Is the Logjam About to Break?

David Thornton

David Thornton is a freelance writer and professional pilot who has also lived in Georgia, Florida, Kentucky, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. He is a graduate of the University of Georgia and Emmanuel College. He is Christian conservative/libertarian who was fortunate enough to have seen Ronald Reagan in person during his formative years. A former contributor to The Resurgent, David now writes for the Racket News with fellow Resurgent alum, Steve Berman, and his personal blog, CaptainKudzu. He currently lives with his wife and daughter near Columbus, Georgia. His son is serving in the US Air Force. You can find him on Twitter @CaptainKudzu and Facebook.

Related Post Roulette

9 Responses

  1. Joe
    Ignored
    says:

    I lived in Iowa for college and grad school. Until the Trump years it was a “could go either way” state in general elections. Since 1988 it has gone for the Democratic nominee in six of nine elections. The DNC is investing money in the IA-1 and IA-3 races, seeing them as winnable.

    If OT folks aren’t already following Art Cullen and his successful paper the Storm Lake Times Pilot, I recommend you do. He’s brilliant and a great writer and person. https://www.stormlake.com/stories/editorials-harris-could-win-iowa,109918?Report

  2. Chip Daniels
    Ignored
    says:

    The good news is that since 2016 Trump has had a hard ceiling of support, above he can’t rise no matter what.

    The bad news is he has an equally hard floor below which he can’t fall no matter what.Report

    • Burt Likko in reply to Chip Daniels
      Ignored
      says:

      Which is why I think the headline of this post raises a question whose answer is “no.” If I had to predict, it’d be that polling numbers will remain roughly static through November, and only move towards convergence in the last few days before the actual election, because they always converge at the end of the campaign.

      And if that sounds distressingly like 2016, yeah, it does.Report

      • Chip Daniels in reply to Burt Likko
        Ignored
        says:

        Which is also why I have said that no matter who wins in this election, we will be having these same discussions and same fights for the next decade at least.

        It has been nearly a decade since Trump rode down the escalator, and the only thing that has changed is that he now representes GOP orthodoxy instead of the insurgency.

        And now every GOP Congressperson and Senator and governor and state legislator and city councilperson and county clerk is in the MAGA cult which means a devotion to installing their vision on the rest of us by any means possible up to and including violence.

        So long as they can command anything more than a Goldwater sized minority, they will believe (and rightly so) that total power is within their grasp.Report

  3. Patrick
    Ignored
    says:

    “This is evidence of a fundamental unpopularity of Republican candidates. As the party introspectively determined in an “autopsy” after Mitt Romney’s loss in 2012, the Republican Party needs to make serious changes to broaden its appeal.

    If Trump wins, the GOP won’t have a mandate to enact radical right-wing policies, but that’s exactly what they will do. In that sense, a Trump victory will make the Republican Party even less popular than it is today and will likely continue the country on a path towards rejection of conservative ideas.”

    That’s the least worst outcome of Trump winning.Report

  4. Philip H
    Ignored
    says:

    The GOP has played the multi-decade long game it has precisely because it had no policies to offer most Americans. It’s pursuit of deregulatory greed leaves most Americans in the dust, to say nothing about it’s deeply unpopular stands on guns and abortion. Knowing this – and knowing it since the late 1960’s the GOP built a movement to cement control. trump is just the latest symptom of this. His loss will not yet deter the GOP from continuing to try and go down that path, especially in the 26 states the party now controls.Report

  5. North
    Ignored
    says:

    There’s so much reason to be cheerful. I can’t help but think that the undecided who’re unwilling to commit to Trump probably generally will break for Harris at the last minute for instance- if they aren’t for him now they won’t be later. But it’s just to close for any sense of tirumphalism.Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *