrative the punditocracy has created suggested we should ignore this record and decide on the basis of the ninety-minute debate and reference to newly surfaced swarms of anonymous sources that Biden is incompetent. Quite a lot of them have been running magical-realism fantasy-football scenarios in which is fun and easy to swap in your favorite substitute candidate. The reality is that it is hard and quite likely to be a terrible mess. Nevertheless this pretense is supposed to mean that telling a presidential candidate in mid-campaign to get lost is fine.
The main argument against Biden is not that he can’t govern – that would be hard to make given that he seems to have done so for the past years – but that he can’t win the election. But candidates do not win elections by themselves. Elections are won, to state the obvious, by how the electorate turns out and votes. The electorate votes based on how they understand the situation and evaluate the candidates. That is, of course, in large part shaped by the media, as Hannah-Jones points out, and the media is right now campaigning hard for a Democratic party loss. The other term for that is a Republican victory. Few things have terrified and horrified me the way this does.”Report
“Journalists should take a side!”
“Okay.”
“WAIT NOT LIKE THAT”Report
D minus.Report
When you see journalists doing what you describe them as doing above, do you find yourself wishing that they’d just report on what is going on? Not spinning, not injecting their personal views into the story, not having hidden agendas that they’re pushing?
Golly, *I* sure do.Report
“How dare journalists be biased in favor of democracy and the rule of law!”Report
How dare we make JB care about something more than trolling!!!Report
You should view it as a sign of weakness.
In the 1930s, misogyny, racism, and fascism were powerful ideas that were expressed openly, and many people viewed them positively because at that time they hadn’t been sufficiently refuted by history.
Trumpism today relies on those same things, but they can’t express them openly because normal people still recoil.
So they can only troll and speak in code. Notice how absolutely no one here except for Koz is willing to openly declare support for Trump?
Notice how after 2016 the most concerted trolling was “You made people vote for Trump because otherwise they wouldn’t have”?
Its an admission that there is no case to be made for Trump being a better choice than Biden. So instead, what we get is snarking about Biden’s age, or sarcasm about liberal pieties with the occasional moral panic about gay people grooming children.
Which is also why the Republicans are so adamant about using the courts now, because in a straight up free election their ideas fail.Report
“Can you believe that guy mocking the people still praising the emperor’s outfit?”
“He’s jealous that he can’t see it.”Report
I should start numbering these.
1. “But Biden’s age!”
2. “Liberals are hypocrites!”
3. “Who can really say, if democracy is good or not?”
Note that nowhere in the list will exist any argument for why Trump is better or even not-worse.Report
“Here’s a criticism of Biden.”
“Why aren’t you talking about Trump?”
“Here’s a criticism of journalists.”
“Why aren’t you talking about Trump?”
“Here’s a look at the polls.”
“WHY AREN’T YOU TALKING ABOUT TRUMP?!?”
Probably because it’s looking like we’ll have four years to talk about Trump.Report
Your points can easily be defeated by simply stipulating every single criticism of Biden, journalists, liberals and wine moms.
He is still the best choice in November.
You’ve as much as admitted this.Report
Hey. There are a lot of reasons to think that Biden will win the election. He’s doing *GREAT* among the 70+ crowd and many of those folks are actively ticked off by the agism being displayed by a lot of Biden’s critics.
That said, there are a lot of reasons that Biden might not win come November and I’m not sure that demanding that the subject be changed to how much better Biden is than Trump will dismiss the reasons that Biden might not win come November.
But good luck trying to control the narrative.Report
So stipulated.
And Biden is still the better choice, and no one here is even trying to say otherwise.Report
Yeah, instead of trying to say otherwise, they’re discussing why Biden might (or is likely to) lose.
I know, I know… “Whatabout Trump?”Report
MmHmm.
Trump World ‘panicking’ as Project 2025 gets on the radar of voters
https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/amp-video/mmvo214312005740
What makes this so important is what I referred to elsewhere, that even if Trump dies tomorrow, the entire GOP is full tilt in a drive to return to the Jim Crow/ Gilded Age.
And it looks like voter category #3 is starting to pay attention.Report
Well, Trump World “panicking” indicates bad stuff for Trump World.
When a campaign is panicking, that’s usually a bad sign, don’t you agree?Report
There are some major hurdles that would need to be overcome:
1. Ohio Republicans have already tried to keep Biden off the ballot. What are the odds that some Republican Secretaries of State object to a non-standard change of candidates? I would bet money on multiple legal challenges in the future.
2. Early voting starts mid-September in some areas. That’s less than two and a half months.
3. The new campaign would start with $0, unless Harris is on top of the ticket. If Harris remained VP or wasn’t on the ticket at all, it’s likely they would not be able to use the money for the campaign.
4. The new candidate will not be chosen by Democratic voters, there’s no time. It will be a deal made by the DNC. Some faction will be *pissed*. You think the Bernie wing was mad at the DNC having their thumb on the scale before?Report
Harris heading the ticket would address most if not all of those objections.Report
The Ohio GOP folded on this I think but it always remains a possibilityReport
Republicans want Biden to go and for that reason, he should remainReport
Re: #3, surely there are shenanigans available that can address that. “We took a vote at the convention and it was unanimous and now Pritzker/Franken have the money.”Report
I read someplace that there’s some crypto billionaire who’s spearheading some big fundraising effort for a Biden replacement, with a goal of $100 million.Report
That sounds trustworthy. Wait a minute, it doesn’t sound trustworthy at allReport
This is basically inadmissible hearsay and if true, he should be forced to put the money in cash in escrow for it to be viable as an offer.Report
Speaking of inadmissable hearsay:
Report
Oh here it is in the NYT:
Report
A tenuous plan to get someone with low name recognition a fraction of their needed money in an effort to boot a black female off the ticket.Report
Biden refuses to cross the picket line: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/06/business/nea-staff-strike-convention-biden-speech.html
That’s being a statesmanReport
Your claim that Biden has been the best president of your lifetime makes a lot more sense, now that I understand your criteria.Report
Why would he start now?Report
Biden spoke at a Black Church in Philadelphia today and the NY Times reported this: “Stacia Parker, 57, a longtime member of the Mount Airy congregation, said she thanked Biden after his speech for forgiving $117,000 worth of student loans and found him cogent and compelling. “We don’t kick you when you’re down,” she said, showing off the selfie Biden snapped on her phone with her seven-year-old granddaughter.”
Stacia Parker is the real base of the Democratic Party. Not the terminally online, not people here, even me, etc.Report
$117,000 worth of student loans? At 57?Report
Let’s see, 50% of likely voters is about 80 million people… 80,000,000x$117,000.00 = 9 trillion dollars of taxpayer money to buy the election. Can Biden pull this off in just four months?Report
Where is the evidence that a substitute candidate — Harris or anyone else — would do better than Biden? Polling numbers I’ve seen show that very few people do any better than Biden. In the Ipsos poll I linked to, only Michelle Obama outpolls Trump, and as we’ve noted elsewhere, she doesn’t want to do it.
I can look back in history to 1968 and see LBJ stepping down as handing Nixon a powerful advantage. This suggests that Biden stepping down would hurt, in ways that are easily foreseeable: a chaotic, divisive convention; an admission of partisan weakness; a concession that Trump won the debate so hard it knocked Biden out of the race. It’s very questionable that Democrats would gain more than they’d lose by switching horses at this point. Doubtful, in my opinion.
Democrats need to pitch that Joe Biden has been a good President and good things have happened because he’s been President. Democrats need to remind people that Donald Trump was a bad President and that bad things happened because Donald Trump used to be President. Such as Roe v. Wade being overturned.
There’s nothing wrong with saying “The other candidate is worse than me.” Repeatedly, forcefully. That is a winning strategy. Just ask Donald Trump, who made that his strategy in the only election he’s ever won.Report
Narrator: There is no evidence that any substitute candidate would better.
The more rational of the Replace Biden people realize that the only person that can replace Biden realistically is Kamala Harris. As Biden’s VP, anything that people don’t like about Biden beyond the fact that he is an old white man can and will be imputed on Harris. The Further Left will get out the Kamala is a Kop memes as a reason not to vote for her.
For every other replacement candidate, you have issues of pluses and minuses. Is Gavin Newsom a liberal lion attack dog who successfully governed the largest state in the Union or is he an empty suit and a Democratic DeSantis. I’ve seen people argue both and lot of people will not like him because California. Gretchen Whitmer is not exactly a national name yet but has the advantage of being from the Mid-West.
Republicans are itching for Biden to go. Therefore, Biden shouldn’t go. I’m just surprised that so many Democratic voters are walking into such an obvious trap.Report
Glancing at RCP Polls, I’d guess that, were the election held today, the map would give Trump 270 (based on nothing but RCP polls page as of less than a minute ago).
On a purely utilitarian level, I can see the argument that if Biden runs and loses, it ruins one career (and only at the very, very end).
If Biden is replaced by (insert candidate here), it has a shot at ruining (insert candidate here)’s career if (insert candidate here) fails. What does (insert candidate here) get out of this? They get to be the answer to a politics question in the 2034 edition of Trivial Pursuit.
On top of that, if Biden loses, Harris gets a “HARRIS WOULD HAVE WON!” boost for a few years and maybe a cushy sinecure somewhere. If Harris loses? Pffft. Kiss *THAT* goodbye. Additionally, Harris’s VP choice will get a disproportionate amount of blame as well. (Seriously, who would sign up for that?)
Just on a purely utilitarian level… it makes the most sense for Biden to stay in. The upsides are better and the downsides are already baked in.Report
RCP has some interesting results – like Emerson saying Trump wins Michigan and Morning Consult saying Biden does. If you look at 538, it looks like Biden is at least even if not ahead in lots of places, and is inside the margin of error on the general election polling.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/Report
Glancing at that, I’d also give Trump 270. So I’ll cheerfully amend my comment to say “Glancing at RCP and 538’s polls page, I’d guess that, were the election held today, the map would give Trump 270 (based on nothing but RCP and 538’s pages as of less than a minute ago).”
Everything after that doesn’t need mutandis mutatising.Report
There isn’t anything. I would also add that a lot of people who are stating Biden must go were generally down on him before the debate. Ezra Klein and Eric Levitz have been down on Biden for months. Sulzy doesn’t like him, Kahn doesn’t like him. The media is in a meth-binge frenzy over this. Luckily most Democrats seem to not be falling for it.
What is interesting and revealing is who is falling for it. Lots of NeverTrumpers and also lots of concern trolls.Report
The entirety of the front page staff of the other blog.Report
Less Cheryl Rofer, who argues that no matter who runs, it’s the policies that win or lose the election.Report
Nope. Not any more. MAGA doesn’t care about policy. They care about control, and then punishment. period. Anything else is irrelevant. Its part of why the media keeps getting this consistently wrong, and trying to create a horse race where there shouldn’t be one.
And that’s the problem. Trump is fighting an emotion filled war for souls, and Biden is fighting an old school policy campaign.Report
Cheryl may be wrong, but that doesn’t change what she’s writing about.Report
You come at Dark Brandon, you best not miss:
Biden dares Democrats to ‘run against me,’ challenge him at convention
President Biden, in a surprise phone interview on MSNBC on Monday morning, said he’s frustrated by the discussion about his fitness and the calls for him to step aside. “Any of these guys that don’t think I should run, run against me. Announce for president, challenge me at the convention,” he said. Biden also sent a letter to his party’s lawmakers in Congress on Monday, insisting that he would stay in the race and saying “Fcuk you Jack I’ll beat your ass like lil Pauly Ryan”. Report
He should challenge Trump to a debate!Report
It is literally impossible for you to do anything in good faithReport
Again, the reason I think of you as basically operating in bad faith is because everything seems like a game or a joke to you and the basic aspect of your personality is middle-school class clown with a substitute teacher.Report
Keep in mind: I see myself not as mocking a substitute teacher, but a moral scold who is telling me how fine the emperor’s outfit is.
If you’d like me to write a short essay explaining how the democrats have found themselves in an unenviable position, I could do that (heck, I have!). I could talk about how the polls aren’t necessarily correct but if we assume that they’re in the ballpark of correct then we are in a bad place, I could talk about how few reasonable options the democrats have, and I could stick to an unemotional appraisal of the situation and discuss nothing but what’s likely to win and what’s likely to lose without wandering off into what I personally like or dislike.
But then I see a comment talking, triumphantly, about Biden bragging about how he’ll defeat anybody he goes up against and I will immediately find myself remembering the debate from JUST LAST FREAKING WEEK.
The emperor is unclothed, Saul.
And it’s in this context that I read your comments complaining about me seeing this as a joke. I don’t see you as taking this seriously. I see you as being in denial and thinking that if you are just enough of a scold that you can get everybody else in line with talking about how great Biden’s clothing is again.
And… yeah. I’m going to give that a big horse laugh.
Which is not to say that Biden will lose. Which is not to say that Trump will win. Which is not to say that California’s recent ballot initiative to further regulate kidney dialysis machines ought to have passed.
I’m just mocking some light public nudity.Report
No, your comment about resisting moral scolds and mockery of people unable to see the plain truth, flatly contradicts your inability to find fault with the Christian Nationalist manifesto that is Project 2025.
I don’t know what tic you have that causes you to try and fool everyone into thinking you are somehow nonpartisan and detached, but I don’t think anyone here is actually fooled.
You are very conservative, highly partisan, and well, heck, why not just embrace it instead of trying to bullsh!t eveyone especially since no one seems to be buying it?Report
Even if he is not partisan in the pro-Republican way. He is partisan in an anti-anti-Trump and also anti-Wine Mom way. He is OT’s example of the nihilistic Trump voter. Not necessarily a reactionary but someone who loves the chaos Trump brings because they have inchoate views on the corruption of it all.
But I agree he will never admit it.Report
I’m *NOT* nonpartisan.
But I’m also not of the opinion that being partisan (or nonpartisan, for that matter) has any relationship to virtue.
Seeing something with your own eyes?
Being able to describe it?
Now *THAT* is worth exploring.
Policing acceptable descriptions?
Nah.
This isn’t a classroom.
You’re not my substitute teacher.
But I don’t mind making fun of the person pretending that we’re in one and they are one.
(And I’m pretty sure that I’ve said that I’m one of the most conservative people on the site. Do you want a link to me saying such a thing? Does that even matter? Of course not.)
I don’t see embracing partisanship as virtuous.
I see embracing telling the truth about what one is seeing as virtuous.
And, get this, active denial as being vicious.Report
OK that’s cool, we can just all agree you are a conservative and you see the world through the lens of your own biases and priors just like the rest of us.Report
Can we also discuss stuff like “here’s what I see”?
Or are we just going to jump straight to “what you are and what your biases and priors are are more important than what you see through them”?Report
Sure.
We all see things, and what we report seeing needs to be assessed in light of our biases and priors. Because what we see may not be the same as what others see.
Like, if I see Project 2025 as a manifesto of Christian Nationalism, I would fully expect people to assess that claim in light of my biases and priors.
This is why I provide handy links and page numbers, to show what its an objective fact versus just me saying something.Report
You got questioned on your links and page numbers and asked how your statements lined up with what you were pointing to, Chip.
With quotations and everything.Report
Who made you the final decider on who is and who is not a moral scold?Report
Ever since Pinky cut his hall monitoring way back? You’re welcome.Report
Moral Scolds: People who say we should accept queer and trans people as full equals;
Not Moral Scolds: People who say queer people are pervert groomers;Report
I would have also accepted:
Moral Scolds: People who wonder whether there is sexism in video games
Not Moral Scolds: The producers of Questionably Consensual Tentacle Orgy 27Report
“You shouldn’t have *THOSE* opinions! You should have *THESE* opinions!”
You’re not the boss of what opinions I have.
Though I appreciate that you feel you ought to be.Report
Generally, I do a quick check and ask “who is acting like a substitute teacher?”
I remember an interaction from a few years back where someone here was complaining about libertarian types. The criticism was this: “It’s like libertarians are constantly yelling ‘YOU’RE NOT MY DAD!'”
And there’s a really good rejoinder to this:
“Am I your son?”
If I’m not… guess what?Report
In short:
If you are telling me what you see from your perspective?
That’s not acting like a moral scold.
If you’re policing me talking about what I’m seeing from mine, or me talking about other people talking about what they’re seeing from theirs?
That’s acting like a moral scold.
If you don’t like that definition, please offer me a better one that I should use instead.Report
That last gloss on his letter is funny – he does sound quite MAGA-y these days. He’s losing a lot of the media elites, will be interesting to see how he fares appealing to the less-sophisticated masses. That’s not been the typical path to success in the Democratic Party.Report
Polling numbers be damned. If anyone but Harris replaces Biden, they start from scratch. Suppose a ton of people get together and arrange to nominate a Whitmer/Newsom ticket at the end of August. As of today, neither of those two are registered with the FEC as running for President. They can’t collect money for a presidential campaign. They don’t have a 50-state campaign organization. There are severe limits on how much the Biden/Harris campaign can donate to them in the form of leases, phone lines, reserved advertising slots, etc.
Running for President is big business. Logistics matter. Which means long-term planning and organization matter. A lot.Report
I still think that shenanigans could overcome the logistics problem. Have a vote at the convention. Tell everyone the vote was unanimous. Tell the people complaining about the contracts that have already been signed that you’ve brought a new version of the contract that is identical to the old contract except this one has a small rider.Report
“I still think that shenanigans could overcome the logistics problem. Have a vote at the convention. Tell everyone the vote was unanimous. ”
I mean, that’s what Biden said on the news the other day, that everyone voted and they voted for him and therefore talking about anyone else is stupid.Report
According to Axios, the dam held. The insurrection is over.
Democrats will stop talking about this.
Conspiracy Theorists theorize that the media will stop talking about it too.Report
Ok, glad that’s all done and dusted. So at what point does the Biden team feel sure Harris is no longer an immediate threat and start playing her up more to try to provide some reassurance?
I had an idea for a new slogan for the campaign but of course someone already beat me to it – “Vote for the corpse, it’s important.”Report
Harris has never been a threat. All of her public appearances since the debate have focused to some extent on delivering a defense of Biden as a candidate, along with defending the Administration’s record. None of us have any insight on her private opinions of course.Report