It is possible though I don't know if it's plausible. The Dems haven't really decided what the fish they're offering yet which is to be expected at this stage of the electoral cycle and Bezo's "personal liberty and free markets" lines are word for word republitarianism which is something Trump has coopted in word (though emphatically not in deed).
Well, sure, if they meant it they would be hammering Trump. If I were a libertarian I'd be absolutely furious with what Trump and Musk are up to. Small government nostrums and Libertarian terms are all over this stuff. If Musk and Trump keep at this the whole dictionary and directory of libertarianism will go from being not taken seriously to being actively despised.
To be clear the little pleasure in this case is Stefanik's discomfiture; expecting a seat out of those districts isn't something you celebrate unless it's in hand.
The worst part- I doubt there'll be significant electoral (and obviously no official, or legal) consequences for this clusterfish- except maybe for The Atlantic.
Nope. I don't agree with Loomis about much but I do agree with him that Dems in R+X districts should not be primaried and should be encouraged to stay in office forever.
IN D+double digits X districts, though, I would not be at all opposed to regular primarying going on.
Well, and also, without vast social media networks none of the drama around this kind of stuff would ever have a vector to escape your immediate social circle.
"This is Peter Jennings with ABC- you won't believe what Brady, age 23, of Duckhump Ohio was doing to Laura, Becca, Stacy AND Karen all at once on a local BBS. More at 11."
Just that. From the article at the end of the first paragraph where he shifted to talking about the gay angle. "Gay men didn’t start acting straighter; straight people started acting like us."
Looks like the only connection is that the author is gay and is comparing how straight dating has become more like gay dating- whether women acknowledge that or not.
It is possible though I don't know if it's plausible. The Dems haven't really decided what the fish they're offering yet which is to be expected at this stage of the electoral cycle and Bezo's "personal liberty and free markets" lines are word for word republitarianism which is something Trump has coopted in word (though emphatically not in deed).
Well, sure, if they meant it they would be hammering Trump. If I were a libertarian I'd be absolutely furious with what Trump and Musk are up to. Small government nostrums and Libertarian terms are all over this stuff. If Musk and Trump keep at this the whole dictionary and directory of libertarianism will go from being not taken seriously to being actively despised.
Smart. I'm not a coder but I can predict that if they're deranged enough to try it; it's going to be a clusterfish to rival all clusterfishes.
Is that before or after he tries to migrate Social Security off its legacy systems and onto newer ones in the course of a couple months?
https://www.wired.com/story/doge-rebuild-social-security-administration-cobol-benefits/
To be clear the little pleasure in this case is Stefanik's discomfiture; expecting a seat out of those districts isn't something you celebrate unless it's in hand.
Sometimes you have to enjoy the small, sweet moments in life.
Also Trump and the Muskrats would be, presumably, walking and talking a lot softer if they knew that excessive clowning would get them snap elections.
The worst part- I doubt there'll be significant electoral (and obviously no official, or legal) consequences for this clusterfish- except maybe for The Atlantic.
Nope. I don't agree with Loomis about much but I do agree with him that Dems in R+X districts should not be primaried and should be encouraged to stay in office forever.
IN D+double digits X districts, though, I would not be at all opposed to regular primarying going on.
Well, and also, without vast social media networks none of the drama around this kind of stuff would ever have a vector to escape your immediate social circle.
"This is Peter Jennings with ABC- you won't believe what Brady, age 23, of Duckhump Ohio was doing to Laura, Becca, Stacy AND Karen all at once on a local BBS. More at 11."
Hahah! I had no such delusions but this author is probably only in his fishing 20's or early 30's.
Yeah good point, basically a very mild version of the delusions John Warnock Hinckley Jr. entertained in the 80's.
Just that. From the article at the end of the first paragraph where he shifted to talking about the gay angle. "Gay men didn’t start acting straighter; straight people started acting like us."
Err, no, this is Chait- he has no confusion at all about why the right does the various things it does.
As usual he's right.
Looks like the only connection is that the author is gay and is comparing how straight dating has become more like gay dating- whether women acknowledge that or not.
Agreed.