Did COVID-19 Kill Republican Midterm Chances?
Okay, hear me out. Back during the pandemic, I had a thought. As I watched Republican politicians and pundits eschew masks and social distancing and vaccines, I wondered, “Could this have an effect on future elections?”
After all, COVID-19 was a disease that generally hit older patients harder and the over-65 set is a major part of the Republican base. As I watched Republicans demonize masks and the vaccines, it occurred to me that they were killing off a lot of their own voters with misinformation and conspiracy theories.
As an example, back in the early days of the pandemic, in April 2020, I pointed out in The Resurgent how a prime driver of the viral spread of COVID was religious services. People sat close together, unmasked, and sang hymns in enclosed rooms, all of which helped the virus to spread. Later on, this attitude progressed to political rallies and a business-as-usual attitude that gave the virus plenty of new hosts.
And a lot of these hosts died. Asymptomatic cases make it difficult to figure an accurate mortality rate, but suffice it to say that, prior to the approval of COVID vaccines, if you became symptomatic there was an all-too-high possibility that you would end up in the hospital. If you went to the hospital with COVID, there was a decent chance that you would leave feet-first in a body bag.
The consensus now seems to be that pre-vaccine mortality rates for COVID were 10 percent or higher. Globally, WHO estimates that over the course of the entire pandemic about 3.4 percent of the reported COVID cases resulted in death. Those aren’t great odds. Few of us would get on an airplane if it had between a 3 and 10 percent chance of crashing.
Back in the early days of the pandemic, there may have been little difference in fatalities between Democrats and Republicans. Masks were an imperfect defense (when medical masks were even available) and even people who were careful could let their guard down at the wrong time.
After the vaccines became available, however, dying of COVID became more of a matter of self-selection. Contrary to what many people listening to Republican media outlets were told, even the initial COVID vaccines were very effective at preventing death or hospitalization. This remained true as the disease mutated into different strains. There is a wealth of data, the CDC charts below are just one example, that shows that those who were vaccinated, especially with a booster, were much less likely to get sick, get hospitalized, or die from COVID than vaccine refuseniks. (If you say, “But what about deaths from vaccines, read the next section.”)
And by this time, getting vaccinated had gotten political. In January 2022, the Kaiser Foundation found that partisan affiliation was the strongest predictor of COVID vaccination status in the US. On average, counties that voted for Biden had a vaccination rate that was more than 10 points higher than counties that voted for Trump.
This may be medical science, but it isn’t rocket science. We would expect (unless we buy into anti-vax conspiracy theories) for counties with lower vaccination rates to have higher COVID death rates. That’s exactly what the New York Times found when it examined the data.
Blue counties jumped out to an early lead at the onset of the pandemic for obvious reasons. We all remember how coastal cities and states were hit hard in the opening days of the pandemic.
But even before vaccines were introduced, red counties had taken a lead in the death toll. After widespread vaccinations, deaths in red counties continued a meteoric rise while rates slowed in blue and purple counties.
Another more recent study by the National Bureau of Economic Research released in September 2022 used voter registration data from Ohio and Florida to determine that excess deaths for Republicans were 76 percent higher than for Democrats during the pandemic years. The small gap early on widened after the introduction of vaccines and was concentrated in counties with low vaccination rates.
There are real-world consequences to this data. If Republican voters are dying in higher numbers than Democratic voters, it could conceivably affect the outcome of some elections.
The disparity in death rates would not make a difference everywhere though. States where Democrats usually win would not be affected by higher death rates among Republicans. Likewise, in states where Republicans have large margins of victory, the disparity is probably not going to be enough to make a difference.
But what about swing states and districts?
By definition, swing states and districts are places where neither party has a large advantage. Also called battleground states, elections in these areas are often close. It is in these places where the outcomes can hinge on one or two percentage points that the COVID effect would be expected to matter.
One interesting piece of data comes from World Meters. I used this site a lot to track COVID statistics during the pandemic, but I had not visited it in quite a while.
As I was thinking about this piece, I reasoned that per capita deaths, that is COVID deaths adjusted for population size, would probably be a good indicator of how likely the death rate would be to affect elections. Where COVID deaths represented a higher share of the population, those missing votes would likely carry greater weight in shifting electoral outcomes.
So, I checked World Meters for the latest per capita COVID death rankings for the 50 states. While red states dominate the top 10 entries on the list (Mississippi was number one), number two on the list was Arizona, the setting for a great many very close upset races. There were other battleground states that ranked high on the list as well. These include Michigan (8), Georgia (13), Nevada (16), and Pennsylvania (17). At number 12, Florida bucked the trend, but the Sunshine State has been trending more and more red in recent cycles.
Let’s focus for a moment on Arizona. The Grand Canyon State reported 31,613 deaths from COVID. Obviously not all of those deaths are Republicans, so let’s exclude the 17,939 deaths that occurred prior to July 1, 2021. That leaves 13,674 largely unnecessary deaths in the vaccine era. Let’s be generous and assume that only half of those were Republicans. That’s 6,837 potential votes that could have easily put Blake Masters and Kari Lake over the top.
This is where the theory gets hard to prove. I’m an unpaid blogger without access to the data that could prove or disprove my hypothesis. Also, my eyes glaze over at the prospect of digging through this data and applying it to even the battleground races.
Instead, as Will Rogers said, I’m the idea man. I’ll let someone else sort out the details. To that end, maybe the wonks at FiveThirtyEight or Freakanomics can crunch the necessary numbers. If you’re interested in this topic and follow these two organizations, send them this link. Maybe it will pique their interest.
On the surface, there is a strong circumstantial case to be made that Republicans literally killed off the voters that would have given them the edge in the midterms, but COVID deaths would have been only one of several factors at play. Despite the loss of critical voters, Republicans could have still carried the day in some races if they had picked better candidates, if the Supreme Court had not overturned Roe, or a hundred other minute details that changed how small slices of the electorate voted.
There are also unknown knowns, to use Donald Rumsfeld’s phrase. For instance, political affiliation is not an immutable characteristic. How many of the dead would have changed parties based on events of the past few years? How many of the deceased Republicans would not have voted for the underwhelming MAGA candidates? There is no way to know for sure but professional researchers can make educated guesses.
No matter how many Republican voters died during the pandemic, the GOP could have used their votes on November 8. It would not have taken many more votes to shift the outcome of a great many races.
The Republican Party paid the price for ignoring what should be a cardinal rule of politics: Don’t kill your base.
BUT WHAT ABOUT VACCINE SAFETY? For those who will argue, “yes, but the vaccine can also kill you,” I’m going to head that argument off at the pass.
Per the CDC website, from December 14, 2020, through November 9, 2022, the VAERS vaccine reporting system received 17,392 preliminary reports of death (0.0027 percent) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine.
Astute readers will note that 0.0027 is smaller than the 3.4 to 10 percent range typically assumed to be COVID’s mortality rate. Much smaller.
But that’s only part of it. VAERS is a system that tracks correlation, not causation. The incidents listed in VAERS are not necessarily caused by vaccines even though they occurred after vaccinations.
For example, last year at about this time, I was out running and tripped, leading to a bad fall. I broke my nose and skinned my knees almost to the bone among other injuries.
My accident is relevant because I had gotten a COVID booster a few days earlier. At the time, I was getting daily text updates from the V-safe After Vaccination Health Checker. These periodic checks would ask about symptoms in the days and weeks after vaccination.
Did I have body aches? Absolutely. Was it related to the vaccine? Absolutely not, but the simple checker only asks about correlation, not whether the symptoms were caused by the vaccine or something else.
So the already low instance of adverse reactions after vaccines needs to be lowered a lot more to account for people who got sick, injured, or killed by something other than the vaccine.
The bottom line here is that, despite what you may have heard, the COVID vaccines are extremely safe and very effective. The risk is much lower with the vaccines than with the virus.
And no, the vaccine didn’t make me fall down.
We’ve lost over a million Americans to Covid, mostly adults. That has all sorts of economic and political impacts we are only just beginning to sort.Report
COVID-19 seems quite marginal as a reason for the lackluster performance of Republicans in the midterms. Maybe you can find races here and there where it mattered but I would not put it as a big reason. The main reasons are:
1. Dobbs, Dobbs, Dobbs. Dobbs is nearly universally unpopular. Kentucky voters reelected Rand Paul easily and also rejected an anti-abortion referendum. So there are clearly people who are willing to vote for Republican candidates and also dislike anti-abortion legislation and restrictions. In more purple states, the Republicans ended up losing ground because of Dobbs. Democrats gained the trifecta in Michigan and Minnesota for example.
2. Horrible candidates. In all but the reddest states, voters nearly universally rejected candidates that fawned on Trump and/or backed the Big Lie and/or palled around with Nazis. Lake lost, Finchem lost, Marchant lost, Joe Kent lost, Tudor Dixon lost, Mastriano lost, etc. There are lots of examples.
3. The strategy of doubling down and blaming all the single ladies and the gays is not going to work: https://morningshots.thebulwark.com/p/no-sex-please-were-republicans
“Genius Ben Shapiro declared: “If you vote for the idea that society has an obligation to recognize male-male or female-female dyads in the same way that society has to recognize male-female, you should not be in the Republican Party.”
In theory, that means that at least a dozen Republican Senators — and probably several dozen House Republicans — ought to be excommunicated. And, under the Shapiro Rule, several million Republican-leaning voters also ought to be shown the door, which seems an odd strategy for a political party struggling to figure out how to win elections.
But maybe, just maybe, that’s part of the GOP’s problem.
Check out this NYT chart on the radical transformation of public opinion on the issue of gay marriage. More than 7 in 10 Americans— including a majority of Republicans — think ‘marriages between same-sex couples should be recognized by the law as valid, with the same rights as traditional marriages.'”
This is from Charlie Sykes, former mini-Rush Limbaugh of Wisconsin. He is not exactly anyone’s idea of a ragging liberal.Report
“Like the exit poll, VoteCast found that about 60 percent of the electorate—63 percent, in the VoteCast sample—said abortion should be legal in all or most cases. But unlike the exit poll, it directly measured the effect of Dobbs. In the VoteCast survey, pro-choice voters (those who said abortion should be legal in all or most cases) were far more likely than pro-life voters (those who said abortion should be illegal in all or most cases) to say that the overturn of Roe had a “major impact” on which candidates they voted for. The gap was more than 20 points: 55 percent of pro-choicers said Dobbs was a major factor, compared to 32 percent of pro-lifers. When analyzed by party, the gap was more than 30 points: 65 percent of Democrats said Dobbs was a major factor, compared to 32 percent of Republicans.”
https://www.thebulwark.com/the-data-have-spoken-abortion-was-a-decisive-issue-in-the-2022-midterms/Report
No.
This is a theory in search of supporting data.
Not to mention that it cannot account for the Republican over performance in New York, or the Red tidal wave in Florida. Two states that despite drastically different policies had the same death rate.Report
Florida has been trending red for a while now. Everyone talks about how DeSantis “barely” won in 2018 but I think that is a misinterpretation of the data. 2018 was a D+9 year that produced a 41-seat majority in the House. Basically, it was as favorable as possible an environment for Democrats and they still lost a Senate seat and could not gain the governorship in Florida. This is a sign of a red state. The equivalent is Jerry Brown winning 60 percent of the vote in 2014 despite it being a very good year for Republicans. Also his 2010 election as governor come to think about it.
New York Democrats committed an own goal with the redistricting process despite the New York State constitution forbidding partisan gerrymanders (another own goal was the fact that the redistricting committee was designed to fail). Combine this with the generally antagonistic relationship the rest of the state to NYC (including people who commute to the city for work daily) and there you go. That being said, the state legislature is still supermajority Democratic in both houses. Democrats only lost one seat in the state Senate and 6 in the assembly. I think this will recorrect in 2024.Report
Please explain how you have a red tidal wave in a state that had a Republican governor, two republican senators, and a republican controlled state legislature BEFORE the election and retains all those things AFTER the election? I mean picking up 4 seats in the House is certainly a thing, but in an already deeply red state I don’t think that’s a wave.Report
Don’t forget gerrymanderingReport
Good piece. I think the vaccine resistance may have made a difference in a few very tight races. But overall, most races were not that close. BTW: The Vaccine Safety Datalink is the superior version of VAERS and does systematic analysis. It finds no excess deaths from the vaccines.Report
Weird how we haven’t heard about all these life insurance companies getting broken from all of these premature deaths already.
Oh wait. The excess deaths were the result of COVID and there are currently only a nominal number of insurers in receivership, most of them being property and casualty carriers.Report
You expect people to understand life insurance companies’ reserves and reinsurance?Report
No. I expect that a person making these kinds of claims is going to be full of shit.Report
If any of this is true, it still doesn’t mean Covid-19 killed their chances. It means the Republicans response to Covid-19 had negative implications for their electoral chances.
Big difference.Report