Why People Hate Politicians
Politicians are routinely some of the most disliked people in the United States. The approval ratings for Congress are abysmal. Current approval ratings are at 18% and the rating has been less than 20% for much of the past ten years. The public is frequently drawn to candidates who do not seem like “typical politicians,” those who seem particularly authentic or are from the world of business or celebrity. In fact, spending too much time in Congress or as a political leader can be seen as damaging for some races, such as the one for president. Only one House Speaker (James K. Polk) and one Senate Majority Leader (Lyndon Johnson) have ever become president. Of the past eight presidents, only two (George H.W. Bush and Joe Biden) ever served in the United States Congress.
Why do people hate politicians? There are a number of negative attributes that people associate with politicians and then use to describe the entire group. The clearest of these is a tendency to stretch the truth. Americans view politicians as a whole as liars, men and women who say what the electorate wants to hear while doing otherwise once in office. Politicians are also seen as weak-willed and terrified of angering lobbyists or powerful interest groups. They collect a government paycheck and line up their next corporate job without actually solving the problems that they were elected to fix in the first place.
But close to the top is self-interest. Politicians are all seen as out for themselves and not serving to benefit their constituents. Several stories in the news the past few weeks have made this sentiment as evident as ever. One of the most notable was the decision in Montana for Democrats to oppose a new state-level child tax credit. The bipartisan credit was a considerable expansion in social spending for Montana families. But some Democrats fought back against the bill, arguing that “it would be used by the governor’s office to justify inaction on Democrats’ priorities.” Democrats put their own priorities over convincing a Republican governor to expand the social safety net and aid thousands of people, a tactical misfire for a party that has fought for decades to change Republican views on government spending.
There has also been furor in New York over the state’s Court of Appeals. Democrats revolted at Governor Kathy Hochul’s first choice for the position, Hector Lasalle. The party highlighted several controversial decisions he had issued on the bench and closely voted down his nomination. But another candidate, Rowan Wilson, was approved last week after a controversy involving similar decisions from the bench. The main difference, as noted by New York’s Errol Louis, was that Wilson also fought hard to support the party’s gerrymandered congressional districts. Once again, the fear is that Democrats voted, not for the person who would be best for New York, but for the judge who would most reliably protect their legislative map.
The fact that both of these stories involve Democrats is important. Democrats often believe in a populist, good-government view of their party. It is the Republicans who are venal, selfish, and wholly committed to lining their own pockets and the pockets of their rich donors. Many Democrats believe that if only the country stopped listening to conservative media and saw what the Democrats were truly about and what they wanted, the party would win every election. Furthermore, political bad behavior harms the greater Democratic project. It is difficult to argue that the federal government can help the nation’s problems when so many people hate its leading representatives.
As a result, Democrats must let go of the selfish urge when in power more often than Republicans. They must focus more on protecting the country and their party than their own self-interests and bottom line. In addition, they must be careful to call out fellow Democrats when they violate ethics rules and act in a selfish manner. The future of their party and its reputation depends on it.
Obama served in the Senate. Not long, but he was there.Report
Al Franken was run out of the U.S. Senate on an allegation. Donald Trump was elected President AFTER making repeated remarks – on tape – about grabbing women’s genatalia. He is currently defending a civil lawsuit regarding defamation stemming from a Rape accusation.
One of these things is STILL not like the other Eric.Report
Both Sides Do It cannot fail, it can only be failed especially when chasing those sweet pundit dollars.Report
Remember when I said something about praising with faint damns?
This is like Homer struggling to say something nasty about Ned Flanders, before finally settling on “He has cans of old paint in his garage!”
Personally if I were looking for turds to fling at the Dems I would start with Sinema and Manchin then go onto Eric Adams, on down to Feinstein.Report
This post comes on the same day that Erik Loomis talks about the astoundingly bad decision made by Arizona Governor Hobbs to veto a law allowing home tortilla making.
All the examples are good, and the advice for Democrats to police their ranks is solid.
Having said that, no one should be under any delusion that doing so will gain any significant number of votes.
Good governance is like good health habits- it doesn’t have much in the way of immediate gratification, but is vital for the long term health of the body.Report
Very well put.
IMHO you end up with fewer “throw the rascals out” moves too.Report
A lot of political science shows that politicians actually do attempt to implement their campaign promises. The main issue with the United States is that there are so many official and unofficial veto points, getting legislation passed is very kludgy and involves a lot of negotiation even if one party controls the President, Senate, and House. Plus somebody could always sue on the constitutionality of it all. In parliamentary democracies, you get actual legislation that closely mirrors the campaign promise.Report
I think a lot of people imagine politics to be a Schoolhouse Rock version of the West Wing.
Its really more like a giant version of the local HOA meeting, involving nukes.
Which sounds like a cynical jibe, but its actually how things oughta be. Who, what sort of people, would actually fit into a West Wing world?
The implied demand that “citizens” behave with wisdom and decorum is in its own way a soft bigotry of high expectations, where we are unforgiving and intolerant of the most basic human weaknesses but endlessly forgiving of our own.Report
Agreed. We complain endlessly about democratic politics but in many cases, especially in the long view, the salami slicing, incrementalism and, especially, the naked self interest politicians have in seeking reelection is salutary to the long term health of the system. It is well politicians fear their voters and want to keep their jobs.
And as ugly and warty as politics is, what lies beyond it is so much worse. Parliament was laid out so the two sides were more than swords lengths apart after all.Report
Of course many people on our side want policies that basically require people to be saints to implement. This is especially true when dealing with policies concerning the people really on the margins like the unhoused/homeless. Part of framing everything as a human right seems to be basically a way around the unpopularity of many leftist policies democratically speaking. Politicians have to do this deeply unpopular thing that will lose them an election because it is human rights.Report
Politicians also get handed impossible or very problematic tasks, like “end inequality”.
California wants to make all children equal in learning math.
The only way to do that is prevent the smarter kids from learning faster.
https://reason.com/2021/05/04/california-math-framework-woke-equity-calculus
A lot of the issues that concern us are “how to get other people to live like we want them to rather than how they want to”.
A politician can get elected promising to do things that shouldn’t be done. The easy short term way to deal with crazy requests is lie and say you’ll do them.Report
Based on observations from other people, a lot of people judge politicians by “and a pony” standard rather than doing their best under the given circumstance standard.Report
A dear departed friend used to say that politicians were like babies’ diapers: they should be changed out regularly, and for the same reasons.
I think about that a lot these days. I live in a state with a shocking level of corruption at the local level, and as far as I can tell, an almost equal amount at the state level. It’s disgusting and from everyone on the take, usually embezzlement from local coffers, well, that’s why our roads can’t get fixed and our bridges are falling apart.Report
Also, water is wet.
Politics is about accumulating and wielding power. That does something sinister to the people who practice it professionally.
The last graph is pure fantasy.Report
Politician do that which will get them elected. It’s silly to take this fact to be a criticism of politicians; it’s simply an instance of the principle of natural selection. The voters decide what politicians must do to be elected. Any criticism of politicians is, in reality, a criticism of ourselves.Report
You mean Democrat politicians are really no better than Republican politicians? STOP THE PRESS!
Most politicians regardless of what political ideology they claim to hold, are just lying, scum-sucking degenerates who really only care about money and power and fooling enough gullible people to elect them come Election Day.Report