The Evolving Act of Physically Reading In a Digitial World

Andrew Donaldson

Born and raised in West Virginia, Andrew has been the Managing Editor of Ordinary Times since 2018, is a widely published opinion writer, and appears in media, radio, and occasionally as a talking head on TV. He can usually be found misspelling/misusing words on Twitter@four4thefire. Andrew is the host of Heard Tell podcast. Subscribe to Andrew'sHeard Tell Substack for free here:

Related Post Roulette

11 Responses

  1. Philip H
    Ignored
    says:

    I read for pleasure in print media, and they will drag the books and magazines from my cold dead hands.

    I read this forum digitally because I have little other choice.

    I read journal articles for work by finding the PDF and printing it out. Usually after saving the PDF to a Reading file on my hard drive.

    There is still something entrancing about paper with words printed on it.Report

    • Chris in reply to Philip H
      Ignored
      says:

      I’m at about 50/50 now for books: about half on my e-reader and about half in print. I don’t think I read differently between the two anymore, though I certainly did when I first got a reader about a decade ago, because there are no physical clues to indicate how much you’ve read and how much you have left to read, like you get with the way a book looks and feels as you read through it.

      Mostly, I think splitting allows me to read way more than I would if I were just reading physical books. One of the problems I had with physical books only was that I’d read a review, or a recommendation, or hear the author speak, or whatever, and get very excited about a book, order it, or put it on a list to order, but by the time it got to me, or I got to it, the excitement had worn off. Now I can order a book and start reading it instantly, which I frequently do (just did this with Ajay Singh Chaudhary’s The Exhausted of the Earth, which I recommend). So the e-reader works out great, and I can still be more deliberative with print books.Report

  2. Damon
    Ignored
    says:

    When I got on long vacations, I bring several paper books. I think I read 4 books on the plane coming and going from my last two long international flights. Hardcopy is better.Report

  3. fillyjonk
    Ignored
    says:

    my comprehension seems worse when I read off a screen. I read a lot of research articles and I have gone back* to printing out the pdfs, reading them, and taking reading notes in a bound journal as I go.

    I have a very large number of physical books. I have a kindle-type app on my phone but never use it, even when traveling – I carry paper books with me.

    I also find i get eyestrain after reading a screen too long, and my 55 year old eyes combined with the distance of my work monitor from my face is not ideal; I often have to magnify sites that have smaller text

    (*after a “save the earth” obsessed former colleague fundamentally bullied me into not printing stuff out because it “wasted paper.” After they retired I realized that it didn’t matter any more, so I started printing again. Also the whole “all my little pdfs cost less to the planet than one CEO’s plane ride to go get lunch with his golfing buddies)Report

    • Chris in reply to fillyjonk
      Ignored
      says:

      I really cannot recommend the Paperwhite (or any reader like it) enough. It’s not backlit, so it doesn’t tire out or irritate your eyes, and is designed in such a way as to make the experience more like reading a physical book (e.g., I think one of the things that hurts comprehension when reading on most screens is the amount of text and other information that you are constantly taking in, but the Paperwhite looks like a normal book page of text). It’s less ideal when reading PDFs, because they’re not formatted for the screen, but I still prefer it to reading off a computer or non-reader tablet screen, and because I hate printing things (I just end up with huge piles of journal articles), I end up reading a lot of research articles and essays on it, as well as books and text books that require a great deal of attention. If I try to read them on pretty much any other screen, my comprehension level drops dramatically, but on the Paperwhite, I don’t think there’s a real difference in comprehension from a print version.

      And it’s very light and thin, so it usually doesn’t take up as much space in or add as much weight to a bag when traveling.Report

    • Burt Likko in reply to fillyjonk
      Ignored
      says:

      Professionally, damn near everything I do is on a screen rather than on paper; when something is on paper I typically reduce it to electrons because these are much easier to work with.

      Personally, I like reading a physical book because it isn’t electronic. It is simply a different psychic experience to have a physical book. I want that experience.Report

    • Michael Cain in reply to fillyjonk
      Ignored
      says:

      Professionally, some times I wind up with three printed technical papers, or three volumes of the Colorado Revised Statutes, spread out across the desktop, each with a full page or two “displayed”. Plus a pad of paper where I’m taking notes in my cramped little handwriting. Flipping back and forth in one of the papers with my left hand while I hold a pen in my right and never asking, “Where’s the f*cking scrollbar for this document?” 4K screens have gotten cheap enough one of these days I may try an actual desktop-sized screen as an experiment.

      I have a pair of computer glasses. I nagged the ophthalmologist into writing a prescription for that distance rather than the typical near or far numbers they write. I may have mentioned it before, but at age 70 my vision, both near and far, has improved in the last year to a degree the ophthalmologist can measure it. Karma is a b*tch, as they say, so that concerns me.Report

  4. Michael Cain
    Ignored
    says:

    Here’s another consideration: storage volume. Several years ago — perhaps many years ago, by now — I started planning for physically downsizing. Several hundred physical books, mostly fiction, have been replaced with e-books*. All of them fit nicely on a single DVD. They’re now searchable. And at least the epub version of things can be displayed in my choice of fonts, my choice of character sizes and line spacing, my choice of paragraph formatting. I won’t criticize anyone who prefers the tactile aspect of paper books, but that comes with lots of disadvantages.Report

    • Burt Likko in reply to Michael Cain
      Ignored
      says:

      The story of (I believe) Paul Allen’s personal library is illustrative of the downside of this approach. When he died, the licenses on all of his electronic media died along with him, and his legatees were denied a substantial portion of the library he’d assembled. Maybe this is a matter of little moment to some, but it might matter to others. I offer it merely as a factor to consider.Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *