
Elon Musk and DOGE are going to come up sort on the stated goal of $1 trillion in budget cutting savings.
Far short.
Way, way short.
From the NY Times:
Last week, Elon Musk indicated for the first time that his Department of Government Efficiency was falling short of its goal.
He previously said his powerful budget-cutting team could reduce the next fiscal year’s federal budget by $1 trillion, and do it by Sept. 30, the end of the current fiscal year. Instead, in a cabinet meeting on Thursday, Mr. Musk said that he anticipated the group would save about $150 billion, 85 percent less than its objective.
Even that figure may be too high, according to a New York Times analysis of DOGE’s claims.
That’s because, when Mr. Musk’s group tallies up its savings so far, it inflates its progress by including billion-dollar errors, by counting spending that will not happen in the next fiscal year — and by making guesses about spending that might not happen at all.
One of the group’s largest claims, in fact, involves canceling a contract that did not exist. Although the government says it had merely asked for proposals in that case, and had not settled on a vendor or a price, Mr. Musk’s group ignored that uncertainty and assigned itself a large and very specific amount of credit for canceling it.
It said it had saved exactly $318,310,328.30.
Mr. Musk’s group has now triggered mass firings across the government, and sharp cutbacks in humanitarian aid around the world. Mr. Musk has justified those disruptions with two promises: that the group would be transparent, and that it would achieve budget cuts that others called impossible.
Now, watching the group pare back its aims and puff up its progress, some of its allies have grown doubtful about both.
“They’re just spinning their wheels, citing in many cases overstated or fake savings,” said Romina Boccia, the director of budget and entitlement policy at the libertarian Cato Institute. “What’s most frustrating is that we agree with their goals. But we’re watching them flail at achieving them.”
Mr. Musk’s group did not respond to questions about its claims sent via X, his social-media platform. Mr. Musk previously acknowledged the group might make errors but said they would be corrected.
The White House press office defended the team, saying it had compiled “massive accomplishments,” but declined to address specific instances where the group seemed to have inflated its progress.
Mr. Musk actually promised an even larger reduction last year. When he was Mr. Trump’s most prominent supporter on the campaign trail, he said he could cut $2 trillion from a federal budget of about $7 trillion. After Mr. Trump was elected and Mr. Musk’s group began its work, Mr. Musk lowered that goal to $1 trillion.
Even after Mr. Musk’s comments in Thursday’s cabinet meeting, a White House official indicated that this target had not changed.
Budget analysts had been deeply skeptical of these claims, saying it would be difficult to cut that much without disrupting government services even further, or drastically altering popular benefit programs like Medicare and Social Security.
Mr. Musk’s group has provided an online ledger of its budget cuts, which it calls the “Wall of Receipts.” The site was last updated on Tuesday, to show an “estimated savings” of $150 billion.
The ledger is riddled with omissions and flaws.
All federal discretionary spending combined is $1.6T. This includes what most of us view as primary gov functions. I would be surprised if he even managed to get $150B.
If we’re serious about cutting gov spending, then we need to spend less on “mandatory” ($5.2T) spending (i.e. entitlements) just because that’s where the money is.
The best way to do that is to reduce the cost of medical care. We should have also raised the retirement age significantly about 20 years ago, I’m not sure what we do now. Maybe means testing.Report
Do those numbers put DOD and military spending done by other parts of the government in discretionary or non-discretionary?Report
Military spending is roughly half of that $1.6T discretionary spending
I think Musk didn’t review that, so he was promising $1.5T in cuts to $0.8T in spending.
Those numbers are also why I think even $150B in cuts is wrong.Report
Or raising revenue … ya know like a business would to meet expenses.Report
I think we have a pretty serious problem in how media in this country functions: It just repeats things that people on the right say while doing absolutely no verification at all.
(For the record, doing the same thing with people on the left would also be a problem, but doesn’t seem to happen.)
This is all government stuff. When it became clear that DOGE was actually an incompetent mess that had no idea what they were doing, the media should have just stopped repeating things they said. Just, period, stopped.
If the government want to show evidence of something, they are the government. None of these agreements are secret, the budget itself is not secret (Which is something that should have been pointed out by the media also when these idiots started talking about fraud.) It is entirely reasonable to say ‘Show me the exact details of what you did’.
Instead, the media reported on a website, and then they think it is their job to track down stuff on that website and _disprove_ it.
NO! They are the government, and they are pretty well-shown to be liars at this point. They should be providing actual documentation! Do not report how much you have disproven, do not accept _any_ of it. The headlines should be ‘DOGE claims giant savings, refuses to document a single dime of it, huge parts of the vague information they did provide are demonstrably false’.Report
I like that headline. Well put.Report