28 thoughts on “Open Mic for the Week of 4/14/2025

  1. This ad showed up in my feed. It’s a young man running for Governor of Colorado (so it most likely won’t show up for you).

    Being 38 I represent Millennials — and everyone who comes after us.

    Our generations are stuck with:

    → Useless degrees & low-paying jobs
    → No affordable housing
    → Crippling healthcare costs
    → Rising crime

    What *I* found interesting is the “useless degrees” part. It seems like “useless degrees” is showing up more and more as a political talking point. It was merely an undercurrent for the debt forgiveness debate but now people who are running for political office are just up’n saying “useless degrees”.Report

    1. While Trump buddies up with Elon Musk, it’s been Gwynne Shotwell that has built SpaceX into the powerhouse it is. She was employee #7, hired by Musk to find a COO. The story goes that whenever she suggested someone, Musk said, “They’re not as good as you are, why don’t you just take the job?” Eventually she did. According to folklore, she’s one of the very few people on Earth that if she says, “Elon, shut up and listen for a minute,” he shuts up and listens.Report

  2. The online right is having their are we the baddies moment: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/14/opinion/dissident-right-trump.html
    
    Nathan Cofnas, a right-wing philosophy professor and self-described “race realist” fixated on group differences in I.Q., wrote on X, “All over the world, almost everyone with more than half a brain is looking at the disaster of Trump (along with Putin, Yoon Suk Yeol, et al.) and drawing the very reasonable conclusion that right-wing, anti-woke parties are incapable of effective governance.” (Yoon Suk Yeol is South Korea’s recently impeached president.)
    
    Scott Siskind, who blogs under the pseudonym Scott Alexander, has been an influential figure in Silicon Valley’s revolt against social justice ideology, though he’s never been a Trump supporter. Last week, he asked whether “edgy heterodox centrists” like himself paved the way for Trump by opening the door to once-verboten arguments. In an imaginary Socratic dialogue, he wrote, “We wanted a swift, lean government that stopped strangling innovation and infrastructure. Instead we got chain-saw-style firings, total devastation of state capacity in exactly the way most likely to strangle innovation more than ever, and the worst and dumbest people in the world gloating about how they solved the ‘grift’ of sending lifesaving medications to dying babies……

    When liberalism was firmly entrenched, its discontents could treat authoritarian ideas as interesting avant-garde provocations. Authoritarianism in power, however, was always going to be crude and stupid.

    Trump’s tariffs have pushed some to the breaking point because they reveal the immediate material cost of that stupidity. The decadent cynics of the new right could dismiss Trump’s lies about the 2020 election as mere hyperbole. It’s harder to be sanguine about a collapse in one’s own net worth and economic prospects. “It kind of made the consequences seem real,” Hanania said of the trade war.”Report

      1. I think definitionally doxxing can only happen to someone once, right? After that there’s nothing new to reveal. Redox is a thing in chemistry but not so much in anonymity management.Report

    1. Jan 6th was more than 4 years ago and proved conclusively that Trump was unfit for office. At that point ideology doesn’t really matter.

      The flaws in “wokeness” are an issue but that’s a different conversation.Report

        1. Living downstream from mines that are still leaching toxic stuff into the surface water more than a century after they were abandoned, I’d be happier to see rapid commercialization of some of the new extraction technologies. Eg, the U of West Virginia has developed a method for extracting from the toxic runoff out of abandoned coal mines a couple of tons of rare earth elements per mine per year. A couple of public research universities, working with the DOE’s national labs, have methods for extracting REEs from coal ash ponds.

          [sarcasm] But tending an extraction facility that uses somewhat sophisticated chemistry isn’t a manly job, like driving big earth movers to shovel whole mountain sides into giant ore crushers, and using a few million gallons per year of concentrated hydrochloric acid that no one knows how to dispose of nicely. [/sarcasm]Report

            1. It’s not an either-or situation. Well, I guess it is if you start from the position, “I want REEs mined and refined in the US to be as cheap as what China produces.” It doesn’t have to be an either-or situation. We can produce REEs in much cleaner fashion if we want to pay somewhat more.Report

  3. Trump is “completely underwater” & has broken his own record with the lowest net approval at this point among independents (-22 pts).

    His economic net approval with indies at this pt is so low (-29 pts) it has “no historical analogy”.

    Most indies (66%) oppose the new tariffs-Harry Enten on CNNReport

  4. The law firm agreements are exactly what you expect: “One reason we know they’re not legally enforceable agreements is that what Trump is threatening is clearly illegal. Indeed, one can go quite a bit further than this, as TPM Reader AK suggests, and say that if the agreements are agreements then the agreements themselves look like bribery. Trump agrees to forego threatened illegal actions in exchange for $100 million or $125 million of services. That amounts to services of great value in exchange for government inaction and, critically, this part of the agreement is with Trump personally, not the U.S. government. It involves causes Trump supports, and this part of the agreement applies “during the Trump Administration and beyond.” So if you follow the purported logic, a 90-year-old ex-President Trump will still have pro bono work credits to assign in retirement.

    But it’s also all just smoke and BS.

    Almost every part of the agreements are worded in ways that make the purported commitments basically meaninglessness. So for instance, each agreement has the firm agreeing not to do “illegal DEI hiring.” But that’s easy for them to agree to, as far as they’re concerned, because they don’t think whatever DEI or affirmative action hiring they do is illegal. So whatever “illegal DEI hiring” might be, they don’t do it. End of story. And the same applies to pretty much all the other fairness-related commitments.

    Even the pro bono work, which now includes “other free legal services,” is a bit less than it appears. I noted above that this part of the agreement appears to be with Trump himself apart from the presidency and continues past the duration of his administration. But the same language means that the notional commitment to either $100 million or $125 million in pro bono work is over an indefinite and actually unlimited period of time. So by the terms of the agreement, Kirkland & Ellis or Cadwalader can run down that commitment over a century. Or two. Any amount of time is okay. Maybe Trump will still be assigning free legal work when he’s 200. I think Ronny Jackson said he’d probably live that long.

    My point here isn’t to say these agreements are fine. It’s that they amount to agreements to lie to each other. And everyone else. Except to the firm’s own staff. They get the real story. Or what the management committee believes is the real story. Or anyone else who says the firm has betrayed their principles. They get told the firm didn’t really agree to anything.”

    https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/whats-really-in-the-white-house-law-firm-agreementsReport

    1. Lovely. Just in time for my UK vacation. I wonder if the people who voted for Trump because they want “government ran like a business” stopped to consider the businessman they elected bankrupted a casino.Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *