thanks for reading, slade. feel like I’m right, which is why I wrote it, and people should grow up and not make everything about them or their partisan purity. All have fallen short of the glory of the lord, so saith the gospel.
thanks for reading as always, Phil. no one was fired at the presidents address. in fact, a young man started an amazing chapter in his life and he made a 13 year old a SS agent. message I took from that is “this kid could protect me better than biden’s SS.”
don’t need USAID to get aid to people in need. way more goes to strategy firms than actual people.
Let’s do some math:
If only 12% of $2000 in aid goes to the needy, $240 in aid.
If I cut the aid to $1000 but I get 37% aid to the needy, it’s $370 in aid.
Now - did I cut aid or raise it?
The commenter archive features may be temporarily disabled at times.
thanks for reading, slade. feel like I’m right, which is why I wrote it, and people should grow up and not make everything about them or their partisan purity. All have fallen short of the glory of the lord, so saith the gospel.
jaybird, thanks for reading! And dynamite contribution. Always excited to see you in the comments.
Yes, I think this model is here to stay for a bit.
thanks for reading as always, Phil. no one was fired at the presidents address. in fact, a young man started an amazing chapter in his life and he made a 13 year old a SS agent. message I took from that is “this kid could protect me better than biden’s SS.”
don’t need USAID to get aid to people in need. way more goes to strategy firms than actual people.
Let’s do some math:
If only 12% of $2000 in aid goes to the needy, $240 in aid.
If I cut the aid to $1000 but I get 37% aid to the needy, it’s $370 in aid.
Now - did I cut aid or raise it?