Devon Archer Day In Hunter Biden Congressional Hearings
It was Devin Archer testimony day at the House Hunter Biden, er, that is House Oversight Committee for a closed-door session that nevertheless proved all the talking points of everyone involved. Which everyone involved immediately announced to anyone who would listen.
The much more objective Punchbowl News broke it down this way:
There was something for everyone in Devon Archer’s behind-closed-doors appearance before the House Oversight Committee on Monday. Both Republicans and Democrats alike seized on portions of the former Hunter Biden associate’s testimony to back up preexisting claims about the Biden family’s business dealings. Here are our main takeaways.
Republicans secured a major talking point when Archer confirmed then-Vice President Joe Biden spoke with Hunter Biden’s business partners. Biden had been insistent in the past that he had “never spoken” with Hunter about his business dealings. The president has indicated a large degree of separation existed between him and his son’s overseas ventures.
But Archer testified that he witnessed Hunter put his dad on speakerphone with business partners numerous times over a decade. And Oversight Republicans released a list of connections between Biden and Hunter’s business partners.
“Devon Archer’s testimony today confirms Joe Biden lied to the American people when he said he had no knowledge about his son’s business dealings and was not involved,” House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said in a statement.
For Hunter Biden, access to his powerful father was clearly a big plus for potential clients. Comer signaled that his panel will continue to “determine whether foreign actors targeted the Bidens, President Biden is compromised and corrupt.” Of course, talk of an impeachment inquiry into Biden is growing among House Republicans.
But Biden never discussed business specifics during any of these calls, according to Archer’s testimony. Democrats seized on this in an attempt to argue Biden’s involvement was innocuous.
“Those calls were all about mundane subjects like the weather, geography, and other niceties and pleasantries,” ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said in a statement.
Democrats also pointed out that Biden talked constantly with Hunter in the aftermath of Beau Biden’s death. And Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), who was present for the transcribed interview, argued it was “preposterous” to expect Biden to reject Hunter’s calls.
“[Biden] says hello to someone that he sees his son with. What is he supposed to say? ‘Hi, son. No, I’m not going to say hello to the other people at the table or the other people on the phone,’” Goldman said.
Archer denied any knowledge of an unverified claim that Hunter and Joe Biden received millions of dollars in bribes from the Burisma CEO.
This is notable because Archer served on the board of Burisma alongside Hunter. If the head of Burisma was bribing the Bidens with large sums of money, one would expect Archer to be aware of the plot. Republicans have made an internal FBI tip sheet alleging the bribery payments a central aspect of their investigation into the president and his family.
“Today, Mr. Archer explicitly stated that he is unaware of any $5 million payments to the Bidens and did not believe the allegations of bribery in the FBI Form 1023 were credible, thus debunking the unverified tip sheet Republicans released last week,” Raskin said.
Here’s White House Spokesperson for Oversight and Investigations Ian Sams:
“House Republicans keep promising bombshell evidence to support their ridiculous attacks against the President, but time after time, they keep failing to produce any. In fact, even their own witnesses appear to be debunking their allegations.”
An important note: Archer is a convicted felon. Archer and two others were convicted in June 2018 for defrauding a Native American tribe out of $60 million of bonds.
Last year, Archer was sentenced to a year in prison and required to repay more than $15 million.
There doesn’t seem to be any legal “there there.” Ethical? sure, but not legal.Report
This is why you pick up your laptop from the repair shop and you leave a tip if he asks for one.Report
In my world, Hunter Biden’s failson antics are a nothingburger and always have been. I’ve never seen a link between them and any political action Joe Biden has taken and all of these investigations still haven’t come up with anything. For instance, we were told that there was a $5,000,000 payment to a “Biden family” account at some point that seemed to lack any sort of explanation, only we now find that the two witnesses for this are both convicted felons, one of them a fugitive from American justice for being an unregistered agent of Chinese arms manufacturers and the other for defrauding a Native American tribe to the tune of sixty million dollars. Both of these relate directly to their lack of propensity for veracity.
I’ve some ConservaBoomers in my immediate family, for whom Hunter Biden is a noxious, criminal agent personally responsible for corrupting his father far beyond credibility, trustworthiness, or even good intent. They presume that of course Joe Biden was talking with Hunter’s business associates and this was the mechanism by which Joe Biden became wealthy. (N.b., he’s well off and lives well, but not extraordinarily so, and his money all seems to have come during the Trump years when he was out of office from legit sources.)
What they’d been hearing turned out to be a bunch of recycled versions of the Biden-Ukraine conspiracy theories that they’d heard shouted at them from FOX News. What they hadn’t done was read the Wikipedia article I just linked. They conceded that the summary on the Wikipedia page “made sense” after I sent them the link.
I can only imagine that following Archer’s testimony, FOX News will shout only the parts about Joe Biden speaking on the speakerphone to, or shaking hands with, Hunter’s business partners, as proof that Joe was “in on it all.” There will be scant mention, only during the hard news reporting portion of FOX’s broadcasts and not during the prime-time, personality-focused opinion shows, of Democrats “claiming” that in fact Joe only spoke of banal matters and largely to be polite and not give his son a brush-off because… Rep. Goldman is right, what is Joe Biden supposed to do when his then-forty-six year old failson calls him up and puts him on the spot? He knows Hunter is a troubled guy and is probably aware that Hunter is trying to trade off of his last name and Joe’s own plans to run for President, but he also still loves his son, which strikes me as what a parent is supposed to do. How else ought Biden have mediated those pressures?
I’m not saying Biden is necessarily free from corruption and certainly would not have been free of temptations. But if Biden did sell his soul to anyone, it would have been American labor unions, and he did it before he first ran for President wa-a-a-ay back in 1988. If such a thing happened, it would also have been done in a way that complied with the law if not necessarily the ideals of public ethics. Again, I think his personal finances, described in the first link in this comment, are revelatory: it doesn’t look like he really ever cashed in on his public service in any meaningful way until the books-and-lectures circuit following his Vice Presidency, which is perfectly legal and could, in theory, even be ethical.Report
They.
DO.
NOT.
CARE.
I keep typing this because the GOP, its politicians, operatives, and followers DO NOT CARE. They do not care about facts, or legalities or precedent. They do not care if their people are doing what they accuse Democrats of doing. They do not care if this makes them look clownish or inept to many Americans. They most certainly do not care about the assessments of the very online OT contributors universe.
They only care about obtaining, consolidating and holding political power. And so they follow Steve Bannon’s advice, flood the zone with so much innuendo, misdirection, and outright lies that good decent sensible people give up. Like your Conserva-Boomers. They gave up until you forced them not to. Because its easier that way. Less mental work. Less pride hitting. And on and on.
The GOP as a political entity got what it wanted from this. Distortion. Confusion. Misdirection. Acceptance. Mental resignation.
Because They.
DO.
NOT.
Care.Report