Then those need to be adjudicated. They haven’t been. And aren’t likely to be apparently because we are no longer going to bother with the rule of law. Apparently.
What the Israeli’s know or don’t know is irrelevant. He is a lawful permanent resident and this subject to US jurisdiction and given the protection of the US Constitution. If the political speech of neonaz.is is protected by that constitution (and they are direct enemies of the US and its citizens), then his speech is equally protected.
So you agree that political speech the president doesn’t like is grounds for expulsion? Weird flex but you do you.
Then those need to be adjudicated. They haven’t been. And aren’t likely to be apparently because we are no longer going to bother with the rule of law. Apparently.
What the Israeli’s know or don’t know is irrelevant. He is a lawful permanent resident and this subject to US jurisdiction and given the protection of the US Constitution. If the political speech of neonaz.is is protected by that constitution (and they are direct enemies of the US and its citizens), then his speech is equally protected.
Sending someone picking for political speech you don’t agree with is a direct assault on the First Amendment.
So betraying one of our founding nations principles strengthens our foreign policy?
That’s … something.